Difference between revisions of "Angle Bisector Theorem"
(→Method 1) |
(→Method 1) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Proof == | == Proof == | ||
===Method 1 === | ===Method 1 === | ||
− | Because of the | + | Because of the [[ratio]]s and equal [[angle]]s in the theorem, we think of [[similarity | similar]] triangles. There are not any similar triangles in the figure as it now stands, however. So, we think to draw in a carefully chosen line or two. Extending AD until it hits the line through C [[parallel]] to AB does just the trick: |
<center>[[image:Anglebisectortheorem.PNG]]</center> | <center>[[image:Anglebisectortheorem.PNG]]</center> | ||
− | Since AB and CE are parallel, we know that <math> \angle BAE=\angle CEA </math> and <math> \angle BCE=\angle ABC </math>. Triangle ACE is isosceles, meaning that AC = CE. | + | Since AB and CE are parallel, we know that <math> \angle BAE=\angle CEA </math> and <math> \angle BCE=\angle ABC </math>. Triangle ACE is [[isosceles triangle | isosceles]], meaning that AC = CE. |
− | By AA, <math> \triangle DAB \cong \triangle DEC </math>. By the properties of similar triangles, we arrive at our desired result: | + | By [[AA similarity]], <math> \triangle DAB \cong \triangle DEC </math>. By the properties of similar triangles, we arrive at our desired result: |
<center><math> \frac cm = \frac bn.</math> </center> | <center><math> \frac cm = \frac bn.</math> </center> |
Revision as of 14:51, 13 October 2006
Introduction
The Angle Bisector Theorem states that given triangle and angle bisector AD, where D is on side BC, then . Likewise, the converse of this theorem holds as well.
Proof
Method 1
Because of the ratios and equal angles in the theorem, we think of similar triangles. There are not any similar triangles in the figure as it now stands, however. So, we think to draw in a carefully chosen line or two. Extending AD until it hits the line through C parallel to AB does just the trick:
Since AB and CE are parallel, we know that and . Triangle ACE is isosceles, meaning that AC = CE.
By AA similarity, . By the properties of similar triangles, we arrive at our desired result:
Method 2
Let . Now, we can express the area of triangle ABD in two ways:
Thus, .
Likewise, triangle ACD can be expressed in two different ways:
Thus, .
But and since . Therefore, we can substitute back into our previous equation to get .
We conclude that , which was what we wanted.
In both cases, if we reverse all the steps, we see that everything still holds and thus the converse holds.
Examples
- Let ABC be a triangle with angle bisector AD with D on line segment BC. If and , find AB and AC.
Solution: By the angle bisector theorem, or . Plugging this into and solving for AC gives . We can plug this back in to find . - In triangle ABC, let P be a point on BC and let . Find the value of .
Solution: First, we notice that . Thus, AP is the angle bisector of angle A, making our answer 0.