Connection between Inconic and Circumconic
by TelvCohl, Aug 7, 2018, 2:57 PM
Notation : Given a
and a point
Let
be the tripolar of
inconic of
with perspector
circumconic of
with perspector
WRT
respectively. When no confusion can be caused, we abbreviate
as 
Property : Given a
with isogonal conjugate
Then
is tangent to the
if and only if
Proof :
Lemma 1 : Given a
with isogonal conjugate
Then 
Proof : First, when a line
passing through
varies around
the mapping
is a homography between
and
so the mapping sending the harmonic conjugate of
WRT
to the harmonic conjugate of
WRT
is a homography, too
the locus of the tripole of
WRT
is a circumconic of
hence to prove the first part it suffices to prove
when
Let
be the anticevian triangle of
WRT
then
is tangent to
at
respectively. Let
be the cevian triangle of
WRT
and assume
then
lie on the polar
of
WRT
so note that
passes through the harmonic conjugate of
WRT
respectively we get 
For the second part, let
be the intersection of
with
respectively, then
are isogonal conjugate WRT
the isogonal conjugate of
WRT
is tangent to
at
Similarly, we can prove the isogonal conjugate of
WRT
is tangent to
at
respectively, so
is the isogonal conjugate of
WRT

Lemma 2 : Given a
and a point
Then the perspector of the circumconic of
with center
is the isotomcomplement of the anticomplement of
WRT 
Proof : Let
be the anticomplement of
WRT
be the isotomcomplement of
WRT
and
be the reflection of
in
By Lemma 1, it suffices to prove that the isogonal conjugate
of
WRT
lies on
where
is the isogonal conjugate
WRT
Let
be the cevian triangle of
WRT
be the anticevian triangle of
WRT
and
be the intersection of
with
respectively. Note that
are homothetic and
so we conclude that
i.e.

Corollary 2.1 : Given a
and points
Then
is tangent to
if and only if 
Proof : Consider the homology taking
to the centroid of
then the desired result simplified follows from Lemma 2. 
Back to the main problem :
By Lemma 1,
is the isogonal conjugate of
WRT
respectively, so
is tangent to the
if and only if
is tangent to
But from Corollary 2.1 we know
is tangent to
if and only if
so we conclude that
is tangent to the
if and only if














Property : Given a





Proof :
Lemma 1 : Given a



Proof : First, when a line


































For the second part, let


















Lemma 2 : Given a






Proof : Let






























Corollary 2.1 : Given a





Proof : Consider the homology taking



Back to the main problem :
By Lemma 1,














This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by TelvCohl, Feb 14, 2020, 10:37 AM