The following identity is easily verified:
Set in (1). In view of we have , and (1) becomes
i.e.,
Now set in (1):
Multiplying the last two equalities we get the claimed one.
Hm I have to admit I really didn't consider that restriction. Isn't it only for the inequalities with geometric mean? Actually it is also possible to proof this inequality using Cauchy-Schwarz: (Though it seems that this time we really have a restriction because of those dmn sqrt{} things. )
[EDIT]
Ok, we just have to try and see that my solution sucks.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ArcticMonkey, Apr 22, 2006, 4:23 PM
Since
It follows that if , then
The numerator of the left factor is
Since , the left factor is
The right factor is
But the denominator, . Everything cancels, and we're left with 9.
The problem is very classic. In Japanese univesity entrance exam, Nara University entrance exam/Medicine has posed te same problem in early 1960 or later 1950.
I would like to know the original problem or articles regarding the problem.
Are there anyone having the information ?
Any information would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
kunny
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Kunihiko_Chikaya, Aug 3, 2015, 8:17 AM
Since a+b+c=0, c=-a-b
Therefore, substituting this in you get the attached image.
Take out 9 from the numerator, cancel 2a^4 + 5(a^3)b - 5a(b^3) - 2b^4 from the top and bottom... and you're done!
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by soupynoodles, Aug 6, 2015, 4:36 PM
Solution:
By elementary symmetric polynomials we have S1=
S2=-2 and
S3=3
By substituting in a direct way we have to But I know that S7=
From this the result is immediate.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by AlexCenteno2007, Apr 17, 2025, 12:08 AM Reason: Error
Solution:
By elementary symmetric polynomials we have S1=
S2=-2 and
S3=3
By substituting in a direct way we have to But I know that S7=
From this the result is immediate.