Difference between revisions of "2017 AIME I Problems/Problem 9"

(Add Solution 5)
(Solution 5)
Line 57: Line 57:
  
 
-AlexLikeMath
 
-AlexLikeMath
 +
 +
==Solution 6 (bash, slower, but safer)==
 +
 +
The first thing you should realize is that each term after the tenth is another two-digit number chained to the last number. 10, 1011, 101112, etc. Now the fact that the sequence starts at 10 can be completely discarded for this solution. Just consider a(10) a(1), and we can add nine to the answer at the end.
 +
 +
 +
The second step is to split 99 as 9 and 11 and solve for divisibility rules individually. Let's start with 11 because it gives us the most information to continue.
 +
 +
 +
In any number generated, if the numbers don't go beyond 20, then the highest number we can get is 10111213141516171819, with every odd digit being 1. This is a little risky because we are assuming that it doesn't exceed 20. If someone wanted to be absolutely sure they could continue, but this is unnecessary later and a big hassle. Anyways, now we write an equation to check for divisibility by 11. We add the even digits, which is ((((n-1) + 0) * n)/2)-n. (apologies for latex illiteracy, please add latex if you can) I don't think I need to go in-depth, but the concept here is to add 0 to (nth-1 term) altogether, then subtract the number of ones in it, which is n. Simplify to (n(n-3))/2 congruent to 0 mod 11. Now notice the divide by two can be discarded because one of n or (n-3) will be even. So if n or n-3 is to be divisible by 11, we can make a simple list.
 +
 +
n = 0, 3, 11, 14, 22, 25, 33, 36, 44, 47, etc.
 +
 +
 +
Now we test each n for divisibility by 9.
 +
This is done by making a list that ultimately calculates the sum of every digit in the large number.
 +
a(1) to a(10) has the first digit 1. a(11) to a(20) has the first digit 2, and so on.
 +
The necessary thing to realize is that the sum of all digits 0-9 is divisible by 9, so we only have to solve for the sum of the first digits, and then the short list of second digits.
 +
 +
For example, let's test n=25.
 +
 +
So we know that 25 include both 1-10 and 11-20, so that's 10 + 20 right away. 21-25 contains 5 numbers that have the first digit 3, so +15. Then we add 0-4 together, which is 10. 10+20+15+10=55, which is not divisible by 9, so it is not the answer.
 +
 +
Do this for just a minute you get that 36 sums to 99, our answer! So n(36) is the answer, right? Don't forget we have to add 9 because we translated a(10) to a(1) at the very beginning!
 +
Finally, after a short bash, we get <math>\boxed{045}</math>.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
{{AIME box|year=2017|n=I|num-b=8|num-a=10}}
 
{{AIME box|year=2017|n=I|num-b=8|num-a=10}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}

Revision as of 16:46, 18 May 2020

Problem 9

Let $a_{10} = 10$, and for each integer $n >10$ let $a_n = 100a_{n - 1} + n$. Find the least $n > 10$ such that $a_n$ is a multiple of $99$.

Solution 1

Writing out the recursive statement for $a_n, a_{n-1}, \dots, a_{10}$ and summing them gives \[a_n+\dots+a_{10}=100(a_{n-1}+\dots+a_{10})+n+\dots+10\] Which simplifies to \[a_n=99(a_{n-1}+\dots+a_{10})+\frac{1}{2}(n+10)(n-9)\] Therefore, $a_n$ is divisible by 99 if and only if $\frac{1}{2}(n+10)(n-9)$ is divisible by 99, so $(n+10)(n-9)$ needs to be divisible by 9 and 11. Assume that $n+10$ is a multiple of 11. Writing out a few terms, $n=12, 23, 34, 45$, we see that $n=45$ is the smallest $n$ that works in this case. Next, assume that $n-9$ is a multiple of 11. Writing out a few terms, $n=20, 31, 42, 53$, we see that $n=53$ is the smallest $n$ that works in this case. The smallest $n$ is $\boxed{045}$.

Note that we can also construct the solution using CRT by assuming either $11$ divides $n+10$ and $9$ divides $n-9$, or $9$ divides $n+10$ and $11$ divides $n-9$, and taking the smaller solution.

Solution 2

\[a_n \equiv a_{n-1} + n \pmod {99}\] By looking at the first few terms, we can see that \[a_n \equiv 10+11+12+ \dots + n \pmod {99}\] This implies \[a_n \equiv \frac{n(n+1)}{2} - \frac{10*9}{2} \pmod {99}\] Since $a_n \equiv 0 \pmod {99}$, we can rewrite the equivalence, and simplify \[0 \equiv \frac{n(n+1)}{2} - \frac{10*9}{2} \pmod {99}\] \[0 \equiv n(n+1) - 90 \pmod {99}\] \[0 \equiv 4n^2+4n+36 \pmod {99}\] \[0 \equiv (2n+1)^2+35 \pmod {99}\] \[64 \equiv (2n+1)^2 \pmod {99}\] The only squares that are congruent to $64 \pmod {99}$ are $(\pm 8)^2$ and $(\pm 19)^2$, so \[2n+1 \equiv -8, 8, 19, \text{or } {-19} \pmod {99}\] $2n+1 \equiv -8 \pmod {99}$ yields $n=45$ as the smallest integer solution.

