User talk:Etmetalakret
AoPS Wiki users, ignore this page. I'm using my User Talk to explain proof writing to friends.
Contents
[hide]Proof 1: The Pythagorean Theorem
Prove the Pythagorean Theorem for a right triangle such that
.
Explanation
I showed this proof in the study group one time. We let be an altitude of
and hunt for triangle similarity. See the following diagram:
We let ,
, and
.
Examine the triangles and
. They both share
and a right angle, so AA Similarity guarantees that
. Similarly,
. We thus get the following ratios:
We can solve for
and
as follows:
But why is this useful? It's because
. Using this fact, we have that
Multiplying this equation by
yields the desired
.
Bad Proof
Note that and
. We thus have by AA Similarity that
. Similarly,
. Therefore,
We can solve for
and
as follows:
Then the following sequence of equations holds:
Multiplying this equation by
yields the desired
.
Why is this proof bad?
- No Diagram: You ALWAYS need a diagram in geometry proofs to help the grader remain oriented in dense notation.
- Terms have not been defined: What are
,
, and
? What about
? You can still use these these instead of writing out
,
,
, and
, but you need to define them.
- Not Enough Space: GIVE THESE WALLS OF EQUATIONS THEIR OWN LINES!
- Degrees Not Specified: The proof references
, not whatever
means.
Good Proof
Let be the point on
such that
, as shown in the following diagram:
Note that and
. We thus have by AA Similarity that
. Similarly,
. Therefore,
We can solve for
and
as follows:
Then the following sequence of equations holds:
Multiplying this equation by
yields the desired
.
Proof 2: Inequalities
The well-known Trivial Inequality states that if is a real number, then
. Prove that if
and
are nonnegative real numbers, then
Explanation
I found the proof by working backwards; I started with the desired result, and connected it to something true. Here is the wall of equations on my page (sadly I can't get them aligned):
Because the left-hand side of this equation is a perfect square, this is actually the Trivial Inequality in disguise. The desired inequality is therefore implied by a true result. We can now write a proof:
Bad Proof
I start out with Multiply the inequality by
and square it,
. Letting our algebra go on autopilot,
and
, so
. This is true by Trivial Inequality, which completes the proof.
Why is this proof bad?
- Written Backwards: We must always write proofs like: true result
desired result. However, the proof is written backwards so that the desired result
true result. The Trivial Inequality should be at the start, not the end.
- Informal Word Choice: Please don't use the phrase "algebra autopilot" in a proof, and don't write sentences with no verbs (see the "Multiply the inequality by
and square it"). Also, don't use "I," although "we" is totally acceptable.
- Not Enough Space: A little more space would make this proof easier to read. Important equations should have their own line.
Good Proof 1
By the Trivial Inequality, we have that Factoring this inequality returns
. We add
to both sides and factor to get
. Note that because
and
are nonnegative, both sides are nonnegative; we may therefore take the square root of the inequality, which yields
Finally, dividing both sides by
gives
, which completes the proof.
Good Proof 2
By the Trivial Inequality, we have that Then the following sequence of inequalities holds:
Note that because
and
are nonnegative, both sides of this final inequality are nonnegative; we may therefore take the square root of both sides, which yields
Finally, dividing the inequality by
gives
, which completes the proof.