Difference between revisions of "2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
5849206328x (talk | contribs) m (→See also) |
5849206328x (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
(''Titu Andreescu'') Prove that for every [[nonnegative]] [[integer]] <math>n</math>, the number <math>7^{7^n}+1</math> is the [[product]] of at least <math>2n+3</math> (not necessarily distinct) [[prime]]s. | (''Titu Andreescu'') Prove that for every [[nonnegative]] [[integer]] <math>n</math>, the number <math>7^{7^n}+1</math> is the [[product]] of at least <math>2n+3</math> (not necessarily distinct) [[prime]]s. | ||
− | == | + | ==Solutions== |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Solution 1 === | === Solution 1 === | ||
Line 74: | Line 10: | ||
Now we assume the result holds for <math>{n}</math>. Note that <math>{a_{n}}</math> satisfies the [[recursion]] | Now we assume the result holds for <math>{n}</math>. Note that <math>{a_{n}}</math> satisfies the [[recursion]] | ||
− | + | <cmath>{a_{n+1}= (a_{n}-1)^{7}+1} = a_{n}\left(a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}\right).</cmath> | |
− | < | ||
Since <math>{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>{7}</math>, <math>{7(a_n-1)}</math> is a perfect square. Therefore <math>{a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}}</math> is a difference of squares and thus [[composite]], i.e. it is divisible by <math>{2}</math> primes. By assumption, <math>{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>{2n + 3}</math> primes. Thus <math>{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>{2+ (2n + 3) = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. | Since <math>{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>{7}</math>, <math>{7(a_n-1)}</math> is a perfect square. Therefore <math>{a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}}</math> is a difference of squares and thus [[composite]], i.e. it is divisible by <math>{2}</math> primes. By assumption, <math>{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>{2n + 3}</math> primes. Thus <math>{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>{2+ (2n + 3) = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. | ||
Line 83: | Line 18: | ||
Let <math>x=7^{7^{k}}</math>. The expression becomes | Let <math>x=7^{7^{k}}</math>. The expression becomes | ||
− | + | <cmath>\frac{7^{7^{k+1}}+1}{7^{7^{k}}+1} = \frac{x^7 + 1}{x + 1},</cmath> | |
− | < | ||
− | |||
which is the shortened form of the [[geometric series]] <math>x^{6}-x^{5}+x^{4}-x^3 + x^2 - x+1</math>. This can be [[factor]]ed as <math>(x^{3}+3x^{2}+3x+1)^{2}-7x(x^{2}+x+1)^{2}</math>. | which is the shortened form of the [[geometric series]] <math>x^{6}-x^{5}+x^{4}-x^3 + x^2 - x+1</math>. This can be [[factor]]ed as <math>(x^{3}+3x^{2}+3x+1)^{2}-7x(x^{2}+x+1)^{2}</math>. | ||
Since <math>x</math> is an odd power of <math>7</math>, <math>7x</math> is a [[perfect square]], and so we can factor this by difference of squares. Therefore, it is composite. | Since <math>x</math> is an odd power of <math>7</math>, <math>7x</math> is a [[perfect square]], and so we can factor this by difference of squares. Therefore, it is composite. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 08:10, 7 August 2014
Problem
(Titu Andreescu) Prove that for every nonnegative integer , the number is the product of at least (not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solutions
Solution 1
We proceed by induction.
Let be . The result holds for because is the product of primes.
Now we assume the result holds for . Note that satisfies the recursion
Since is an odd power of , is a perfect square. Therefore is a difference of squares and thus composite, i.e. it is divisible by primes. By assumption, is divisible by primes. Thus is divisible by primes as desired.
Solution 2
Notice that . Therefore it suffices to show that is composite.
Let . The expression becomes which is the shortened form of the geometric series . This can be factored as .
Since is an odd power of , is a perfect square, and so we can factor this by difference of squares. Therefore, it is composite.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See also
- <url>viewtopic.php?t=145849 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>
2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.