Difference between revisions of "Talk:Soli Deo Gloria Home Educators"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Agreed. The basic informational parts are fine, but there's lots of content that shouldn't be there ("For the glory of god alone"? In a math wiki?). Also, the piece is signed by its author, which is decidely non-wikilike. --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 11:49, 23 August 2006 (EDT) | Agreed. The basic informational parts are fine, but there's lots of content that shouldn't be there ("For the glory of god alone"? In a math wiki?). Also, the piece is signed by its author, which is decidely non-wikilike. --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 11:49, 23 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree. Articles should not be written in the first person. Also articles need to be written in the wiki format, with links where appropriate. --[[User:DPatrick|DPatrick]] 18:43, 23 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:43, 23 August 2006
This page reads like an ad. Is that allowed? --ComplexZeta 10:49, 23 August 2006 (EDT)
Agreed. The basic informational parts are fine, but there's lots of content that shouldn't be there ("For the glory of god alone"? In a math wiki?). Also, the piece is signed by its author, which is decidely non-wikilike. --JBL 11:49, 23 August 2006 (EDT)
I agree. Articles should not be written in the first person. Also articles need to be written in the wiki format, with links where appropriate. --DPatrick 18:43, 23 August 2006 (EDT)
