We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
2 var inquality
sqing   1
N 7 minutes ago by SunnyEvan
Source: Own
Let $ a,b $ be nonnegative real numbers such that $ a^2+ab+b^2+a+b=1. $ Prove that
$$  (ab+1)(a+b)\leq \frac{ 20}{27}  $$$$ (ab+1)(a+b-1)\leq  - \frac{ 10}{27}  $$Let $ a,b $ be nonnegative real numbers such that $ a^2+b^2+a+b=1. $ Prove that
$$  (ab+1)(a+b)\leq \frac{ 5\sqrt 3-7}{2}  $$$$ (ab+1)(a+b-1)\leq 3\sqrt 3- \frac{ 11}{2}  $$
1 reply
+1 w
sqing
Yesterday at 3:00 PM
SunnyEvan
7 minutes ago
Romania Junior TST 2021 Day 3 P2
oVlad   4
N 10 minutes ago by DensSv
Let $O$ be the circumcenter of triangle $ABC$ and let $AD$ be the height from $A$ ($D\in BC$). Let $M,N,P$ and $Q$ be the midpoints of $AB,AC,BD$ and $CD$ respectively. Let $\mathcal{C}_1$ and $\mathcal{C}_2$ be the circumcircles of triangles $AMN$ and $POQ$. Prove that $\mathcal{C}_1\cap \mathcal{C}_2\cap AD\neq \emptyset$.
4 replies
1 viewing
oVlad
Jun 7, 2021
DensSv
10 minutes ago
A lot of z
Anulick   4
N 19 minutes ago by quasar_lord
Source: CMI 2024
(a) FInd the number of complex roots of $Z^6 = Z + \bar{Z}$
(b) Find the number of complex solutions of $Z^n = Z + \bar{Z}$ for $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$
4 replies
+1 w
Anulick
May 19, 2024
quasar_lord
19 minutes ago
Inspired by Titu Andreescu
sqing   2
N 25 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c>0 $ and $ a+b+c\geq 3abc . $ Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+c^2+1\geq \frac{4}{3}(ab+bc+ca) $$
2 replies
1 viewing
sqing
4 hours ago
sqing
25 minutes ago
No more topics!
C-B=60 <degrees>
Sasha   26
N Mar 18, 2025 by shendrew7
Source: Moldova TST 2005, IMO Shortlist 2004 geometry problem 3
Let $O$ be the circumcenter of an acute-angled triangle $ABC$ with ${\angle B<\angle C}$. The line $AO$ meets the side $BC$ at $D$. The circumcenters of the triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ are $E$ and $F$, respectively. Extend the sides $BA$ and $CA$ beyond $A$, and choose on the respective extensions points $G$ and $H$ such that ${AG=AC}$ and ${AH=AB}$. Prove that the quadrilateral $EFGH$ is a rectangle if and only if ${\angle ACB-\angle ABC=60^{\circ }}$.

Proposed by Hojoo Lee, Korea
26 replies
Sasha
Apr 10, 2005
shendrew7
Mar 18, 2025
C-B=60 <degrees>
G H J
Source: Moldova TST 2005, IMO Shortlist 2004 geometry problem 3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Sasha
129 posts
#1 • 6 Y
Y by Adventure10, ImSh95, Mango247, Funcshun840, ItsBesi, and 1 other user
Let $O$ be the circumcenter of an acute-angled triangle $ABC$ with ${\angle B<\angle C}$. The line $AO$ meets the side $BC$ at $D$. The circumcenters of the triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ are $E$ and $F$, respectively. Extend the sides $BA$ and $CA$ beyond $A$, and choose on the respective extensions points $G$ and $H$ such that ${AG=AC}$ and ${AH=AB}$. Prove that the quadrilateral $EFGH$ is a rectangle if and only if ${\angle ACB-\angle ABC=60^{\circ }}$.

Proposed by Hojoo Lee, Korea
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by djmathman, Aug 1, 2015, 2:52 AM
Reason: Official version is better than non-official one
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
grobber
7849 posts
#2 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, ImSh95, Mango247, endless_abyss
First of all, it's easy to see that $AD\perp EF,GH$. The triangles $ACF,ABE$ are isosceles, and have the same angles, so they are similar. This means that $AFE$ is similar to $ACB$, and thus to $AGH$.

Since $AFE,AGH$ share the same altitude starting from $A$, it means that $AFE$ is obtained from $AGH$ by reflecting it through a line $\perp AD$, and then performing a homothety centered at $A$ of ratio $\frac{AF}{AG}$, so $EFGH$ will be a rectangle iff $AF=GH$, i.e. iff $AF=AC\iff AFC$ is equilateral. With the given conditions, this is equivalent to $\angle ADC=30^{\circ}$, and the conclusion follows easily.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#3 • 5 Y
Y by Adventure10, ImSh95, Paramizo_Dicrominique, Mango247, and 1 other user
This problem was problem 2 in the 3rd German TST 2005. Hence, I have a conjecture on where it is from, although some people repeatedly dispute it ;) . Anyway, here is the way the problem was posed on our TST:

Problem. Let ABC be an acute-angled triangle with A < B, and let U be the circumcenter of the triangle ABC. The lines CU and AB intersect at a point D. Let E and F be the circumcenters of triangles ACD and BCD. Choose points K and L on the rays AC and BC such that AK = BL = a + b. Prove that the quadrilateral EFKL is a rectangle if and only if B - A = 60°.

And here is the solution I gave on the exam (just copied from my writeup, not simplified, hence it will be far more complicated than necessary):

We will use non-directed angles. See the accompanying sketch for the arrangement of the points.

Since U is the circumcenter of triangle ABC, the central angle theorem yields < BUC = 2 < BAC = 2A. On the other hand, BU = CU, again because U is the circumcenter of triangle ABC. Hence, the triangle BUC is isosceles, and its base angle is therefore

$\measuredangle UCB=\frac{180^{\circ}-\measuredangle BUC}{2}=\frac{180^{\circ}-2A}{2}=90^{\circ}-A$.

Analogously, < UCA = 90° - B. Similarly, for the circumcenters E and F of triangles ACD and BCD we can find

< ECA = < CDA - 90°;
< EAC = < CDA - 90°;
< FBC = 90° - < CDB;
< FCB = 90° - < CDB.

Hereby, in the proofs of the equations < ECA = < CDA - 90° and < EAC = < CDA - 90°, we have to apply the central angle theorem in the form

< CEA = 2 $\cdot$ acute chordal angle of the chord CA in the circumcircle of triangle ACD
= 2 $\cdot$ (180° - < CDA) = 360° - 2 < CDA,

since the angle < CDA is obtuse, and the point E lies outside of the triangle ACD.

Also, since E and F are the circumcenters of triangles ACD and BCD, we have CE = AE and BF = CF, so that the triangles CEA and BFC are isosceles.

Now, by the sum of angles in triangle CDA, we have

< CDA = 180° - < DCA - < CAD = 180° - < UCA - A = 180° - (90° - B) - A = 90° + (B - A).

Consequently,

< CDB = 180° - < CDA = 180° - (90° + (B - A)) = 90° - (B - A).

Thus,

< ECA = < CDA - 90° = (90° + (B - A)) - 90° = B - A;
< EAC = < CDA - 90° = (90° + (B - A)) - 90° = B - A;
< FBC = 90° - < CDB = 90° - (90° - (B - A)) = B - A;
< FCB = 90° - < CDB = 90° - (90° - (B - A)) = B - A.

Hence, in particular, < ECA = < FCB and < EAC = < FBC. Thus, the triangles ECA and FCB are similar. This yields CE : CA = CF : CB. On the other hand, the equality < ECA = < FCB yields < ECF = < ECB - < FCB = < ECB - < ECA = < ACB. This, combined with CE : CA = CF : CB, shows that the triangles CEF and CAB are similar, so that EF : AB = CE : CA.

On the other hand, the equation AK = a + b implies CK = AK - CA = (a + b) - b = a = CB, and similarly CL = CA. This, together with < KCL = < BCA, shows that the triangles CLK and CAB are congruent. Consequently, KL = AB. Hence, the equation EF : AB = CE : CA becomes EF : KL = CE : CA.

The problem asks us to prove that the quadrilateral EFKL is a rectangle if and only if B - A = 60°. Hence, in order to solve the problem, it is enough to show the following two assertions:

Assertion 1. If B - A = 60°, then the quadrilateral EFKL is a rectangle.
Assertion 2. If the quadrilateral EFKL is a rectangle, then B - A = 60°.

Proof of Assertion 2. If the quadrilateral EFKL is a rectangle, then EF = KL. Since EF : KL = CE : CA, this yields CE = CA. Hence, the triangle CEA, which is already isosceles with CE = AE, must be equilateral. Hence, < ECA = 60°. Since < ECA = B - A, we therefore obtain B - A = 60°. This proves Assertion 2.

Proof of Assertion 1. If B - A = 60°, then, since < ECA = B - A, we have < ECA = 60°. Hence, the triangle CEA, which is already isosceles with CE = AE, must be equilateral. Thus, CE = CA. Since EF : KL = CE : CA, this yields EF = KL.

On the other hand, we know that the triangles CEF and CAB are similar, and that the triangles CLK and CAB are congruent. Thus, the triangles CEF and CLK are similar. Moreover, these two triangles must be congruent, since EF = KL. Hence, CE = CL and CF = CK. Thus, the triangles ECL and FCK are isosceles. The base angle of the isosceles triangle ECL equals

$\measuredangle CEL=\frac{180^{\circ}-\measuredangle ECL}{2}=\frac{\measuredangle BCE}{2}=\frac{\measuredangle BCA+\measuredangle ECA}{2}$
$=\frac{C+\left(B-A\right)}{2}$ (since < BCA = C and < ECA = B - A)
$=\frac{\left(B+C\right)-A}{2}=\frac{\left(180^{\circ}-A\right)-A}{2}$ (since B + C = 180° - A by the sum of the angles in triangle ABC)
$=\frac{180^{\circ}-2A}{2}=90^{\circ}-A$.

Also, since the triangles CEF and CAB are similar, we have < CEF = < CAB. Thus,

< FEL = < CEF + < CEL = < CAB + (90° - A) = A + (90° - A) = 90°.

Similarly, < EFK = 90°.

Since the triangles CEF and CLK are similar, we have < CEF = < CLK, and since the triangle ECL is isosceles with CE = CL, we have < CEL = < CLE. Thus,

< FEL = < CEF + < CEL = < CLK + < CLE = < ELK.

Consequently, < FEL = 90° implies < ELK = 90°.

Similarly, < FKL = 90°.

Altogether, we have obtained < FEL = 90°, < EFK = 90°, < ELK = 90° and < FKL = 90°. Thus, the quadrilateral EFKL has four right angles, so that it must be a rectangle. This proves Assertion 1.

Now, as both Assertions 1 and 2 are proven, the problem is solved.

Darij
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
k2c901_1
146 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, ImSh95, Mango247
Incidentally, this was also Taiwan 2nd TST 2005 final exam problem 5.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sayantanchakraborty
505 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by ImSh95, Adventure10, Mango247
Trigonometry


Bye...

Sayantan....
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sunken rock
4372 posts
#6 • 3 Y
Y by ImSh95, Adventure10, Mango247
In case you did not notice that $\triangle AFC$ was equilateral - see Grobber's, as I did, then from $\triangle ABO\sim\triangle ADF$ get $\frac{DF}{BO}=\frac{AD}{AB}$, and, with $DF=AC, BO-AO$ getting $AO\cdot AD=AB\cdot AC$.
If the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$ intersects $BC$ and the circumcircle of $\Delta ABC$ (second time) at $M,N$ respectively, then we know that $AB\cdot AC=AM\cdot AN$, or $DOMN$ is cyclic; from $\angle DMN=\angle DON$ we get the same $\hat C-\hat B=60^\circ$.

Best regards,
sunken rock
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
tenplusten
1000 posts
#7 • 3 Y
Y by ImSh95, Adventure10, Mango247
Another beautiful problem from Hojo Lee.
Solution

Comment
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by tenplusten, Apr 6, 2017, 4:31 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#8 • 6 Y
Y by Mathasocean, A-Thought-Of-God, SSaad, Elnuramrv, ImSh95, Adventure10
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6862 posts
#9 • 5 Y
Y by srijonrick, v4913, A-Thought-Of-God, ImSh95, Paramizo_Dicrominique
Solution from Twitch solves ISL stream:

