Difference between revisions of "2021 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 25"
Sugar rush (talk | contribs) |
(→Solution) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
To find the upper bound, notice that each point with an integer-valued x-coordinate is either <math>\frac{1}{3}</math> or <math>\frac{2}{3}</math> above the line. Since the slope through a point is the y-coordinate divided by the x-coordinate, a shift in the slope will increase the y-value of the higher x-coordinates. We turn our attention to <math>x=28, 29, 30</math> which the line <math>y=\frac{2}{3}x</math> intersects at <math>y= \frac{56}{3}, \frac{58}{3}, 20</math>. The point (30,20) is already counted below the line, and we can clearly see that if we slowly increase the slope of the line, we will hit the point (28,19) since (28, <math>\frac{56}{3}</math>) is closer to the lattice point. The slope of the line which goes through both the origin and (28,19) is <math>y=\frac{19}{28}x</math>. This gives an upper bound of <math>m=\frac{19}{28}</math>. | To find the upper bound, notice that each point with an integer-valued x-coordinate is either <math>\frac{1}{3}</math> or <math>\frac{2}{3}</math> above the line. Since the slope through a point is the y-coordinate divided by the x-coordinate, a shift in the slope will increase the y-value of the higher x-coordinates. We turn our attention to <math>x=28, 29, 30</math> which the line <math>y=\frac{2}{3}x</math> intersects at <math>y= \frac{56}{3}, \frac{58}{3}, 20</math>. The point (30,20) is already counted below the line, and we can clearly see that if we slowly increase the slope of the line, we will hit the point (28,19) since (28, <math>\frac{56}{3}</math>) is closer to the lattice point. The slope of the line which goes through both the origin and (28,19) is <math>y=\frac{19}{28}x</math>. This gives an upper bound of <math>m=\frac{19}{28}</math>. | ||
| − | Taking the upper bound of m and subtracting the lower bound yields <math>\frac{19}{28}-\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{84}</math>. This is answer <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)} ~ | + | Taking the upper bound of m and subtracting the lower bound yields <math>\frac{19}{28}-\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{84}</math>. This is answer <math>1+84=</math> <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)} ~85}</math>. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 12 February 2021
Problem
Let 
be the set of lattice points in the coordinate plane, both of whose coordinates are integers between 
and 
inclusive. Exactly 
points in lie on or below a line with equation 
The possible values of 
lie in an interval of length 
where 
and 
are relatively prime positive integers. What is 
Solution
I know that I want about 
of the box of integer coordinates above my line. There are a total of 30 integer coordinates in the desired range for each axis which gives a total of 900 lattice points. I estimate that the slope, m, is . Now, although there is probably an easier solution, I would try to count the number of points above the line to see if there are 600 points above the line. The line 
separates the area inside the box so that of the are is above the line.
I find that the number of coordinates with 
above the line is 30, and the number of coordinates with 
above the line is 29. Every time the line hits a y-value with an integer coordinate, the number of points above the line decreases by one. I wrote out the sum of 30 terms in hopes of finding a pattern. I graphed the first couple positive integer x-coordinates, and found that the sum of the integers above the line is 
. The even integer repeats itself every third term in the sum. I found that the average of each of the terms is 20, and there are 30 of them which means that exactly 600 above the line as desired. This give a lower bound because if the slope decreases a little bit, then the points that the line goes through will be above the line.
To find the upper bound, notice that each point with an integer-valued x-coordinate is either 
or above the line. Since the slope through a point is the y-coordinate divided by the x-coordinate, a shift in the slope will increase the y-value of the higher x-coordinates. We turn our attention to 
which the line intersects at 
. The point (30,20) is already counted below the line, and we can clearly see that if we slowly increase the slope of the line, we will hit the point (28,19) since (28, 
) is closer to the lattice point. The slope of the line which goes through both the origin and (28,19) is 
. This gives an upper bound of 
.
Taking the upper bound of m and subtracting the lower bound yields 
. This is answer 
.
See also
| 2021 AMC 12B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
| Preceded by Problem 24 |
Followed by Last problem |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
| All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions | |
| 2021 AMC 10B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 24 |
Followed by Last problem | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
| All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions | ||
