Difference between revisions of "2012 AIME I Problems/Problem 13"
(→Solution 1) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Three concentric circles have radii <math>3,</math> <math>4,</math> and <math>5.</math> An equilateral triangle with one vertex on each circle has side length <math>s.</math> The largest possible area of the triangle can be written as <math>a + \tfrac{b}{c} \sqrt{d},</math> where <math>a,</math> <math>b,</math> <math>c,</math> and <math>d</math> are positive integers, <math>b</math> and <math>c</math> are relatively prime, and <math>d</math> is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find <math>a+b+c+d.</math> | Three concentric circles have radii <math>3,</math> <math>4,</math> and <math>5.</math> An equilateral triangle with one vertex on each circle has side length <math>s.</math> The largest possible area of the triangle can be written as <math>a + \tfrac{b}{c} \sqrt{d},</math> where <math>a,</math> <math>b,</math> <math>c,</math> and <math>d</math> are positive integers, <math>b</math> and <math>c</math> are relatively prime, and <math>d</math> is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find <math>a+b+c+d.</math> | ||
− | == Solution 1== | + | == Solution == |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Solution 1 === | ||
Reinterpret the problem in the following manner. Equilateral triangle <math>ABC</math> has a point <math>X</math> on the interior such that <math>AX = 5,</math> <math>BX = 4,</math> and <math>CX = 3.</math> A <math>60^\circ</math> counter-clockwise rotation about vertex <math>A</math> maps <math>X</math> to <math>X'</math> and <math>C</math> to <math>C'.</math> Note that angle <math>XAX'</math> is <math>60</math> and <math>XA = X'A = 5</math> which tells us that triangle <math>XAX'</math> is equilateral and that <math>XX' = 5.</math> We now notice that <math>XC = 3</math> and <math>X'C = 4</math> which tells us that angle <math>XCX'</math> is <math>90</math> because there is a <math>3</math>-<math>4</math>-<math>5</math> Pythagorean triple. Now note that <math>\angle ABC + \angle ACB = 120^\circ</math> and <math>\angle XCA + \angle XBA = 90^\circ,</math> so <math>\angle XCB+\angle XBC = 30^\circ</math> and <math>\angle BXC = 150^\circ.</math> Applying the law of cosines on triangle <math>BXC</math> yields | Reinterpret the problem in the following manner. Equilateral triangle <math>ABC</math> has a point <math>X</math> on the interior such that <math>AX = 5,</math> <math>BX = 4,</math> and <math>CX = 3.</math> A <math>60^\circ</math> counter-clockwise rotation about vertex <math>A</math> maps <math>X</math> to <math>X'</math> and <math>C</math> to <math>C'.</math> Note that angle <math>XAX'</math> is <math>60</math> and <math>XA = X'A = 5</math> which tells us that triangle <math>XAX'</math> is equilateral and that <math>XX' = 5.</math> We now notice that <math>XC = 3</math> and <math>X'C = 4</math> which tells us that angle <math>XCX'</math> is <math>90</math> because there is a <math>3</math>-<math>4</math>-<math>5</math> Pythagorean triple. Now note that <math>\angle ABC + \angle ACB = 120^\circ</math> and <math>\angle XCA + \angle XBA = 90^\circ,</math> so <math>\angle XCB+\angle XBC = 30^\circ</math> and <math>\angle BXC = 150^\circ.</math> Applying the law of cosines on triangle <math>BXC</math> yields | ||
Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
so our final answer is <math>3+4+25+9 = \boxed{041}.</math> | so our final answer is <math>3+4+25+9 = \boxed{041}.</math> | ||
− | == | + | |
+ | === Solution 2 === | ||
Here is a proof that shows that there are 2 distinct equilateral triangles (up to congruence) that have the given properties: | Here is a proof that shows that there are 2 distinct equilateral triangles (up to congruence) that have the given properties: | ||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
Now, suppose <math>O</math> does not lie in the interior of triangle <math>ABC</math>. We then obtain convex quadrilateral <math>OBAC</math> with diagonals <math>CB</math> and <math>OA</math> intersecting at <math>X</math>. Here <math>AX=AB=AC=x</math>. We may let <math>\alpha</math> denote the measure of angle <math>CAX</math> so that angle <math>XAB</math> measures <math>60-\alpha</math>. Note that the law of cosines on triangles <math>CXA</math> and <math>BXA</math> yield the same equations as in the first case with <math>\theta</math> replaced with <math>\alpha</math>. Thus we obtain again <math>x^2=25\pm12\sqrt{3}</math>. If <math>x^2=25+12\sqrt{3}</math> then <math>x\approx 6.8</math>, but this is impossible