Difference between revisions of "2001 AMC 12 Problems/Problem 24"
Mathmind777 (talk | contribs) (→Solution 1) |
m (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
We start with the observation that <math>\angle ADB = 180^\circ - 15^\circ - 45^\circ = 120^\circ</math>, and <math>\angle ADC = 15^\circ + 45^\circ = 60^\circ</math>. | We start with the observation that <math>\angle ADB = 180^\circ - 15^\circ - 45^\circ = 120^\circ</math>, and <math>\angle ADC = 15^\circ + 45^\circ = 60^\circ</math>. | ||
− | We can draw the height <math>CE</math> from <math>C</math> onto <math> | + | We can draw the height <math>CE</math> from <math>C</math> onto <math>AD</math>. In the triangle <math>CED</math>, we have <math>\frac {ED}{CD} = \cos EDC = \cos 60^\circ = \frac 12</math>. Hence <math>ED = CD/2</math>. |
By the definition of <math>D</math>, we also have <math>BD=CD/2</math>, therefore <math>BD=DE</math>. This means that the triangle <math>BDE</math> is isosceles, and as <math>\angle BDE=120^\circ</math>, we must have <math>\angle BED = \angle EBD = 30^\circ</math>. | By the definition of <math>D</math>, we also have <math>BD=CD/2</math>, therefore <math>BD=DE</math>. This means that the triangle <math>BDE</math> is isosceles, and as <math>\angle BDE=120^\circ</math>, we must have <math>\angle BED = \angle EBD = 30^\circ</math>. |
Revision as of 21:21, 23 July 2018
Contents
[hide]Problem
In ,
. Point
is on
so that
and
. Find
.
Solution 1
We start with the observation that , and
.
We can draw the height from
onto
. In the triangle
, we have
. Hence
.
By the definition of , we also have
, therefore
. This means that the triangle
is isosceles, and as
, we must have
.
Then we compute , thus
and the triangle
is isosceles as well. Hence
.
Now we can note that , hence also the triangle
is isosceles and we have
.
Combining the previous two observations we get that , and as
, this means that
.
Finally, we get .
Solution 2
Draw a good diagram! Now, let's call , so
. Given the rather nice angles of
and
as you can see, let's do trig. Drop an altitude from
to
; call this point
. We realize that there is no specific factor of
we can call this just yet, so let
. Notice that in
we get
. Using the 60-degree angle in
, we obtain
. The comparable ratio is that
. If we involve our
, we get:
. Eliminating
and removing radicals from the denominator, we get
. From there, one can easily obtain
. Now we finally have a desired ratio. Since
upon calculation, we know that
can be simplified. Indeed, if you know that
or even take a minute or two to work out the sine and cosine using
, and perhaps the half- or double-angle formulas, you get
.
Solution 3
WLOG, we can assume that and
. As above, we are able to find that
and
.
Using Law of Sines on triangle , we find that
. Since we know that
,
, and
, we can compute
to equal
and
to be
.
Next, we apply Law of Cosines to triangle to see that
. Simplifying the RHS, we get
, so
.
Now, we apply Law of Sines to triangle to see that
. After rearranging and noting that
, we get
.
Dividing the RHS through by , we see that
, so
is either
or
. Since
is not a choice, we know
.
Note that we can also confirm that by computing
with Law of Sines.
See Also
2001 AMC 12 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 23 |
Followed by Problem 25 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.