$2n+1 \equiv 8 \pmod {99}$ yields $n=53$ as the smallest integer solution.

$2n+1 \equiv -19 \pmod {99}$ yields $n=89$ as the smallest integer solution.

$2n+1 \equiv 19 \pmod {99}$ yields $n=9$ as the smallest integer solution. However, $n$ must be greater than $10$.

The smallest positive integer solution greater than $10$ is $n=\boxed{045}$.

Solution 3

$a_n=a_{n-1} + n \pmod{99}$. Using the steps of the previous solution we get up to $n^2+n \equiv 90 \pmod{99}$. This gives away the fact that $(n)(n+1) \equiv 0 \pmod{9} \implies n \equiv \{0, 8\} \pmod{9}$ so either $n$ or $n+1$ must be a multiple of 9.

Case 1 ($n|9$): Say $n=9x$ and after simplification $x(9x+1) = 10 \pmod{90} \forall x \in \mathbb{Z}$.

Case 2: ($n+1|9$): Say $n=9a-1$ and after simplification $(9a-1)(a) = 10 \pmod{90} \forall a \in \mathbb{Z}$.

As a result $a$ must be a divisor of $10$ and after doing some testing in both cases the smallest value that works is $x=5 \implies \boxed{045}$.

~First

Solution 4 (not good, risky)

We just notice that $100 \equiv 1 \pmod{99}$, so we are just trying to find $10 + 11 + 12 + \cdots + n$ modulo $99$, or $\dfrac{n(n+1)}{2} - 45$ modulo $99$. Also, the sum to $44$ is divisible by $99$, and is the first one that is. Thus, if we sum to $45$ the $45$ is cut off and thus is just a sum to $44$.

Without checking whether there are other sums congruent to $45 \pmod{99}$, we can just write the answer to be $\boxed{045}$.

Solution 5

Let $b_n = 2a_{n+10}$. We can find a formula for $b_n$:

$b_n = (20+n)(n+1)$.

Notice that both can't have a factor of 3. Thus we can limit our search range of n to $n \equiv 7,8 \pmod{9}$. Testing values for n in our search range (like 7,8,16,17,25,26...), we get that 35 is the least n. But, don't write that down! Remember, $b_n = 2a_{n+10}$, so, the 35th term in b corresponds to the 45th term in a. Thus our answer is $\boxed{045}$

-AlexLikeMath

Solution 6 (bash, slower, but safer)

The first thing you should realize is that each term after the tenth is another two-digit number chained to the last number. 10, 1011, 101112, etc. Now the fact that the sequence starts at 10 can be completely discarded for this solution. Just consider a(10) a(1), and we can add nine to the answer at the end.


The second step is to split 99 as 9 and 11 and solve for divisibility rules individually. Let's start with 11 because it gives us the most information to continue.


In any number generated, if the numbers don't go beyond 20, then the highest number we can get is 10111213141516171819, with every odd digit being 1. This is a little risky because we are assuming that it doesn't exceed 20. If someone wanted to be absolutely sure they could continue, but this is unnecessary later and a big hassle. Anyways, now we write an equation to check for divisibility by 11. We add the even digits, which is ((((n-1) + 0) * n)/2)-n. (apologies for latex illiteracy, please add latex if you can) I don't think I need to go in-depth, but the concept here is to add 0 to (nth-1 term) altogether, then subtract the number of ones in it, which is n. Simplify to (n(n-3))/2 congruent to 0 mod 11. Now notice the divide by two can be discarded because one of n or (n-3) will be even. So if n or n-3 is to be divisible by 11, we can make a simple list.

n = 0, 3, 11, 14, 22, 25, 33, 36, 44, 47, etc.


Now we test each n for divisibility by 9. This is done by making a list that ultimately calculates the sum of every digit in the large number. a(1) to a(10) has the first digit 1. a(11) to a(20) has the first digit 2, and so on. The necessary thing to realize is that the sum of all digits 0-9 is divisible by 9, so we only have to solve for the sum of the first digits, and then the short list of second digits.

For example, let's test n=25.

So we know that 25 include both 1-10 and 11-20, so that's 10 + 20 right away. 21-25 contains 5 numbers that have the first digit 3, so +15. Then we add 0-4 together, which is 10. 10+20+15+10=55, which is not divisible by 9, so it is not the answer.

Do this for just a minute you get that 36 sums to 99, our answer! So n(36) is the answer, right? Don't forget we have to add 9 because we translated a(10) to a(1) at the very beginning! Finally, after a short bash, we get $\boxed{045}$.

See also

2017 AIME I (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 8
Followed by
Problem 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Invalid username
Login to AoPS