Difference between revisions of "2017 USAJMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution 1) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution 1== | ==Solution 1== | ||
− | The answer is no. Substitute <math>x=a-2,y=b-2,z=c-2</math>. This means that <math>x,y,z\geq -1</math>. Then <cmath>a^2+b^2+c^2+abc-2017=(x+y+z-41)(x+y+z+49)+xyz+12.</cmath> It is given in the problem that this is positive. Now, suppose for the sake of contradiction that <math>xyz+12</math> is a prime. Clearly <math>x,y,z\neq 0</math>. Then we have <cmath>\frac{(x+y+z-41)(x+y+z | + | The answer is no. Substitute <math>x=a-2,y=b-2,z=c-2</math>. This means that <math>x,y,z\geq -1</math>. Then <cmath>a^2+b^2+c^2+abc-2017=(x+y+z-41)(x+y+z+49)+xyz+12.</cmath> It is given in the problem that this is positive. Now, suppose for the sake of contradiction that <math>xyz+12</math> is a prime. Clearly <math>x,y,z\neq 0</math>. Then we have <cmath>\frac{(x+y+z-41)(x+y+z+49)}{xyz+12}</cmath> is an integer greater than or equal to <math>1</math>. This also implies that <math>x+y+z > 41</math>. Since <math>xyz+12</math> is prime, we must have <cmath>xyz+12\mid x+y+z-41\text{ or } xyz+12\mid x+y+z+49.</cmath> Additionally, <math>x, y, z</math> must be odd, so that <math>xyz+12</math> is odd while <math>x+y+z-41,x+y+z+49</math> are even. So, if <cmath>xyz+12\mid x+y+z-41\text{ or }xyz+12\mid x+y+z+49,</cmath> we must have <cmath>2(xyz+12)\leq x+y+z-41\text{ or }2(xyz+12)\leq x+y+z+49.</cmath> Now suppose WLOG that <math>x=-1</math> and <math>y,z>0</math>. Then we must have <math>yz\leq 10</math>, impossible since <math>x+y+z>41</math>. Again, suppose that <math>x,y=-1</math> and <math>z>0</math>. Then we must have <cmath>2(z+12)\leq z-43\text{ or }2(z+12)\leq z+47,</cmath> and since in this case we must have <math>z>43</math>, this is also impossible. |
Then the final case is when <math>x,y,z</math> are positive odd numbers. Note that if <math>xyz>x+y+z</math> for positive integers <math>x,y,z</math>, then <math>abc>a+b+c</math> for positive integers <math>a,b,c</math> where <math>a>x,b>y,c>z</math>. Then we only need to prove the case where <math>x+y+z=43</math>, since <math>x+y+z</math> is odd. Then one of <cmath>2(xyz+12)\leq 2\text{ and/or }2(xyz+12)\leq 92</cmath> is true, implying that <math>xyz\leq -11</math> or <math>xyz\leq 34</math>. But if <math>x+y+z=43</math>, then <math>xyz</math> is minimized when <math>x=1,y=1,z=41</math>, so that <math>xyz\geq 41</math>. This is a contradiction, so we are done. | Then the final case is when <math>x,y,z</math> are positive odd numbers. Note that if <math>xyz>x+y+z</math> for positive integers <math>x,y,z</math>, then <math>abc>a+b+c</math> for positive integers <math>a,b,c</math> where <math>a>x,b>y,c>z</math>. Then we only need to prove the case where <math>x+y+z=43</math>, since <math>x+y+z</math> is odd. Then one of <cmath>2(xyz+12)\leq 2\text{ and/or }2(xyz+12)\leq 92</cmath> is true, implying that <math>xyz\leq -11</math> or <math>xyz\leq 34</math>. But if <math>x+y+z=43</math>, then <math>xyz</math> is minimized when <math>x=1,y=1,z=41</math>, so that <math>xyz\geq 41</math>. This is a contradiction, so we are done. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{USAJMO newbox|year=2017|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{USAJMO newbox|year=2017|num-b=3|num-a=5}} |
Latest revision as of 11:44, 3 April 2024
Problem
Are there any triples of positive integers such that is prime that properly divides the positive number ?
Solution 1
The answer is no. Substitute . This means that . Then It is given in the problem that this is positive. Now, suppose for the sake of contradiction that is a prime. Clearly . Then we have is an integer greater than or equal to . This also implies that . Since is prime, we must have Additionally, must be odd, so that is odd while are even. So, if we must have Now suppose WLOG that and . Then we must have , impossible since . Again, suppose that and . Then we must have and since in this case we must have , this is also impossible. Then the final case is when are positive odd numbers. Note that if for positive integers , then for positive integers where . Then we only need to prove the case where , since is odd. Then one of is true, implying that or . But if , then is minimized when , so that . This is a contradiction, so we are done.
See also
2017 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAJMO Problems and Solutions |