1983 AIME Problems/Problem 13
Contents
Problem
For and each of its non-empty subsets a unique alternating sum is defined as follows. Arrange the numbers in the subset in decreasing order and then, beginning with the largest, alternately add and subtract successive numbers. For example, the alternating sum for
is
and for
it is simply
. Find the sum of all such alternating sums for
.
Solution
Solution 1
Let be a non- empty subset of
.
Then the alternating sum of , plus the alternating sum of
, is
. This is because, since
is the largest element, when we take an alternating sum, each number in
ends up with the opposite sign of each corresponding element of
.
Because there are of these pairs of sets, the sum of all possible subsets of our given set is
, giving an answer of
.
Solution 2 (almost the same as Solution 1)
Consider a given subset of
that contains
; then there is a subset
which contains all the elements of
except for
, and only those elements . Since each element of
has one fewer element preceding it than it does in
, their signs are opposite. Thus the sum of the alternating sums of
and
is equal to 7. There are
subsets containing 7, so our answer is
.
Solution 3
Denote the desired total of all alternating sums of an -element set as
. We are looking for
. Notice that all alternating sums of an
-element set are also alternating sums of an
-element set. However, when we go from an
to
element set, for each subset with the new element, we are adding the new element and subtracting one of the alternating sums of the
-element set. There are
subsets of an
-element set that includes the new element, giving us the relationship
. When
, we therefore get
.
Solution 4
We analyze all the numbers from 1 to 7 separately to see where the number contributes its positive or negative to the sum of the alternating sums. Whenever 7 appears, which it does 64 times, it contributes a positive because it is always first. This gives a net gain of .
If we look at when 6 appears, which it also does 64 times, whether it comes as positive or negative depends on the presence of 7. Half of the subsets with 6 have 7 resulting in subtracting 6 each time, while the other half does not have 7 adding 6 each time, so these contributions of sixes cancel each other out giving a net gain of 0.
The same thing happens to any positive integer less than 7. This is because the determination of a positive or negative contribution is dependent on the number of larger numbers in front of it(For example, the sign of 3 is dependent on the presence of 4, 5, 6, and 7 in the subset). If the number of larger numbers is even, it gives in a positive copy while odd produces its negative. We know that the frequencies of these two cases occurring are the same because via the Binomial Theorem. Therefore, all positive integers less than 7 will not have any effect and our sum will be
.
Solution 5
Let . Let the alternating sum of a certain subset of
of
be
and let
We see that
as if
is the largest element in
Now, we know that
so
Thus, our answer (which is the
case) is
Solution 6 (Lucky Guess, Not Recommended)
Computing the first few gives,
,
,
, and
. From this, we think the formula for
must be an exponential function in terms of
because the amount of subsets that a set with
elements has is
and this is a question about subsets so we try
=
. Trying this formula for the first few
, gives away
to be
or more simply
=
(try proving this by induction) . Substuiting
gives the requested answer of
.
Sidenote
This solution is not a proof and since the AIME does not require proof, it is okay to finsh the answer like this. If you would like to see why the formula holds, please observe Solution 3.
-ThemathCanadian
See Also
1983 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 12 |
Followed by Problem 14 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |