Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Sequence and prime factors
USJL   7
N 2 minutes ago by MathLuis
Source: 2025 Taiwan TST Round 2 Independent Study 1-N
Let $a_0,a_1,\ldots$ be a sequence of positive integers with $a_0=1$, $a_1=2$ and
\[a_n = a_{n-1}^{a_{n-1}a_{n-2}}-1\]for all $n\geq 2$. Show that if $p$ is a prime less than $2^k$ for some positive integer $k$, then there exists $n\leq k+1$ such that $p\mid a_n$.
7 replies
USJL
Mar 26, 2025
MathLuis
2 minutes ago
number theory
Levieee   2
N 8 minutes ago by DTforever
Idk where it went wrong, marks was deducted for this solution
$\textbf{Question}$
Show that for a fixed pair of distinct positive integers \( a \) and \( b \), there cannot exist infinitely many \( n \in \mathbb{Z} \) such that
\[
\sqrt{n + a} + \sqrt{n + b} \in \mathbb{Z}.
\]
$\textbf{Solution}$

Let
\[
x = \sqrt{n + a} + \sqrt{n + b} \in \mathbb{N}.
\]
Then,
\[
x^2 = (\sqrt{n + a} + \sqrt{n + b})^2 = (n + a) + (n + b) + 2\sqrt{(n + a)(n + b)}.
\]So:
\[
x^2 = 2n + a + b + 2\sqrt{(n + a)(n + b)}.
\]
Therefore,
\[
\sqrt{(n + a)(n + b)} \in \mathbb{N}.
\]
Let
\[
(n + a)(n + b) = k^2.
\]Assume \( n + a \neq n + b \). Then we have:
\[
n + a \mid k \quad \text{and} \quad k \mid n + b,
\]or it could also be that \( k \mid n + a \quad \text{and} \quad n + b \mid k \).

Without loss of generality, we take the first case:
\[
(n + a)k_1 = k \quad \text{and} \quad kk_2 = n + b.
\]
Thus,
\[
k_1 k_2 = \frac{n + b}{n + a}.
\]
Since \( k_1 k_2 \in \mathbb{N} \), we have:
\[
k_1 k_2 = 1 + \frac{b - a}{n + a}.
\]
For infinitely many \( n \), \( \frac{b - a}{n + a} \) must be an integer, which is not possible.

Therefore, there cannot be infinitely many such \( n \).
2 replies
Levieee
an hour ago
DTforever
8 minutes ago
powers sums and triangular numbers
gaussious   4
N 15 minutes ago by kiyoras_2001
prove 1^k+2^k+3^k + \cdots + n^k \text{is divisible by } \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \text{when} k \text{is odd}
4 replies
gaussious
Yesterday at 1:00 PM
kiyoras_2001
15 minutes ago
complex bashing in angles??
megahertz13   2
N 20 minutes ago by ali123456
Source: 2013 PUMAC FA2
Let $\gamma$ and $I$ be the incircle and incenter of triangle $ABC$. Let $D$, $E$, $F$ be the tangency points of $\gamma$ to $\overline{BC}$, $\overline{CA}$, $\overline{AB}$ and let $D'$ be the reflection of $D$ about $I$. Assume $EF$ intersects the tangents to $\gamma$ at $D$ and $D'$ at points $P$ and $Q$. Show that $\angle DAD' + \angle PIQ = 180^\circ$.
2 replies
megahertz13
Nov 5, 2024
ali123456
20 minutes ago
OMOUS-2025 (Team Competition) P6
enter16180   1
N Today at 2:38 PM by MS_asdfgzxcvb
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Let $f:[-1,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function such that $\int_{-1}^{1} x^{2} f(x) d x=0$. Prove that

$$
8 \int_{-1}^{1} f^{2}(x) d x \geq\left(\int_{-1}^{1} 3 f(x) d x\right)^{2}
$$
1 reply
enter16180
Today at 12:03 PM
MS_asdfgzxcvb
Today at 2:38 PM
2025 OMOUS Problem 2
enter16180   1
N Today at 1:32 PM by Figaro
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Compute

$$
\prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(2 n)^{4}-1}{(2 n+1)^{4}-1} \frac{n^{2}}{(n+1)^{2}} .
$$
1 reply
enter16180
Today at 11:44 AM
Figaro
Today at 1:32 PM
Integrate exp(x-10cosh(2x))
EthanWYX2009   1
N Today at 1:16 PM by GreenKeeper
Source: 2024 May taca-14
Determine the value of
\[I=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{x-10\cosh (2x)}\mathrm dx.\]
1 reply
EthanWYX2009
Today at 5:20 AM
GreenKeeper
Today at 1:16 PM
Linear Space Decomposition
Suan_16   0
Today at 12:46 PM
Let $A$ be a linear transformation on linear space $V$ satisfying:$$A^l=0$$but $$A^{l-1} \neq 0$$, and $V_0$ is the eigensubspace of eigenvalue $0$. Prove that $V$ can be decomposed to $dim V_0$ $A$-cyclic subspace's direct sum.

Click to reveal hidden text
0 replies
Suan_16
Today at 12:46 PM
0 replies
The Relationship Between Function and Ordering Relation
mathservant   0
Today at 12:35 PM
I think, the necessary and sufficient condition for a function to induce an ordering relation (specifically a partial or total order) on its domain is that it must be compatible with the ordering defined on the codomain (i.e., it must be order-preserving).

How can we express this necessary and sufficient condition more clearly? Thank you.
0 replies
mathservant
Today at 12:35 PM
0 replies
Jordan form and canonical base of a matrix
And1viper   1
N Today at 12:30 PM by Suan_16
Find the Jordan form and a canonical basis of the following matrix $A$ over the field $Z_5$:
$$A = \begin{bmatrix}
    2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\
    0 & 4 & 0 & 3 & 4 \\
    0 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 2 \\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 1 \\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2
  \end{bmatrix}
$$
1 reply
And1viper
Feb 26, 2023
Suan_16
Today at 12:30 PM
OMOUS-2025 (Team Competition) P10
enter16180   0
Today at 12:11 PM
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Let $f: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ and $g: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow\{A, G\}$ functions are given with following properties:
(a) $f$ is strict increasing and for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$ there holds $f(n)=\frac{f(n-1)+f(n+1)}{2}$ or $f(n)=\sqrt{f(n-1) \cdot f(n+1)}$.
(b) $g(n)=A$ if $f(n)=\frac{f(n-1)+f(n+1)}{2}$ holds and $g(n)=G$ if $f(n)=\sqrt{f(n-1) \cdot f(n+1)}$ holds.

Prove that there exist $n_{0} \in \mathbb{N}$ and $d \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n \geq n_{0}$ we have $g(n+d)=g(n)$
0 replies
enter16180
Today at 12:11 PM
0 replies
OMOUS-2025 (Team Competition) P9
enter16180   0
Today at 12:09 PM
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Let $\left\{a_{i}\right\}_{i=1}^{3}$ and $\left\{b_{i}\right\}_{i=1}^{3}$ be nonnegative numbers and $C:=\left\{c_{i j}\right\}_{i, j=1}^{3}$ be a nonnegative symmetric matrix such that $c_{11}=c_{22}=c_{33}=0$. Given $d>0$, consider the quadratic form

$$
Q(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{3} a_{i} x_{i}^{2}+\sum_{i=1}^{3} a_{i}\left(d-x_{i}\right)^{2}+\sum_{i, j=1}^{3} c_{i j}\left(x_{i}-x_{j}\right)^{2}, \quad x=\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\right) \in R^{3} .
$$Assume that

$$
\sum_{i=1}^{3} a_{i}>0, \quad \sum_{i=1}^{3} b_{i}>0,
$$
and for any $i, j$ there exists $m_{i j}>0$ such that $(i, j)$-the entry of the $m_{i j}$-th power $C^{m_{i j}}$ of $C$ is positive. Show that $Q$ has a unique minimum and the minimum lies in the open cube $(0, d)^{3}$ in $R^{3}$.
0 replies
enter16180
Today at 12:09 PM
0 replies
OMOUS-2025 (Team Competition) P8
enter16180   0
Today at 12:07 PM
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Find all functions $f:\left(\frac{\pi}{2025}, \frac{2024}{20225} \pi\right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that for all $x, y \in\left(\frac{\pi}{2025}, \frac{2024}{20225} \pi\right)$, we have

$$
\sin y f(x)-\sin x f(y) \leq \sqrt[2025]{(x-y)^{20226}}
$$
0 replies
enter16180
Today at 12:07 PM
0 replies
OMOUS-2025 (Team Competition) P7
enter16180   0
Today at 12:04 PM
Source: Open Mathematical Olympiad for University Students (OMOUS-2025)
Let $R$ be a ring not assumed to have an identity, with the following properties:
(i) There is an element of $R$ that is not nilpotent.
(ii) If $x_{1}, \ldots, x_{2024}$ are nonzero elements of $R$, then $\sum_{j=1}^{2024} x_{j}^{2025}=0$.

Show that $R$ is a division ring, that is, the nonzero elements of R form a group under multiplication.
0 replies
enter16180
Today at 12:04 PM
0 replies
Problem 5 (Second Day)
darij grinberg   77
N Feb 24, 2025 by v_Enhance
Source: IMO 2004 Athens
In a convex quadrilateral $ABCD$, the diagonal $BD$ bisects neither the angle $ABC$ nor the angle $CDA$. The point $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ and satisfies \[\angle PBC=\angle DBA\quad\text{and}\quad \angle PDC=\angle BDA.\] Prove that $ABCD$ is a cyclic quadrilateral if and only if $AP=CP$.
77 replies
darij grinberg
Jul 13, 2004
v_Enhance
Feb 24, 2025
Problem 5 (Second Day)
G H J
Source: IMO 2004 Athens
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#68 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
This took too long...

Suppose $ABCD$ is cyclic, inscribed in $\omega.$ Let $B_1=\overline{BP}\cap\omega$ and $D_1=\overline{DP}\cap\omega.$ Notice $\angle DBA=\angle CBB_1$ so $AD=BC_1$ and $\overline{B_1D}\parallel\overline{AC}.$ Similarly, $\overline{BD_1}\parallel\overline{AC}.$ Since $P$ is the center of cyclic trapezoid $BDB_1D_1,$ it lies on the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{BD_1}$ which is equivalent to the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{AC}.$

Suppose $PA=PC.$ Construct $B_2$ on $\overline{BP}$ such that $PB_2=PD.$ Similarly construct $D_2$ on $\overline{DP}$ such that $PD_2=PB.$ Notice $\measuredangle BPC=\measuredangle APD$ as $A,C$ are isogonal conjugates wrt $\triangle PBD$ so $$\measuredangle B_2PC=\measuredangle BPC=\measuredangle APD$$and $\triangle PDA\cong\triangle PB_2C.$ Hence, $$\angle BB_2C=\angle ADP=\angle BAC$$and $ABCB_2$ is cyclic isosceles trapezoid. Also, $\angle B_2CA=\angle CAD$ and $CB_2=AD$ so $\overline{AC}\parallel\overline{B_2D}.$ Similarly, $ABD_2C$ is cyclic isosceles trapezoid and so $BDB_2D_2$ is cyclic. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1696 posts
#69
Y by
jesus

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/925784397469331477/952714711261147176/Screen_Shot_2022-03-13_at_4.47.55_PM.png?width=1356&height=1170

Suppose $ABCD$ is cyclic. Let $PB$ intersect the circumcircle of $ABCD$ at $K.$ Let $DP$ intersect the circumcircle of $ABCD$ at $J.$ Note that $\angle PBD=\angle ABP$ so $CD=AK.$ This implies $KD||AC.$ Similarly, $BJ||AC.$ $DKJB$ is a cyclic trapezoid so $P$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $KD.$ Thus it must also lie on the perpendicular bisector of $AC.$

