2016 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 25
Contents
[hide]Problem
The sequence is defined recursively by , , and for . What is the smallest positive integer such that the product is an integer?
Solution 1
Let . Then and for all . The characteristic polynomial of this linear recurrence is , which has roots and .
Therefore, for constants to be determined . Using the fact that we can solve a pair of linear equations for :
.
Thus , , and .
Now, , so we are looking for the least value of so that
.
Note that we can multiply all by three for convenience, as the are always integers, and it does not affect divisibility by .
Now, for all even the sum (adjusted by a factor of three) is . The smallest for which this is a multiple of is by Fermat's Little Theorem, as it is seen with further testing that is a primitive root .
Now, assume is odd. Then the sum (again adjusted by a factor of three) is . The smallest for which this is a multiple of is , by the same reasons. Thus, the minimal value of is .
Solution 2
Since the product is an integer, it must be a power of , so the sum of the base- logarithms must be an integer. Multiply all of these logarithms by (to make them integers), so the sum must be a multiple of .
The logarithms are . Using the recursion (modulo to save calculation time), we get the sequence Listing the numbers out is expedited if you notice .
The cycle repeats every terms. Notice that since , the first terms sum up to a multiple of . Since , we only need at most the first terms to sum up to a multiple of , and this is the lowest answer choice.
Note 1: To rigorously prove this is the smallest value, you will have to keep a running sum of the terms and check that it is never a multiple of before the th term.
Note 2: In response to note 1, it can be proven that , where . Since is a multiple of , it suffices to find the minimal such that . In this case, happens to be minimal such , so the answer would be .
The relation can be proven by rearranging the relation to for all integers , then adding those equations together. The LHS telescopes into , and the RHS becomes . Therefore, if you don't find a cleaner solution involving the relation , you can always solve the problem just by considering the value of rather than keeping a running sum.
Solution 3
Like in Solution 2, calculate the first few terms of the sequence, but also keep a running sum of the logarithms (not modulo here): Notice that for odd and for even . Since is relatively prime to , we can ignore even and calculate odd using (modulo ): is first a multiple of at . ~emerald_block
Solution 4 (Using a formula)
Consider the product (will finish tommorow)
Video Solution by CanadaMath (Problem 21-25)
Fast Forward to 26:01 for problem 25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3jJDLGyF2w&t=1546s
~THEMATHCANADIAN
See Also
2016 AMC 12B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 24 |
Followed by Last Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.