since <math>AX\leq 5</math> but the shortest possible distance from <math>A</math> to <math>X</math> is the height of equilateral triangle <math>ABC</math> which is <math>\approx6.8\sqrt{3}\approx5.8</math>; a contradiction. Hence in this case <math>x^2=25-12\sqrt{3}</math>. But, the area of this triangle is clearly less than that in the first case, so we are done. Hence the phrasing of the question (the triangle with maximal area) is absolutely necessary since there are 2 possible triangles (up to congruence). | Now, suppose <math>O</math> does not lie in the interior of triangle <math>ABC</math>. We then obtain convex quadrilateral <math>OBAC</math> with diagonals <math>CB</math> and <math>OA</math> intersecting at <math>X</math>. Here <math>AX=AB=AC=x</math>. We may let <math>\alpha</math> denote the measure of angle <math>CAX</math> so that angle <math>XAB</math> measures <math>60-\alpha</math>. Note that the law of cosines on triangles <math>CXA</math> and <math>BXA</math> yield the same equations as in the first case with <math>\theta</math> replaced with <math>\alpha</math>. Thus we obtain again <math>x^2=25\pm12\sqrt{3}</math>. If <math>x^2=25+12\sqrt{3}</math> then <math>x\approx 6.8</math>, but this is impossible since <math>AX\leq 5</math> but the shortest possible distance from <math>A</math> to <math>X</math> is the height of equilateral triangle <math>ABC</math> which is <math>\approx6.8\sqrt{3}\approx5.8</math>; a contradiction. Hence in this case <math>x^2=25-12\sqrt{3}</math>. But, the area of this triangle is clearly less than that in the first case, so we are done. Hence the phrasing of the question (the triangle with maximal area) is absolutely necessary since there are 2 possible triangles (up to congruence). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 3=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The problem basically asks for the area of <math>\bigtriangleup ABC</math> such that it is equilateral and there is a point <math>O</math> inside of the triangle which satisfies <math>AO = 3</math>, <math>BO = 4</math>, and <math>CO = 5</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>AB = BC = AC = s</math>. We want the area of the triangle, which is just <math>[ABC] = \frac{s^{2}\sqrt{3}}{4}</math>. Thus, we want to know <math>s^{2}</math>, and then finding the area will be a matter of simple calculation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | By law of cosines, <math>s^{2} = 3^{2} + 4^{2} - 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4 \cdot \cos{\theta} = 25 - 24\cos{\theta}</math>, where <math>\theta = \angle{AOB}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, if we plug this value in for <math>s^{2}</math> in the area formula, we get <math>[ABC] = \frac{25}{4}\sqrt{3} - 6\sqrt{3}\cos{\theta}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that, in order for this expression to be in the required answer form <math>a + \tfrac{b}{c} \sqrt{d}</math>, <math>\cos{\theta}</math> must involve <math>\sqrt{3}</math>. Now, even minimal experience with simple trigonometric functions will instantly make you think of <math>\frac{\pi}{6}</math> or <math>\frac{5\pi}{6}</math>. The former doesn't work, since <math>\angle{AOB}</math> is obtuse, so <math>\theta = \frac{5\pi}{6}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, our area must be <math>[ABC] = \frac{25}{4}\sqrt{3} + 9</math>, and so our answer is <math>\boxed{041}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\textbf{NOTE:}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we were using law of cosines, we instantly went to the sub-triangle <math>\bigtriangleup ABO</math>. Why? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that <math>\angle{ABO}</math> is bigger than both <math>\angle{BOC}</math> and <math>\angle{AOC}</math>. Intuition and eyeballing a diagram tells you that this is true. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also notice that the three angles add up to <math>2\pi</math> radians. One of our angles is <math>\frac{5\pi}{6}</math> by our reasoning/guessing above. This angle then must be the greatest angle out of the three, since the three angles all must be obtuse, and if one angle was <math>\frac{5\pi}{6}</math>, and another was greater than <math>\frac{5\pi}{6}</math>, then the third angle would be less than <math>\frac{\pi}{3}</math>, leading to a contradiction, since we know that all of the three angles are obtuse. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, we know that our greatest angle <math>\angle{ABO} = \frac{5\pi}{6}</math>. So, we instantly went to the sub-triangle <math>\bigtriangleup ABO</math> when using law of cosines since the other sub-triangles will get us nowhere. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2012|n=I|num-b=12|num-a=14}} | {{AIME box|year=2012|n=I|num-b=12|num-a=14}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 22:54, 5 March 2019
