2012 AIME I Problems/Problem 14
Complex numbers and are zeros of a polynomial and The points corresponding to and in the complex plane are the vertices of a right triangle with hypotenuse Find
By Vieta's formula, the sum of the roots is equal to 0, or . Therefore, . Because the centroid of any triangle is the average of its vertices, the centroid of this triangle is the origin. Let one leg of the right triangle be and the other leg be . Without the loss of generality, let be the hypotenuse. The magnitudes of , , and are just of the medians because the origin, or the centroid in this case, cuts the median in a ratio of . So, because is two thirds of the median from . Similarly, . The median from is just half the hypotenuse because the median of any right triangle is just half the hypotenuse. So, . Hence, . Therefore, .
Assume and are real, so at least one of and must be real, with the remaining roots being pairs of complex conjugates. Without loss of generality, we assume is real and and are and respectively. By symmetry, the triangle described by and must be isosceles and is thus an isosceles right triangle with hypotenuse Now since has no term, we must have and thus Also, since the length of the altitude from the right angle of an isosceles triangle is half the length of the hypotenuse, and thus We can then solve for :
Now is the distance between and so and thus
Solution 3 (Messy)
Let the roots , , and each be represented by complex numbers , , and . By Vieta's formulas, their sum is 0. Breaking into real and imaginary components, we get:
And, we know that the sum of the squares of the magnitudes of each is 250, so
Given the complex plane, we set each of these complex numbers to points: , , . WLOG let be the vertex opposite the hypotenuse.
If the three points form a right triangle, the vectors from to and 's dot product is 0.
Substituting and likewise, simplifying:
Rearranging we get:
The answer is the distance from to = . Substituting the equation equal to 250,
Taking our original equations summing to 0, and squaring each we get:
Adding, we get:
Substituting again we obtain:
Substituting the equivalence of :
Solving for , we find it equal to .
Substituting this value into our answer expression, we get:
, Answer = .
Solution 4 (clean)
As noted in the previous solutions, . Let , , and we have . Then the given translates to Note that in a right triangle, the sum of the squares of the three sides is equal to two times the square of the hypotenuse, by the pythagorean theorem. Thus, we have so and we may conclude. ~ rzlng
Solution 5 (dirty because of god intuition + wishful thinking)
First, note that the roots of this cubic will be and due to Vieta's, which means that the sum of the roots are 0.
Now, we use some god level wishful thinking. It would really be nice if one of these roots was on the real axis, and it was a right isosceles triangle, because that would be very convenient and easy to work with. The neat part is that it actually works
Set one of the roots as , where is any real number. WLOG, assume that this is the right angle. With symmetry to respect of the x axis (because symmetry makes the imaginary parts of the other 2 roots cancel out, besides the fact that complex conjugate root theorem forces it). This way, we can set the other 2 roots as and , making the roots add up to 0.
Now, as we want the roots to satisfy the original condition (right triangle) we are going to have to set an equation to find out. We use the fact that it is an isosceles right triangle to find that , which means that the 2 other roots are now and
Now we use the fact that . Clearly one of these is away from the origin, so that gets , and then we get which gets us , getting , so . So the final answer comes out to
P.S.: The main propose, saying that one root is on the real axis and the right triangle is a right isosceles triangle is not actually only a wishful thinking that came out by luck, but actually is something that must be true due to the complex conjugate root theorem. -SuperDolphin
- in this specific problem this logic is incorrect, as the coefficients of the polynomial can be complex. If a question specified real roots, then this would be appropriate. In this case, it is just wishful thinking as stated above
Solution 5 (vectors)
As shown in the other solutions, .
Without loss of generality, let be the complex number opposite the hypotenuse.
Note that there is an isomorphism between under and under .
Let , , and be the corresponding vectors to , , and .
Now implies that
Also note that because there is a right angle at , and are perpendicular.
Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
|2012 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)|
|1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15|
|All AIME Problems and Solutions|