Suppose $P$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of $AC.$ Then, let $\ell$ be the perpendicular bisector of $AC.$ Let $K,J$ be reflections of $D,B$ over $\ell$ respectively. Note that since $P$ is on $\ell,$ $DP=PK,BP=PJ.$ Since $\triangle CDB$ is a reflection of $\triangle KAB$ over $\ell$ we have $\angle KBA=\angle CBD=\angle KJA$ so $KAJB$ is cyclic. Also, $\angle AKJ=\angle CDB=\angle ABJ.$ Thus, $AKDJ$ is cyclic. This implies $K,J$ are on $(ABD).$ $BD=KJ$ so $BDKJ$ is isosceles trapezoid. Thus, $\ell$ is a diameter of the circle $(ABD)$ so the reflection of $A$ over $\ell,$ $C$ is also on that circle. Thus, $ABCD$ cyclic.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
BVKRB-
322 posts
#70
Y by
Really good problem! This is probably one of the shorter solutions in this thread (I also notice that @above @2above have done similar (almost same) stuff). Also I found this solution really fast as I didn't want to use tools like protractors to construct isogonal conjugates and instead used isosceles trapezoid which miraculously lead to a clean solution.

(i) Assume $ABCD$ is cyclic and $\odot(ABCD) = \Omega$
Let $BP \cap \Omega = X$ and $DP \cap \Omega = Y$
Notice that $ADXC$ and $ABYC$ are both isosceles trapezoids and therefore $$\widehat{BD} = \widehat{AD}+\widehat{AB}=\widehat{CX}+\widehat{CY}= \widehat{XY} \implies \angle XDY = \angle BXD \implies PD=PX \implies \triangle APD \cong \triangle CPX \implies AP = CP \ \blacksquare$$(ii) Assume $AP=CP$
Let $X$ be a point such that $ADXC$ is an isosceles trapezoid and let $XP \cap \odot(ADC) = B'$, this immediately gives us that $\angle PBC=\angle DBA$
It is obvious that $\triangle APD \cong \triangle CPX$ which implies $$\angle ADP = \angle CXP = \angle CXB' = \angle CDB' \implies \angle ADB = \angle CDP \implies B=B' \implies B \in \odot(ADC) \ \blacksquare$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CyclicISLscelesTrapezoid
372 posts
#71 • 2 Y
Y by megarnie, ike.chen
Notice that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to $\triangle BDP$, so the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$ bisects $\angle APC$.

Only if direction: Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $ABCD$. By angle chasing, $BPOD$ is cyclic. Since $OB=OD$, the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$ passes through $O$. Since $OA=OC$ and $O$ lies on the angle bisector of $\angle APC$, either $PA=PC$ or $OAPC$ is cyclic. However, the latter is absurd because $P$ would have to be the intersection of the circumcircles of $AOC$ and $BOD$, which is outside of the circumcircle of $ABCD$ (and thus outside of $ABCD$).

If direction: Fix point $A$. Notice that the function taking points $A'$ on $\overline{AB}$ to the corresponding point $P$ is injective, so we must have $A$ such that $ABCD$ is cyclic.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ru83n05
170 posts
#72
Y by
Let $l$ be the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ and $X=l\cap BD$.

Part 1: If $\Gamma=(ABCD)$ is cyclic, then define $\{N, M\}=l\cap \Gamma$.
If we have two distinct points $P_1, P_2\in l$ such that $\angle P_1DA=\angle BDA$ and $\angle P_2BA=\angle DBC$, then notice that
$$(X, P_1; N, M)=-1=(X, P_2; N, M)\implies P_1=P_2$$so one direction is completed

Part 2: Now assume $P\in l$. Redefine $\{N, M\}=l\cap (CDA)$. $B, D$ both belong to the $D$ - apolonius circle in $\triangle DPX$, which has diameter $NM$. So $\angle NBM=90=\angle NDA$ and thus $(NMDB)$ is also cylcic. Hence $(ABCD)$ is cyclic.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ike.chen
1162 posts
#74
Y by
Let $A_1$ denote the reflection of $A$ in $BD$, the midpoints of $A_1C$ and $A_1P$ be $M$ and $N$ respectively, and the pedal triangle of $A_1$ wrt $BCD$ be $XYZ$. It's easy to see $A_1YBZ$, $A_1ZCX$, and $A_1XDY$ are cyclic with diameters $A_1B$, $A_1C$, and $A_1D$ respectively.

