Difference between revisions of "2022 AIME I Problems/Problem 6"
Ihatemath123 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | == Problem == |
+ | Find the number of ordered pairs of integers <math>(a, b)</math> such that the sequence<cmath>3, 4, 5, a, b, 30, 40, 50</cmath>is strictly increasing and no set of four (not necessarily consecutive) terms forms an arithmetic progression. | ||
− | + | == Solution == | |
− | + | Since <math>3,4,5,a</math> and <math>3,4,5,b</math> cannot be an arithmetic progression, <math>a</math> or <math>b</math> can never be <math>6</math>. Since <math>b, 30, 40, 50</math> and <math>a, 30, 40, 50</math> cannot be an arithmetic progression, <math>b</math> can never be <math>20</math>. Since <math>a < b</math>, there are <math>{24 - 2 \choose 2} = 231</math> ways to choose <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> with these two restrictions in mind. | |
− | ~ | + | However, there are still specific invalid cases counted in these <math>231</math> pairs <math>(a,b)</math>. Since |
+ | <cmath>3,5,a,b</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (7,9)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>a,b,30,50</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot be an arithmetic progression, so <math>(a,b) \neq (-10,10)</math>; however, since this pair was not counted in our <math>231</math>, we do not need to subtract it off. | ||
+ | <cmath>3,a,b,30</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, so <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (12,21)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>4, a, b, 40</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, so <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (16,28)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>5, a,b, 50</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, <math>(a,b) \neq 20, 35</math>; however, since this pair was not counted in our <math>231</math> (since we disallowed <math>a</math> or <math>b</math> to be <math>20</math>), we do not to subtract it off. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, the sequences <math>(3,a,b,40)</math>, <math>(3,a,b,50)</math>, <math>(4,a,b,30)</math>, <math>(4,a,b,50)</math>, <math>(5,a,b,30)</math> and <math>(5,a,b,40)</math> will never be arithmetic, since that would require <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> to be non-integers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, we need to subtract off <math>3</math> progressions from the <math>231</math> we counted, to get our final answer of <math>\boxed{228}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~ ihatemath123 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{AIME box|year=2022|n=I|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 19:45, 17 February 2022
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs of integers such that the sequenceis strictly increasing and no set of four (not necessarily consecutive) terms forms an arithmetic progression.
Solution
Since and cannot be an arithmetic progression, or can never be . Since and cannot be an arithmetic progression, can never be . Since , there are ways to choose and with these two restrictions in mind.
However, there are still specific invalid cases counted in these pairs . Since cannot form an arithmetic progression, . cannot be an arithmetic progression, so ; however, since this pair was not counted in our , we do not need to subtract it off. cannot form an arithmetic progression, so . cannot form an arithmetic progression, so . cannot form an arithmetic progression, ; however, since this pair was not counted in our (since we disallowed or to be ), we do not to subtract it off.
Also, the sequences , , , , and will never be arithmetic, since that would require and to be non-integers.
So, we need to subtract off progressions from the we counted, to get our final answer of .
~ ihatemath123
See Also
2022 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.