Difference between revisions of "2001 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 23"
m (→Solution 3 (Elimination)) |
|||
(27 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
− | Points <math>R</math>, <math>S</math> and <math>T</math> are vertices of an equilateral triangle, and points <math>X</math>, <math>Y</math> and <math>Z</math> are midpoints of its sides. How many noncongruent triangles can be | + | <!-- don't remove the following tag, for PoTW on the Wiki front page--><onlyinclude>Points <math>R</math>, <math>S</math> and <math>T</math> are vertices of an equilateral triangle, and points <math>X</math>, <math>Y</math> and <math>Z</math> are midpoints of its sides. How many noncongruent triangles can be |
− | drawn using any three of these six points as vertices? | + | drawn using any three of these six points as vertices?<!-- don't remove the following tag, for PoTW on the Wiki front page--></onlyinclude> |
<asy> | <asy> | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<math>\text{(A)}\ 1 \qquad \text{(B)}\ 2 \qquad \text{(C)}\ 3 \qquad \text{(D)}\ 4 \qquad \text{(E)}\ 20</math> | <math>\text{(A)}\ 1 \qquad \text{(B)}\ 2 \qquad \text{(C)}\ 3 \qquad \text{(D)}\ 4 \qquad \text{(E)}\ 20</math> | ||
− | ==Solution== | + | ==Solution 1 (Complementary Counting)== |
− | There are <math> 6 </math> points in the figure, and <math> 3 </math> of them are needed to form a triangle, so there are <math> {6\choose{3}} =20 </math> possible | + | There are <math> 6 </math> points in the figure, and <math> 3 </math> of them are needed to form a triangle, so there are <math> {6\choose{3}} =20 </math> possible triplets of the <math> 6 </math> points. However, some of these created congruent triangles, and some don't even make triangles at all. |
'''Case 1: Triangles congruent to <math> \triangle RST </math>''' There is obviously only <math> 1 </math> of these: <math> \triangle RST </math> itself. | '''Case 1: Triangles congruent to <math> \triangle RST </math>''' There is obviously only <math> 1 </math> of these: <math> \triangle RST </math> itself. | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
'''Case 3: Triangles congruent to <math> \triangle RSX </math>''' There are <math> 6 </math> of these: <math> \triangle RSX, \triangle TSX, \triangle STY, \triangle RTY, \triangle RSZ, </math> and <math> \triangle RTZ </math>. | '''Case 3: Triangles congruent to <math> \triangle RSX </math>''' There are <math> 6 </math> of these: <math> \triangle RSX, \triangle TSX, \triangle STY, \triangle RTY, \triangle RSZ, </math> and <math> \triangle RTZ </math>. | ||
− | '''Case 4: | + | '''Case 4: Triangles congruent to <math> \triangle SYX </math>''' There are again <math> 6 </math> of these: <math> \triangle SYX, \triangle SZX, \triangle TYZ, \triangle TYX, \triangle RXZ, </math> and <math> \triangle RYZ </math>. |
However, if we add these up, we accounted for only <math> 1+4+6+6=17 </math> of the <math> 20 </math> possible triplets. We see that the remaining triplets don't even form triangles; they are <math> SYR, RXT, </math> and <math> TZS </math>. Adding these <math> 3 </math> into the total yields for all of the possible triplets, so we see that there are only <math> 4 </math> possible non-congruent, non-degenerate triangles, <math> \boxed{\text{D}} </math> | However, if we add these up, we accounted for only <math> 1+4+6+6=17 </math> of the <math> 20 </math> possible triplets. We see that the remaining triplets don't even form triangles; they are <math> SYR, RXT, </math> and <math> TZS </math>. Adding these <math> 3 </math> into the total yields for all of the possible triplets, so we see that there are only <math> 4 </math> possible non-congruent, non-degenerate triangles, <math> \boxed{\text{D}} </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2 (Brute Force)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can do casework in this problem like the solution above, but that would take too much time. Instead, we see that we can split this equilateral dot triangle to two halves by dropping an altitude from the top vertex of the big triangle. Using the smaller triangle we won't have to worry about extra unneeded cases. We can see that there are three distinct triangles in the half, and combining this with the larger equilateral triangle our answer is <math>3+1 = \boxed{4}</math>, which is <math>\boxed{\text{D}}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | -FIREDRAGONMATH16 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3 (Elimination)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that 20 is obviously too high (There are only 20 ways to choose 3 of the points to form a triangle or a line in total!) and you can count 4 distinct triangles quickly: <math>\triangle RYX</math>, <math>\triangle RYT</math>, <math>\triangle RYZ</math>, <math>\triangle RST</math>. So the answer is <math>\boxed{\text{(D) } 4}</math> | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{AMC8 box|year=2001|num-b=22|num-a=24}} | {{AMC8 box|year=2001|num-b=22|num-a=24}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
+ | [[Category:Introductory Combinatorics Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 15:35, 23 July 2023
Contents
Problem
Points , and are vertices of an equilateral triangle, and points , and are midpoints of its sides. How many noncongruent triangles can be drawn using any three of these six points as vertices?
Solution 1 (Complementary Counting)
There are points in the figure, and of them are needed to form a triangle, so there are possible triplets of the points. However, some of these created congruent triangles, and some don't even make triangles at all.
Case 1: Triangles congruent to There is obviously only of these: itself.
Case 2: Triangles congruent to There are of these: and .
Case 3: Triangles congruent to There are of these: and .
Case 4: Triangles congruent to There are again of these: and .
However, if we add these up, we accounted for only of the possible triplets. We see that the remaining triplets don't even form triangles; they are and . Adding these into the total yields for all of the possible triplets, so we see that there are only possible non-congruent, non-degenerate triangles,
Solution 2 (Brute Force)
We can do casework in this problem like the solution above, but that would take too much time. Instead, we see that we can split this equilateral dot triangle to two halves by dropping an altitude from the top vertex of the big triangle. Using the smaller triangle we won't have to worry about extra unneeded cases. We can see that there are three distinct triangles in the half, and combining this with the larger equilateral triangle our answer is , which is
-FIREDRAGONMATH16
Solution 3 (Elimination)
Notice that 20 is obviously too high (There are only 20 ways to choose 3 of the points to form a triangle or a line in total!) and you can count 4 distinct triangles quickly: , , , . So the answer is
See Also
2001 AMC 8 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.