Difference between revisions of "2019 AIME I Problems/Problem 13"
Cooljupiter (talk | contribs) (→Solution 5) |
R00tsofunity (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
==Solution 3== | ==Solution 3== | ||
− | Construct <math>FC</math> and let <math>FC\cap AE=K</math>. Let <math>FK=x</math>. Using <math>\triangle FKE\sim \triangle BKC</math>, <cmath>BK=\frac{5}{7}x</cmath> Using <math>\triangle FDK\sim ACK</math>, it can be found that <cmath>3x=AK=4+\frac{5}{7}x\to x=\frac{7}{4}</cmath> This also means that <math>BK=\frac{21}{4}-4=\frac{5}{4}</math>. It suffices to find <math>KE</math>. It is easy to see the following: <cmath>180-\angle ABC=\angle KBC=\angle KFE</cmath> Using reverse Law of Cosines on <math>\triangle ABC</math>, <math>\cos{\angle ABC}=\frac{1}{8}\to \cos{180-\angle ABC}=\frac{-1}{8}</math>. Using Law of Cosines on <math>\triangle EFK</math> gives <math>KE=\frac{21\sqrt 2}{4}</math>, so <math>BE=\frac{5+21\sqrt 2}{4}\to \textbf{032}</math>. | + | Construct <math>FC</math> and let <math>FC\cap AE=K</math>. Let <math>FK=x</math>. Using <math>\triangle FKE\sim \triangle BKC</math>, <cmath>BK=\frac{5}{7}x</cmath> Using <math>\triangle FDK\sim ACK</math>, it can be found that <cmath>3x=AK=4+\frac{5}{7}x\to x=\frac{7}{4}</cmath> This also means that <math>BK=\frac{21}{4}-4=\frac{5}{4}</math>. It suffices to find <math>KE</math>. It is easy to see the following: <cmath>180-\angle ABC=\angle KBC=\angle KFE</cmath> Using reverse Law of Cosines on <math>\triangle ABC</math>, <math>\cos{\angle ABC}=\frac{1}{8}\to \cos{180-\angle ABC}=\frac{-1}{8}</math>. Using Law of Cosines on <math>\triangle EFK</math> gives <math>KE=\frac{21\sqrt 2}{4}</math>, so <math>BE=\frac{5+21\sqrt 2}{4}\to \boxed{\textbf{032}}</math>. |
-franchester | -franchester | ||
+ | |||
==Solution 4 (No <C = <DFE, no LoC)== | ==Solution 4 (No <C = <DFE, no LoC)== | ||
Let <math>P=AE\cap CF</math>. Let <math>CP=5x</math> and <math>BP=5y</math>; from <math>\triangle{CBP}\sim\triangle{EFP}</math> we have <math>EP=7x</math> and <math>FP=7y</math>. From <math>\triangle{CAP}\sim\triangle{DFP}</math> we have <math>\frac{6}{4+5y}=\frac{2}{7y}</math> giving <math>y=\frac{1}{4}</math>. So <math>BP=\frac{5}{4}</math> and <math>FP=\frac{7}{4}</math>. These similar triangles also gives us <math>DP=\frac{5}{3}x</math> so <math>DE=\frac{16}{3}x</math>. Now, Stewart's Theorem on <math>\triangle{FEP}</math> and cevian <math>FD</math> tells us that <cmath>\frac{560}{9}x^3+28x=\frac{49}{3}x+\frac{245}{3}x,</cmath>so <math>x=\frac{3\sqrt{2}}{4}</math>. Then <math>BE=\frac{5}{4}+7x=\frac{5+21\sqrt{2}}{4}</math> so the answer is <math>\boxed{032}</math> as desired. (Solution by Trumpeter, but not added to the Wiki by Trumpeter) | Let <math>P=AE\cap CF</math>. Let <math>CP=5x</math> and <math>BP=5y</math>; from <math>\triangle{CBP}\sim\triangle{EFP}</math> we have <math>EP=7x</math> and <math>FP=7y</math>. From <math>\triangle{CAP}\sim\triangle{DFP}</math> we have <math>\frac{6}{4+5y}=\frac{2}{7y}</math> giving <math>y=\frac{1}{4}</math>. So <math>BP=\frac{5}{4}</math> and <math>FP=\frac{7}{4}</math>. These similar triangles also gives us <math>DP=\frac{5}{3}x</math> so <math>DE=\frac{16}{3}x</math>. Now, Stewart's Theorem on <math>\triangle{FEP}</math> and cevian <math>FD</math> tells us that <cmath>\frac{560}{9}x^3+28x=\frac{49}{3}x+\frac{245}{3}x,</cmath>so <math>x=\frac{3\sqrt{2}}{4}</math>. Then <math>BE=\frac{5}{4}+7x=\frac{5+21\sqrt{2}}{4}</math> so the answer is <math>\boxed{032}</math> as desired. (Solution by Trumpeter, but not added to the Wiki by Trumpeter) | ||
Line 92: | Line 93: | ||
Then we can get that <math>5040k^2=630</math>, getting <math>k=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4}</math> | Then we can get that <math>5040k^2=630</math>, getting <math>k=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4}</math> | ||
