Difference between revisions of "2023 AIME I Problems/Problem 7"
Megaboy6679 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1) |
Megaboy6679 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<math>n</math> is then <math>3 \pmod{4}</math>. If <math>n \equiv 0 \pmod{3}</math>, <math>n \equiv 3 \pmod{6}</math>, a contradiction. Thus, <math>n \equiv 2 \pmod{3}</math>, which implies <math>n \equiv 5 \pmod{6}</math>. <math>n</math> can either be <math>0 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 35 \pmod{60}</math> by CRT, giving <math>17</math> cases; or <math>4 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 59 \pmod{60}</math> by CRT, giving <math>16</math> cases. | <math>n</math> is then <math>3 \pmod{4}</math>. If <math>n \equiv 0 \pmod{3}</math>, <math>n \equiv 3 \pmod{6}</math>, a contradiction. Thus, <math>n \equiv 2 \pmod{3}</math>, which implies <math>n \equiv 5 \pmod{6}</math>. <math>n</math> can either be <math>0 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 35 \pmod{60}</math> by CRT, giving <math>17</math> cases; or <math>4 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 59 \pmod{60}</math> by CRT, giving <math>16</math> cases. | ||
− | The total number of extra-distinct numbers is thus <math>16 + 16 + 17 = \boxed{ | + | The total number of extra-distinct numbers is thus <math>16 + 16 + 17 = \boxed{049}</math>. |
~mathboy100 | ~mathboy100 | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
After listing all of the remainders up to <math>60</math>, we find that <math>35</math>, <math>58</math>, and <math>59</math> are extra-distinct. So, we have <math>3</math> numbers every <math>60</math> which are extra-distinct. <math>60\cdot16 = 960</math> and <math>3\cdot16 = 48</math>, so we have <math>48</math> extra-distinct numbers in the first <math>960</math> numbers. Because of our pattern, we know that the numbers from <math>961</math> thru <math>1000</math> will have the same remainders as <math>1</math> thru <math>40</math>, so we have <math>1</math> other extra-distinct number (<math>35</math>). | After listing all of the remainders up to <math>60</math>, we find that <math>35</math>, <math>58</math>, and <math>59</math> are extra-distinct. So, we have <math>3</math> numbers every <math>60</math> which are extra-distinct. <math>60\cdot16 = 960</math> and <math>3\cdot16 = 48</math>, so we have <math>48</math> extra-distinct numbers in the first <math>960</math> numbers. Because of our pattern, we know that the numbers from <math>961</math> thru <math>1000</math> will have the same remainders as <math>1</math> thru <math>40</math>, so we have <math>1</math> other extra-distinct number (<math>35</math>). | ||
− | <math>48 + 1 = \boxed{ | + | <math>48 + 1 = \boxed{049}</math>. |
~Algebraik | ~Algebraik | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Therefore, the number extra-distinct <math>n</math> in this subcase is 16. | Therefore, the number extra-distinct <math>n</math> in this subcase is 16. | ||
− | Putting all cases together, the total number of extra-distinct <math>n</math> is <math>16 + 17 + 16 = \boxed{ | + | Putting all cases together, the total number of extra-distinct <math>n</math> is <math>16 + 17 + 16 = \boxed{049}</math>. |
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) | ~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) |
Revision as of 18:23, 9 February 2023
Problem
Call a positive integer extra-distinct if the remainders when is divided by and are distinct. Find the number of extra-distinct positive integers less than .
Solution 1
can either be or mod .
Case 1:
Then, , which implies and , and therefore . Using CRT, we obtain , which gives values for .
Case 2:
is then . If , , a contradiction. Thus, , which implies . can either be , which implies that by CRT, giving cases; or , which implies that by CRT, giving cases.
The total number of extra-distinct numbers is thus .
~mathboy100
Solution 2 (Simpler)
Because the LCM of all of the numbers we are dividing by is , we know that all of the remainders are again at , meaning that we have a cycle that repeats itself every numbers.
After listing all of the remainders up to , we find that , , and are extra-distinct. So, we have numbers every which are extra-distinct. and , so we have extra-distinct numbers in the first numbers. Because of our pattern, we know that the numbers from thru will have the same remainders as thru , so we have other extra-distinct number ().
.
~Algebraik
Solution 3
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies , .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of . Thus, .
However, conflicts . Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of .
Because , we must have . Hence, .
Hence, . Hence, .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this case is 16.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, and are two distinct numbers in . Because and is odd, we have . Hence, or 4.
, , .
We have .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 17.
, , .
.
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 16.
Putting all cases together, the total number of extra-distinct is .
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
See also
2023 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 6 |
Followed by Problem 8 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.