Difference between revisions of "1970 AHSME Problems/Problem 17"

(Solution)
(Solution)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
If <math>r>0</math> and <math>pr>qr</math>, we can divide by the positive number <math>r</math> and not change the inequality direction to get <math>p>q</math>.  Multiplying by <math>-1</math> (and flipping the inequality sign because we're multiplying by a negative number) leads to <math>-p < -q</math>, which directly contradicts <math>A</math>.
 
If <math>r>0</math> and <math>pr>qr</math>, we can divide by the positive number <math>r</math> and not change the inequality direction to get <math>p>q</math>.  Multiplying by <math>-1</math> (and flipping the inequality sign because we're multiplying by a negative number) leads to <math>-p < -q</math>, which directly contradicts <math>A</math>.
  
If <math>p < 0</math> (which is possible but not guaranteed), we can divide by <math>p</math> to get <math>1 > \frac{q}{p}</math>.  This contradicts <math>D</math>.
+
If <math>p < 0</math> (which is possible but not guaranteed), we can divide the true statement <math>p>q</math> by <math>p</math> to get <math>1 > \frac{q}{p}</math>.  This contradicts <math>D</math>.
  
 
If <math>(p, q, r) = (3, 2, 1)</math>, then the condition that <math>pr > qr</math> is satisfied.  However, <math>-p = -3</math> and <math>q = 2</math>, so <math>-p > q</math> is false, eliminating <math>B</math>.
 
If <math>(p, q, r) = (3, 2, 1)</math>, then the condition that <math>pr > qr</math> is satisfied.  However, <math>-p = -3</math> and <math>q = 2</math>, so <math>-p > q</math> is false, eliminating <math>B</math>.

Revision as of 21:39, 13 July 2019

Problem

If $r>0$, then for all $p$ and $q$ such that $pq\ne 0$ and $pr>qr$, we have

$\text{(A) } -p>-q\quad \text{(B) } -p>q\quad \text{(C) } 1>-q/p\quad \text{(D) } 1<q/p\quad \text{(E)  None of these}$

Solution

If $r>0$ and $pr>qr$, we can divide by the positive number $r$ and not change the inequality direction to get $p>q$. Multiplying by $-1$ (and flipping the inequality sign because we're multiplying by a negative number) leads to $-p < -q$, which directly contradicts $A$.

If $p < 0$ (which is possible but not guaranteed), we can divide the true statement $p>q$ by $p$ to get $1 > \frac{q}{p}$. This contradicts $D$.

If $(p, q, r) = (3, 2, 1)$, then the condition that $pr > qr$ is satisfied. However, $-p = -3$ and $q = 2$, so $-p > q$ is false, eliminating $B$.

If $(p, q, r) = (2, -3, 1)$, then $pr > qr$ is also satisfied. However, $-\frac{q}{p} = 1.5$, so $1 > -\frac{q}{p}$ is false, eliminating $C$.

All four options do not follow from the premises, leading to $\fbox{E}$ as the correct answer.

See also

1970 AHSC (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 16
Followed by
Problem 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
All AHSME Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Invalid username
Login to AoPS