Difference between revisions of "2017 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 24"
Ihatemath123 (talk | contribs) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 3 (Linearity of expectation)) |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | ==Solution 3 (Linearity of | + | ==Solution 3 (Linearity of Expectation)== |
For any randomly chosen day, there is a <math>\frac{2}{3}</math> chance the first child does not call her, a <math>\frac{3}{4}</math> chance the second child does not call her and a <math>\frac{4}{5}</math> chance the third child does not call her. So, in a randomly chosen day, there is a <math>\frac{2}{3} \times \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{4}{5} = \frac{2}{5}</math> chance no child calls her. | For any randomly chosen day, there is a <math>\frac{2}{3}</math> chance the first child does not call her, a <math>\frac{3}{4}</math> chance the second child does not call her and a <math>\frac{4}{5}</math> chance the third child does not call her. So, in a randomly chosen day, there is a <math>\frac{2}{3} \times \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{4}{5} = \frac{2}{5}</math> chance no child calls her. | ||
In particular, this "unrigorous" reasoning becomes rigorous, by linearity of expectation, when we take a sample of <math>360</math> days; over the first <math>360</math> days, <math>360 \times \frac{2}{5} = 144</math> days will go without a phone call. Now, we simply check the remaining days; on day <math>361</math> and <math>362</math>, nobody calls her; on day <math>363</math>, the child that calls every three days will call her; on day <math>364</math>, the child that calls every four days will call her; on day <math>365</math>, the child that calls every five days will call her. Thus, we add two more days to <math>144</math>, to get our answer of <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D) }146}</math>. | In particular, this "unrigorous" reasoning becomes rigorous, by linearity of expectation, when we take a sample of <math>360</math> days; over the first <math>360</math> days, <math>360 \times \frac{2}{5} = 144</math> days will go without a phone call. Now, we simply check the remaining days; on day <math>361</math> and <math>362</math>, nobody calls her; on day <math>363</math>, the child that calls every three days will call her; on day <math>364</math>, the child that calls every four days will call her; on day <math>365</math>, the child that calls every five days will call her. Thus, we add two more days to <math>144</math>, to get our answer of <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D) }146}</math>. | ||
− | ~ ihatemath123 | + | ~ihatemath123 |
==Video Solutions== | ==Video Solutions== |
Revision as of 03:45, 13 August 2022
Contents
Problem
Mrs. Sanders has three grandchildren, who call her regularly. One calls her every three days, one calls her every four days, and one calls her every five days. All three called her on December 31, 2016. On how many days during the next year did she not receive a phone call from any of her grandchildren?
Solution 1 (Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion)
We use Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion. There are days in the year, and we subtract the days that she gets at least phone call, which is
To this result we add the number of days where she gets at least phone calls in a day because we double subtracted these days, which is
We now subtract the number of days where she gets three phone calls, which is Therefore, our answer is
Solution 2 (Least Common Multiple)
Note that so there is a cycle every days.
As shown below, all days in a cycle that Mrs. Sanders receives a phone call from any of her grandchildren are colored in red, yellow, or green. The year 2017 has days, or cycles and days.
- For each cycle, there are days that Mrs. Sanders does not receive a phone call, as indicated by the white squares.
- For the last days, there are days that Mrs. Sanders does not receive a phone call, as indicated by the first days in a cycle.
Together, the answer is
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 3 (Linearity of Expectation)
For any randomly chosen day, there is a chance the first child does not call her, a chance the second child does not call her and a chance the third child does not call her. So, in a randomly chosen day, there is a chance no child calls her.
In particular, this "unrigorous" reasoning becomes rigorous, by linearity of expectation, when we take a sample of days; over the first days, days will go without a phone call. Now, we simply check the remaining days; on day and , nobody calls her; on day , the child that calls every three days will call her; on day , the child that calls every four days will call her; on day , the child that calls every five days will call her. Thus, we add two more days to , to get our answer of .
~ihatemath123
Video Solutions
https://youtu.be/a3rGDEmrxC0 ~Happytwin
https://youtu.be/Zhsb5lv6jCI?t=2797
https://youtu.be/9JDGys53Sn8 ~savannahsolver
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eJ422kMgs0
See Also
2017 AMC 8 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 23 |
Followed by Problem 25 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.