We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
Inspired by Kazakhstan 2017
sqing   3
N 37 minutes ago by MS_asdfgzxcvb
Source: Own
Let $a,b,c\ge \frac{1}{2}$ and $a+b+c=2. $ Prove that
$$\left(\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{c}\right)\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right)\ge 1$$Let $a,b,c\ge \frac{1}{3}$ and $a+b+c=1. $ Prove that
$$\left(\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{c}\right)\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right)\ge 9$$
3 replies
+1 w
sqing
Today at 7:54 AM
MS_asdfgzxcvb
37 minutes ago
a,b,c,d shift inequality
verigo   6
N an hour ago by SomeonecoolLovesMaths
Source: sweden
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ prove that
\[ \frac{a^2}{b^2} + \frac{b^2}{c^2} + \frac{c^2}{d^2} + \frac{d^2}{a^2}\geq\frac{a}{d} + \frac{b}{a} + \frac{c}{b} + \frac{d}{c}\]If you know same tasks, link them please
6 replies
verigo
Feb 14, 2018
SomeonecoolLovesMaths
an hour ago
Happy 3.14
JetFire008   2
N an hour ago by whwlqkd
Happy PI day!! :clap: :trampoline:
2 replies
JetFire008
an hour ago
whwlqkd
an hour ago
Inequalities
sqing   0
an hour ago
Let $a,b,c\ge \frac{1}{2}$ and $\left(\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{c}\right)\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right)\le 1. $ Prove that
$$a+b+c\geq 2$$Let $a,b,c\ge \frac{1}{2}$ and $ \left(a+\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{c}\right)\left(a+\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right)\le \frac{9}{2}. $ Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+c^2\geq 1$$Let $a,b\ge \frac{1}{2}$ and $ \left( \frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+2\right)\left( \frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{a}+2\right) \le   \frac{20}{9}. $ Prove that
$$ a+b\geq 2$$Let $a,b\ge \frac{1}{2}$ and $a^2+b^2=1. $ Prove that
$$\left(\frac{2}{a}+\frac{1}{b}-1\right)\left(\frac{2}{a}-\frac{1}{b}+1\right)\ge \frac{13}{3}$$
0 replies
sqing
an hour ago
0 replies
postaffteff
JetFire008   4
N an hour ago by JetFire008
Source: Internet
Let $P$ be the Fermat point of a $\triangle ABC$. Prove that the Euler line of the triangles $PAB$, $PBC$, $PCA$ are concurrent and the point of concurrence is $G$, the centroid of $\triangle ABC$.
4 replies
JetFire008
2 hours ago
JetFire008
an hour ago
i need help
MR.1   3
N an hour ago by MR.1
Source: help
can you guys tell me problems about fe in $R+$(i know $R$ well). i want to study so if you guys have some easy or normal problems please send me
3 replies
MR.1
4 hours ago
MR.1
an hour ago
IOQM P2 2024
SomeonecoolLovesMaths   10
N an hour ago by BackToSchool
The number of four-digit odd numbers having digits $1,2,3,4$, each occuring exactly once, is:
10 replies
SomeonecoolLovesMaths
Sep 8, 2024
BackToSchool
an hour ago
Find a line in inequality gemetry
William_Mai   1
N 3 hours ago by William_Mai
M point is given inside a angle xOy. Draw a line d that passes through M and intersects Ox and Oy at the A và B with the smallest possible of AB.
(Note: line d not passing through O)

IMAGE
1 reply
William_Mai
Mar 9, 2025
William_Mai
3 hours ago
2017 BCSMC Round 2 #1 (BC)^2 - (AB)^2 = 1081 in right ABC
parmenides51   2
N 4 hours ago by BackToSchool
In right triangle $ABC$, $\angle ABC = 90^o$, $AC = 37$, and $(BC)^2 - (AB)^2 = 1081$. Find $AB + BC$.
2 replies
parmenides51
Jan 24, 2024
BackToSchool
4 hours ago
Inequalities
sqing   10
N 4 hours ago by sqing
Let $ a,b $ be reals such that $   a^2+b^2=1. $ Prove that
$$\sqrt{ a+1}+ \sqrt{ b+1}+k \sqrt{ 2ab+1} \leq \sqrt{2}(k+ \sqrt{ 2+\sqrt{2}})$$Where $ k>0. $
10 replies
sqing
Mar 9, 2025
sqing
4 hours ago
Inequalities from SXTX
sqing   6
N 6 hours ago by sqing
T702. Let $ a,b,c>0 $ and $ a+2b+3c=\sqrt{13}. $ Prove that $$ \sqrt{a^2+1} +2\sqrt{b^2+1} +3\sqrt{c^2+1} \geq 7$$S
T703. Let $ a,b $ be real numbers such that $ a+b\neq 0. $. Find the minimum of $ a^2+b^2+(\frac{1-ab}{a+b} )^2.$
T704. Let $ a,b,c>0 $ and $ a+b+c=3. $ Prove that $$ \frac{a^2+7}{(c+a)(a+b)} + \frac{b^2+7}{(a+b)(b+c)} +\frac{c^2+7}{(b+c)(c+a)}  \geq 6$$S
6 replies
sqing
Feb 18, 2025
sqing
6 hours ago
Difficult Geometry Optimization Problem.
ReticulatedPython   4
N Today at 8:00 AM by bhontu
Consider three concentric circles with radii $x$, $y$, and $z.$ Point $X$ is chosen on the circle with radius $x$, point $Y$ is chosen on the circle with radius $y$, and point $Z$ is chosen on the circle with radius $z.$ Given that $x<y<z$, find the maximum and minimum values of $$XY^2+YZ^2+XZ^2$$in terms of $x$, $y$, and $z.$
4 replies
ReticulatedPython
Yesterday at 3:09 PM
bhontu
Today at 8:00 AM
2017 BCSMC Round 2 #3 yellow pig walks on a number line
parmenides51   3
N Today at 4:20 AM by MathPerson12321
A yellow pig walks on a number line starting at $17$. Each step the pig has probability $\frac{8}{17}$ of moving $1$ unit in the positive direction and probability $\frac{9}{17}$ of moving $1$ unit in the negative direction. Find the expected number of steps until the yellow pig visits $0$.
3 replies
parmenides51
Jan 24, 2024
MathPerson12321
Today at 4:20 AM
number theory
IOQMaspirant   6
N Today at 3:19 AM by Yiyj1
Prove 6|(a + b + c) if and only if 6|(a^3 + b^3 + c^3)
6 replies
IOQMaspirant
Mar 11, 2025
Yiyj1
Today at 3:19 AM
APMO 2016: Line is tangent to circle
shinichiman   41
N Yesterday at 9:45 PM by Ilikeminecraft
Source: APMO 2016, problem 3
Let $AB$ and $AC$ be two distinct rays not lying on the same line, and let $\omega$ be a circle with center $O$ that is tangent to ray $AC$ at $E$ and ray $AB$ at $F$. Let $R$ be a point on segment $EF$. The line through $O$ parallel to $EF$ intersects line $AB$ at $P$. Let $N$ be the intersection of lines $PR$ and $AC$, and let $M$ be the intersection of line $AB$ and the line through $R$ parallel to $AC$. Prove that line $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$.

Warut Suksompong, Thailand
41 replies
shinichiman
May 16, 2016
Ilikeminecraft
Yesterday at 9:45 PM
APMO 2016: Line is tangent to circle
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: APMO 2016, problem 3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shinichiman
3212 posts
#1 • 11 Y
Y by buratinogigle, phantranhuongth, Ramanujan_1729, Davi-8191, Tawan, HolyMath, thczarif, SSaad, centslordm, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $AB$ and $AC$ be two distinct rays not lying on the same line, and let $\omega$ be a circle with center $O$ that is tangent to ray $AC$ at $E$ and ray $AB$ at $F$. Let $R$ be a point on segment $EF$. The line through $O$ parallel to $EF$ intersects line $AB$ at $P$. Let $N$ be the intersection of lines $PR$ and $AC$, and let $M$ be the intersection of line $AB$ and the line through $R$ parallel to $AC$. Prove that line $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$.

Warut Suksompong, Thailand
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by MellowMelon, May 18, 2017, 3:30 AM
Reason: add proposer
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TelvCohl
2311 posts
#2 • 43 Y
Y by Ankoganit, WizardMath, YadisBeles, conqueror21, langkhach11112, WinToOPeace, armankz, fz0718, cookie112, Tawan, AlastorMoody, JasperL, rkm0959, Wizard_32, thczarif, RaduAndreiLecoiu, Cindy.tw, rashah76, Aryan-23, samuel, enhanced, Kagebaka, translate, User582032, parola, Pondtzx, TETris5, centslordm, tree_3, Hasin_Ahmad, Tafi_ak, AllanTian, gabrupro, Slavici_Adrian, Quidditch, rayfish, sabkx, Ru83n05, Lcz, X.Allaberdiyev, Adventure10, Mango247, math_comb01
Let $ T_{\infty} $ be the infinity point on $ AE. $ From $ OP $ $ \parallel $ $ EF $ we get the second tangent from $ P $ to $ \odot (O) $ is parallel to $ AE, $ so from the converse of Brianchon's theorem for the degenerate hexagon $ MFPT_{\infty}EN $ we conclude that $ MN $ is tangent to $ \omega. $
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6857 posts
#3 • 18 Y
Y by WizardMath, langkhach11112, WinToOPeace, armankz, Anar24, AlastorMoody, thczarif, blacksheep2003, Aryan-23, SSaad, centslordm, tree_3, AllanTian, abvk1718, vrondoS, Rounak_iitr, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $X$ be the second tangency point from $N$ to $\omega$. Let $GE$ be a diameter of $\omega$. Let $Z = PG \cap NE \cap MR$ now (at infinity).

[asy]size(5cm);
defaultpen(fontsize(9pt));
pair E = dir(140);
pair F = dir(40);
pair A = 2*E*F/(E+F);
pair O = origin;
pair X = dir(100);
pair N = 2*E*X/(E+X);
pair M = extension(A, F, N, X);
pair G = -E;
pair P = 2*F*G/(F+G);
pair R = extension(N, P, E, F);

filldraw(unitcircle, palecyan, blue);
draw(E--A--P, blue);
draw(O--P, mediumcyan);
draw(E--F, mediumcyan);

draw(M--R, red);
draw(A--E, red);
draw(G--P, dashed+red);
draw(N--P, blue);
draw(E--G, dotted+red);
draw(N--X, blue);
draw(X--M, dotted+blue);

dot("$E$", E, dir(E));
dot("$F$", F, dir(F));
dot("$A$", A, dir(A));
dot("$O$", O, dir(225));
dot("$X$", X, dir(X));
dot("$N$", N, dir(N));
dot("$M$", M, dir(M));
dot("$G$", G, dir(G));
dot("$P$", P, dir(P));
dot("$R$", R, dir(250));
[/asy]

Take a projective transform which sends $EXFG$ to a rectangle centered at $R$. Then $M = PF \cap NX \cap RZ$. Thus $MNX$ collinear, done.
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by v_Enhance, Sep 5, 2017, 1:28 AM
Reason: Add diagram
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
navi_09220114
461 posts
#4 • 11 Y
Y by v_Enhance, WizardMath, YadisBeles, zschess, WinToOPeace, Tawan, thunderz28, sabkx, vrondoS, Adventure10, Mango247
Should i actually post this? I feel embarrassed to post this with the existence of the above two solutions :blush:

Redefine $M$ to be the point on $AB$ so that $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$, then we want to prove $RM\parallel AC$. Let $X=AO\cap EF$, use Menelaus theorem, then $\frac{AP}{PF}\cdot \frac{FR}{RE}\cdot \frac{EN}{NA}=1$. So we want to prove $$\frac{PR}{RN}=\frac{PM}{MA}$$$$\iff \frac{AP}{PF}\cdot \frac{PM}{MA}\cdot \frac{EN}{NA}=1$$But $OP\parallel EF$, so this is equivalent to $$\frac{AO}{OX}\cdot \frac{PM}{MA}\cdot\frac{EN}{NA}=1$$Let us view $\omega$ to be the excircle of $\triangle AMN$, then we get the following problem:

Given $\triangle ABC$, if $A$-excircle with center $O$ is tangent to $AB, AC$ at $M, N$, and $AO\cap MN=X$ then prove $\frac{AO}{OX}=\frac{AB}{BM}\cdot\frac{AC}{CN}$.

Upon homothety mapping excircle to incircle, and use the standard lengths on incircle and excircle, we get the following problem:

Given $\triangle ABC$, if incircle with center $I$ is tangent to $BC, CA, AB$ at $D, E, F$, and $AO\cap EF=M$ then prove $\frac{AI}{IM}=\frac{AB}{BD}\cdot \frac{AC}{CD}$.

Now we tackle this problem using trigo, this is standard incircle configuration, so it shouldn't be hard. Here we go: Denote $\alpha=\frac{\angle A}{2}, \beta=\frac{\angle A}{2}, \gamma=\frac{\angle C}{2}$

First compute that $$\frac{AI}{IM}=(\frac{AF}{FM})^2=\frac{1}{\sin^2 \angle FAI}=\frac{1}{\sin^2 \alpha}$$Next, let's compute $\frac{AB}{BD}$. We have $$\frac{AB}{BD}=\frac{AB}{BI}\cdot \frac{BI}{BD}=\frac{\sin \angle AIB}{\sin \angle BAI}\cdot \frac{1}{\cos\angle IBD}=\frac{\cos \gamma}{\cos \beta}\cdot \frac{1}{\sin \alpha}$$Then likewise $\frac{AC}{CD}=\frac{\cos \beta}{\cos \gamma}\cdot \frac{1}{\sin \alpha}$. So this easily verifies $\frac{AI}{IM}=\frac{1}{\sin^2 \alpha}=\frac{AB}{BD}\cdot \frac{AC}{CD}$. Done.

To above two solutions: What is your motivation to brianchon/projective transformation idea? I am curious to know how you came out with it. :)
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by navi_09220114, May 17, 2016, 12:55 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6857 posts
#5 • 5 Y
Y by navi_09220114, WizardMath, WinToOPeace, Anar24, Adventure10
navi_09220114 wrote:
To above two solutions: What is your motivation to brianchon/projective transformation idea? I am curious to know how you came out with it. :)
This problem falls into a class of problems which I like to call "purely projective", id est it can be phrased entirely in terms of incidence (concurrency, tangency, et al) and at most one circle. In any problem of this form, one can generally take a projective transformation to destroy the entire problem like I've done.

This method is discussed in more detail in Section 9.7 "Projective Transformations" of my textbook, and briefly in Prasolov.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
My solution, found after the test, relies upon no synthetic observation and just on trigonometry, although very ugly(to type it out). Anyways yours are really nice solutions!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Complex2Liu
83 posts
#7 • 12 Y
Y by YadisBeles, oceanmath99, Eray, SidVicious, cauterez, Tawan, MathBoy2001, rashah76, AllanTian, sabkx, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $X$ be the second tangency point from $N$ to $\omega$ and $Y$ be the reflection of $F$ over $OP.$ Clearly $Y$ lies on $\omega$ and $FY$ is the diameter of $\omega,$ moreover $Y$ is the second tangency point form $P$ to $\omega.$

Let $R^*$ be the intersection of $\overline{XY}$ and $\overline{EF}.$ It's easy to see that $N,P,R^*$ lies on the polar of $EX\cap YF,$ hence we conclude that $R^*\equiv R.$

Therefore $\angle RXF=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle A=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle MRF$ (here $\angle RMF=\angle A$ follows by parallel condition), which amounts to $M$ is the center of $\odot(XRF)\implies MX=MF\implies MX$ is tangent to $\omega.$ The statement follows. $\square$
[asy]
size(7cm); pointpen=black; pathpen=black; pointfontpen=fontsize(9pt);
void b(){
pair O=D("O",origin,S);
pair E=D("E",dir(150),dir(150));
pair F=D("F",dir(30),dir(-100)*1.5);
pair A=D("A",IP(L(-E*dir(90)+E,E,5,5),L(-F*dir(-90)+F,F,5,5)),N);
pair P=D("P",IP(L(F-E,O,5,5),L(A,F,5,5)),dir(45));
pair R=D("R",6*F/11+5*E/11,dir(-130));
pair N=D("N",extension(P,R,A,E),dir(135));
pair X=D("X",IP(CP(N,E),unitcircle),dir(60));
pair M=D("M",extension(N,X,A,F),dir(45));
pair Y=D("Y",extension(X,R,E,O),dir(-60));
D(unitcircle);
D(A--E--F--cycle);
D(N--M,blue+dashed);
D(X--Y--E,red);
D(O--P--F);
D(M--R);
D(CP(M,R),dotted);
D(X--O--F);
D(Y--P,dashed);
}
b(); pathflag=false; b();
[/asy]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Konigsberg
2205 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
v_Enhance wrote:
Let $X$ be the second tangency point from $N$ to $\omega$. Also, let $GF$ be a diameter of $\omega$. Let $Z = PG \cap NF \cap MR$ now.

Take a projective transform which sends $EXFG$ to a rectangle centered at $R$. Then $M = PE \cap NX \cap RZ$. Thus $MNX$ collinear, done.

Please elaborate on this - what do you mean by "a projective transform"? Do you have links (aside from your textbook)?

Could you also elaborate on your method and how does it "destroy" the "purely-projective" problems?

I have prasolov - which chapter is this?

thanks a lot
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
danepale
99 posts
#9 • 5 Y
Y by v_Enhance, PRO2000, sabkx, Adventure10, Mango247
TelvCohl wrote:
Let $ T_{\infty} $ be the infinity point on $ AE. $ From $ OP $ $ \parallel $ $ EF $ we get the second tangent from $ P $ to $ \odot (O) $ is parallel to $ AE, $ so from the converse of Brianchon's theorem for the degenerate hexagon $ MFPT_{\infty}EN $ we conclude that $ MN $ is tangent to $ \omega. $

Would you mind explaining why does this work? Brianchon's theorem (the other direction) used for a degenerate circumscribed hexagon in which three consecutive vertices lie on a line isn't always true, as noted here.

It is possible that the converse doesn't have any such special cases, but a short Google search doesn't confirm or refute anything about the matter.

For example, the author of this handout claims the degenerate version is true, but only uses it when one of the three collinear points is the contact point of the conic section, like it is used in this solution.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
danepale
99 posts
#10 • 4 Y
Y by v_Enhance, PRO2000, Adventure10, Mango247
I've found something about this issue:
Quote:
A geometrical theorem can be used in a degenerate case if either its proof still functions in this case, or one can deduce
the degenerate case from the generic case by a limiting argument. Our application of the Brianchon theorem to the hexagon AX'BCZD did not match any of these two
conditions; thus, it was not legitimate. Hence, there is no wonder the resulting assertion was wrong.
But:
Darij Grinberg wrote:
In other words: The hexagon formed by the lines a1; b1; c1; d1; e1; f1 may be
degenerated, but if two adjacent sides lie on one line, then the vertex where these sides
meet must be the point of tangency of this line with the circle, and not just an arbitrary
point on this line.