− | <math>BE=21k=\frac{21\sqrt{2}}{4}; BJ=\frac{5}{4}</math>, so the desired answer is <math>\frac{21\sqrt{2}+5}{4}</math>, which leads to the answer <math>\boxed{ | + | <math>BE=21k=\frac{21\sqrt{2}}{4}; BJ=\frac{5}{4}</math>, so the desired answer is <math>\frac{21\sqrt{2}+5}{4}</math>, which leads to the answer <math>\boxed{032}</math> |
~bluesoul | ~bluesoul | ||
Line 121: | Line 122: | ||
~CoolJupiter | ~CoolJupiter | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Video Solution by MOP 2024== | ||
+ | https://youtube.com/watch?v=B7rFw05AYQ0 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~r00tsOfUnity | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Latest revision as of 19:44, 20 December 2023
Contents
Problem
Triangle has side lengths , , and . Points and are on ray with . The point is a point of intersection of the circumcircles of and satisfying and . Then can be expressed as , where , , , and are positive integers such that and are relatively prime, and is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find .
Solution 1
Notice that By the Law of Cosines, Then, Let , , and . Then, However, since , , but since , and the requested sum is .
(Solution by TheUltimate123)
Solution 2
Define to be the circumcircle of and to be the circumcircle of .
Because of exterior angles,
But because is cyclic. In addition, because is cyclic. Therefore, . But , so . Using Law of Cosines on , we can figure out that . Since , . We are given that and , so we can use Law of Cosines on to find that .
Let be the intersection of segment and . Using Power of a Point with respect to within , we find that . We can also apply Power of a Point with respect to within to find that . Therefore, .
Note that is similar to . . Also note that is similar to , which gives us . Solving this system of linear equations, we get . Now, we can solve for , which is equal to . This simplifies to , which means our answer is .
Solution 3
Construct and let . Let . Using , Using , it can be found that This also means that . It suffices to find . It is easy to see the following: Using reverse Law of Cosines on , . Using Law of Cosines on gives , so . -franchester
Solution 4 (No <C = <DFE, no LoC)
Let . Let and ; from we have and . From we have giving . So and . These similar triangles also gives us so . Now, Stewart's Theorem on and cevian tells us that so . Then so the answer is as desired. (Solution by Trumpeter, but not added to the Wiki by Trumpeter)
Solution 5
Connect meeting at . We can observe that Getting that . We can also observe that , getting that
Assume that , since , we can get that , getting that
Using Power of Point, we can get that Assume that , getting that
Now applying Law of Cosine on two triangles, separately, we can get two equations
Since , we can use to eliminate the term
Then we can get that , getting
, so the desired answer is , which leads to the answer
~bluesoul
Solution 6
Nice problem!
First, let and intersect at . Our motivation here is to introduce cyclic quadrilaterals and find useful relationships in terms of angles. Observe that By the so-called "Reverse Law of Cosines" on we have Applying on gives So , now by our cyclic quadrilaterals again, we are motivated by the multiple appearances of similar triangles throughout the figure. We want some that are related to and , which are crucial lengths in the problem. Suppose for simplicity. We have:
So So . The requested sum is .
~CoolJupiter
Video Solution by MOP 2024
https://youtube.com/watch?v=B7rFw05AYQ0
~r00tsOfUnity
See Also
2019 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 12 |
Followed by Problem 14 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.