Notice $$\angle PBC = \angle DBA = \angle DBA_1$$and $$\angle PDC = \angle BDA = \angle BDA_1.$$Now, because $ABCD$ is convex, it follows that $A_1$ and $P$ are isogonal conjugates wrt $BCD$. Thus, a well-known lemma implies $N$ is the center of $(XYZ)$.

By a homothety centered at $A_1$, we know $PA = PC$ holds if and only if $NY = NM$, which is equivalent to $M \in (XYZ)$. Now, since $A_1ZCX$ is centered at $M$, $$\angle XMZ = 2 \angle XCZ = 2 \angle BCD.$$In addition, we have $$\angle XYZ = \angle XYA_1 + \angle A_1YZ = \angle XDA_1 + \angle A_1BZ$$$$= \angle PDB + \angle DBP = 180^{\circ} - \angle BPD.$$Thus, $XYZM$ is cyclic if and only if $\angle BPD = 2 \angle BCD$.

Now, observe that $$\angle BAD = 180^{\circ} - \angle DBA - \angle BDA = 180^{\circ} - \angle PBC - \angle PDC$$$$= \angle BCD + \angle DBP + \angle BDP = \angle BCD + (180^{\circ} - \angle BPD).$$It follows that $ABCD$ is cyclic if and only if $\angle BPD = 2 \angle BCD$, which finishes. $\blacksquare$


Remark: Solving USA TST 2010/7 and reading this article by Evan Chen helped me with this question.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fclvbfm934
759 posts
#75
Y by
We shall start with proving $AP = CP \Rightarrow ABCD$ is cyclic, as this is the harder portion.

The key is to focus on $PBD$ as the reference triangle. Then, we see that $BA$ and $BC$ are isogonal, as well as $DC$ and $DA$. Thus, $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates of each other (with respect to $\triangle PBD$). In the diagram below, I've extended PC and marked the equal angles red, in case it is confusing what it means for $PA$ and $PC$ to be isogonal in this context.

A simple angle chase demonstrates that the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ (shown in dashed orange) is the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$. Thus, this perpendicular bisector of $AC$ must pass through $I_B$ and $I_D$, the $B-$ and $D-$ excenters, respectively. Now comes the key claim:

Claim: $BCI_BAI_D$ and $DCI_DAI_B$ are both cyclic.

Proof: We shall show $BCI_BA$ is cyclic, as the others are analogous. Observe that $BI_B$ is the angle bisector of $\angle PBD$, but since $\angle PBC = \angle DBA$, we get that
$BI_B$ is also the angle bisector of $\angle ABC$! Thus, $I_B$ is the intersection of the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ and the angle bisector of $\angle ABC$, which is well known to be the arc midpoint of $\widehat{AC}$ on $(ABC)$, unless $BC = BA$. But we know $BC = BA$ is impossible, as that would imply $DB$ bisects $\angle CDA$.

A similar argument can be done to get $I_D$ lies on $(ABC)$: $BI_D$ is the external angle bisector of $\angle ABC$, and $I_DA = I_DC$, so $I_D$ must be the arc midpoint of $\widehat{ABC}$. $\Box$

Using the claim, both $B$ and $D$ lie on circumcircle $(ACI_BI_D)$, so $ABCD$ is cyclic as desired.
https://i.ibb.co/fDGbvRR/2004-imo-prob5.png

Now we prove $ABCD$ cyclic $\Rightarrow AP = CP$.

Let $X = BP \cap (ABCD)$ and $Y = DP \cap (ABCD)$. Because $\angle DBA = \angle XBC$, we have $ACDX$ is an isoceles trapezoid, so $DX || AC$. Similarly, we have $BY || AC$. Putting these together, we have $BY || DX$, so $BYXD$ is an isoceles trapezoid as well. This means that $BY, AC,$ and $DX$ share a perpendicular bisector.

Furthermore, we know that $P$, the intersection of diagonals of isoceles trapezoid $BYXD$, must lie on the perpendicular bisector of $BY$ and $XD$. Thus, $P$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ as well, proving $PA = PC$.
https://i.ibb.co/k0j6tg5/image.png
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math_comb01
662 posts
#76
Y by
Cute and easy problem! Sketch
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_comb01, Jun 6, 2023, 6:43 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lpieleanu
2905 posts
#77 • 1 Y
Y by huashiliao2020
Solved with huashiliao2020.

forward direction

backward direction
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by lpieleanu, Jul 20, 2023, 12:29 PM
Reason: typo
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#78 • 1 Y
Y by CT17
Very conceptual problem demonstrating how one deals with isogonal conjugates.

