Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hexagon"
I_like_pie (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
English please? --[[User:I like pie|I_like_pie]] 20:21, 1 November 2006 (EST) | English please? --[[User:I like pie|I_like_pie]] 20:21, 1 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Supremum" = "least upper bound." In many situations this just means "maximum," but there are others where it doesn't. For example, in an open set such as the interior of a circle or radius <math>r</math>, there are no two points at a distance <math>2r</math> from each other, but the diameter of the set is still <math>2r</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The point was just that there is only one value which is the diameter of a given set. The notion you're trying to capture is something to do with the lengths of paths from points on the hexagon passing through the center, or some such -- it would probably be better just to give the lengths of the apothem and circumradius, instead. | ||
Revision as of 12:58, 2 November 2006
"
The maximum diameter a hexagon can have is twice its side length, and the minimum is 
.
"
The diameter of a set (by definition) is the supremum of the distances between two points of the set. --JBL 11:55, 1 November 2006 (EST)
English please? --I_like_pie 20:21, 1 November 2006 (EST)
"Supremum" = "least upper bound." In many situations this just means "maximum," but there are others where it doesn't. For example, in an open set such as the interior of a circle or radius 
, there are no two points at a distance 
from each other, but the diameter of the set is still .
The point was just that there is only one value which is the diameter of a given set. The notion you're trying to capture is something to do with the lengths of paths from points on the hexagon passing through the center, or some such -- it would probably be better just to give the lengths of the apothem and circumradius, instead.
