Difference between revisions of "2023 AIME I Problems/Problem 9"
m |
m (→Solution 1 (bash)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Solution 1 (bash) == | ==Solution 1 (bash) == | ||
− | Plugging <math>2</math> and <math>m</math> into <math> | + | Plugging <math>2</math> and <math>m</math> into the expression for <math>p(x)</math> and equating them, we get <math>8+4a+2b+c = m^3+am^2+bm+c</math>. Rearranging, we have <cmath>(m^3-8) + (m^2 - 4)a + (m-2)b = 0.</cmath> Note that the value of <math>c</math> won't matter as it can be anything in the provided range, giving a total of <math>41</math> possible choices for <math>c.</math> So we only need to find the number of ordered pairs <math>(a, b)</math> that work, and multiply it by <math>41.</math> |
− | We can start by first dividing both sides by <math>m-2.</math> (Note that this is valid since <math>m\neq2:</math> <cmath>m^2 + 2m + 4 + (m+2)a + b = 0.</cmath> We can rearrange this so it is a quadratic in <math>m</math>: <cmath>m^2 + (a+2)m + (4 + 2a + b) = 0.</cmath> Remember that <math>m</math> has to be unique and not equal to <math>2.</math> We can split this into two cases: case <math>1</math> being that <math>m</math> has exactly one solution, and it isn't equal to <math>2</math>; case <math>2</math> being that <math>m</math> has two solutions, one being | + | We can start by first dividing both sides by <math>m-2.</math> (Note that this is valid since <math>m\neq2:</math> <cmath>m^2 + 2m + 4 + (m+2)a + b = 0.</cmath> We can rearrange this so it is a quadratic in <math>m</math>: <cmath>m^2 + (a+2)m + (4 + 2a + b) = 0.</cmath> Remember that <math>m</math> has to be unique and not equal to <math>2.</math> We can split this into two cases: case <math>1</math> being that <math>m</math> has exactly one solution, and it isn't equal to <math>2</math>; case <math>2</math> being that <math>m</math> has two solutions, one being <math>2,</math> but the other is a unique solution not equal to <math>2.</math> |
<math>\textbf{Case 1:}</math> | <math>\textbf{Case 1:}</math> | ||
− | There is exactly one solution for <math>m,</math> and that solution is not <math>2.</math> This means that the discriminant of the quadratic equation is <math>0,</math> using that, we have <math>(a+2)^2 = 4(4 + 2a + b) | + | There is exactly one solution for <math>m,</math> and that solution is not <math>2.</math> This means that the discriminant of the quadratic equation is <math>0,</math> using that, we have <math>(a+2)^2 = 4(4 + 2a + b)</math>. Rearranging, we have <cmath>(a-2)^2 = 4(4 + b)\Longrightarrow a = 2\pm2\sqrt{4+b}.</cmath> Using the fact that <math>4+b</math> must be a perfect square, we can easily see that the values for <math>b</math> can be <math>-4, -3, 0, 5,</math> and <math>12.</math> Also since it's a "<math>\pm</math>" there will usually be <math>2</math> solutions for <math>a</math> for each value of <math>b.</math> The two exceptions for this would be if <math>b = -4</math> and <math>b = 12.</math> For <math>b=-4</math> because it would be a <math>\pm0,</math> which only gives one solution, instead of two. For <math>b=12</math>, because then <math>a = -6</math>, the solution for <math>m</math> would equal <math>2,</math>, and we don't want this. (We can know this by replacing the solutions into the quadratic formula). |
− | So we have <math>5</math> solutions for <math>b,</math> each of which | + | So we have <math>5</math> solutions for <math>b,</math> each of which gives <math>2</math> values for <math>a,</math> except for <math>2,</math> which only gives one. So in total, there are <math>5*2 - 2 = 8</math> ordered pairs of <math>(a,b)</math> in this case. |
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
\end{align*}</cmath> From the first equation, we subtract both sides by <math>2</math> and double both sides to get <math>2r = -2a - 8</math> which also equals to <math>4+2a+b</math> from the second equation. Equating both, we have <math>4a + b + 12 = 0.</math> We can easily count that there would be <math>11</math> ordered pairs <math>(a,b)</math> that satisfy that. | \end{align*}</cmath> From the first equation, we subtract both sides by <math>2</math> and double both sides to get <math>2r = -2a - 8</math> which also equals to <math>4+2a+b</math> from the second equation. Equating both, we have <math>4a + b + 12 = 0.</math> We can easily count that there would be <math>11</math> ordered pairs <math>(a,b)</math> that satisfy that. | ||
− | However, there's an outlier case in which <math>r</math> happens to also equal | + | However, there's an outlier case in which <math>r</math> happens to also equal <math>2,</math> and we don't want that. We can reverse engineer and find out that <math>r=2</math> when <math>(a,b) = (-6, 12),</math> which we overcounted. So we subtract by one and we conclude that there are <math>10</math> ordered pairs of <math>(a,b)</math> that satisfy this case. |
− | This all shows that there | + | This all shows that there is a total of <math>8+10 = 18</math> amount of ordered pairs <math>(a,b).</math> Multiplying this by <math>41</math> (the amount of values for <math>c</math>) we get <math>18\cdot41=\boxed{738}</math> as our final answer. |
~s214425 | ~s214425 | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
In the first case <math>p(x)=x^3-(4+m)x^2+(4+4m)x-4m+p(2)</math>, with <math>|4+4m|\leq 20</math> (which entails <math>|4+m|\leq 20</math>), so <math>m</math> can be <math>-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1, (\textbf{not 2}!), 3,4</math> and <math>-4m+p(2)</math> can be any integer from <math>-20</math> to <math>20</math>, giving <math>410</math> polynomials (since the coefficients are given by linear functions of <math>m</math> and thus are distinct). | In the first case <math>p(x)=x^3-(4+m)x^2+(4+4m)x-4m+p(2)</math>, with <math>|4+4m|\leq 20</math> (which entails <math>|4+m|\leq 20</math>), so <math>m</math> can be <math>-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1, (\textbf{not 2}!), 3,4</math> and <math>-4m+p(2)</math> can be any integer from <math>-20</math> to <math>20</math>, giving <math>410</math> polynomials (since the coefficients are given by linear functions of <math>m</math> and thus are distinct). | ||
− | In the second case <math>p(x)=x^3-( | + | In the second case <math>p(x)=x^3-(2+2m)x^2+(4m+m^2)x-2m^2+p(2)</math>, and <math>m</math> can be <math>-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1</math> and <math>-4m+p(2)</math> can be any integer from <math>-20</math> to <math>20</math>, giving <math>328</math> polynomials. |
The total is <math>\boxed{738}</math>. | The total is <math>\boxed{738}</math>. | ||
~EVIN- | ~EVIN- | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Video Solution== | ==Video Solution== |
Latest revision as of 08:06, 25 November 2024
Contents
Problem
Find the number of cubic polynomials where and are integers in such that there is a unique integer with
Solution 1 (bash)
Plugging and into the expression for and equating them, we get . Rearranging, we have Note that the value of won't matter as it can be anything in the provided range, giving a total of possible choices for So we only need to find the number of ordered pairs that work, and multiply it by We can start by first dividing both sides by (Note that this is valid since We can rearrange this so it is a quadratic in : Remember that has to be unique and not equal to We can split this into two cases: case being that has exactly one solution, and it isn't equal to ; case being that has two solutions, one being but the other is a unique solution not equal to
There is exactly one solution for and that solution is not This means that the discriminant of the quadratic equation is using that, we have . Rearranging, we have Using the fact that must be a perfect square, we can easily see that the values for can be and Also since it's a "" there will usually be solutions for for each value of The two exceptions for this would be if and For because it would be a which only gives one solution, instead of two. For , because then , the solution for would equal , and we don't want this. (We can know this by replacing the solutions into the quadratic formula).
So we have solutions for each of which gives values for except for which only gives one. So in total, there are ordered pairs of in this case.
has two solutions, but exactly one of them isn't equal to This ensures that of the solutions is equal to
Let be the other value of that isn't By Vieta: From the first equation, we subtract both sides by and double both sides to get which also equals to from the second equation. Equating both, we have We can easily count that there would be ordered pairs that satisfy that.
However, there's an outlier case in which happens to also equal and we don't want that. We can reverse engineer and find out that when which we overcounted. So we subtract by one and we conclude that there are ordered pairs of that satisfy this case.
This all shows that there is a total of amount of ordered pairs Multiplying this by (the amount of values for ) we get as our final answer.
~s214425
Solution 2 (factor the difference)
is a cubic with at least two integral real roots, therefore it has three real roots, which are all integers.
There are exactly two distinct roots, so either or , with .
In the first case , with (which entails ), so can be and can be any integer from to , giving polynomials (since the coefficients are given by linear functions of and thus are distinct).
In the second case , and can be and can be any integer from to , giving polynomials.
The total is .
~EVIN-
Video Solution
~MathProblemSolvingSkills.com
See also
2023 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.