For one direction, let $ABCD$ be cyclic and denote $X = \overline{BP} \cap (ABCD)$, $Y = \overline{DP} \cap (ABCD)$. By the angle conditions, $ADXC$ and $ABYC$ are isosceles trapezoids. Thus it follows that $\overline{BY}, \overline{DX}, \overline{AC}$ share a perpendicular bisector, and the result follows.

For the other direction, notice that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to triangle $BPD$. Construct $X$ on $\overline{BP}$ such that $XP=DP$ and $Y$ similarly. The triangles $APB$ and $CPY$ are congruent as $\angle APB = \angle CPY$, thus $\overline{BY} \parallel \overline{AC} \parallel \overline{DX}$. On the other hand, $\angle CBX = \angle DBA = \angle CYX$, hence $BYCX$ is cyclic, and similarly $DYCX$ is cyclic. It follows that all the points $A, B, Y, C, X, D$ are concyclic, as needed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#79 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
whoops

I first prove that if $ABCD$ is cyclic then $AP=CP$. The condition implies that $\overline{BD}$ and $\overline{BP}$ are isogonal in $\triangle BAC$, and $\overline{DB}$ and $\overline{DP}$ are isogonal in $\triangle DAC$. Let $B'$ and $D'$ be points such that $BB'AC$ and $DD'AC$ are isosceles trapezoids (with $\overline{BB'} \parallel \overline{DD'} \parallel \overline{AC}$), which also lie on $(ABCD)$. Then $B,P,D'$ are collinear, as are $D,P,B'$, so in fact $P=\overline{BD'} \cap \overline{DB'}$ which lies on the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{AC}$ by symmetry.

I will now prove that we don't need to consider the other direction! We use the following claim.

Claim: Let $X,Y,Z$ be points and $\ell$ be a line. Then either there are at most two points $R \in \ell$ such that $\ell$ and $\overline{RZ}$ are isogonal in $\triangle RXY$, or (algebraically) the isogonality always holds.
Proof: We use complex numbers with $\ell$ being the real axis (WLOG), denoting $X=x$ etc. The isogonality condition is equivalent to
$$\frac{r-x}{r-0} \div \frac{r-z}{r-y} \in \mathbb{R} \iff \frac{(r-x)(r-y)}{r-z} \in \mathbb{R} \iff (r-x)(r-y)(r-\overline{z})=(r-\overline{x})(r-\overline{y})(r-z).$$Upon expansion and simplification this means that any $r$ is the root of a fixed quadratic (in terms of $x,y,z$). If the quadratic is identically zero then the isogonality is true for all $P \in \ell$, otherwise it has at most two solutions. $\blacksquare$

Fix a choice of $B,A,C$, as well as line $\overline{BD}$; note the convex condition implies $\overline{BD}$ intersects segment $\overline{AC}$. Then if $AP=CP$, $P$ is fixed as well, since $\overline{BP}$ is a fixed line as $D$ varies. Now apply the claim with $\ell=\overline{BD}$ and $X=A,Y=C,Z=P$. Obviously we can't have $\overline{AP} \parallel \overline{CP}$, so at least one of them is not parallel to $\ell$; WLOG $\overline{CP}$. Then if $R$ is placed at $\overline{CP} \cap \ell$, then the isogonality does not hold, since $A \not \in \overline{BD}$ so $\angle (\overline{AR},\ell) \neq 0$ but $\angle (\overline{CR},\ell)=0$.

Hence the "at most two" part of the claim applies. Since $B$ and $\ell \cap (ABC) \neq B$ are valid positions for $R$ in the language of the claim, the first being tautological and the second being true due to the first part of this solution, it follows that $D$ must be placed at the second intersection of $\ell$ with $(ABC)$, whence $ABCD$ is cyclic. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lelouchvigeo
179 posts
#80
Y by
This took soo long.
The problem is quite easy but i don't know why.
The case where $ABCD$ is cyclic is easy.
IF $AP=PC$ , then construct $D'$ such that $ADD'C$ is cyclic. Let $D'P$ intersect again at$ B'$.
Then by angle chasing B=B'
We are done
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by lelouchvigeo, Jan 15, 2024, 6:55 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheHazard
93 posts
#81
Y by
Why consider the other direction when you can just not !!

By shifting $D$ along $BD$, it follows that at most one value of $D$ on a fixed line works as the other line is fixed. As such, showing the result for cyclic $ABCD$ finishes.
Let $F$ be the midpoint of $\widehat{ADC}$ and $E$ the midpoint of $\widehat{ABC}$. It remains to show that $P, E, F$ are collinear.
Note that $\angle BPF = \angle BFP + \angle PBF = \angle BFE + \angle FBD$ $\angle EPD = \angle PED + \angle EDP = \angle FED + \angle BDE$.
As such, it follows that $\angle BPF + \angle EPD = 2 \angle BDE + 2 \angle FBD = \angle BDP + PBD = BPD$ which finishes.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
p.lazarov06
55 posts
#82
Y by
Claim

$$\angle APD+\angle CPD=180^{\circ}$$

Proof Let $X$ be a point on $BD$ such that $\angle BAX=\angle CAD$. Now we can see that $P$ and $Q$ are isogonaly conjugate with respect to three of the four angle, so $X$ and $P$ are isogonaly conjugate with respect to $ABCD$. \end{proof}



Now let we start with the angle chase. $o$ means orange, $g$ means green and $x$ and $y$ are like the diagram that is (hopefully) attached.



$$\angle APB = 180^{\circ}-x-o-g=180^{\circ}-CPD=PDC+PCD=ADB+ACD-y=180^{\circ}-BAD-y=180^{\circ}-g-o-x$$

So this means that $x=y$, or $PA=PC$. The opposite direction is similar.
Attachments:
diagram.pdf (6kb)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6872 posts
#83 • 1 Y
Y by anantmudgal09
Is this problem possible with only isogonal conjugates and angle chasing? I tried for a while, until I got frustrated and took the easy way out:

More than 11 years later I attempted to solve the problem again without taking the easy way out, using the method suggested in post #82 above. This solution is below. It shows that this problem can be a lot more subtle than people expect, in that an attempt to solve the problem using only angles can require a separate analysis of the case where $P$ is on line $AC$; equivalently, $ABCD$ is a so-called quasi-harmonic quadrilateral. I do not have the patience to check whether various solutions above miss this case, but I suspect a few of them do ;)

The solution consists of two parts. The first part is that by angle chasing, we will prove that \[ \measuredangle PAC = \measuredangle ACP \iff \measuredangle BAC + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ADB = 0. \qquad (\spadesuit). \]A careless reader would be forgiven for thinking that $(\spadesuit)$ implies the problem or at least one direction, but it turns out the situation is more subtle. The second part analyzes the angle conditions more carefully and provides a complete proof.
Proof of the equivalence $(\spadesuit)$ by angle chasing. We start with the following unconditional claim, valid for any quadrilateral.
Claim: [Isogonal conjugation] Let $ABCD$ and $P$ be as in the problem statement. Then $\measuredangle APB + \measuredangle CPD = 180^{\circ}$.
Proof. The angles in the statement imply that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to $\triangle PBC$. Thus, lines $PA$ and $PC$ are isogonal with respect to $\angle BPC$, as needed. $\blacksquare$

[asy]
import geometry;
size(9cm); pair A = (-0.50099,1.69422); pair B = (-1.8,-0.6); pair C = (0.09182,-1.79600); pair D = (1.55802,-0.60384); pair P = (-1.04359,-0.19363);
draw(circumcircle(A,B,C), gray+dashed); filldraw(A--B--C--D--cycle, invisible, black); draw(B--D); draw(A--C);
draw(C--P--A, brown); draw(B--P--D, gray);
markangle(radius=15, n=2, P, A, C, red, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, red)); markangle(radius=15, n=2, A, C, P, red, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, red)); markangle(radius=10, n=3, A, P, B, deepgreen, StickIntervalMarker(1,2, deepgreen)); markangle(radius=10, n=3, C, P, D, deepgreen, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, deepgreen)); markangle(radius=12, n=1, B, A, C, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, C, B, D, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, D, C, A, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, A, D, B, blue);
dot("$A$", A, dir(A)); dot("$B$", B, dir(B)); dot("$C$", C, dir(C)); dot("$D$", D, dir(D)); dot("$P$", P, dir(45));
[/asy]
Next we rewrite the two angles $\measuredangle APB$ and $\measuredangle CPD$ in the claim (colored green with three rings) so that their only dependence on $P$ is through the angles $\measuredangle PAC$ and $\measuredangle CAP$ (colored red with two rings), as follows: \begin{align*} -\measuredangle APB &= \measuredangle PBA + \measuredangle BAP = \measuredangle PBA + (\measuredangle BAC - \measuredangle PAC) \\ &= \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC - \measuredangle PAC \\ -\measuredangle CPD &= \measuredangle PDC + \measuredangle DCP = \measuredangle PDC + (\measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ACP) \\ &= \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ACP. \end{align*}Since the claim says $\measuredangle APB + \measuredangle CPD = 0$, summing lets us finally rewrite $\measuredangle PAC - \measuredangle APC$ in terms of only $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$: \begin{align*} 0 &= (\measuredangle ACP - \measuredangle PAC) + \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC \\ \implies \measuredangle PAC - \measuredangle ACP &= \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC. \end{align*}These four latter angles are colored blue with one ring in the figure. This proves $(\spadesuit)$.
Quasi-harmonic quadrilaterals. To interpret the condition $(\spadesuit)$, we define a new term: a quadrilateral $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if $AB \cdot CD = BC \cdot DA$. (See IMO 2018/6 for another problem involving quasi-harmonic quadrilaterals.) The following two lemmas show why this condition is relevant:
Lemma: The condition \[ \measuredangle BAC + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ADB = 0 \]is equivalent to $ABCD$ being either cyclic or quasi-harmonic or both.
Proof. This is proved by inversion at $A$; details to be added later. (See also https://problems.ru/view_problem_details_new.php?id=116602.) $\blacksquare$

Lemma: Quadrilateral $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if and only if $P$ lies on line $AC$.
Proof. Let $X = \overline{BD} \cap \overline{AC}$. If the isogonal of line $BD$ with respect to $\angle B$ meets line $AC$ at $Y$, then $\frac{AX}{CX} \frac{AY}{CY} = \left( \frac{BA}{BC} \right)^2$. Similarly if the isogonal to $\angle D$ meets line $AC$ at $Y'$, then $\frac{AX}{CX} \frac{AY'}{CY'} = \left( \frac{DA}{DC} \right)^2$. Hence $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if and only if $Y = Y'$ (that is, $Y=Y'=P$). $\blacksquare$

Wrap-up. We now show that $PA = PC$ if and only if $ABCD$ is cyclic by cases on whether $P$ lies on $\overline{AC}$.
  • If $ABCD$ is not quasi-harmonic, then $(\spadesuit)$ implies the problem statement immediately. Indeed, $\measuredangle PAC = \measuredangle ACP$ if and only if $PA = PC$ (as $\triangle PAC$ is not degenerate) and the second lemma turns our angle condition into $ABCD$ cyclic.
  • Now assume $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic and $P$ lies on line $AC$. We ignore $(\spadesuit)$. Instead, note that if $ABCD$ is also cyclic then $\overline{BD}$ is a symmedian of $\triangle ABC$ and hence $P$ is the midpoint. Conversely, suppose we know $\overline{BD}$ is a symmedian of $\triangle ABC$. Let $D' \neq B$ be the point for which $ABCD'$ is cyclic and harmonic; then $B$, $D$, $D'$ are collinear and $\frac{BD}{CD} = \frac{BD'}{CD'} = \frac{BA}{CA}$. So $D' = D$ (the corresponding Apollonian circle only meets line $BD$ twice), as needed.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by v_Enhance, Feb 24, 2025, 9:46 PM
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a