[/quote]
,
and 
Prove that
Let 
and 
Let 
and 
Let 
and 
Show that![\[\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{1+\sum_{j\neq k}x_j}\le\frac n{1+(n-1)\sqrt[n]{x_1x_2\cdots x_n}}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/4/c/e4ca07e5003fad8937af3c44dcbc9906fa48e5b4.png)
with 
the following inequality holds:
Prove that
,
,
,![\[ \frac {1}{a^3 + b^3 + abc} + \frac {1}{b^3 + c^3 + abc} + \frac {1}{c^3 + a^3 + abc} \leq \frac {1}{abc}
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/a/9/fa964e29de91f0e2f3cb32e335a52d4521bc38fd.png)
.![\[ \frac {1}{a^{3}\left(b + c\right)} + \frac {1}{b^{3}\left(c + a\right)} + \frac {1}{c^{3}\left(a + b\right)}\geq \frac {3}{2}.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/2/9/b295b0b2a765e41a639657e13b724c60323fa208.png)
.
min
be a triangle. Let 
be the feet of the altitudes from 
respectively. Let 
be the projections of 
.
.
be real numbers such that ![\[ \frac{1}{x^2-1} + \frac{1}{y^2-1} + \frac{1}{z^2-1} = 1. \]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/f/5/8f5d49c9b44e3db3cd85fea7b6521e1dc02d4269.png)
Prove that ![\[ \frac{1}{x+1} + \frac{1}{y+1} + \frac{1}{z+1} \le 1. \]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/0/4/c0438d6eba686d0a11fd4decb4afa9a14aa50bac.png)
are non-negative integers.
.
and 
be two sequences defined by:![\[
a_{n+1} = \frac{1 + a_n + a_n b_n}{b_n} \quad \text{and} \quad b_{n+1} = \frac{1 + b_n + a_n b_n}{a_n}
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/a/0/aa0a5c5acedc990eb345fb50a8395db05307a4e7.png)
for all 
,
and 
.![\[
a_{2024} < 5.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/c/a/fca6e6630f33429b5a7ea867d639a2e29ff881f2.png)
children, no two of the same height, lined up. Let us call a pair of different children 
good if between them there is no child whose height is greater than the height of one of 
and 
,
are considered the same pair.)
satisfy 
prove in equality.
Y by
Given a finite set 
, and the pairwise comparison of the sums of elements of all its subsets (with the empty set defined as having a sum of 0), which amounts to 
inequalities, these given comparisons satisfy the following three constraints:
1. The sum of elements of any non-empty subset is greater than 0.
2. For any two subsets, removing or adding the same elements does not change their comparison of the sums of elements.
3. For any two disjoint subsets
and 
, if the sums of elements of and are greater than those of subsets 
and 
respectively, then the sum of elements of the union 
is greater than that of 
.
The question is: Does there necessarily exist a positive solution
that satisfies all these conditions?
, and the pairwise comparison of the sums of elements of all its subsets (with the empty set defined as having a sum of 0), which amounts to 
inequalities, these given comparisons satisfy the following three constraints:1. The sum of elements of any non-empty subset is greater than 0.
2. For any two subsets, removing or adding the same elements does not change their comparison of the sums of elements.
3. For any two disjoint subsets
and 
, if the sums of elements of and are greater than those of subsets 
and 
respectively, then the sum of elements of the union 
is greater than that of 
.The question is: Does there necessarily exist a positive solution
that satisfies all these conditions?This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by bobaboby1, Mar 12, 2025, 3:28 PM
Reason: Wrong typing.
Reason: Wrong typing.
