Difference between revisions of "2020 AIME II Problems/Problem 14"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
For real number <math>x</math> let <math>\lfloor x\rfloor</math> be the greatest integer less than or equal to <math>x</math>, and define <math>\{x\} = x - \lfloor x \rfloor</math> to be the fractional part of <math>x</math>. For example, <math>\{3\} = 0</math> and <math>\{4.56\} = 0.56</math>. Define <math>f(x)=x\{x\}</math>, and let <math>N</math> be the number of real-valued solutions to the equation <math>f(f(f(x)))=17</math> for <math>0\leq x\leq 2020</math>. Find the remainder when <math>N</math> is divided by <math>1000</math>. | For real number <math>x</math> let <math>\lfloor x\rfloor</math> be the greatest integer less than or equal to <math>x</math>, and define <math>\{x\} = x - \lfloor x \rfloor</math> to be the fractional part of <math>x</math>. For example, <math>\{3\} = 0</math> and <math>\{4.56\} = 0.56</math>. Define <math>f(x)=x\{x\}</math>, and let <math>N</math> be the number of real-valued solutions to the equation <math>f(f(f(x)))=17</math> for <math>0\leq x\leq 2020</math>. Find the remainder when <math>N</math> is divided by <math>1000</math>. | ||
− | ==Solution== | + | ==Solution 1== |
+ | \[ | ||
+ | \sum_{x=17}^{2019} \sum_{y=x}^{2019} \sum_{z=y}^{2019} 1 | ||
+ | .\] | ||
+ | A combinatorical argument exists which is the official solution, but I will present another here for the sake of variety. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Applying algebraic manipulation and the hockey-stick identity <math>3</math> times gives | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \sum_{x=17}^{2019} \sum_{y=x}^{2019} \sum_{z=y}^{2019} 1 | ||
+ | =\sum_{x=17}^{2019} \sum_{y=x}^{2019} \sum_{z=y}^{2019} \binom{z-y}{0}\ | ||
+ | =\sum_{x=17}^{2019} \sum_{y=x}^{2019} \binom{2020-y}{1}\ | ||
+ | =\sum_{x=17}^{2019} \binom{2021-x}{2}\ | ||
+ | =\binom{2005}{3} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
To solve <math>f(f(f(x)))=17</math>, we need to solve <math>f(x) = y</math> where <math>f(f(y))=17</math>, and to solve that we need to solve <math>f(y) = z</math> where <math>f(z) = 17</math>. | To solve <math>f(f(f(x)))=17</math>, we need to solve <math>f(x) = y</math> where <math>f(f(y))=17</math>, and to solve that we need to solve <math>f(y) = z</math> where <math>f(z) = 17</math>. |
Revision as of 04:05, 5 August 2020
Contents
[hide]Problem
For real number let
be the greatest integer less than or equal to
, and define
to be the fractional part of
. For example,
and
. Define
, and let
be the number of real-valued solutions to the equation
for
. Find the remainder when
is divided by
.
Solution 1
\[ \sum_{x=17}^{2019} \sum_{y=x}^{2019} \sum_{z=y}^{2019} 1 .\] A combinatorical argument exists which is the official solution, but I will present another here for the sake of variety.
Applying algebraic manipulation and the hockey-stick identity times gives
Solution 2
To solve , we need to solve
where
, and to solve that we need to solve
where
.
It is clear to see for some integer there is exactly one value of
in the interval
where
To understand this, imagine the graph of
on the interval
The graph starts at
, is continuous and increasing, and approaches
. So as long as
, there will be a solution for
in the interval.
Using this logic, we can find the number of solutions to . For every interval
where
there will be one solution for x in that interval. However, the question states
, but because
doesn't work we can change it to
. Therefore,
, and there are
solutions to
.
We can solve similarly.
to satisfy the bounds of
, so there are
solutions to
, and
to satisfy the bounds of
.
Going back to , there is a single solution for z in the interval
, where
. (We now have an upper bound for
because we know
.) There are
solutions for
, and the floors of these solutions create the sequence
Lets first look at the solution of where
. Then
would have
solutions, and the floors of these solutions would also create the sequence
.
If we used the solution of where
, there would be
solutions for
. If we used the solution of
where
, there would be
solutions for
, and so on. So for the solution of
where
, there will be
solutions for
If we now look at the solution of where
, there would be
solutions for
. If we looked at the solution of
where
, there would be
solutions for
, and so on.
The total number of solutions to is
. Using the hockey stick theorem, we see this equals
, and when we take the remainder of that number when divided by
, we get the answer,
~aragornmf
Solution 2 (Official MAA)
For any nonnegative integer , the function
increases on the interval
, with
and
for every
in this interval. On this interval
, which takes on every real value in the interval
exactly once. Thus for each nonnegative real number
, the equation
has exactly one solution
for every
.
For each integer there is exactly one
with
such that
; likewise for each integer
there is exactly one
with
and
such that
. Finally, for each integer
there is exactly one
with
,
, and
such that
.
Thus has exactly one solution
with
for each triple of integers
with
, noting that
is not a solution. This nondecreasing ordered triple can be identified with a multiset of three elements of the set of
integers
, which can be selected in
ways. Thus
Video Solution
https://youtu.be/bz5N-jI2e0U?t=515
See Also
2020 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 13 |
Followed by Problem 15 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.