Difference between revisions of "Titu's Lemma"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<cmath> \frac{ a_1^2 } { b_1 } + \frac{ a_2 ^2 } { b_2 } + \cdots + \frac{ a_n ^2 } { b_n } \geq \frac{ (a_1 + a_2 + \cdots+ a_n ) ^2 } { b_1 + b_2 + \cdots+ b_n }. </cmath> | <cmath> \frac{ a_1^2 } { b_1 } + \frac{ a_2 ^2 } { b_2 } + \cdots + \frac{ a_n ^2 } { b_n } \geq \frac{ (a_1 + a_2 + \cdots+ a_n ) ^2 } { b_1 + b_2 + \cdots+ b_n }. </cmath> | ||
− | It is a direct consequence of [[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]]. | + | It is a direct consequence of [[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]]. |
+ | |||
+ | Equality holds when <math>a_i = kb_i</math> for <math>1 \leq i \leq n</math>. | ||
Titu's lemma is named after Titu Andreescu and is also known as T2 lemma, Engel's form, or Sedrakyan's inequality. | Titu's lemma is named after Titu Andreescu and is also known as T2 lemma, Engel's form, or Sedrakyan's inequality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Examples== | ||
+ | ===Example 1=== | ||
+ | Given that positive reals <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> are subject to <math>a + b + c = 1</math>, find the minimum value of <math>\frac{1}{a} + \frac{4}{b} + \frac{9}{c}</math>. (Source: [https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/User:Cxsmi cxsmi]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Solution==== | ||
+ | This is a somewhat standard application of Titu's lemma. Notice that <cmath>\frac{1}{a} + \frac{4}{b} + \frac{9}{c} = \frac{1^2}{a} + \frac{2^2}{b} + \frac{3^2}{c}.</cmath> When solving problems with Titu's lemma, the goal is to get perfect squares in the numerator. Now, we can apply the lemma. <cmath>\frac{1^2}{a} + \frac{2^2}{b} + \frac{3^2}{c}</cmath> <cmath>\geq \frac{(1+2+3)^2}{a + b + c}</cmath> <cmath>= \boxed{36}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Example 2=== | ||
+ | Prove [https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Nesbitt%27s_Inequality Nesbitt's Inequality]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Solution==== | ||
+ | For reference, Nesbitt's Inequality states that for positive reals <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math>, <cmath>\frac{a}{b + c} + \frac{b}{a + c} + \frac{c}{a + b} \geq \frac{3}{2}.</cmath> We rewrite as follows. <cmath>\frac{a^2}{ab + ac} + \frac{b^2}{ab + bc} + \frac{c^2}{ac + bc}</cmath> <cmath>\geq \frac{(a + b + c)^2}{2(ab + ac + bc)}</cmath> This is the application of Titu's lemma. <cmath>\geq \frac{3(ab + bc + ac)}{2(ab + ac + bc)}</cmath> This step follows from <math>a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \geq ab + ac + bc \implies (a + b + c)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab + bc + ac) \geq 3(ab + bc + ac)</math>. <cmath>= \frac{3}{2}</cmath> <cmath>\blacksquare</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Example 3=== | ||
+ | Let <math>a_1</math>, <math>a_2</math>, <math>\cdots</math>, <math>a_n</math>, <math>b_1</math>, <math>b_2</math>, <math>\cdots</math>, <math>b_n</math> be positive real numbers such that <math>a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n = b_1 + b_2 + \cdots + b_n</math>. Show that | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{a_1^2}{a_1 + b_1} + \frac{a_2^2}{a_2 + b_2} + \cdots + \frac{a_n^2}{a_n + b_n} \geq \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n}{2} </cmath> ([https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/1991_APMO_Problems/Problem_3 Source]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Solution==== | ||
+ | By Titu's Lemma, | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{a_1^2}{a_1 + b_1} + \frac{a_2^2}{a_2 + b_2} + \cdots + \frac{a_n^2}{a_n + b_n} \geq \frac{(a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n)^2}{a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n + b_1 + b_2 + ... + b_n}</cmath> <cmath>= \frac{(a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n)^2}{2(a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n)}</cmath> This is valid because <math>a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n = b_1 + b_2 + ... + b_n</math> (from the problem statement). <cmath>= \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n}{2}</cmath> <cmath>\blacksquare</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Problems== | ||
