Difference between revisions of "2009 AIME II Problems/Problem 4"
God of Math (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
A group of <math>c</math> children held a grape-eating contest. When the contest was over, the following was true: There was a <math>n</math> such that for each <math>k</math> between <math>1</math> and <math>c</math>, inclusive, the child in <math>k</math>-th place had eaten exactly <math>n+2-2k</math> grapes. The total number of grapes eaten in the contest was <math>2009</math>. Find the smallest possible value of <math>n</math>. | A group of <math>c</math> children held a grape-eating contest. When the contest was over, the following was true: There was a <math>n</math> such that for each <math>k</math> between <math>1</math> and <math>c</math>, inclusive, the child in <math>k</math>-th place had eaten exactly <math>n+2-2k</math> grapes. The total number of grapes eaten in the contest was <math>2009</math>. Find the smallest possible value of <math>n</math>. | ||
− | === | + | === Solution 1 === |
The total number of grapes eaten can be computed as the sum of the arithmetic progression with initial term <math>n</math> (the number of grapes eaten by the child in <math>1</math>-st place), difference <math>d=-2</math>, and number of terms <math>c</math>. We can easily compute that this sum is equal to <math>c(n-c+1)</math>. | The total number of grapes eaten can be computed as the sum of the arithmetic progression with initial term <math>n</math> (the number of grapes eaten by the child in <math>1</math>-st place), difference <math>d=-2</math>, and number of terms <math>c</math>. We can easily compute that this sum is equal to <math>c(n-c+1)</math>. | ||
− | Hence we have the equation <math>2009=c(n-c+1)</math>, and we are looking for a solution <math>(n,c)</math>, where both <math>n</math> and <math>c</math> are positive integers, <math>n\geq 2(c-1)</math>, and <math>n</math> is | + | Hence we have the equation <math>2009=c(n-c+1)</math>, and we are looking for a solution <math>(n,c)</math>, where both <math>n</math> and <math>c</math> are positive integers, <math>n\geq 2(c-1)</math>, and <math>n</math> is minimized. (The condition <math>n\geq 2(c-1)</math> states that even the last child had to eat a non-negative number of grapes.) |
The prime factorization of <math>2009</math> is <math>2009=7^2 \cdot 41</math>. Hence there are <math>6</math> ways how to factor <math>2009</math> into two positive terms <math>c</math> and <math>n-c+1</math>: | The prime factorization of <math>2009</math> is <math>2009=7^2 \cdot 41</math>. Hence there are <math>6</math> ways how to factor <math>2009</math> into two positive terms <math>c</math> and <math>n-c+1</math>: | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The smallest valid solution is therefore <math>c=41</math>, <math>n=\boxed{089}</math>. | The smallest valid solution is therefore <math>c=41</math>, <math>n=\boxed{089}</math>. | ||
+ | === Solution 2 === | ||
− | === | + | If the first child ate <math>n=2m</math> grapes, then the maximum number of grapes eaten by all the children together is <math>2m + (2m-2) + (2m-4) + \cdots + 4 + 2 = m(m+1)</math>. Similarly, if the first child ate <math>2m-1</math> grapes, the maximum total number of grapes eaten is <math>(2m-1)+(2m-3)+\cdots+3+1 = m^2</math>. |
− | + | For <math>m=44</math> the value <math>m(m+1)=44\cdot 45 =1980</math> is less than <math>2009</math>. Hence <math>n</math> must be at least <math>2\cdot 44+1=89</math>. For <math>n=89</math>, the maximum possible sum is <math>45^2=2025</math>. And we can easily see that <math>2009 = 2025 - 16 = 2025 - (1+3+5+7)</math>, hence <math>2009</math> grapes can indeed be achieved for <math>n=89</math> by dropping the last four children. | |
+ | |||
+ | Hence we found a solution with <math>n=89</math> and <math>45-4=41</math> kids, and we also showed that no smaller solution exists. Therefore the answer is <math>\boxed{089}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Solution 3 (similar to solution 1) === | ||
+ | If the winner ate n grapes, then 2nd place ate <math>n+2-4=n-2</math> grapes, 3rd place ate <math>n+2-6=n-4</math> grapes, 4th place ate <math>n-6</math> grapes, and so on. Our sum can be written as <math>n+(n-2)+(n-4)+(n-6)\dots</math>. If there are x places, we can express this sum as <math>(x+1)n-x(x+1)</math>, as there are <math>(x+1)</math> occurrences of n, and <math>(2+4+6+\dots)</math> is equal to <math>x(x+1)</math>. This can be factored as <math>(x+1)(n-x)=2009</math>. Our factor pairs are (1,2009), (7,287), and (41,49). To minimize n we take (41,49). If <math>x+1=41</math>, then <math>x=40</math> and <math>n=40+49=\boxed{089}</math>. (Note we would have come upon the same result had we used <math>x+1=49</math>.) | ||
+ | ~MC413551 | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2009|n=II|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{AIME box|year=2009|n=II|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Intermediate Number Theory Problems]] | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 17:40, 12 January 2024
Contents
Problem
A group of children held a grape-eating contest. When the contest was over, the winner had eaten grapes, and the child in -th place had eaten grapes. The total number of grapes eaten in the contest was . Find the smallest possible value of .
Solution
Resolving the ambiguity
The problem statement is confusing, as it can be interpreted in two ways: Either as "there is a such that the child in -th place had eaten grapes", or "for all , the child in -th place had eaten grapes".
The second meaning was apparrently the intended one. Hence we will restate the problem statement in this way:
A group of children held a grape-eating contest. When the contest was over, the following was true: There was a such that for each between and , inclusive, the child in -th place had eaten exactly grapes. The total number of grapes eaten in the contest was . Find the smallest possible value of .
Solution 1
The total number of grapes eaten can be computed as the sum of the arithmetic progression with initial term (the number of grapes eaten by the child in -st place), difference , and number of terms . We can easily compute that this sum is equal to .
Hence we have the equation , and we are looking for a solution , where both and are positive integers, , and is minimized. (The condition states that even the last child had to eat a non-negative number of grapes.)
The prime factorization of is . Hence there are ways how to factor into two positive terms and :
- , , then is a solution.
- , , then is a solution.
- , , then is a solution.
- In each of the other three cases, will obviously be less than , hence these are not valid solutions.
The smallest valid solution is therefore , .
Solution 2
If the first child ate grapes, then the maximum number of grapes eaten by all the children together is . Similarly, if the first child ate grapes, the maximum total number of grapes eaten is .
For the value is less than . Hence must be at least . For , the maximum possible sum is . And we can easily see that , hence grapes can indeed be achieved for by dropping the last four children.
Hence we found a solution with and kids, and we also showed that no smaller solution exists. Therefore the answer is .
Solution 3 (similar to solution 1)
If the winner ate n grapes, then 2nd place ate grapes, 3rd place ate grapes, 4th place ate grapes, and so on. Our sum can be written as . If there are x places, we can express this sum as , as there are occurrences of n, and is equal to . This can be factored as . Our factor pairs are (1,2009), (7,287), and (41,49). To minimize n we take (41,49). If , then and . (Note we would have come upon the same result had we used .) ~MC413551
See Also
2009 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.