Difference between revisions of "1992 AIME Problems/Problem 6"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (Reformatted the page, rewrote one of the solutions using tables, as one picture is worth 1000 words. Also, I arrange the solutions in the order of educational values. If anyone is unhappy with this, please PM me, and we will work things out. :)) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1: Used some semicolons to separate inequalities.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution 1 == | == Solution 1 == | ||
− | + | For one such pair of consecutive integers, let the smaller integer be <math>\underline{1ABC},</math> where <math>A,B,</math> and <math>C</math> are digits from <math>0</math> through <math>9.</math> | |
+ | |||
+ | We wish to count the ordered triples <math>(A,B,C).</math> By casework, we consider all possible forms of the larger integer, as shown below. | ||
<cmath>\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c} | <cmath>\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c} | ||
& & & & & & \\ [-2.5ex] | & & & & & & \\ [-2.5ex] | ||
− | \textbf{Case} & \textbf{Thousands} & \textbf{Hundreds} & \textbf{Tens} & \textbf{Ones} & \textbf{No | + | \textbf{Case} & \textbf{Thousands} & \textbf{Hundreds} & \textbf{Tens} & \textbf{Ones} & \textbf{Conditions for No Carrying} & \boldsymbol{\#}\textbf{ of Ordered Triples} \\ [0.5ex] |
\hline | \hline | ||
& & & & & & \\ [-2ex] | & & & & & & \\ [-2ex] | ||
0\leq C\leq 8 & 1 & A & B & C+1 & 0\leq A,B,C\leq 4 & 5^3 \\ | 0\leq C\leq 8 & 1 & A & B & C+1 & 0\leq A,B,C\leq 4 & 5^3 \\ | ||
− | 0\leq B\leq 8 | + | 0\leq B\leq 8; \ C=9 & 1 & A & B+1 & 0 & 0\leq A,B\leq 4; \ C=9 & 5^2 \\ |
− | 0\leq A\leq 8 | + | 0\leq A\leq 8; \ B=C=9 & 1 & A+1 & 0 & 0 & 0\leq A\leq 4; \ B=C=9 & 5 \\ |
A=B=C=9 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & A=B=C=9 & 1 | A=B=C=9 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & A=B=C=9 & 1 | ||
\end{array}</cmath> | \end{array}</cmath> |
Latest revision as of 01:03, 10 July 2021
Problem
For how many pairs of consecutive integers in is no carrying required when the two integers are added?
Solution 1
For one such pair of consecutive integers, let the smaller integer be where and are digits from through
We wish to count the ordered triples By casework, we consider all possible forms of the larger integer, as shown below. Together, the answer is
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 2
Consider what carrying means: If carrying is needed to add two numbers with digits and , then or or . 6. Consider . has no carry if . This gives possible solutions.
With , there obviously must be a carry. Consider . have no carry. This gives possible solutions. Considering , have no carry. Thus, the solution is .
Solution 3
Consider the ordered pair where and are digits. We are trying to find all ordered pairs where does not require carrying. For the addition to require no carrying, , so unless ends in , which we will address later. Clearly, if , then adding will require no carrying. We have possibilities for the value of , for , and for , giving a total of , but we are not done yet.
We now have to consider the cases where , specifically when . We can see that , and all work, giving a grand total of ordered pairs.
See also
1992 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
Followed by Problem 7 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.