Difference between revisions of "1992 AIME Problems/Problem 5"
m (→See also: box) |
(→Solution: solution) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | {{ | + | We consider the method in which repeating decimals are normally converted to fractions with an example: |
+ | |||
+ | <math>x=0.\overline{176}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow 1000x=176.\overline{176}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow 999x=1000x-x=176</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow x=\frac{176}{999}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, let <math>x=0.\overline{abc}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow 1000x=abc.\overline{abc}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow 999x=1000x-x=abc</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\Rightarrow x=\frac{abc}{999}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>abc</math> is not divisible by <math>3</math> or <math>37</math>, then this is in lowest terms. Let us consider the other multiples: <math>333</math> multiples of <math>3</math>, <math>27</math> of <math>37</math>, and <math>9</math> of <math>3</math> and <math>37</math>, so <math>999-333-27+9 = 648</math>, which is the amount that are neither. The <math>12</math> numbers that arere multiples of <math>81</math> reduce to multiples of <math>3</math>. There aren't any numbers which are multiples of <math>372</math>, so we can't get numerators which are multiples of <math>37</math>. Therefore <math>648 + 12 = \boxed{660}</math>. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=1992|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{AIME box|year=1992|num-b=4|num-a=6}} |
Revision as of 22:15, 11 November 2007
Problem
Let be the set of all rational numbers , , that have a repeating decimal expansion in the form , where the digits , , and are not necessarily distinct. To write the elements of as fractions in lowest terms, how many different numerators are required?
Solution
We consider the method in which repeating decimals are normally converted to fractions with an example:
Thus, let
If is not divisible by or , then this is in lowest terms. Let us consider the other multiples: multiples of , of , and of and , so , which is the amount that are neither. The numbers that arere multiples of reduce to multiples of . There aren't any numbers which are multiples of , so we can't get numerators which are multiples of . Therefore .
See also
1992 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |