ka May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.
Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.
Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Source: Al-Khwarizmi Junior International Olympiad 2025 P8
There are cards on a table, flipped face down. Madina knows that on each card a single number is written and that the numbers are different integers from to . In a move, Madina is allowed to choose any cards, and she is told a number that is written on one of the chosen cards, but not which specific card it is on. After several moves, Madina must determine the written numbers on as many cards as possible. What is the maximum number of cards Madina can ensure to determine?
A regular polygon with vertices is given. To each vertex, a natural number from the set is assigned. Prove that there are vertices such that if the numbers are assigned to them respectively, then and is a parallelogram.
Let be a triangle inscribed in a circle with orthocenter and altitude . Let be the midpoint of . Line meets again at . Line meets again at . Let be the orthogonal projection of on the line . Line meets again at . Prove that .
Let be a set of distinct integers all of whose prime factors are at most Prove that contains distinct integers such that their product is a perfect cube.
Equilateral triangle is given. Let and be the midpoints of and , respectively.
A point on segment is given. Draw equilateral such that is on and is on .
Y bymathingbingo, guptaamitu1, wasikgcrushedbi, bhan2025, cubres
WLOG . Since divides the RHS, it also divides , hence ; in particular, . Also, , so , which means . Now, This clearly implies . The equation is now . So . If , then , so , contradiction. Therefore, , so . Also, , so . In summary, .
Suppose . Then . This means (assuming , but this case is easy to deal with). Hence , contradiction.
Therefore, , and bashing out these cases gives the only solution as . In conclusion, the answers are and permutations.
The answer is and permutations which works. Assuming , write the given equation as Thus actually assume .
Write where the second equality follows from the fact has no local minima for , hence is minimized at endpoints.
This implies , so we just need to manually examine for solutions in . Doing so gives the solution.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Sep 22, 2020, 11:36 PM
Y byN0_NAME, ayan_mathematics_king, IAmTheHazard, veirab, cubres
The answers are and permutations. WLOG let .
Suppose that . Define the function so that is a root of . Observe that: By the intermediate value theorem, has a root in each of the intervals . Since is a cubic polynomial, it no other roots. But then has no integer root at least , which is a contradiction.
Thus . Check that the only solution is as desired.
Without loss of generality say This is an inequality. Check that does not work in general to avoid sadness.
Note so Now note that we want implying that we want or in particular,
Now we rinse and repeat. We want We claim that equality cannot hold unless ; note that otherwise or epicly failing for size reasons since this implies and if and contradiction.
Thus we want and note that as we assume and obviously and that So we have which is ridiculous, so we reach a contradiction.
Y bychengalexzhongzhi, Mano, Carius_MrPenguin, cubres
Here's a cool solution I found. Without loss of generality say . We know that is a root of the polynomial . Let and be the other two roots. By Vieta's formulas, we have From the first equation, we see that is an integer, and from the second and third equation we see that . Let . Then, eliminating , we obtain the following equations: Using the inequality , we have where we used the ordering for the last inequality.
The equations are now If and , we have , which implies , a contradiction.
If , then and , which implies , which is a solution.
If , then the only triples we need to check are , and . Since none of them works, the only solution is .
Uhh too ez . Similiar to the others but ill post anyways.
Solution
WLOG .Notice that Also notice that This implies that Notice that this implies that . If then we get that but this contradicts are initial assumpiton. So we get that and . Now just bash the rest of the cases to get that . Since the equation is symmetric all permutations of this work. With this we're done
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GeoMetrix, Sep 23, 2020, 12:35 PM
Using divisibility twice seems to accelerate the solution, as follows.
Let , without loss. Then implying . Furthermore, then gives . Combining these, . If , then , giving , not possible. Thus .
Now we arrive at . Next, it is easily seen that , thus . Consequently, . Furthermore, . Combining these, we have . This inequality is possible only when . Now, we also have the condition , and . Under this, the cases turn out to be impossible. Thus . This gives . From symmetry, any permutation of works.
WLOG . Note that because we can divide by in the original equation and since the RHS is an integer the LHS must be an integer too. So we know that . By our assumption, . Hence we know that or . This means that Hence we know that . This now means that . We can test every value and we quickly see that any permutation of work.
By the AM-GM inequality, is at most . So rearranging terms in the inequality, . This implies
Now, we can manually check that we cannot have a solution where of the numbers are equal, so we must have and and as the only possible solutions out of which only works
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by everythingpi3141592, Feb 25, 2023, 3:45 AM
Without loss of generality, let . It follows that , or . Since , we also have . From the first inequality, , so If , it is easy to check there are no solutions to this inequality. Then , and we can have any value of between and inclusive. Checking all of them, we find only works up to permutation.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by bobthegod78, Jun 22, 2023, 8:32 PM
As the equation is symmetric, we may assume that . First note that , so Moreover, so or . Combining these two inequalities, giving . Therefore, the equation reduces to Then, as , we have Putting this together, we have , which is inductively false for . So or . Finishing, we see that yields no solution while gives .
Solved with ihategeo_1969. We found it funny that this is actually the base case of 2019 Iran MO Round 2 Problem 3 but I guess there's probably a perfectly valid explanation for this. We claim that the only triple of solutions (upto permutations) is . The equations is entirely symmetric so we assume .
Now, since is a factor of the left hand side it must also be a factor of the right hand side, so . Then, . But, note that, So, . Combining this with our previous inequality we have that if , which is a very clear contradiction since is a positive integer. Thus, . Repeating the bounding with this additional piece of information, so or . Of these, when we have which quite clearly has no solutions, and when we have which implies of which only work giving us our desired solution set.
We claim that the answer is upto permutations.
Assume WLOG , then we have that , and .
Combining these we get that .
Now our equation is. This implies that .
But we have that and , where equality is when , hence , implying that , subtracting one we get that.
For the other case, if and this implies that and that
Which holds when and . Hence we are done
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Ywgh1, Aug 18, 2024, 6:30 AM
WLOG . Note that , and .
Analysing , we see it is increasing in both and positive for , so in fact .
From here similar arguments yield , and case bashing gives and permutations.
nice
Only two observations are needed. Assume . Then we get:
First, notice .
Second, notice .
Hence write .
Notice that From here we simply bound: notice that fails, as we obtain or if then which is false. Thus .
Notice now that . We split into cases:
If, then ---and thus , so that , which fails.
If, then or . In the first case, we find , so that . The solution works. In the second case, we find , so that or , neither of which work.
If, then ,, or , so that . In this case, only is valid, from . This fails the original equation.
If, then , so that . These numbers yield from and from . None of these work---the check, by the way, is being done by checking if is a square.
If, then , so that . Only works from , and this fails.
If, then , so that . Only works from , as well as from . None of these work.
If, then , so that . Only works from , and this fails.
If, then from , so that . From here, only work from . These each fail the original equation.
If, then from , and no value works for .
We have exhausted all cases. The only working triplet is and its permutations.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by asdf334, Dec 23, 2024, 3:45 PM
Suppose and that , we get that , thus , we can't have that as , however we have that , thus , thus , however if this is not possible. Thus now suppose , we have that , thus now suppose , if we that there are no solutions, as if we get that , so thus , however this is not possible as . Thus let , we get , thus , we must have that , however this gives: , however for this does not hold, thus . After checking the small cases we find the only solution is any permutation of .
This problem is so smashed but i am posting anyways .
Since this equation is symmetric then WLOG .
this means .
And we know that i.e. from this .
Finally we can say that i.e. .This inequality is wrong when and both happens.Then and . Then after the checking cases there is a unique answer and their permutations.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Frd_19_Hsnzde, Mar 19, 2025, 12:30 AM