Difference between revisions of "2017 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 25"
m |
Thanosaops (talk | contribs) (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Solution 1== | ==Solution 1== | ||
+ | There are 81 multiples of 11. Some have digits repeated twice, making 3 permutations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Others that have no repeated digits have 6 permutations, but switching the hundreds and units digits also yield a multiple of 11. Therefore, assign 3 permutations to each multiple. | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are now 81*3 = 243 permutations, but we have overcounted. Some multiples of 11 have a zero, and we must subtract a permutation for each. | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are 110, 220, 330 ... 990, yielding 9 extra permutations | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, there are 209, 308, 407...902, yielding 8 more permutations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, just subtract these 17 from the total (243), getting 226. <math>\boxed{\textbf{(A) } 226}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 2=== | ||
Let the three-digit number be <math>ACB</math>: | Let the three-digit number be <math>ACB</math>: |
Revision as of 17:32, 27 January 2020
Contents
Problem
How many integers between and , inclusive, have the property that some permutation of its digits is a multiple of between and For example, both and have this property.
Solution 1
There are 81 multiples of 11. Some have digits repeated twice, making 3 permutations.
Others that have no repeated digits have 6 permutations, but switching the hundreds and units digits also yield a multiple of 11. Therefore, assign 3 permutations to each multiple.
There are now 81*3 = 243 permutations, but we have overcounted. Some multiples of 11 have a zero, and we must subtract a permutation for each.
There are 110, 220, 330 ... 990, yielding 9 extra permutations
Also, there are 209, 308, 407...902, yielding 8 more permutations.
Now, just subtract these 17 from the total (243), getting 226.
Solution 2
Let the three-digit number be :
If a number is divisible by , then the difference between the sums of alternating digits is a multiple of .
There are two cases: and
We now proceed to break down the cases. Note: let so that we avoid counting the same permutations and having to subtract them later.
: .
: , this case results in . There are two ways to arrange the digits in each of those numbers.
: , this case results in . There are ways to arrange the digits in all of those number except the first, and ways for the first. This leads to cases.
: , this case results in . There are ways to arrange the digits in all of those number except the first, and 3 ways for the first. This leads to cases.
: , this case results in . There are ways to arrange the digits in all of those number except the first, and 3 ways for the first. This leads to cases.
: , this case results in and . There are ways to arrange the digits in 594 and 3 ways for 484. This leads to cases.
This case has subcases.
: .
: , this cases results in . There are ways to arrange each of those cases. This leads to cases.
: , this cases results in . There are ways to arrange each of those cases, except the last. This leads to cases.
: , this cases results in . There are ways to arrange each of those cases. This leads to cases.
... If we continue this counting, we receive subcases.
Solution 2
We note that we only have to consider multiples of and see how many valid permutations each has. We can do casework on the number of repeating digits that the multiple of has:
All three digits are the same. By inspection, we find that there are no multiples of here.
Two of the digits are the same, and the third is different.
There are multiples of without a zero that have this property: , , , , , , , . Each contributes valid permutations, so there are permutations in this subcase.
There are multiples of with a zero that have this property: , , , , , , , , . Each one contributes valid permutations (the first digit can't be zero), so there are permutations in this subcase.
All the digits are different. Since there are multiples of between and , there are multiples of remaining in this case. However, of them contain a zero, namely , , , , , , , and . Each of those multiples of contributes valid permutations, but we overcounted by a factor of ; every permutation of , for example, is also a permutation of . Therefore, there are . Therefore, there are remaining multiples of without a in this case. Each one contributes valid permutations, but once again, we overcounted by a factor of (note that if a number ABC is a multiple of , then so is CBA). Therefore, there are valid permutations in this subcase.
Adding up all the permutations from all the cases, we have .
Solution 3
We can first overcount and then subtract. We know that there are multiples of .
We can then multiply by for each permutation of these multiples. (Yet some multiples do not have six distinct permutations.)
Now divide by , because if a number with digits , , and is a multiple of , then is also a multiple of so we have counted the same permutations twice.
Basically, each multiple of has its own permutations (say has and whereas has and ). We know that each multiple of has at least permutations because it cannot have repeating digits.
Hence we have permutations without subtracting for overcounting. Now note that we overcounted cases in which we have 's at the start of each number. So, in theory, we could just answer and then move on.
If we want to solve it, then we continue.
We overcounted cases where the middle digit of the number is and the last digit is .
Note that we assigned each multiple of three permutations.
The last digit is gives possibilities where we overcounted by permutation for each of .
The middle digit is gives possibilities where we overcount by . and
Subtracting gives .
Now, we may ask if there is further overlap (i.e if two of and and were multiples of ). Thankfully, using divisibility rules, this can never happen, as taking the divisibility rule mod and adding, we get that , , or is congruent to . Since are digits, this can never happen as none of them can equal and they can't equal as they are the leading digit of a three-digit number in each of the cases.
Solution 4: A Slightly Adjusted Version of Solution 2
If you do not feel comfortable looking at a massive amount of casework, please skip the solution.
Recalling the divisibility rule for , if we have a number where , , are digits, then .
Notice that for any three-digit positive integer , , thus we have 2 possibilities: and .
Subcase :
We have these values for From which we get triples . Counting every permutation, we have possibilities.
Subcase : ,
We have From which we get possibilities.
Subcase :
We have Since can't be the hundreds digit, from here we get possibilities. Summing up case , we have possibilities.
Subcase :
We have these values for From which we get possibilities.
Subcase : ,
We have From which we get possibilities.
Subcase :
We have From which we get possibilities. Summing up case , we have possibilities.
Adding the cases, we get a total of possibilities.
~ Nafer
Video Solution
Two different variations on solving it. https://youtu.be/z5KNZEwmrWM
See Also
2017 AMC 10A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 24 |
Followed by Last Problem | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.