We start with a few observations which are always true regardless of the condition.
  • Quadrilateral $HGCB$ is always an isosceles trapezoid, and in particular $BC = GH$.
  • By angle chasing $\overline{AO} \perp \overline{GH}$ always holds. (One clean way to see this is to note that $\overline{GH}$ and $\overline{BC}$ are antiparallel through $\angle A$.) This implies $\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{GH}$.
  • By Salmon theorem, we always have \[ \triangle AEF \overset{+}{\sim} \triangle ABC. \]
[asy] size(6cm); pair B = dir(200); pair C = dir(-20); pair A = dir(30); pair O = origin; pair D = extension(A, O, B, C); pair E = circumcenter(A, B, D); pair F = circumcenter(A, C, D);
filldraw(A--B--C--cycle, invisible, blue); draw(A--D, blue); filldraw(A--E--F--cycle, invisible, red); pair G = A+(A-B)*abs(C-A)/abs(B-A); pair H = A+(A-C)*abs(B-A)/abs(C-A);
filldraw(A--C--G--cycle, invisible, blue); filldraw(A--B--H--cycle, invisible, blue); filldraw(A--G--H--cycle, invisible, blue);
dot("$B$", B, dir(B)); dot("$C$", C, dir(C)); dot("$A$", A, dir(330)); dot("$O$", O, dir(270)); dot("$D$", D, dir(270)); dot("$E$", E, dir(E)); dot("$F$", F, dir(270)); dot("$G$", G, dir(G)); dot("$H$", H, dir(H));
/* TSQ Source:
!size(10cm); B = dir 200 C = dir -20 A = dir 30 R330 O = origin R270 D = extension A O B C R270 E = circumcenter A B D F = circumcenter A C D R270
A--B--C--cycle 0.1 lightblue / blue A--D blue A--E--F--cycle 0.1 lightred / red G = A+(A-B)*abs(C-A)/abs(B-A) H = A+(A-C)*abs(B-A)/abs(C-A)
A--C--G--cycle 0.1 lightcyan / blue A--B--H--cycle 0.1 lightcyan / blue A--G--H--cycle 0.1 lightblue / blue
*/ [/asy]
We begin now with:
Claim: We have $\triangle AEF \cong \triangle ABC$ if and only if $\angle C - \angle B = 60^{\circ}$.
Proof. The congruence just means $FA = AC$. Since $FA = FC$ always, triangle $AFC$ is equilateral if and only if $\angle AFC = 60^{\circ} \iff \angle ADC = 30^{\circ}$. As $\angle ADC = (90^{\circ} - \angle C) + \angle B$, and the result follows. $\blacksquare$

Claim: We have $EFGH$ is a parallelogram if and only if $\triangle AEF \cong \triangle ABC$.
Proof. Since we already know $\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{GH}$, the parallelogram condition is equivalent to $EF = GH$, but as $GH = BC$ we get the earlier congruence. $\blacksquare$
It remains only to show that if $EFGH$ is a parallelogram then it is also a rectangle. In the situation of the claims, note that $EG = FH$ by symmetry through the oppositely congruent triangles $\triangle AEF$ and $\triangle AHG$ as needed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
weaving2
14 posts
#10 • 1 Y
Y by ImSh95
@v_Enhance what is the name of the twitch channel?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6862 posts
#11 • 2 Y
Y by v4913, ImSh95
weaving2 wrote:
@v_Enhance what is the name of the twitch channel?

https://twitch.tv/vEnhance which normally runs Friday 8pm ET. You can see a schedule at https://web.evanchen.cc/videos.html.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DikranB
1 post
#12 • 1 Y
Y by ImSh95
Quote:
By Salmon theorem, we always have\[ \triangle AEF \overset{+}{\sim} \triangle ABC. \]

Why is this the case? Can you provide any link to further material on the subject?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DottedCaculator
7305 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by guptaamitu1, ImSh95
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Overlord123
799 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by ImSh95
$EFGH$ is a rectangle if and only if $EFGH$ is a rectangle.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mahdi_Mashayekhi
689 posts
#16 • 1 Y
Y by ImSh95
Assume GHEF is rectangle we will prove ∠C - ∠B = 60.
EF = GH = BC and we have AEF and ABC are similar so ABC and AEF are congruent so AEB and AFC are regular triangles.
∠AFC = 60 so ∠ADC = 30.
∠ADC = ∠B + ∠OAB = ∠B + 90 - ∠C so ∠C - ∠B = 90 - 30 = 60 as wanted.

Assume ∠C - ∠B = 60 we will prove GHEF is rectangle.
∠ADC = ∠B + 90 - ∠C = 30 so ∠AFC = 60 and FA = FC so AFC is regular triangle. we have AEF and ABC are similar and AC = AF so AEF and ABC are
congruent so EF = BC = GH. ∠BAF = 180 - 2C so ∠FGA = 90 - ∠C. ∠HGF = ∠HGA + ∠FGA = ∠C + 90 - ∠C = 90. same way ∠GHE = 90 so HE || GF so HEFG is rectangle.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mahdi_Mashayekhi, Jan 13, 2022, 11:54 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Numbertheorydog
18 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by ImSh95
Mahdi_Mashayekhi wrote:
we have AEF and ABC are similar
how do you get that they are similar?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#18 • 2 Y
Y by ImSh95, centslordm
Inefficient angle chasing solution... will improve later if I have time