If the proof of the converse is analogous, then the proof works because the tangent points are the vertices of the degenerate hexagon, not just any points on the sides.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
juckter
322 posts
#11 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Here is a boring solution:

Let the tangent to $\omega$ at $M$ different from $MF$ meet $AE$ at $N'$. We wish to prove that $N', R$, and $P$ are collinear. By Menelaus' Theorem in $\triangle AEF$ it suffices to prove that

$$\frac{AF}{FP} \cdot \frac{FR}{RE} \cdot \frac{EN'}{N'A} = -1$$
Now, set $MN' = a$, $N'A = b$, $AM = c$, $s = \frac{a + b + c}{2}$ and $\angle FOP = \alpha$. Then

$$\frac{EN'}{N'A} = \frac{s - b}{b}$$
And

$$\frac{FR}{RE} = \frac{FM}{MA} = \frac{s - c}{c}$$
Now, notice that $PO^2 = PF \cdot PA$, and hence $\frac{AP}{PF} = -\frac{PO^2}{PF^2} = -\frac{1}{\sin^2 \alpha}$. Putting all of this together, we wish to prove

$$\sin^2 \alpha = \frac{(s - b)(s - c)}{bc}$$
Which upon noticing that $\angle MAO = \alpha = \frac{\angle MAN'}{2}$, is a trigonometric identity depending only on triangle $MAN'$, which is easy to prove using the Law of Cosines and standard manipulation.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by juckter, May 30, 2016, 3:57 PM
Reason: I don't know how to trig.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MonsterS
148 posts
#12 • 2 Y
Y by sa2001, Adventure10
์Newton 's theorem
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Just an observation: Almost each year recently has a purely projective APMO problem!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IndoMathXdZ
691 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
v_Enhance wrote:
Let $X$ be the second tangency point from $N$ to $\omega$. Let $GE$ be a diameter of $\omega$. Let $Z = PG \cap NE \cap MR$ now (at infinity).

[asy]size(5cm);
defaultpen(fontsize(9pt));
pair E = dir(140);
pair F = dir(40);
pair A = 2*E*F/(E+F);
pair O = origin;
pair X = dir(100);
pair N = 2*E*X/(E+X);
pair M = extension(A, F, N, X);
pair G = -E;
pair P = 2*F*G/(F+G);
pair R = extension(N, P, E, F);

filldraw(unitcircle, palecyan, blue);
draw(E--A--P, blue);
draw(O--P, mediumcyan);
draw(E--F, mediumcyan);

draw(M--R, red);
draw(A--E, red);
draw(G--P, dashed+red);
draw(N--P, blue);
draw(E--G, dotted+red);
draw(N--X, blue);
draw(X--M, dotted+blue);

dot("$E$", E, dir(E));
dot("$F$", F, dir(F));
dot("$A$", A, dir(A));
dot("$O$", O, dir(225));
dot("$X$", X, dir(X));
dot("$N$", N, dir(N));
dot("$M$", M, dir(M));
dot("$G$", G, dir(G));
dot("$P$", P, dir(P));
dot("$R$", R, dir(250));
[/asy]

Take a projective transform which sends $EXFG$ to a rectangle centered at $R$. Then $M = PF \cap NX \cap RZ$. Thus $MNX$ collinear, done.

I wanted to ask.
If we observe the diagram when it is a rectangle, we have $F = P = G$ ane $N = E$.
But you said that $M = PF \cap NX \cap RZ$. I understand that $PF \cap RZ = M$. But how come either $PF \cap NX $ or $NX \cap RZ$ is the point at infinity? They are not parallel, are they?
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by IndoMathXdZ, Mar 25, 2019, 5:56 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6857 posts
#16 • 4 Y
Y by AlastorMoody, v4913, Adventure10, Mango247
IndoMathXdZ wrote:
If we observe the diagram when it is a rectangle, we have $F = P = G$ ane $N = E$.
This seems wrong. Here is the post-transformed diagram.

[asy] pair E = dir(220); pair F = -E; pair X = dir(140); pair G = -X; pair O = origin; pair N = 2*E*X/(E+X); pair P = 2*F*G/(F+G); pair M = extension(P, F, N, X); pair R = extension(N, P, E, F); pair T = extension(N, E, P, G);

filldraw(unitcircle, invisible, blue); draw(M--P, blue); draw(O--P, heavycyan); draw(E--F, heavycyan);

draw(M--T, red); draw(N--T--P, red); draw(N--P, blue); draw(E--G, dotted+red); draw(N--X, blue); draw(X--M, dotted+blue);

dot("$E$", E, dir(E)); dot("$F$", F, dir(F)); dot("$X$", X, dir(X)); dot("$G$", G, dir(G)); dot("$N$", N, dir(N)); dot("$P$", P, dir(P)); dot("$M$", M, dir(M)); dot("$R$", R, dir(315)); dot("$T$", T, dir(T));

/* TSQ Source:

E = dir 220 F = -E X = dir 140 G = -X O := origin N = 2*E*X/(E+X) P = 2*F*G/(F+G) M = extension P F N X R = extension N P E F R315 T = extension N E P G

unitcircle 0.1 lightcyan / blue M--P blue O--P heavycyan E--F heavycyan

M--T red N--T--P red N--P blue E--G dotted red N--X blue X--M dotted blue

*/ [/asy]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IndoMathXdZ
691 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
v_Enhance wrote:
IndoMathXdZ wrote:
If we observe the diagram when it is a rectangle, we have $F = P = G$ ane $N = E$.
This seems wrong. Here is the post-transformed diagram.

[asy] pair E = dir(220); pair F = -E; pair X = dir(140); pair G = -X; pair O = origin; pair N = 2*E*X/(E+X); pair P = 2*F*G/(F+G); pair M = extension(P, F, N, X); pair R = extension(N, P, E, F); pair T = extension(N, E, P, G);

filldraw(unitcircle, invisible, blue); draw(M--P, blue); draw(O--P, heavycyan); draw(E--F, heavycyan);

draw(M--T, red); draw(N--T--P, red); draw(N--P, blue); draw(E--G, dotted+red); draw(N--X, blue); draw(X--M, dotted+blue);

dot("$E$", E, dir(E)); dot("$F$", F, dir(F)); dot("$X$", X, dir(X)); dot("$G$", G, dir(G)); dot("$N$", N, dir(N)); dot("$P$", P, dir(P)); dot("$M$", M, dir(M)); dot("$R$", R, dir(315)); dot("$T$", T, dir(T));

/* TSQ Source:

E = dir 220 F = -E X = dir 140 G = -X O := origin N = 2*E*X/(E+X) P = 2*F*G/(F+G) M = extension P F N X R = extension N P E F R315 T = extension N E P G

unitcircle 0.1 lightcyan / blue M--P blue O--P heavycyan E--F heavycyan

M--T red N--T--P red N--P blue E--G dotted red N--X blue X--M dotted blue

*/ [/asy]

Thanks a lot for your help :D
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mmathss
282 posts
#18 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Here is my solution
Let $MX$ be the second tangent through $M$ and let it intersect ray $AC$ at point $X$
We prove that $P$,$R$ and $X$ are collinear
For convenience we denote $AM$ by $c$ ,$AN$ by $b$ and $MN$ by $a$
It needs to be proven that $$AP\div PF\times FR\div RE\times EX\div XA=1$$$$FR\div RE=FM\div MA=(s-c)\div c$$and $$EX\div XA=(s-b)\div b$$Since OP is parallel to FE it follows that $AO\perp OP$ Also $OF\perp AP$
Therefore $$AP\div PF=(AP\times AF)\div (PF\times AF)=AO^2\div OF^2=(s^2+r_A^2)\div r_A^2$$Now it needs to be proven that $$((s^2+r_A^2)\div s^2)\times (s-b)(s-c)\div bc=1$$Using $(s-b)(s-c)=r\times r_A$ and $(s-b)+(s-c)=(a)$ we get the desired result.
Comment:I guess this problem is hard to prove using elementary techniques like angle chasing and radical axis and easy using bash, inversion,projective geometry,etc.
This post has been edited 6 times. Last edited by mmathss, Dec 22, 2019, 9:16 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sa2001
281 posts
#21 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
MonsterS wrote:
์Newton 's theorem

Redefine $M$ s.t. $M$ lies on $FF$ and $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$. Let $G$ be the antipode of $E$. Then $GP$ is tangent to $\omega$. Let $L$ be the point at infinity along $EE$ and $GG$. It suffices to prove that $M, R, L$ are collinear, which follows from Newton's Theorem in $LNMP$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Wizard_32
1566 posts
#22 • 5 Y
Y by math_pi_rate, amar_04, User582032, Adventure10, Mango247
Here's a nice solution using moving points.
shinichiman wrote:
Let $AB$ and $AC$ be two distinct rays not lying on the same line, and let $\omega$ be a circle with center $O$ that is tangent to ray $AC$ at $E$ and ray $AB$ at $F$. Let $R$ be a point on segment $EF$. The line through $O$ parallel to $EF$ intersects line $AB$ at $P$. Let $N$ be the intersection of lines $PR$ and $AC$, and let $M$ be the intersection of line $AB$ and the line through $R$ parallel to $AC$. Prove that line $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$.
Move $R$ on the line $EF$ and fix everything else. Clearly the degrees of $N$ and $M$ are both $1.$ Hence degree of the line $NM$ is at most $1+1=2.$ So the degree of the pole of $NM$ is $2$ which hence moves on a conic, and so by the projective dual of this $NM$ is tangent to a fixed conic $\mathcal{C}$. To show $\mathcal{C} \equiv \omega,$ we need to check this for $5$ positions of $R,$ since a conic is uniquely determined by $5$ points.

Take $R=E,F,\infty_{EF}$ and the result is trivial here. Take $R \in EF$ such that $PR \parallel AC$ and the result is again true here. For the last position, take $N$ such that the line parallel to $EF$ through $N$ is tangent to $\omega.$ With some work, we can show that this works. So we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amar_04
1915 posts
#23 • 3 Y
Y by Pakistan, Adventure10, Mango247
Draw the second tangent to $\omega$ through $P$ which touches $\omega$ at $Y$. Now if $\angle FAE=\theta\implies\angle AFE=90^\circ-\frac{\theta}{2}=\angle APO\implies\angle APY=180^\circ-\theta\implies PY\|AE\|MR$. So let $PY,MR,AE$ concur at the point at infinity $(P_{\infty})$. So, $M,R,P_{\infty}$ are collinear.

Now let $X$ be a point on $\omega$ such that $NX$ is a tangent to $\omega$. So, it suffices to prove that $MX$ is also a tangent to $\omega$.

Now let $X'$ be a point on $\omega$ such that $MX'$ is a tangent to $\omega$. So, by Pascal's Theorem on $FFX'X'EY$ and $EEYYFX'$ we get that $M,YX'\cap EF,P_{\infty}$ are collinear. So, $YX'\cap EF\equiv R\equiv EF\cap XY\implies X'\equiv X$. So, $MX$ is also a tangent to $\omega$.

Hence, $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$. $\blacksquare$.
This post has been edited 14 times. Last edited by amar_04, Oct 10, 2019, 3:36 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ali3085
214 posts
#24 • 2 Y
Y by Spectralon, AllanTian
A solution without branchion, projective transformation and polars :-D
lemma:
Click to reveal hidden text
return to our problem:
redifine it as
Let $N$ a point on $AE$ , $X \neq E$ a point on $\omega$ such that $NX$ is tangent to $\omega$
$M = NX \cap AF $ , $R = PN \cap EF$ prove that $MR  || AE$
solution :
Click to reveal hidden text
and we are done :D
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#25 • 3 Y
Y by gamerrk1004, lilavati_2005, SenatorPauline
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MeineMeinung
68 posts
#26
Y by
My Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#27 • 1 Y
Y by amar_04
Here's a synthetic solution I found (which incidentally doesn't use projective geometry):

First, we claim the following:
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with $DEF$ being the intouch triangle, and $I_A$ the $A-$excenter. Let $E', F'$ be the $A-$mixtilinear excircle touchpoints with $AC, AB$ respectively. Then the intersection of the line through $B$ which is parallel to $AC$ and the line $CF'$ is the reflection of $E$ in the midpoint of $BC$ and lies on the $A-$excircle touchchord.

For the proof, note that by $\sqrt{bc}$ inversion at $A$ and a flip over the angle bisector, since $F'$ is mapped to $E$, the lines $BE, CF'$ are parallel. Taking a reflection in the midpoint of $BC$, the first part of our claim is proved. Now, since the $A-$intouch chord and the $A-$extouch chord meet $BC$ at isotomic points, they are reflections in the midpoint of $BC$ since they are parallel, proving the second part of the claim.

Coming back to the main problem, let the tangent from $N$ to $\omega$ meet $AF$ at $X$. Applying our claim to $AXN$ as the reference triangle, we see that $XR \parallel AN$ (since $OP$ coincides with the $A$-mixtilinear excircle touchchord), so $X = M$, as needed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
zuss77
520 posts
#28 • 4 Y
Y by amar_04, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
Problem is about excircle but nothing prevents it to be about incircle, so for the sake of variety I'll reformulate it as follows.
Restated wrote:
Incircle of $ABC$ with center $I$ tangent to sides $BC, AC$ at $D,E$ resp. $DE$ meet line through $A$ parallel to $BC$ at $P$. $BP$ meet $AC$ at $X$. Prove that $IX \parallel DE$.
original statement

By Brianchon on $DBAEX\infty_{BC}$ we see that tangent from $X$ to incircle is parallel to $BC$. So it follows that $\angle IXC = \angle DEC$.
Attachments:
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by zuss77, Jun 19, 2020, 10:36 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathForesterCycle1
79 posts
#29
Y by
dame dame
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by MathForesterCycle1, Oct 17, 2021, 5:11 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AwesomeYRY
579 posts
#30 • 2 Y
Y by centslordm, Eyed
My first homography problem! I probably messed up somewhere. Special thanks to Elliott Liu and Jeffrey Chen for helping me work through my debilitating confusion.

Let $G$ be the second tangency point from $P$ to $\omega$. Then, since $FE\parallel PO$ we have that $\angle (EF,FG)= \angle (OP,FG) = 90$. Thus, by Thale's $EG$ is a diameter.

Denote with $Q$ the point at infinity defined by $AE\cap MR \cap PG$.

Now by Theorem 2.4, the special case of conic mappings, we may take the interior point $R$ and map it to the center of $\omega$ while maintaining collinearity and the cross ratio.

In our new diagram, $R$ is the center and $EF$ is a diameter. Note that since $N,R,P$ are still collinear and $N,P$'s tangents are parallel, we have that $R$ is the midpoint of $NP$. Similar argument holds for $Q,M$.
Thus, after taking a homothety with factor $-1$ at $R$, we have that $PQ$ is tangent to $\omega$ at $G$ implies that $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$ and we're done. $\blacksquare$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by AwesomeYRY, Aug 17, 2021, 1:19 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
VicKmath7
1385 posts
#31 • 4 Y
Y by Tafi_ak, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
This was pretty easy to trig-length bash. Here's a sketch. We prove $MR||AN$, and assume tangency. Do Menelaus for triangle $AEF$ and $P-R-N$. If we let $<APO=x$, then $AP/EP=cos(x)$ and $<MAN=180-2x$. Use Thales in $AEF$ to see we want $ER/RF=EM/MA=MX/MA$ ($X$ is the tangency point).
Also for the Menelaus expression, we use $FN/AN=XN/AN$. So now we have everything in the Menelaus expression in terms of the sides of $AMN$ and $cos(x)$. Use LoC is triangle $AMN$ to finish (we have the lengths $MX$ and $NX$ because we have an excircle for triangle $AMN$).
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by VicKmath7, Aug 28, 2021, 4:10 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Tafi_ak
309 posts
#32 • 1 Y
Y by nixon0630
My solution by moving points.

Suppose the tangent from $N$ to $\omega$ touches $\omega$ at $X\neq E$. We have to prove that the points $M, N, X$ are collinear. Let calculate the degrees of the points (here degrees are at most).
Let $R$ be the moving point on line $EF$ and $\omega , E, F, A$ are fixed. Therefore $P$ is also fixed.
Now deg(N)=1 just because $N$ is the intersection of $AE, PR$. $AE$ has degree $0$ and $RP$ has $1$. So deg(N)=1. By the similar process deg(M)=1. Now have to calculate the degree of the point $X$. As $R$ varies on the line $EF$, the point varies on the circle $\omega$. Therefore deg(X)=2.
So we have to check for $1+1+2+1=5$ cases that $M, N, X$ collinear. Before checking $5$ cases, lets reduce the degrees.
(i) when $F=P$ then easily $N=X=E$.
(ii) when $A$ lies on the circle then everything is same. Easily checked.
(iii) when $R=P$ then same as previous.
reducing $3$ degrees we have to show only $2$ cases. when $R=E$ then collinear and when $R=F$ then also collinear.

Remark: Please anybody can fix error then inform kindly.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Tafi_ak, Oct 9, 2021, 7:28 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math31415926535
5617 posts
#33
Y by
Let the tangent from $P$ to $\omega$ intersect $\omega$ at $G.$
Claim: $PG \parallel MR \parallel AE.$
Proof: $\angle{AFE}=90-\frac{\angle{A}}{2}=\angle{APO}=\angle{GPO} \implies \angle{GPB}=\angle{CAB}.$ $\Box$
Now, use the converse of Brianchon's Theorem on degenerate hexagon $MFPP_{\infty}EN$ gives us the desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JAnatolGT_00
559 posts
#34 • 1 Y
Y by Lcz
Move $R$ on $EF.$ Let distinct from $AB$ tangent to $\omega$ through $M$ meet $AC$ by $M';$ since angle $\angle MOM'=\frac{\pi-\angle BAC}{2}$ is fixed, mapping $M\mapsto M'$ is composition of rotation and central projection, so it's a homography. Also composition of central projections $M\stackrel{\infty_{AC}}{\mapsto} R\stackrel{P}{\mapsto} N$ is a homography, so to prove $M'=N$ it's suffice to check it for three cases; trivial when $R$ coincides with $E,F.$ When $R=\infty_{AC}$ we see $M=\infty_{AB}, N=OP\cap AC,$ and $MN$ is tangent to $\omega$ by symmetry wrt $O.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mahdi_Mashayekhi
689 posts
#35
Y by
Let tangent at N to $\omega$ meet it at K and meet AF at M'. we'll prove M' is M. we can prove M'R || AC. NE/NQ = NR/NP so we will prove AM'/AP = NE/NQ. Let PO meet $\omega$ at Q. Let perpendicular to M' meet PQ at S. we will prove ASP,NOQ and ASM',NOE are similar. ( I found triangle ENQ interesting so my idea was to find a point S such that ASP,NOQ and ASM',NOE are similar and then we can easily prove AM'/AP = NE/NQ.)

Claim1 : OEN and SM'A are similar.
Proof : ∠OEN = 90 = ∠SM'A and ∠NOE = (180 - KOF - FOP - EOQ)/2 = 90 - ∠M'OF - ∠FOP = ∠AOM' = ∠ASM'.

Claim2 : ONQ and SAP are cyclic.
∠NOQ = ∠NOE + ∠EOQ = ∠AOM' + ∠FOP = ∠ASM' + ∠M'SP = ∠ASP and ∠ONQ = 90 - ∠NOE = 90 - ∠ASM' = ∠SAP.

Now by similarities we have NE/AM' = NQ/AP so NE/NQ = AM'/AP.
we're Done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Math-48
44 posts
#36 • 2 Y
Y by Muaaz.SY, Mahmood.sy
Here's a different solution using Moving Points :-D
Move $M$ on $(AB)$ and let the tangent from $M$ to $\omega$ (other than $MB$ ) intersect line $AC$ at $N_1$ $, $ $N_2=PR\cap AC$
Since $M\to R\to N_2$ all are projective
$\implies M\to N_2$ is projective
Let $D$ be the tangency point of $MN_1$ with $\omega$ and denote by $X'$ the image of $X$ under an inversion w.r.t to $\omega$
Since $M\to M'\to D\to N_1'\to N_1$ all are projective hence $M\to N_1$ is also projective
Therefore to show $N_1=N_2$, it suffices to check three values of $M.$
$\bullet$ $M=A\implies R=N_1=E$ so $N_2=E \implies N_1=N_2$
$\bullet$ $M=F\implies R=F,N_1=A$ so $N_2=A \implies N_1=N_2$
$\bullet $$M=\infty_{AB}\implies R=\infty_{EF},MN_1\parallel AB$
So $D$ is the reflection of $F$ w.r.t to $O$
Since $R=\infty_{EF}$ then $PR\parallel EF$ so to show$N_1=N_2$ it's enough to check that $ON_1\parallel EF$ but note that :
$\angle{DON_1}=\angle{DEN_1}=\angle{EDN_1}=\angle{DFE}$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $\implies ON_1\parallel EF  $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $  $ $ $ $ $ $  $ $ $ $  $ $ $ $ $ $ $$   \blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Math-48, Mar 27, 2022, 2:41 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
787 posts
#37
Y by
Define $K$ and $L$, distinct from $E$ and $F$, such that $NK$ and $PL$ are tangent to $\omega$.

$\textcolor{blue}{\textbf{Claim 1:}}$ Points $K$, $R$, and $L$ are collinear.

This is equivalent to proving $KL \cap EF$ lies on $NP$. By Brocard on $EKFL$, we know $KL \cap EF$ lies on the polar of $FL \cap EK$. However, we know $N$ and $P$ also lie on this polar by La Hire's. ${\color{blue} \Box}$

$\textcolor{blue}{\textbf{Claim 2:}}$ $M$ is the circumcenter of $\triangle FRK$.

We first note $L$ and $F$ are reflections over $OP$ by symmetry, so \[FL \perp PO \parallel EF \implies EL \text{ is a diameter of } \omega.\]
Since $\triangle FMR \sim \triangle FAE$ by the given parallel condition, we know $FM = MR$ and \[\angle FKR = \angle FEL = \frac{180 - \angle FOE}{2} = \frac{\angle A}{2} = \frac{\angle FAE}{2} = \frac{\angle FMR}{2}.~{\color{blue} \Box}\]
Thus $MF = MK$, so $MKN$ is tangent to $\omega$. $\blacksquare$

[asy]
size(270); 
pair A, B, C, O, E, F, P, R, N, M, K, L; 
A = dir(95); 
B = dir(210); 
C = dir(320); 
O = incenter(A, B, C);
E = foot(O, A, C); 
F = foot(O, A, B); 
P = extension(O, O+F-E, A, B); 
R = .2E + .8F; 
N = extension(A, C, P, R); 
M = extension(A, B, R, A+R-E); 
K = foot(O, M, N); 
L = 2*foot(F, P, O)-F; 

draw(C--A--B^^E--F^^K--L); 
draw(M--R^^P--N--K^^O--P--L); 
draw(M--K^^L--extension(L, F, E, K)--E, dashed); 
draw(incircle(A, B, C)); 

dot("$A$", A, dir(90)); 
dot("$B$", B, dir(270)); 
dot("$C$", C, dir(270)); 
dot("$E$", E, dir(0)); 
dot("$F$", F, dir(180)); 
dot("$K$", K, dir(90)); 
dot("$L$", L, dir(270)); 
dot("$O$", O, dir(270)); 
dot("$P$", P, dir(180)); 
dot("$M$", M, .6dir(140)); 
dot("$N$", N, dir(0)); 
dot("$R$", R, dir(305)); 
dot(extension(L, F, E, K)); 
[/asy]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
starchan
1601 posts
#38 • 1 Y
Y by mxlcv
APMO vibes
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Inconsistent
1455 posts
#39
Y by
Notice $M \to R \to N$ is projective. When $M = E, A$ the result is obvious. To show $M = \infty_{AC}$ works, it suffices to prove that $P$ is the intersection of $AB$ and the reflection of $AC$ through $O$, since in this case $N = P$. This follows immediately since $OP$ is the external angle bisector of $\angle MOE$, finishing. Now since a projective map is defined by three points and it is well known that mapping from a line to a second line via tangents in a circle tangent to both lines is projective, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
4999 posts
#40
Y by
Animate $R$ with degree $1$, so $M$ has degree $1$, $\overline{OM}$ has degree $1$, and thus the reflection of the fixed $\overline{AF}$ over $\overline{OM}$also the other tangent from $M$has degree $2$ (by a tangent addition coordinate calculation). Its intersection $N'$ with $\overline{AE}$ has degree $1$ by strong Zack's lemma since when $R=E$ the reflection coincides with $\overline{AE}$. It suffices to show that $P,R,N'$ are collinear, which is now a degree $2$ condition, so we check $3$ cases.
  • When $R=F$ we have $N'=A$ and the collinearity is obvious
  • When $R=\infty_{\overline{EF}}$ we have $M=\infty_{\overline{AF}}$ and the reflected line is the other line parallel to $\overline{AF}$ tangent to $\omega$, so $N'$ is the reflection of $P$ over $O$, implying the desired collinearity.
  • When $R$ is chosen such that $M=P$, the reflected line is the other line parallel to $\overline{AE}$ tangent to $\omega$, so $N'=\infty_{\overline{AE}}$ and the collinearity follows.
This finishes the problem. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
4999 posts
#41
Y by
By replacing $N$ with a phantom point defined according to a tangency (so that $\omega$ is the $A$-excircle of $\triangle AMN$) extraverting, and relabeling, it suffices to prove the following.
Quote:
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incircle $\omega$, incenter $I$, and intouch triangle $DEF$. Let $P$ be the point on $\overline{AB}$ such that $\overline{AI} \perp \overline{IP}$. Prove that $\overline{EF}$, $\overline{CP}$, and the line $\ell$ through $B$ parallel to $\overline{AC}$ concur.
We use barycentric coordinates.

Note that the point at infinity along $\overline{AC}$ has coordinates $(1:0:-1)$, and thus $\ell$ has equation $x+z=0$. We have $E=(s-c:0:s-a)$ and $F=(s-b:s-a:0)$, so $\overline{EF}$ has equation $(s-a)x-(s-b)y-(s-c)z=0$, so to find $\overline{EF} \cap \ell$ we need to solve
$$(s-a)x+(s-c)x=bx=(s-b)y,$$hence the intersection $X$ has coordinates $(s-b:b:b-s)$. Thus $P':=\overline{CX} \cap \overline{AB}=(s-b:b:0)$. It suffices to show $\overline{AI} \perp \overline{IP'}$; the relevant displacement vectors are $(b+c:-b:-c)$ and $(c-b:b:-c)$, and we want to show
\begin{align*}
0&=a^2(bc-bc)+b^2(-c(b+c)-c(c-b))+c^2(b(b+c)-b(c-b))\\
&=-b^3c-b^2c^2-b^2c^2+b^3c+b^2c^2+bc^3-bc^3+b^2c^2=0
\end{align*}so we're done. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by IAmTheHazard, Mar 6, 2024, 3:47 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
4999 posts
#42
Y by
By replacing $N$ with a phantom point defined according to a tangency (so that $\omega$ is the $A$-excircle of $\triangle AMN$) extraverting, and relabeling, it suffices to prove the following.
Quote:
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incircle $\omega$, incenter $I$, and intouch triangle $DEF$. Let $P$ be the point on $\overline{AB}$ such that $\overline{AI} \perp \overline{IP}$. Prove that $\overline{EF}$, $\overline{CP}$, and the line $\ell$ through $B$ parallel to $\overline{AC}$ concur.
Let $X=\ell \cap \overline{EF}$; we use Menelaus on $\triangle AEF$ to show that $X,P,C$ are collinear. In what proceeds all ratios are unsigned.

We have $\frac{AC}{CE}=\frac{b}{s-c}$. Since $\triangle BFX \sim \triangle AFE$, we have $\frac{EX}{XF}=\frac{AB}{BF}=\frac{c}{s-b}$. Finally, let $T=\overline{AI} \cap \overline{EF}$; since $\overline{EF} \perp \overline{IP}$, we have
$$\frac{FP}{PA}=1-\frac{AT}{AI}=1-\frac{\cos \frac{\angle A}{2}}{\sec \frac{\angle A}{2}}=1-\cos^2 \frac{\angle A}{2}=\sin^2 \frac{\angle A}{2}=\frac{1-\cos \angle A}{2}=\frac{a^2-b^2-c^2+2bc}{4bc}=\frac{(a-b+c)(a+b-c)}{4bc}=\frac{(s-b)(s-c)}{bc}.$$Clearly none of $X,P,C$ lie on the segment sides of $\triangle AEF$, so since $\frac{b}{s-c} \cdot \frac{c}{s-b} \cdot \frac{(s-b)(s-c)}{bc}=1$ we conclude. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Saucepan_man02
1294 posts
#43
Y by
Here goes homography:

Let $G$ denote the second tangent from point $P$. Note that: $PG \parallel MR \parallel AE$ (say they are concurrent at $T$, thus $T$ being point at infinity on line $AE$ right now). Let $NX$ denote the second tangent of point $N$. Thus, there exists an homography which maps $EFGE$ to a rectangle. Thus: by converse of Brianchon's theorem on $MFPTEN$, $NM$ must be tangent to $\omega$ at $X$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3425 posts
#45
Y by
Let $N'$ be the unique point on line $AC$, not equal to $A$, for which $\overline{MN'}$ is tangent to $\omega$. It suffices to show that $P$, $R$ and $N'$ are collinear, as that implies $N = N'$. We have
\[ \tfrac{ER}{RF} \cdot \tfrac{AN}{NE} = \tfrac{AM}{MF} \cdot \tfrac{AN}{NE} = \tfrac{2c}{a+b-c} \tfrac{2b}{a-b+c} = \tfrac{2}{1 - \tfrac{b^2 - c^2-a^2}{2bc}} = \tfrac{2}{1 - \cos \angle MAN } = \tfrac{1}{\sin^2 \angle MAN} = \tfrac{AP}{PO} \cdot \tfrac{PO}{PF} = \tfrac{AP}{PF},\]implying the collinearity by Menelaus ($AM = c$, $MN = a$ and $AN = b$).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
268 posts
#46
Y by
why is homography so confusing.
Let $G$ be the second tangent from $P.$ Observe that $PG\parallel MR\parallel AE,$ and so they are concurrent at the point of infinite along line $MR.$
Let $NX$ be the second tangent of $N$.
Take the homography mapping $EGFX$ to a rectangle
Clearly, $R = PN\cap EF$ becomes the center of the circle.
$PNM\infty$ obviously becomes a rhombus, where $\infty$ is the point of infinity along $MR.$ This finishes
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a