Difference between revisions of "2010 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 20"
(Created page with '== Problem 20 == Arithmetic sequences <math>\left(a_n\right)</math> and <math>\left(b_n\right)</math> have integer terms with <math>a_1=b_1=1<a_2 \le b_2</math> and <math>a_n b_n…') |
Clarkculus (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == Problem | + | == Problem == |
Arithmetic sequences <math>\left(a_n\right)</math> and <math>\left(b_n\right)</math> have integer terms with <math>a_1=b_1=1<a_2 \le b_2</math> and <math>a_n b_n = 2010</math> for some <math>n</math>. What is the largest possible value of <math>n</math>? | Arithmetic sequences <math>\left(a_n\right)</math> and <math>\left(b_n\right)</math> have integer terms with <math>a_1=b_1=1<a_2 \le b_2</math> and <math>a_n b_n = 2010</math> for some <math>n</math>. What is the largest possible value of <math>n</math>? | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Solution 1 === | ||
Since <math>\left(a_n\right)</math> and <math>\left(b_n\right)</math> have integer terms with <math>a_1=b_1=1</math>, we can write the terms of each sequence as | Since <math>\left(a_n\right)</math> and <math>\left(b_n\right)</math> have integer terms with <math>a_1=b_1=1</math>, we can write the terms of each sequence as | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*}&\left(a_n\right) \Rightarrow \{1, x+1, 2x+1, 3x+1, ...\}\\ | ||
+ | &\left(b_n\right) \Rightarrow \{1, y+1, 2y+1, 3y+1, ...\}\end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | where <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> (<math>x\leq y</math>) are the common differences of each, respectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Since | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*}a_n &= (n-1)x+1\\ | ||
+ | b_n &= (n-1)y+1\end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | it is easy to see that | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a_n \equiv b_n \equiv 1 \mod{(n-1)}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Hence, we have to find the largest <math>n</math> such that <math>\frac{a_n-1}{n-1}</math> and <math>\frac{b_n-1}{n-1}</math> are both integers; equivalently, we want to maximize <math>\gcd(a_n-1, b_n-1)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The prime factorization of <math>2010</math> is <math>2\cdot{3}\cdot{5}\cdot{67}</math>. We list out all the possible pairs that have a product of <math>2010</math>, noting that these are the possible values of <math>(a_n, b_n)</math> and we need <math>a_n \leq b_n</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>(2,1005), (3, 670), (5,402), (6,335), (10,201),(15,134),(30,67)</cmath> | ||
− | <math> | + | and soon find that the largest <math>n-1</math> value is <math>7</math> for the pair <math>(15, 134)</math>, and so the largest <math>n</math> value is <math>\boxed{8\ \textbf{(C)}}</math>. |
− | + | === Solution 2 === | |
+ | As above, let <math>a_n=(n-1)x+1</math> and <math>b_n=(n-1)y+1</math> for some <math>1\leq x\leq y</math>. | ||
− | + | Now we get <math>2010 = a_n b_n = (n-1)^2xy + (n-1)(x+y) + 1</math>, hence <math>2009 = (n-1)( (n-1)xy + x + y )</math>. Therefore <math>n-1</math> divides <math>2009 = 7^2 \cdot 41</math>. And as the second term is greater than the first one, we only have to consider the options <math>n-1\in\{1,7,41\}</math>. | |
+ | For <math>n=42</math> we easily see that for <math>x=y=1</math> the right side is less than <math>49</math> and for any other <math>(x,y)</math> it is way too large. | ||
+ | For <math>n=8</math> we are looking for <math>(x,y)</math> such that <math>7xy + x + y = 2009/7 = 7\cdot 41</math>. Note that <math>x+y</math> must be divisible by <math>7</math>. We can start looking for the solution by trying the possible values for <math>x+y</math>, and we easily discover that for <math>x+y=21</math> we get <math>xy + 3 = 41</math>, which has a suitable solution <math>(x,y)=(2,19)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hence <math>n=8</math> is the largest possible <math>n</math>. (There is no need to check <math>n=2</math> anymore.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Solution 3 (using answer choices) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consider <math>n=288</math>, which would imply <math>b_{288}\ge a_{288}\ge 288</math>. However then <math>a_n b_n\ge 288^2>2010</math>, so we just need to show that <math>n=8</math> is achievable. This is true when <math>a_n=1+2n</math> and <math>b_n=1+19n</math>, giving <math>a_8 b_8=(15)(134)=2010</math>. Hence the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(C)}\ 8}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Alternative Thinking== | ||
Since | Since | ||
− | |||
− | <math>b_n = (n-1) | + | <math>a_n*b_n = 2010,</math> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | and | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a_n \le b_n</math>, | ||
+ | blue+yellow=green | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | it follows that | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a_n \le \sqrt{2010} \Rightarrow a_n \le 44</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | But <math>a_n</math> and <math>b_n</math> are also integers, so <math>a_n</math> must be a factor of <math>2010</math> smaller than <math>44</math>. Notice that <math>2010 = 2*3*5*67</math>. Therefore <math>a_n = 2, 3, 5, 6, 112, 15,</math> or <math>30</math> and <math>b_n = 1005, 670, 402, 335, 201, 134,</math> or <math>67</math>; respectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that the term <math>a_m</math> is equivalent to the first term <math>a_1 = 1</math> plus <math>(m-1)</math> times the common difference for that particular arithmetic sequence. Let the common difference of <math>(a_n)</math> be <math>k</math> and the common difference of <math>(b_n)</math> be <math>i</math> (not <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>). Then | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a_n</math> (the <math>n</math>th term, not the sequence itself) <math>=1 + k(n-1)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | and | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math>b_n = 1 + i(n-1)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Subtracting one from all the possible values listed above for <math>a_n</math> and <math>b_n</math>, we get | ||
− | |||
− | <math> | + | <math>k(n-1) = 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, 29</math> |
− | + | and | |
− | + | <math>i(n-1) = 1004, 669, 401, 334, 200, 133, 66</math> | |
− | <math> | + | In order to maximize <math>n</math>, we must maximize <math>n-1</math>. Therefore <math>k</math> and <math>i</math> are [[coprime]] and <math>n-1</math> is the [[Greatest common factor|GCF]] of any corresponding pair. Inspecting all of the pairs, we see that the [[Greatest common factor|GCF]] is always <math>1</math> except for the pair <math>(14, 133),</math> which has a GCF of <math>7</math>. Therefore the maximum value of <math>n</math> is <math>8 \Rightarrow \boxed{\text{C}}</math>. |
+ | == See also == | ||
+ | {{AMC12 box|year=2010|num-b=19|num-a=21|ab=A}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:Introductory Algebra Problems]] | |
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 26 August 2024
Contents
Problem
Arithmetic sequences and have integer terms with and for some . What is the largest possible value of ?
Solution
Solution 1
Since and have integer terms with , we can write the terms of each sequence as
where and () are the common differences of each, respectively.
Since
it is easy to see that
.
Hence, we have to find the largest such that and are both integers; equivalently, we want to maximize .
The prime factorization of is . We list out all the possible pairs that have a product of , noting that these are the possible values of and we need :
and soon find that the largest value is for the pair , and so the largest value is .
Solution 2
As above, let and for some .
Now we get , hence . Therefore divides . And as the second term is greater than the first one, we only have to consider the options .
For we easily see that for the right side is less than and for any other it is way too large.
For we are looking for such that . Note that must be divisible by . We can start looking for the solution by trying the possible values for , and we easily discover that for we get , which has a suitable solution .
Hence is the largest possible . (There is no need to check anymore.)
Solution 3 (using answer choices)
Consider , which would imply . However then , so we just need to show that is achievable. This is true when and , giving . Hence the answer is .
Alternative Thinking
Since
and
,
blue+yellow=green
it follows that
.
But and are also integers, so must be a factor of smaller than . Notice that . Therefore or and or ; respectively.
Notice that the term is equivalent to the first term plus times the common difference for that particular arithmetic sequence. Let the common difference of be and the common difference of be (not ). Then
(the th term, not the sequence itself)
and
Subtracting one from all the possible values listed above for and , we get
and
In order to maximize , we must maximize . Therefore and are coprime and is the GCF of any corresponding pair. Inspecting all of the pairs, we see that the GCF is always except for the pair which has a GCF of . Therefore the maximum value of is .
See also
2010 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 19 |
Followed by Problem 21 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.