ka May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.
Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.
Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Many of our AoPS Community members share their knowledge with their peers in a variety of ways, ranging from creating mock contests to creating real contests to writing handouts to hosting sessions as part of our partnership with schoolhouse.world.
To facilitate students in these efforts, we have created a new Peer-to-Peer Programs forum. With the creation of this forum, we are starting a new process for those of you who want to advertise your efforts. These advertisements and ensuing discussions have been cluttering up some of the forums that were meant for other purposes, so we’re gathering these topics in one place. This also allows students to find new peer-to-peer learning opportunities without having to poke around all the other forums.
To announce your program, or to invite others to work with you on it, here’s what to do:
1) Post a new topic in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum. This will be the discussion thread for your program.
2) Post a single brief post in this thread that links the discussion thread of your program in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum.
Please note that we’ll move or delete any future advertisement posts that are outside the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum, as well as any posts in this topic that are not brief announcements of new opportunities. In particular, this topic should not be used to discuss specific programs; those discussions should occur in topics in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum.
Your post in this thread should have what you're sharing (class, session, tutoring, handout, math or coding game/other program) and a link to the thread in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum, which should have more information (like where to find what you're sharing).
The purpose of this post is to lay out a few suggestions about what kind of posts work well for the C&P forum. Except in a few cases these are mostly meant to be "suggestions based on historical trends" rather than firm hard rules; we may eventually replace this with an actual list of firm rules but that requires admin approval :) That said, if you post something in the "discouraged" category, you should not be totally surprised if it gets locked; they are discouraged exactly because past experience shows they tend to go badly.
----------------------------- 1. Program discussion: Allowed
If you have questions about specific camps or programs (e.g. which classes are good at X camp?), these questions fit well here. Many camps/programs have specific sub-forums too but we understand a lot of them are not active.
----------------------------- 2. Results discussion: Allowed
You can make threads about e.g. how you did on contests (including AMC), though on AMC day when there is a lot of discussion. Moderators and administrators may do a lot of thread-merging / forum-wrangling to keep things in one place.
----------------------------- 3. Reposting solutions or questions to past AMC/AIME/USAMO problems: Allowed
This forum contains a post for nearly every problem from AMC8, AMC10, AMC12, AIME, USAJMO, USAMO (and these links give you an index of all these posts). It is always permitted to post a full solution to any problem in its own thread (linked above), regardless of how old the problem is, and even if this solution is similar to one that has already been posted. We encourage this type of posting because it is helpful for the user to explain their solution in full to an audience, and for future users who want to see multiple approaches to a problem or even just the frequency distribution of common approaches. We do ask for some explanation; if you just post "the answer is (B); ez" then you are not adding anything useful.
You are also encouraged to post questions about a specific problem in the specific thread for that problem, or about previous user's solutions. It's almost always better to use the existing thread than to start a new one, to keep all the discussion in one place easily searchable for future visitors.
----------------------------- 4. Advice posts: Allowed, but read below first
You can use this forum to ask for advice about how to prepare for math competitions in general. But you should be aware that this question has been asked many many times. Before making a post, you are encouraged to look at the following:
[list]
[*] Stop looking for the right training: A generic post about advice that keeps getting stickied :)
[*] There is an enormous list of links on the Wiki of books / problems / etc for all levels.
[/list]
When you do post, we really encourage you to be as specific as possible in your question. Tell us about your background, what you've tried already, etc.
Actually, the absolute best way to get a helpful response is to take a few examples of problems that you tried to solve but couldn't, and explain what you tried on them / why you couldn't solve them. Here is a great example of a specific question.
----------------------------- 5. Publicity: use P2P forum instead
See https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c5h2489297_peertopeer_programs_forum.
Some exceptions have been allowed in the past, but these require approval from administrators. (I am not totally sure what the criteria is. I am not an administrator.)
----------------------------- 6. Mock contests: use Mock Contests forum instead
Mock contests should be posted in the dedicated forum instead: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c594864_aops_mock_contests
----------------------------- 7. AMC procedural questions: suggest to contact the AMC HQ instead
If you have a question like "how do I submit a change of venue form for the AIME" or "why is my name not on the qualifiers list even though I have a 300 index", you would be better off calling or emailing the AMC program to ask, they are the ones who can help you :)
----------------------------- 8. Discussion of random math problems: suggest to use MSM/HSM/HSO instead
If you are discussing a specific math problem that isn't from the AMC/AIME/USAMO, it's better to post these in Middle School Math, High School Math, High School Olympiads instead.
----------------------------- 9. Politics: suggest to use Round Table instead
There are important conversations to be had about things like gender diversity in math contests, etc., for sure. However, from experience we think that C&P is historically not a good place to have these conversations, as they go off the rails very quickly. We encourage you to use the Round Table instead, where it is much more clear that all posts need to be serious.
----------------------------- 10. MAA complaints: discouraged
We don't want to pretend that the MAA is perfect or that we agree with everything they do. However, we chose to discourage this sort of behavior because in practice most of the comments we see are not useful and some are frankly offensive.
[list] [*] If you just want to blow off steam, do it on your blog instead.
[*] When you have criticism, it should be reasoned, well-thought and constructive. What we mean by this is, for example, when the AOIME was announced, there was great outrage about potential cheating. Well, do you really think that this is something the organizers didn't think about too? Simply posting that "people will cheat and steal my USAMOO qualification, the MAA are idiots!" is not helpful as it is not bringing any new information to the table.
[*] Even if you do have reasoned, well-thought, constructive criticism, we think it is actually better to email it the MAA instead, rather than post it here. Experience shows that even polite, well-meaning suggestions posted in C&P are often derailed by less mature users who insist on complaining about everything.
[/list]
----------------------------- 11. Memes and joke posts: discouraged
It's fine to make jokes or lighthearted posts every so often. But it should be done with discretion. Ideally, jokes should be done within a longer post that has other content. For example, in my response to one user's question about olympiad combinatorics, I used a silly picture of Sogiita Gunha, but it was done within a context of a much longer post where it was meant to actually make a point.
On the other hand, there are many threads which consist largely of posts whose only content is an attached meme with the word "MAA" in it. When done in excess like this, the jokes reflect poorly on the community, so we explicitly discourage them.
----------------------------- 12. Questions that no one can answer: discouraged
Examples of this: "will MIT ask for AOIME scores?", "what will the AIME 2021 cutoffs be (asked in 2020)", etc. Basically, if you ask a question on this forum, it's better if the question is something that a user can plausibly answer :)
----------------------------- 13. Blind speculation: discouraged
Along these lines, if you do see a question that you don't have an answer to, we discourage "blindly guessing" as it leads to spreading of baseless rumors. For example, if you see some user posting "why are there fewer qualifiers than usual this year?", you should not reply "the MAA must have been worried about online cheating so they took fewer people!!". Was sich überhaupt sagen lässt, lässt sich klar sagen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, darüber muss man schweigen.
----------------------------- 14. Discussion of cheating: strongly discouraged
If you have evidence or reasonable suspicion of cheating, please report this to your Competition Manager or to the AMC HQ; these forums cannot help you.
Otherwise, please avoid public discussion of cheating. That is: no discussion of methods of cheating, no speculation about how cheating affects cutoffs, and so on --- it is not helpful to anyone, and it creates a sour atmosphere. A longer explanation is given in Seriously, please stop discussing how to cheat.
----------------------------- 15. Cutoff jokes: never allowed
Whenever the cutoffs for any major contest are released, it is very obvious when they are official. In the past, this has been achieved by the numbers being posted on the official AMC website (here) or through a post from the AMCDirector account.
You must never post fake cutoffs, even as a joke. You should also refrain from posting cutoffs that you've heard of via email, etc., because it is better to wait for the obvious official announcement. A longer explanation is given in A Treatise on Cutoff Trolling.
----------------------------- 16. Meanness: never allowed Being mean is worse than being immature and unproductive. If another user does something which you think is inappropriate, use the Report button to bring the post to moderator attention, or if you really must reply, do so in a way that is tactful and constructive rather than inflammatory.
-----------------------------
While we do allow advertisements of official contests (at the MAA and MATHCOUNTS level) and those run by college students with at least one successful year, any and all advertisements of a paid service or program is not allowed and will be deleted.
Disclaimer: this entire post is my opinion based solely on my own experiences. I happen to do a lot of teaching, so if you have thoughts or opinions of your own, please do share - I could use them. :)
Recently I've seen a bunch of improvement threads come up which I feel can be answered in more or less the same way. Rather than post a reply to each of these I decided I'd just make a separate topic and hope people read/link it.
I'm going to start by reposting something I wrote at the end of last year: [quote="v_Enhance"]In general, I think once you figure out what you're trying to improve then it doesn't make a big difference whether you do ARML vs Mandelbrot vs NIMO vs OMO or whatever.[/quote] In retrospect I should have bolded this sentence, because it was one of the main points I was trying to make: the choice of what book/problems you choose to do really doesn't matter. The only book I've ever read more than half of was Volume 2. WOOT was helpful when I started really getting serious about olympiads because it filled in various knowledge gaps (e.g. complex numbers), but beyond that my training basically consists of doing random problems from the contest section. (I don't even bother to pick topics.)
This is why I feel the extensive discussion over "which chapters of Volume 1 are most important", "which tests are about the same difficulty as X", "breakdown of AMC10 topics", et cetera, get more attention than they deserve. Really, I think that once you know the fundamentals -- and there aren't that many -- only a few things actually make a difference during practice:
[list=1]
[*]Difficulty of problems. Specifically, do hard problems when you get the chance. Doing easy problems makes you faster and less prone to errors but does nothing to help expand the range of problems you can solve. So, do hard problems, and don't worry about time until later. (I have fond memories of USAMTS for that.) Of course, this is something that should be done during the academic year, and not right before a major contest.
[*]Building intuition. See this. Particularly the third point, which I think applies in full force to any level of competition. The really important thing to see is that people don't pull solutions to hard problems out of thin air; there's a thought process behind it all. MOPpers don't solve problems just because they were born with some innate talent; they've built an intuition from doing lots and lots of hard problems.[/list]
Beyond that it just comes down to doing enough problems. Speed/careless issues are things that you should practice for sometimes, but not most of the time, and definitely not exclusively.
In closing, some little things for people who are just starting out with contests:
[list=1]
[*]Don't cram. Just relax on the couple days before the contest. I find Starbucks Coffee a good, free way to relax.
[*]Don't take contests too seriously. For me the best part about these contests has always been getting to know other really cool people, and we're all getting together this weekend![/list]
Do you want to work on a fun, untimed team math competition with amazing questions by MOPpers and IMO & EGMO medalists?
Do you want to have a chance to win thousands in cash and raffle prizes (no matter your skill level)?
Check out the fifth annual iteration of the
Online Monmouth Math Competition!
Online Monmouth Math Competition, or OMMC, is a 501c3 accredited nonprofit organization managed by adults, college students, and high schoolers which aims to give talented high school and middle school students an exciting way to develop their skills in mathematics.
This is not a local competition; any student 18 or younger anywhere in the world can attend. We have changed some elements of our contest format, so read carefully and thoroughly. Join our Discord or monitor this thread for updates and test releases.
How hard is it?
We designed OMMC to be accessible to beginners but also challenging to experts. Earlier questions on the main round will be around the difficulty of easy questions from the AMC 8 and AMC 10/12, and later questions will be at the difficulty of the hardest questions from the AIME. Our most skilled teams are invited to compete in an invitational final round consisting of difficult proof questions. We hope that teams will have fun and think deeply about the problems on the test, no matter their skill level.
We plan to raffle out a TON of prizes over all competitors regardless of performance. So just submit: a few minutes of your time will give you a great chance to win amazing prizes!
How are the problems?
Only the best problems by our panel of dedicated and talented problem writers have been selected. Hundreds upon hundreds of problems have been comprehensively reviewed by our panel of equally wonderful testsolvers. Our content creation staff has achieved pretty much every mathematical achievement possible! Staff members have attended MOP, participated in MIT-PRIMES, RSI, SPARC, won medals at EGMO, IMO, RMM, etc. Our staff members have contributed to countless student-led math organizations and competitions in the past and we all have a high degree of mathematical experience under our belts. We believe OMMC Year 5 contains some of our best work thus far.
We highly recommend competitors join our Community Discord for the latest updates on the competition, as well as for finding team members to team up with. Each team is between 1 and 4 people, inclusive. Each competitor in a team has to be 18 or younger. You won’t have to sign up right now. Look out for a test portal link by which teams can register and access the test. Teams will put in their registration information as they submit the test.
However, we do encourage you to “sign up” on this thread, just like how you might with a mock contest. This isn’t required to take the test nor does it force you to take the test. But it’s a great way to show support and bump the thread to the top of the forums, so we appreciate it. (Also a great way to find teammates!)
Solo teams?
Solo participants are allowed and will be treated simply as one man teams. They will be eligible for the same prizes as teams with multiple people.
Test Policy
Our test will be held completely online and untimed. We do not allow the use of anything other than writing utensils, scratch paper, compass, ruler/straightedge, and a single four function calculator (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division).
Timeline: Main Round: May 17th - May 24th Test Portal Released. The Main Round of the contest is held. The Main Round consists of 25 questions that each have a numerical answer. Teams will have the entire time interval to work on the questions. They can submit any time during the interval. Teams are free to edit their submissions before the period ends, even after they submit.
Final Round: May 26th - May 28th The top placing teams will qualify for this invitational round (5-10 questions). The final round consists of 5-10 proof questions. Teams again will have the entire time interval to work on these questions and can submit their proofs any time during this interval. Teams are free to edit their submissions before the period ends, even after they submit.
Conclusion of Competition: Early June Solutions will be released, winners announced, and prizes sent out to winners.
Scoring:
For the main round, there are 25 computational (number answer questions). Each of the 25 questions will be worth 2 points, for a total of 50 points. Ties are broken by the last (highest numbered) question that one team solved and the other team didn’t, MATHCOUNTS-style. The team that solved this question would be given preference. For example, if teams A and B both have scores of 24, but Team A got question 20 wrong and Team B got question 25 wrong, then team A will be given preference over team B because team A solved question 25.
The top ~10-15 teams will move onto the final round, where there are 5-10 proof questions. Each of the questions is worth a different number of points (the specific weighting will be given to each of the finalist teams). The Olympiad round in total will be worth 50 points. A team’s total OMMC index will be the sum of the main round score and the final round score (out of 50+50=100), and teams will be ranked on their OMMC index (if there are ties, they will be broken by the aforementioned main round tie breaking system).
Prizes:
Prize List So Far: - TBD
In past years we’ve received $5000+ in prizes. Stay tuned for more details, but we intend to give prizes to all teams on the leaderboard, as well as raffle out a TON of prizes over all competitors. So just submit: a few minutes of your time will give you a great chance to win amazing prizes!
I have more questions. Whom do I ask?
We respond most quickly on our community discord, but you can also contact us through email via the ommcofficial@gmail.com address.
We hope for your participation, and good luck!
OMMC staff
OMMC’S 2025 EVENTS ARE SPONSORED BY:
[list]
[*]Nontrivial Fellowship
[*]Citadel
[*]SPARC
[*]Jane Street
[*]And counting!
[/list]
Results, problems, and solutions are here. Congratulations to SFBA ARML / AlphaStar: Foxes and Friends and Leading Aces Academy for placing 1st and 2nd overall and to Liam Reddy (Utah Rookies) for their perfect score on the individual round and for being the only student with a perfect score to answer the tiebreaker correctly.
Find the largest integer satisfying the following conditions:
(i) can be expressed as the difference of two consecutive cubes;
(ii) is a perfect square.
A box contains chips, numbered ,,,, and . Chips are drawn randomly one at a time without replacement until the sum of the values drawn exceeds . What is the probability that draws are required?
[$10K+ IN PRIZES] Poolesville Math Tournament (PVMT) 2025
qwerty123456asdfgzxcvb11
NYesterday at 8:31 PM
by Ruegerbyrd
Hi everyone!
After the resounding success of the first three years of PVMT, the Poolesville High School Math Team is excited to announce the fourth annual Poolesville High School Math Tournament (PVMT)! The PVMT team includes a MOPper and multiple USA(J)MO and AIME qualifiers!
PVMT is open to all 6th-9th graders in the country (including rising 10th graders). Students will compete in teams of up to 4 people, and each participant will take three subject tests as well as the team round. The contest is completely free, and will be held virtually on June 7, 2025, from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM (EST).
Additionally, thanks to our sponsors, we will be awarding approximately $10K+ worth of prizes (including gift cards, Citadel merch, AoPS coupons, Wolfram licenses) to top teams and individuals. More details regarding the actual prizes will be released as we get closer to the competition date.
Further, newly for this year we might run some interesting mini-events, which we will announce closer to the competition date, such as potentially a puzzle hunt and integration bee!
Additionally, more information about PVMT can be found at https://pvmt.org
If you have any questions not answered in the below FAQ, feel free to ask in this thread or email us at falconsdomath@gmail.com!
We look forward to your participation!
FAQ
How do I sign up?
You can sign up through the Google form at https://tinyurl.com/PVMT25.
When will registration close?
The registration deadline is on June 6, at 11:59 PM EST. You may sign up anytime before then.
What if I don't have a team or my team has less than 4 people?
You can still register as an individual or as a team of less than four, you'll just have a disadvantage on the team round.
Are calculators allowed?
No. Calculators, textbooks, computer programs, and other outside aids are not allowed on any round in the contest.
What is the difficulty of the problems?
Problems will range from early-AMC 8 to mid-late AIME difficulty.
Will there be any kind of proctoring?
Yes, you will be proctored through Zoom. The opening and closing ceremony will also be held on Zoom.
Let be a convex quadrilateral with and Suppose that the centroids of and form the vertices of an equilateral triangle. What is the maximum possible value of the area of ?
Source: Saint Petersburg MO 2020 Grade 11 Problem 3
is the angle bisector of , and is its incenter. The perpendicular bisector of segment intersects the circumcircle of at and . Point is on the segment such that .Prove that the four points and are concyclic.
is the angle bisector of , and is its incenter. The perpendicular bisector of segment intersects the circumcircle of at and . Point is on the segment such that .Prove that the four points and are concyclic.
Y byamar_04, zuss77, SatisfiedMagma, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
Let with . By reflection about the perpendicular bisector of it suffices to show that is cyclic. Invert about with radius and reflect the inverted figure in the angle bisector of to get the following problem-
Inverted problem wrote:
Let be the midpoint of arc not containing , and suppose the tangent at to meets at . Suppose meets the -Apollonius circle at . Then is cyclic.
Since is the center of , so the result directly follows from the fact that and are orthogonal.
EDIT: To show that and are orthogonal, just invert about and invoke Shooting Lemma to see that remains fixed.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_pi_rate, May 7, 2020, 7:32 PM
Let be the midpoint of smaller arc . Lemma: because
From this it follows and so basically is the Humpty point of triangle . (key insight)
Since is the reflection of the Humpty point it follows is the intersection of the symmedian with the circumcircle of triangle so are concyclic points and are harmonic at that!
Attachments:
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Steve12345, May 7, 2020, 9:28 PM
Let be the midpoint of arc of not containing .Note that are collinear.Easy to see that .[inversion in swaps because it swaps and ].
So [from ]
and [from ]
SO .So are concyclic.
This post has been edited 6 times. Last edited by Mathematicsislovely, Jun 5, 2020, 11:00 AM
is the angle bisector of , and is its incenter. The perpendicular bisector of segment intersects the circumcircle of at and . Point is on the segment such that .Prove that the four points and are concyclic.
Let meet again at . Note that are symmetric in hence the reflection of in the perpendicular bisector of (whose midpoint is ) lies on . Since , the conclusion follows.
Let be the circumcenter of . It is well known that lies on . Let be the reflection of over , and let hit the circumcircle of a second time at . Using directed angles, it is easy to see that .
From here, we use complex numbers with as the unit circle. Let , and . Because is the perpendicular bisector of , we have that . WLOG, let and . Since , we obtain that Because is the reflection of over the midpoint of , we have
Because , we get . Then implies To check that are concyclic, we just have to check that the quantity We just simplify: which is obviously a real number.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by HKIS200543, Aug 23, 2020, 9:12 AM
Let , which is the circumcenter of . Let be the reflexion of w.r.t .
On one hand , implying that are concyclic.
On the other hand, is an isosceles trapezoid, which are concyclic, which completes the proof.
I'll explain math_pi_rate's solution, because in its essence it's more simple than it looks and quite inversion-instructive. We don't even need to construct inversive diagram to understand it.
Let be and is where hit . Let .
Perform inversion with center (bisector-flip actually don't even needed here).
is fixed.
Since orthogonal to it goes to circle (say, ) orthogonal to .
Since is a reflection of over it goes to circumcenter of (say, ).
obviously go to .
With being centers of orthogonal circles we immediately see that is cyclic. Inverting back it makes cyclic. And finally reflect it about to get what we need.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by zuss77, Nov 7, 2020, 9:25 AM
Let and be the midpoint of and arc . meets at . Then as and are concurrent on , by butterfly theorem, and are also concurrent on . Let this concurrency point be . Then by power of a point, and so are concyclic. Consider an inversion at with radius . This swaps with , and preserves the circle . Therefore, and , and consequently, which shows that also lies on .
Very nice problem:
Let us consider the intersection of the median of with the circle. Clearly, (radical axis argument) lies in the circle . Now we prove the following Lemma:
Claim: are collinear where is the midpoint of arc .
Proof: Apply Angle Bissector Theorem in and you'll be good to go.
In conclusion, notice that because .
However, which implies that is cyclic desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by RodSalgDomPort, Jan 21, 2021, 11:30 PM Reason: typo
Let be the midpoint of and be the intersection of and . So is cyclic. Let be the intersection of perpendicular bisector and . Since is midpoint of by butterfly it follows that lies on . Which is the exterior angle of the quadrilateral so is cyclic. Combining both results we get that is cyclic.
Let meets the circumcircle of again at . We know that is the center of that is the midpoint of . Assume that meets the circumcircle of again at . Then, the points and , and are symmetrical with respect to the line .
Considering an inversion centred at with radius , we obtain that , and the points are fixed. So the circle goes to the circle .
Let be the second intersection point of the circles and . As they are mapped each to other by the inversion, we get that should be fixed under the inversion, i.e. lies on . On the other hand, the triangles and are symmetrical with respect to the line , so their circumcenters are too. That means be the radical axis of their circumcircles. Hence and ,,, are concyclic.