ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Right-angled triangle if circumcentre is on circle
liberator76
N21 minutes ago
by numbertheory97
Source: IMO 2013 Problem 3
Let the excircle of triangle opposite the vertex be tangent to the side at the point . Define the points on and on analogously, using the excircles opposite and , respectively. Suppose that the circumcentre of triangle lies on the circumcircle of triangle . Prove that triangle is right-angled.
We say that a triangle is great if the following holds: for any point on the side , if and are the feet of the perpendiculars from to the lines and , respectively, then the reflection of in the line lies on the circumcircle of the triangle . Prove that triangle is great if and only if and .
Senior Problems Committee of the Australian Mathematical Olympiad Committee
In a board, each square is colored either white or black, with all the squares on the border of the board being black. Additionally, no square within the board has all four squares of the same color. Prove that the board contains a square colored like a chessboard.
Consider an acute-angled triangle . Let be the foot of the altitude of triangle issuing from the vertex , and let be the circumcenter of triangle . Assume that . Prove that .
Given two charges of any magnitude , a third charge collinear with them , exists such that it is in equillibirum , Prove that if a fourth charge in the same line exists such that it is in equillibrium , then the 3rd charge and the fourth charge are harmonic conjugates with respect to the two fixed charges . , For example if two +q charges are fixed then if in their midpoint placed a charge -q , it is in equillibrium , also if the same charge -q is placed at infinity the system is again in equillibrium , and the midpoint and the point at infinity are harmonic conjugates .
This is so messed up, well first u have to prove that there exists an such that now the replace after that doesn't give and finally the fact that is an identity doesn't mean
Let , so equation rewrites as , and putting , we get , call this .
Note that for any such that , and gives that for all .
.
, comparing this with above, we get for all .
Now, letting , since , we get for all .
Since was surjective, we get for all , and putting we get that for all , so is constant and for some constant . It is easy to see that all such functions work.
I claim that all solutions are of the form for some , these can be shown to work.
Let be the assertion. gives that , thus is surjective. For any such that , gives that , so has exactly solution. Assume that there are distinct and such that . Let be such that , and let be such that . Note that and must be distinct. and give that , giving a contradiction, so is injective. gives as desired.
Let the assertion yields: (1)
Since is surjective, yields: yields: , let denote yields: from (1)
Furthermore let , thus let . This implies that: .
And we are done!
f(x + f(x+y)) = x + f(f(x) + y)(1)
(1) x --> 0 => f(f(y)) = f(y + f(0))(2)
(1) y--> -f(x) => f : surjective
There is exist some c such that f(c) = 0
(1) x--> c, y --> 0 => f(c) = c + f(0) => c = -f(0)
(1) y --> -x+c => f(x) = x + f(f(x) - x +c ) => f(x) - x = f(f(x) - x +c)
Let a = f(x) - x + c => f(a) = a+f(0)
(1) x--> a, y --> y - a => f(a + f(y)) = a + f(f(a) + y - a) => f(a + f(y)) = a + f(y + f(0)) => f(a + f(y)) = a + f(f(y))
By (2) we can replace f(y) by z => f(z + a) = a + f(z)(3)
(1) y --> y - x + c => f(x + f(y + c)) = x + f(f(x) + y - x +c) and a = f(x) - x +c => f(x + f(y+c)) = x + f(y) + f(x) - x + c =>
f(x + f(y - f(0))) = f(x) + f(y) + c, replace y by y + f(0) => f(x + f(y)) = f(x) + f(y + f(0)) + c => f(x + f(y)) = f(x) + f(y) + c
By (2) we can replace f(y) by y => f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) + c then g(x) = f(x) - f(0) => g(x+y) = g(x) + g(y)
(1) => g(x + g(x + y) + f(0)) + f(0) = x + f(0) + g(g(x) + y + f(0)) => g(x + g(x + y)+ f(0)) - g(g(x) + y + f(0)) = x =>
g(x - y + g(y)) = x => put y = a => g(x) = x then f(x) = x+f(0) - is answer
Answer is for any real constant . Note that plugging yields the surjectivity of . Let . Pick to get gives or . Comparing with implies Since is surjective, we can replace with . So which yields is constant. If then as desired.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by bin_sherlo, Nov 4, 2024, 4:18 PM
Let denote the assertion. gives Suppose with , let , then for all . But gives So is injective and . Plugging this in, we get that all work for constant .
Let denote the assertion. gives Suppose with , let , then for all . But gives So is injective and . Plugging this in, we get that all work for constant .