Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 15"

Revision as of 16:33, 12 May 2021

Problem

Let $f(n)$ and $g(n)$ be functions satisfying $f(n) = \begin{cases}\sqrt{n} & \text{ if } \sqrt{n} \text{ is an integer}\\ 1 + f(n+1) & \text{ otherwise} \end{cases}$ and $g(n) = \begin{cases}\sqrt{n} & \text{ if } \sqrt{n} \text{ is an integer}\\ 2 + g(n+2) & \text{ otherwise} \end{cases}$ for positive integers $n$ . Find the least positive integer $n$ such that $\tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} = \tfrac{4}{7}$ .

Solution 1

Consider what happens when we try to calculate $f(n)$ where n is not a square. If $k^2<n<(k+1)^2$ for (positive) integer k, recursively calculating the value of the function gives us $f(n)=(k+1)^2-n+f((k+1)^2)=k^2+3k+2-n$ . Note that this formula also returns the correct value when $n=(k+1)^2$ , but not when $n=k^2$ . Thus $f(n)=k^2+3k+2-n$ for $k^2<n \leq (k+1)^2$ .

If $2 \mid (k+1)^2-n$ , $g(n)$ returns the same value as $f(n)$ . This is because the recursion once again stops at $(k+1)^2$ . We seek a case in which $f(n)<g(n)$ , so obviously this is not what we want. We want $(k+1)^2,n$ to have a different parity, or $n, k$ have the same parity. When this is the case, $g(n)$ instead returns $(k+2)^2-n+g((k+2)^2)=k^2+5k+6-n$ .

Write $7f(n)=4g(n)$ , which simplifies to $3k^2+k-10=3n$ . Notice that we want the $LHS$ expression to be divisible by 3; as a result, $k \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$ . We also want n to be strictly greater than $k^2$ , so $k-10>0, k>10$ . The LHS expression is always even (why?), so to ensure that k and n share the same parity, k should be even. Then the least k that satisfies these requirements is $k=16$ , giving $n=258$ .

Indeed - if we check our answer, it works. Therefore, the answer is $\boxed{258}$ .

-Ross Gao

Solution 2 (More Variables)

We restrict $n$ in which $k^2<n\leq(k+1)^2$ for some positive integer $k,$ or $n=(k+1)^2-p\hspace{40mm}(1)$ for some nonnegative integer $p.$ By observations, we get $\begin{align*} f\left((k+1)^2\right)&=k+1, \\ f\left((k+1)^2-1\right)&=k+2, \\ f\left((k+1)^2-2\right)&=k+3, \\ &\cdots \\ f\bigl(\phantom{ }\underbrace{(k+1)^2-p}_{n}\phantom{ }\bigr)&=k+p+1. \hspace{19mm}(2) \\ \end{align*}$ If $n$ and $(k+1)^2$ have the same parity, then starting with $g\left((k+1)^2\right)=k+1,$ we get $g(n)=f(n)$ by a similar process. This contradicts the precondition $\frac{f(n)}{g(n)} = \frac{4}{7}.$ Therefore, $n$ and $(k+1)^2$ must have different parities, from which $n$ and $(k+2)^2$ must have the same parity.

Along with the earlier restriction, we obtain $k^2<n\leq(k+1)^2<(k+2)^2,$ or $n=(k+2)^2-2q\hspace{38.25mm}(3)$ for some positive integer $q.$ By observations, we get $\begin{align*} g\left((k+2)^2\right)&=k+2, \\ g\left((k+2)^2-2\right)&=k+4, \\ g\left((k+2)^2-4\right)&=k+6, \\ &\cdots \\ g\bigl(\phantom{ }\underbrace{(k+2)^2-2q}_{n}\phantom{ }\bigr)&=k+2q+2. \hspace{15.5mm}(4) \\ \end{align*}$ By $(2)$ and $(4),$ we have $\frac{f(n)}{g(n)}=\frac{k+p+1}{k+2q+2}=\frac{4}{7}. \hspace{27mm}(5)$ From $(1)$ and $(3),$ equating the expressions for $n$ gives $(k+1)^2-p=(k+2)^2-2q.$ Solving for $k$ produces $k=\frac{2q-p-3}{2}. \hspace{41.25mm}(6)$ We substitute $(6)$ into $(5),$ then simplify, cross-multiply, and rearrange: $\begin{align*} \frac{\tfrac{2q-p-3}{2}+p+1}{\tfrac{2q-p-3}{2}+2q+2}&=\frac{4}{7} \\ \frac{p+2q-1}{-p+6q+1}&=\frac{4}{7} \\ 7p+14q-7&=-4p+24q+4 \\ 11p-11&=10q \\ 11(p-1)&=10q. \hspace{29mm}(7) \end{align*}$ Since $\gcd(11,10)=1,$ we know that $p-1$ must be divisible by $10,$ and $q$ must be divisible by $11.$ Furthermore, rewriting the restriction $k^2<n$ in terms of $p$ and $q$ gives $\begin{align*} k^2&<\underbrace{(k+2)^2-2q}_{\text{by }(3)} \\ q&<2k+2 &\hspace{5.5mm}(8) \\ q&<2\biggl(\phantom{ }\underbrace{\frac{2q-p-3}{2}}_{\text{by }(6)}\phantom{ }\biggr)+2 \\ p+1&<q. &\hspace{5.5mm}(9) \end{align*}$ Combining $(8)$ and $(9)$ produces the compound inequality $p+1<q<2k+2. \hspace{34.625mm}(10)$

Note that if we start with $k^2<\underbrace{(k+1)^2-p}_{\text{by }(1)}$ instead, then we get $p<2k+1$ and $p<q-1,$ both of which agree with $(10).$

To minimize $n$ in either $(1)$ or $(3),$ we should minimize $k,$ so we should minimize $p$ and $q$ in $(10).$ From $(6)$ and $(7),$ we construct the following table: $\begin{array}{c|c|c|c} & & & \\ [-2.5ex] \boldsymbol{p} & \boldsymbol{q} & \boldsymbol{k} & \textbf{Satisfies }\boldsymbol{(10)?} \\ [0.5ex] \hline & & & \\ [-2ex] 11 & 11 & 4 & \\ 21 & 22 & 10 & \\ 31 & 33 & 16 & \checkmark \\ \geq41 & \geq44 & \geq22 & \checkmark \\ \end{array}$ Finally, we have $(p,q,k)=(31,33,16).$ Substituting this result into either $(1)$ or $(3)$ generates $n=\boxed{258}.$

Remark

We can verify that $\frac{f(258)}{g(258)}=\frac{31+\overbrace{f(289)}^{17}}{2\cdot33+\underbrace{f(324)}_{18}}=\frac{48}{84}=\frac47.$

~MRENTHUSIASM

Video Solution

https://youtu.be/tRVe2bKwIY8

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 Note that if we start with <math>k^2<\underbrace{(k+1)^2-p}_{\text{by }(1)}</math> instead, then we get <math>p<2k+1</math> and <math>p<q-1,</math> both of which agree with <math>(10).</math>
-In order to minimize <math>n,</math> we should minimize <math>k.</math> By <math>(10),</math> we should minimize <math>p</math> and <math>q.</math> From <math>(6)</math> and <math>(7),</math> we construct the following table:
+To minimize <math>n</math> in either <math>(1)</math> or <math>(3),</math> we should minimize <math>k,</math> so we should minimize <math>p</math> and <math>q</math> in <math>(10).</math> From <math>(6)</math> and <math>(7),</math> we construct the following table:
 <cmath>\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}
 & & & \\ [-2.5ex]

2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by Problem 14	Followed by Last Question
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search