Difference between revisions of "2009 AIME II Problems/Problem 8"
(New page: == Problem == Dave rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Independently, Linda rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Let <math>m</m...) |
m (→Solution 3) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dave rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Independently, Linda rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Let <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> be relatively prime positive integers such that <math>\dfrac mn</math> is the probability that the number of times Dave rolls his die is equal to or within one of the number of times Linda rolls her die. Find <math>m+n</math>. | Dave rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Independently, Linda rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Let <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> be relatively prime positive integers such that <math>\dfrac mn</math> is the probability that the number of times Dave rolls his die is equal to or within one of the number of times Linda rolls her die. Find <math>m+n</math>. | ||
− | == | + | == Solutions == |
=== Solution 1 === | === Solution 1 === | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
How to compute <math>p</math>? | How to compute <math>p</math>? | ||
− | Suppose that Linda made exactly <math>t</math> throws. The probability that this happens is <math>(5/6)^{t-1}\cdot (1/6)</math>, as she must make <math>t-1</math> unsuccessful throws followed by a successful one. In this case, we need Dave to make at least <math>t+2</math> throws. This happens | + | Suppose that Linda made exactly <math>t</math> throws. The probability that this happens is <math>(5/6)^{t-1}\cdot (1/6)</math>, as she must make <math>t-1</math> unsuccessful throws followed by a successful one. In this case, we need Dave to make at least <math>t+2</math> throws. This happens if his first <math>t+1</math> throws are unsuccessful, hence the probability is <math>(5/6)^{t+1}</math>. |
Thus for a fixed <math>t</math> the probability that Linda makes <math>t</math> throws and Dave at least <math>t+2</math> throws is <math>(5/6)^{2t} \cdot (1/6)</math>. | Thus for a fixed <math>t</math> the probability that Linda makes <math>t</math> throws and Dave at least <math>t+2</math> throws is <math>(5/6)^{2t} \cdot (1/6)</math>. | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
With probability <math>\frac 1{36}</math>, both throw a six and we win. | With probability <math>\frac 1{36}</math>, both throw a six and we win. | ||
− | With probability <math>\frac{10}{36}</math> exactly one of them throws a six. In this case, we win | + | With probability <math>\frac{10}{36}</math> exactly one of them throws a six. In this case, we win if the remaining player throws a six in their next throw, which happens with probability <math>\frac 16</math>. |
Finally, with probability <math>\frac{25}{36}</math> none of them throws a six. Now comes the crucial observation: At this moment, we are in exactly the same situation as in the beginning. Hence in this case we will win with probability <math>p</math>. | Finally, with probability <math>\frac{25}{36}</math> none of them throws a six. Now comes the crucial observation: At this moment, we are in exactly the same situation as in the beginning. Hence in this case we will win with probability <math>p</math>. | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Solving for <math>p</math>, we get <math>p=\frac 8{33}</math>, hence the answer is <math>8+33 = \boxed{041}</math>. | Solving for <math>p</math>, we get <math>p=\frac 8{33}</math>, hence the answer is <math>8+33 = \boxed{041}</math>. | ||
+ | ===Solution 3=== | ||
+ | Let's write out the probabilities with a set number of throws that Linda rolls before getting a 6. The probability of Linda rolling once and gets 6 right away is <math>\frac{1}{6}</math>. The probability that Dave will get a six in the same, one less, or one more throw is <math>\frac{1}{6} + \frac{5}{6} * \frac{5}{6}</math>. Thus the combined probability is <math>\frac{11}{216}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let's do the same with the probability that Linda rolls twice and getting a six. This time it is <math>\frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6}</math>. The probability that Dave meets the requirements set is <math>\frac{1}{6} + \frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6} + \frac{5}{6} * \frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6}</math>. Combine the probabilities again to get <math>\frac{455}{7776}</math>. (or not, because you can simplify without calculating later) | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's clear that as the number of rolls before getting a six increases, the probability that Dave meets the requirements is multiplied by <math>\frac{5}{6} * \frac{5}{6}</math>. We can use this pattern to solve for the sum of an infinite geometric series. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | First, set the case where Linda rolls only once aside. It doesn't fit the same pattern as the rest, so we'll add it separately at the end. Next, let <math>a = (\frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6}) * (\frac{1}{6} + \frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6} + \frac{5}{6} * \frac{5}{6} * \frac{1}{6}) = \frac{455}{7776}</math> as written above. Each probability where the number of tosses Linda makes increases by one will be <math>a * (\frac{25}{36})^{n+1}</math>. Let <math>S</math> be the sum of all these probabilities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S = a + a * \frac{25}{36} + a * (\frac{25}{36})^2...</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S * \frac{25}{36} = a * \frac{25}{36} + a * (\frac{25}{36})^2 + a * (\frac{25}{36})^3...</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Subtract the second equation from the first to get | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S * \frac{11}{36} = a</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S = a * \frac{36}{11}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S = \frac{455}{2376}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Don't forget to add the first case where Linda rolls once. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{455}{2376} + \frac{11}{216} = \frac{8}{33}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>8 + 33 = \boxed{41}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | -jackshi2006 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: this is equivalent to computing <math>\frac{1}{36}(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (\frac{5}{6})^n((\frac{5}{6})^{n-1}+(\frac{5}{6})^{n}+(\frac{5}{6})^{n+1})+1+\frac{5}{6})</math> | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2009|n=II|num-b=7|num-a=9}} | {{AIME box|year=2009|n=II|num-b=7|num-a=9}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 18:54, 27 January 2024
Problem
Dave rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Independently, Linda rolls a fair six-sided die until a six appears for the first time. Let and be relatively prime positive integers such that is the probability that the number of times Dave rolls his die is equal to or within one of the number of times Linda rolls her die. Find .
Solutions
Solution 1
There are many almost equivalent approaches that lead to summing a geometric series. For example, we can compute the probability of the opposite event. Let be the probability that Dave will make at least two more throws than Linda. Obviously, is then also the probability that Linda will make at least two more throws than Dave, and our answer will therefore be .
How to compute ?
Suppose that Linda made exactly throws. The probability that this happens is , as she must make unsuccessful throws followed by a successful one. In this case, we need Dave to make at least throws. This happens if his first throws are unsuccessful, hence the probability is .
Thus for a fixed the probability that Linda makes throws and Dave at least throws is .
Then, as the events for different are disjoint, is simply the sum of these probabilities over all . Hence:
Hence the probability we were supposed to compute is , and the answer is .
Solution 2
Let be the probability that the number of times Dave rolls his die is equal to or within one of the number of times Linda rolls her die. (We will call this event "a win", and the opposite event will be "a loss".)
Let both players roll their first die.
With probability , both throw a six and we win.
With probability exactly one of them throws a six. In this case, we win if the remaining player throws a six in their next throw, which happens with probability .
Finally, with probability none of them throws a six. Now comes the crucial observation: At this moment, we are in exactly the same situation as in the beginning. Hence in this case we will win with probability .
We just derived the following linear equation:
Solving for , we get , hence the answer is .
Solution 3
Let's write out the probabilities with a set number of throws that Linda rolls before getting a 6. The probability of Linda rolling once and gets 6 right away is . The probability that Dave will get a six in the same, one less, or one more throw is . Thus the combined probability is .
Let's do the same with the probability that Linda rolls twice and getting a six. This time it is . The probability that Dave meets the requirements set is . Combine the probabilities again to get . (or not, because you can simplify without calculating later)
It's clear that as the number of rolls before getting a six increases, the probability that Dave meets the requirements is multiplied by . We can use this pattern to solve for the sum of an infinite geometric series.
First, set the case where Linda rolls only once aside. It doesn't fit the same pattern as the rest, so we'll add it separately at the end. Next, let as written above. Each probability where the number of tosses Linda makes increases by one will be . Let be the sum of all these probabilities.
Subtract the second equation from the first to get
Don't forget to add the first case where Linda rolls once.
-jackshi2006
Note: this is equivalent to computing
See Also
2009 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 7 |
Followed by Problem 9 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.