Difference between revisions of "2004 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 23"
(In the explanation of B, c_2003 isn't necessarily the sum of the roots.) |
Wizkid8402 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<cmath>\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k} = \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{b_k}.</cmath> | <cmath>\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k} = \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{b_k}.</cmath> | ||
− | Which of the following quantities can be a | + | Which of the following quantities can be a non zero number? |
<math>\text {(A)} c_0 \qquad \text {(B)} c_{2003} \qquad \text {(C)} b_2b_3...b_{2004} \qquad \text {(D)} \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k} \qquad \text {(E)}\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{c_k}</math> | <math>\text {(A)} c_0 \qquad \text {(B)} c_{2003} \qquad \text {(C)} b_2b_3...b_{2004} \qquad \text {(D)} \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k} \qquad \text {(E)}\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{c_k}</math> | ||
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1== |
We have to evaluate the answer choices and use process of elimination: | We have to evaluate the answer choices and use process of elimination: | ||
*<math>\mathrm{(A)}</math>: We are given that <math>a_1 = b_1 = 0</math>, so <math>z_1 = 0</math>. If one of the roots is zero, then <math>P(0) = c_0 = 0</math>. | *<math>\mathrm{(A)}</math>: We are given that <math>a_1 = b_1 = 0</math>, so <math>z_1 = 0</math>. If one of the roots is zero, then <math>P(0) = c_0 = 0</math>. | ||
− | *<math>\mathrm{(B)}</math>: By [[Vieta's formulas]], we know that <math>\frac{c_{2003}}{c_{2004}</math> is the sum of all of the roots of <math>P(x)</math>. Since that is real, <math> \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{b_k}=0=\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k}, and < | + | *<math>\mathrm{(B)}</math>: By [[Vieta's formulas]], we know that <math>-\frac{c_{2003}}{c_{2004}}</math> is the sum of all of the roots of <math>P(x)</math>. Since that is real, <math> \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{b_k}=0=\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k}</math>, and <math>\frac{c_{2003}}{c_{2004}}=0</math>, so <math>c_{2003}=0</math>. |
− | *< | + | *<math>\mathrm{(C)}</math>: All of the coefficients are real. For sake of contradiction suppose none of <math>b_{2\ldots 2004}</math> are zero. Then for each complex root <math>z_k</math>, its [[complex conjugate]] <math>\overline{z_k} = a_k - b_k i</math> is also a root. So the roots should pair up, but we have an odd number of imaginary roots! (Remember that <math>b_1 = 0</math>.) This gives us the contradiction, and therefore the product is equal to zero. |
− | *< | + | *<math>\mathrm{(D)}</math>: We are given that <math>\sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{a_k} = \sum_{k = 1}^{2004}{b_k}</math>. Since the coefficients are real, it follows that if a root is complex, its conjugate is also a root; and the sum of the imaginary parts of complex conjugates is zero. Hence the RHS is zero. |
− | There is, however, no reason to believe that < | + | There is, however, no reason to believe that <math>\boxed{\mathrm{E}}</math> should be zero (in fact, that quantity is <math>P(1)</math>, and there is no evidence that <math>1</math> is a root of <math>P(x)</math>). |
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2(cheap method using answer choices)== | ||
+ | Rule out answer choices <math>A, B, D</math> as done in solution 1. Assume for the sake of contradiction that <math>\mathrm{(E)}</math> is <math>0</math>. Then <math>P(1)=0</math>, so there is some <math>m\neq 1</math> such that <math>z_m=1+0i</math>, which implies at least one <math>b_i</math>, <math>i\neq 1</math> is <math>0</math> SO if <math>\sum_{k=1}^{2004}c_k=0</math>, then <math>\prod_{i=2}^{2004}b_i=0</math>. So we have that <math>\sum_{k=1}^{2004}c_k\neq 0</math>, because then that would rule out all the answer choices. Hence <math>\boxed{\mathrm{E}}</math> must be nonzero, so the answer is <math>\mathrm{(E)}</math>. | ||
+ | -vsamc | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
[[Category:Introductory Algebra Problems]] | [[Category:Introductory Algebra Problems]] | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 13:13, 5 September 2021
Problem
has real coefficients with and distinct complex zeroes , with and real, , and
Which of the following quantities can be a non zero number?
Solution 1
We have to evaluate the answer choices and use process of elimination:
- : We are given that , so . If one of the roots is zero, then .
- : By Vieta's formulas, we know that is the sum of all of the roots of . Since that is real, , and , so .
- : All of the coefficients are real. For sake of contradiction suppose none of are zero. Then for each complex root , its complex conjugate is also a root. So the roots should pair up, but we have an odd number of imaginary roots! (Remember that .) This gives us the contradiction, and therefore the product is equal to zero.
- : We are given that . Since the coefficients are real, it follows that if a root is complex, its conjugate is also a root; and the sum of the imaginary parts of complex conjugates is zero. Hence the RHS is zero.
There is, however, no reason to believe that should be zero (in fact, that quantity is , and there is no evidence that is a root of ).
Solution 2(cheap method using answer choices)
Rule out answer choices as done in solution 1. Assume for the sake of contradiction that is . Then , so there is some such that , which implies at least one , is SO if , then . So we have that , because then that would rule out all the answer choices. Hence must be nonzero, so the answer is . -vsamc
See also
2004 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.