+ | ===Introductory=== | ||
+ | *There exists a smallest possible integer <math>N</math> such that <cmath>\frac{(x_1 + 2x_2 + \ldots + 2014x_{2014})^2}{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + \ldots + x_{2014}^2} \leq N</cmath> for all real sequences <math>x_1, x_2, ..., x_{2014}</math>. Find the sum of the digits of <math>N</math>. ([https://brilliant.org/wiki/titus-lemma/ Source]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Intermediate=== | ||
+ | *Let positive real numbers <math>x</math>, <math>y</math>, and <math>z</math> be roots of the polynomial <math>p(x) = x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d</math> for some real <math>b</math>, <math>c</math>, and <math>d</math>. There exists some minimum integer <math>k>1</math> such that the equation <math>h = \sqrt{\frac{x^2yz + 3x^2y + 2x^2z + 6x^2 + xy^2z + 3xy^2 + y^2z + 3y^2 + xyz^2 + 2xz^2 + yz^2 + 2z^2}{xyz + 3xy + 2xz + 6x + yz + 3y + 2z + 6}}</math> has some solution in <math>x</math>, <math>y</math>, and <math>z</math> when <math>h=k</math> and no solutions when <math>h<k</math>. This is the case if and only if <math>p(x)</math> has y-intercept <math>r</math>, where <math>r</math> is some constant. What is the value of <math>r + k</math>? (Source: [https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/User:Cxsmi cxsmi]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Prove that, for all positive real numbers <math>a, b, c,</math> <cmath>\frac{1}{a^3+b^3+abc}+\frac{1}{b^3+c^3+abc}+\frac{1}{a^3+c^3+abc} \le \frac{1}{abc}.</cmath> ([https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/1997_USAMO_Problems/Problem_5 Source]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Olympiad=== | ||
+ | *Let <math>a, b, c</math> be positive real numbers such that <math>abc = 1</math>. Prove that <cmath>\frac{ab}{a^5 + b^5 + ab} + \frac{bc}{b^5 + c^5 + bc} + \frac{ac}{a^5 + c^5 + ac} \leq 1.</cmath> ([https://artofproblemsolving.com/downloads/printable_post_collections/3947 Source]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Let <math>a, b, c</math> be positive real numbers such that <math>abc = 1</math>. Prove that | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{1}{a^3(b+c)} + \frac{1}{b^3(c+a)} + \frac{1}{c^3(a+b)} \geq \frac{3}{2}. </cmath> ([https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/1995_IMO_Problems/Problem_2 Source]) |
Revision as of 16:35, 14 March 2024
Titu's lemma states that:
It is a direct consequence of Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
Equality holds when for .
Titu's lemma is named after Titu Andreescu and is also known as T2 lemma, Engel's form, or Sedrakyan's inequality.
Contents
Examples
Example 1
Given that positive reals , , and are subject to , find the minimum value of . (Source: cxsmi)
Solution
This is a somewhat standard application of Titu's lemma. Notice that When solving problems with Titu's lemma, the goal is to get perfect squares in the numerator. Now, we can apply the lemma.
Example 2
Prove Nesbitt's Inequality.
Solution
For reference, Nesbitt's Inequality states that for positive reals , , and , We rewrite as follows. This is the application of Titu's lemma. This step follows from .
Example 3
Let , , , , , , , be positive real numbers such that . Show that (Source)
Solution
By Titu's Lemma, This is valid because (from the problem statement).
Problems
Introductory
- There exists a smallest possible integer such that for all real sequences . Find the sum of the digits of . (Source)
Intermediate
- Let positive real numbers , , and be roots of the polynomial for some real , , and . There exists some minimum integer such that the equation has some solution in , , and when and no solutions when . This is the case if and only if has y-intercept , where is some constant. What is the value of ? (Source: cxsmi)
- Prove that, for all positive real numbers (Source)
Olympiad
- Let be positive real numbers such that . Prove that (Source)
- Let be positive real numbers such that . Prove that
(Source)