Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Claim: Emphasized that this claim has 2 proofs.) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
If <math>a=b,</math> then <math>\gcd(a,b)=a=b,</math> from which the claim is clearly true. | If <math>a=b,</math> then <math>\gcd(a,b)=a=b,</math> from which the claim is clearly true. | ||
− | Otherwise, let <math>a>b</math> without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers <math>p>q>0,</math> we have <cmath>\gcd(p,q)=\gcd(p-q,q).</cmath> We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: <cmath>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^a-1-u^{a-b}\left(u^b-1\right)\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right).</cmath> | + | Otherwise, let <math>a>b</math> without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers <math>p>q>0,</math> we have <cmath>\gcd(p,q)=\gcd(p-q,q)=\cdots=\gcd(q,p\text{ mod }q).</cmath> We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: <cmath>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^a-1-u^{a-b}\left(u^b-1\right)\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right).</cmath> |
+ | Continuing, we will get | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)&=\cdots \\ | ||
+ | &=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right) \\ | ||
+ | &=\cdots \\ | ||
+ | &=\gcd\left(u^d-1,u^d-1\right) \\ | ||
+ | &=u^d-1 | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | for some positive integer <math>d.</math> | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM |
Revision as of 02:37, 1 April 2021
Contents
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs such that and are positive integers in the set and the greatest common divisor of and is not .
Solution 1
We make use of the (olympiad number theory) lemma that .
Noting , we have (by difference of squares) It is now easy to calculate the answer (with casework on ) as .
~Lcz
Solution 2 (Generalized and Comprehensive)
Claim
If and are positive integers for which then
There are two proofs to this claim, as shown below.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)
If then from which the claim is clearly true.
Otherwise, let without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers we have We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: Continuing, we will get for some positive integer
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 2
Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution
Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.
~MRENTHUSIASM
See also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.