Problem 13
Three concentric circles have radii and An equilateral triangle with one vertex on each circle has side length The largest possible area of the triangle can be written as where and are positive integers, and are relatively prime, and is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find
Solution
Solution 1
Reinterpret the problem in the following manner. Equilateral triangle has a point on the interior such that and A counter-clockwise rotation about vertex maps to and to Note that angle is and which tells us that triangle is equilateral and that We now notice that and which tells us that angle is because there is a -- Pythagorean triple. Now note that and so and Applying the law of cosines on triangle yields
and thus the area of equals
so our final answer is
Solution 2
Here is a proof that shows that there are 2 distinct equilateral triangles (up to congruence) that have the given properties:
We claim that there are 2 distinct equilateral triangles (up to congruence) that have the given properties; one of which has largest area. We have 2 cases to consider; either the center of the circles lies in the interior of triangle or it does not (and we shall show that both can happen). To see that the first case can occur, refer to Solution 1 above, or for a less creative and more direct approach proceed as follows. Using the notation from Solution 1, let be the measure of angle so that angle has measure . Let . The law of cosines on triangles and yields and . Solving this system will yield the value of . Since we have that . Substituting these into the equation we obtain . After clearing denominators, combining like terms, isolating the square root, squaring, and expanding, we obtain so that by the quadratic formula . Under the hypothesis that lies in the interior of triangle , must be . To see this, note that the other value for is roughly so that , but since and we have a contradiction. We then obtain the area as in Solution 1.
Now, suppose does not lie in the interior of triangle . We then obtain convex quadrilateral with diagonals and intersecting at . Here . We may let denote the measure of angle so that angle measures . Note that the law of cosines on triangles and yield the same equations as in the first case with replaced with . Thus we obtain again . If then , but this is impossible since but the shortest possible distance from to is the height of equilateral triangle which is ; a contradiction. Hence in this case . But, the area of this triangle is clearly less than that in the first case, so we are done. Hence the phrasing of the question (the triangle with maximal area) is absolutely necessary since there are 2 possible triangles (up to congruence).
Solution 3
The problem basically asks for the area of such that it is equilateral and there is a point inside of the triangle which satisfies , , and .
Let . We want the area of the triangle, which is just . Thus, we want to know , and then finding the area will be a matter of simple calculation.
By law of cosines, , where .
Now, if we plug this value in for in the area formula, we get .
Notice that, in order for this expression to be in the required answer form , must involve . Now, even minimal experience with simple trigonometric functions will instantly make you think of or . The former doesn't work, since is obtuse, so .
Thus, our area must be , and so our answer is .
When we were using law of cosines, we instantly went to the sub-triangle . Why?
Notice that is bigger than both and . Intuition and eyeballing a diagram tells you that this is true.
Also notice that the three angles add up to radians. One of our angles is by our reasoning/guessing above. This angle then must be the greatest angle out of the three, since the three angles all must be obtuse, and if one angle was , and another was greater than , then the third angle would be less than , leading to a contradiction, since we know that all of the three angles are obtuse.
Thus, we know that our greatest angle . So, we instantly went to the sub-triangle when using law of cosines since the other sub-triangles will get us nowhere.
See also
2012 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 12 |
Followed by Problem 14 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.