Difference between revisions of "Talk:Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion"

Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
It'll look fine after someone adds some more introductory-level information (such as citing a few simpler examples first, before jumping to the semi-general result, which will be indecipherable to a young beginner).  Then it will be lower on the page and the big gap won't appear. --[[User:Rrusczyk|Rrusczyk]] 13:25, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
 
It'll look fine after someone adds some more introductory-level information (such as citing a few simpler examples first, before jumping to the semi-general result, which will be indecipherable to a young beginner).  Then it will be lower on the page and the big gap won't appear. --[[User:Rrusczyk|Rrusczyk]] 13:25, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link?  It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics.  --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:35, 18 June 2006

I forgot to write Summary. I added the statement, but it doesn't look very good.


It'll look fine after someone adds some more introductory-level information (such as citing a few simpler examples first, before jumping to the semi-general result, which will be indecipherable to a young beginner). Then it will be lower on the page and the big gap won't appear. --Rrusczyk 13:25, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link? It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics. --Mysmartmouth 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS