Difference between revisions of "2000 AIME I Problems/Problem 4"
Danielguo94 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Call the squares' side lengths from smallest to largest <math>a_1,\ldots,a_9</math>, and let <math>l,w</math> represent the dimensions of the rectangle. | Call the squares' side lengths from smallest to largest <math>a_1,\ldots,a_9</math>, and let <math>l,w</math> represent the dimensions of the rectangle. | ||
− | The picture shows that | + | The picture shows that |
− | <cmath>\begin{ | + | <cmath>\begin{align*} |
− | a_1+a_2 &= | + | a_1+a_2 &= a_3\ |
− | a_1 + a_3 &= | + | a_1 + a_3 &= a_4\ |
− | a_3 + a_4 &= | + | a_3 + a_4 &= a_5\ |
− | a_4 + a_5 &= | + | a_4 + a_5 &= a_6\ |
− | a_2 + a_3 + a_5 &= | + | a_2 + a_3 + a_5 &= a_7\ |
− | a_2 + a_7 &= | + | a_2 + a_7 &= a_8\ |
− | a_1 + a_4 + a_6 &= | + | a_1 + a_4 + a_6 &= a_9\ \intertext{and} |
− | a_6 + a_9 &= | + | a_6 + a_9 &= a_7 + a_8\end{align*}</cmath> |
− | With a bit of trial and error and some arithmetic, we can use | + | With a bit of trial and error and some arithmetic, we can use these equations to find that <math>5a_1 = 2a_2</math>; we can guess that <math>a_1 = 2</math>. Then solving gives <math>a_9 = 36</math>, <math>a_6=25</math>, <math>a_8 = 33</math>, which gives us <math>l=61,w=69</math>. These numbers are relatively prime, as desired. (If we started with <math>a_1</math> odd, the resulting sides would not be integers and we would need to scale up by a factor of <math>2</math> to make them integers; if we started with <math>a_1 > 2</math> even, the resulting dimensions would not be relatively prime and we would need to scale down.) The perimeter is <math>2(61)+2(69)=\boxed{260}</math>. |
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 07:55, 26 January 2012
Problem
The diagram shows a rectangle that has been dissected into nine non-overlapping squares. Given that the width and the height of the rectangle are relatively prime positive integers, find the perimeter of the rectangle.
![[asy]draw((0,0)--(69,0)--(69,61)--(0,61)--(0,0));draw((36,0)--(36,36)--(0,36)); draw((36,33)--(69,33));draw((41,33)--(41,61));draw((25,36)--(25,61)); draw((34,36)--(34,45)--(25,45)); draw((36,36)--(36,38)--(34,38)); draw((36,38)--(41,38)); draw((34,45)--(41,45));[/asy]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/1/d8140d628cc0905f333aa8deaface1b89ee6c983.png)
Solution
Call the squares' side lengths from smallest to largest , and let
represent the dimensions of the rectangle.
The picture shows that
With a bit of trial and error and some arithmetic, we can use these equations to find that ; we can guess that
. Then solving gives
,
,
, which gives us
. These numbers are relatively prime, as desired. (If we started with
odd, the resulting sides would not be integers and we would need to scale up by a factor of
to make them integers; if we started with
even, the resulting dimensions would not be relatively prime and we would need to scale down.) The perimeter is
.
See also
2000 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |