Difference between revisions of "2005 AIME II Problems/Problem 11"

Revision as of 17:51, 21 November 2022

Problem

Let $m$ be a positive integer, and let $a_0, a_1,\ldots,a_m$ be a sequence of reals such that $a_0 = 37, a_1 = 72, a_m = 0,$ and $a_{k+1} = a_{k-1} - \frac 3{a_k}$ for $k = 1,2,\ldots, m-1.$ Find $m.$

Solution 1

For $0 < k < m$ , we have

$a_{k}a_{k+1} = a_{k-1}a_{k} - 3$ .

Thus the product $a_{k}a_{k+1}$ is a monovariant: it decreases by 3 each time $k$ increases by 1. For $k = 0$ we have $a_{k}a_{k+1} = 37\cdot 72$ , so when $k = \frac{37 \cdot 72}{3} = 888$ , $a_{k}a_{k+1}$ will be zero for the first time, which implies that $m = \boxed{889}$ , our answer.

Note: In order for $a_{m} = 0$ we need $a_{m-2}a_{m-1}=3$ simply by the recursion definition.

Solution 2

Plugging in $k = m-1$ to the given relation, we get $0 = a_{m-2} - \frac {3}{a_{m-1}} \implies{a_{m-2}a_{m-1} = 3}$ . Inspecting the value of $a_{k}a_{k+1}$ for small values of $k$ , we see that $a_{k}a_{k+1} = 37\cdot 72 - 3k$ . Setting the RHS of this equation equal to $3$ , we find that $m$ must be $\boxed{889}$ .

~ anellipticcurveoverq

Induction Proof

As above, we experiment with some values of $a_{k}a_{k+1}$ , conjecturing that $a_{m-p}a_{m-p-1}$ = $3p$ ,where $m$ is a positive integer and so is $p$ , and we prove this formally using induction. The base case is for $p = 1$ , $a_{m} = a_{m-2} - 3/a_{m-1}$ Since $a_{m} = 0$ , $a_{m-1}a_{m-2} = 3$ ; from the recursion given in the problem $a_{m-p+1} = a_{m-p-1} - 3/a_{m-p}$ , so $a_{m-p+1} = 3p/a_{m-p} - 3/a_{m-p} = 3(p-1)/a_{m-p}$ , so $a_{m-p}a_{m-p+1} = a_{m-(p-1)}a_{m-(p-1)-1} = 3(p-1)$ , hence proving our formula by induction. ~USAMO2023

Solution 3 (Telescoping)

Note that $a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3$ . Then, we can generate a series of equations such that $\sum_{k=1}^{m-1} a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3(m-1)$ . Then, note that all but the first and last terms on the LHS cancel out, leaving us with $a_m\cdot a_{m-1} - a_1\cdot a_0 = -3(m-1)$ . Plugging in $a_m=0$ , $a_0=37$ , $a_1=72$ , we have $-37\cdot 72 = -3(m-1)$ . Solving for $m$ gives $m=\boxed{889}$ . ~sigma

Video solution

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfxNr7lv7iQ

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ==Solution 3 (Telescoping)==
-Note that <math> a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3 </math>. Then, we can generate a series of equations such that <math>\sum_{k=1}^{m-1} a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3(m-1)</math>. Then, note that all but the first and last terms on the LHS cancel out, leaving us with <math>a_m\cdot a_{m-1} - a_1\cdot a_0 = -3(m-1)</math>. Plugging in <math>a_m=0</math>, <math>a_0=37</math>, <math>a_1=72</math>, we have -37\cdot 72 = -3(m-1)<math>. Solving for </math>m<math> gives </math>m=\boxed{889}$.
+Note that <math> a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3 </math>. Then, we can generate a series of equations such that <math>\sum_{k=1}^{m-1} a_{k+1}\cdot a_{k} - a_{k}\cdot a_{k-1} = - 3(m-1)</math>. Then, note that all but the first and last terms on the LHS cancel out, leaving us with <math>a_m\cdot a_{m-1} - a_1\cdot a_0 = -3(m-1)</math>. Plugging in <math>a_m=0</math>, <math>a_0=37</math>, <math>a_1=72</math>, we have <math>-37\cdot 72 = -3(m-1)</math>. Solving for <math>m</math> gives <math>m=\boxed{889}</math>.
 ~sigma

2005 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by Problem 10	Followed by Problem 12
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search