Let $\angle BAC=\alpha$ and so on. Notice $\overline{AO}\perp\overline{EF}$ since $\overline{AO}$ is the radical axis of $(ABD)$ and $(ACD).$ Also, $\overline{AO}\perp\overline{GH}$ as $$\measuredangle(\overline{AO},\overline{GH})=\measuredangle(\overline{AO},\overline{AG})+\measuredangle AGH=\measuredangle BCA+\measuredangle OAB=90.$$Finally, $$\angle CDA=\measuredangle BCA+\measuredangle OCA=\measuredangle BCA+90-\measuredangle ABC=90-(\measuredangle ACB-\measuredangle CBA).$$
If Direction: $\gamma-\beta=60$ implies $EFGH$ is a rectangle.
Proof. Notice $\triangle AEB$ is equilateral as $$\angle BEA=2\angle CDA=2(90-60)=60.$$Hence, $$\angle EAO=60+90-\angle ACB=\angle ACB-\angle CBA+90-\angle ACB=90-\angle CBA=\angle OAC$$so $\angle AEH=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle EAC=\angle OAC$ and $\overline{EH}\parallel\overline{AO}.$ Similarly, $\overline{FG}\parallel\overline{AO}.$ $\blacksquare$

Only If Direction: $EFGH$ is a rectangle implies $\gamma-\beta=60.$
Proof. We know $\triangle AEF\cong\triangle DEF$ so $$\angle AFE=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle AFD=\angle ACB.$$Similarly, $\angle FEA=\angle CBA$ so $\triangle AEF\sim\triangle ABC.$ Then, $\triangle AEF\cong\triangle AHG$ so $\triangle AEB$ is equilateral. Thus, $$90-(\measuredangle ACB-\measuredangle CBA)=\angle CDA=\tfrac{1}{2}\cdot 60=30.$$$\blacksquare$ $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1665 posts
#19
Y by
This took me way too long

It is easy to see that $BCGH$ is a isosceles trapezoid. Let $X$ be $OA\cap GH.$ We have \[\angle GAX=\angle OAB=90^\circ-\angle ACB=90^\circ-\angle AGX.\]Thus, $AX\perp GH.$ We also have $EF\perp AD$ so $EF\parallel GH.$ It is clear why F is inside and E is outside so now, $\angle CFD=2\angle CAD=\angle COD$ so $CFOD$ is cyclic. Similarly, $BEOD$ is cyclic. We have \[\angle FOE+\angle FAE=360^\circ-\angle FOD-\angle DOE+\angle FDE\]\[=\angle FCD+\angle EBD+180^\circ-\angle FDC-\angle EDB=180^\circ\]which implies that $AFOE$ is cyclic. We have $\angle ACB-\angle ABC= 90^\circ-\angle OAB-(90^\circ-\angle OAC)=\angle OAC-\angle OAB.$ What's important to see is that \[\angle OAE=\angle OFE=\angle FOD-90^\circ=90^\circ-\angle FCD=\angle OAC\]and similarly, $\angle OAF=\angle OAB.$ Thus, $\angle OAC-\angle OAB=\angle OAC-\angle OAF=\angle CAF.$ Therefore, we have \[\angle ACB=\angle ABC\iff \triangle ACF \text{ is equilateral}\]We know that $\triangle ABC\sim \triangle AEF$ and $\triangle ABC\cong \triangle AHG$ so $\triangle ACF$ is equilateral $\iff$ $\triangle AFE\cong \triangle AHG.$ Since $EF\parallel GH$, $\triangle AFE\cong\triangle AHG\iff EFGH$ rectangle, as desired.
Numbertheorydog wrote:
Mahdi_Mashayekhi wrote:
we have AEF and ABC are similar
how do you get that they are similar?

angle chasing.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SatisfiedMagma
451 posts
#20
Y by
Solved with proxima1681.

Solution: Let $D' = AO \cap GH$. As $AD$ is the radical axis of $\odot(ADC)$ and $\odot(ADB)$, we get $EF \perp AO$. It is also easy see that $\triangle ABC \cong \triangle AHG$.

[asy]
            import graph; size(11cm);
            real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
            pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(14); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */
            pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */
            real xmin = -7, xmax = 6, ymin = -4.184372376555464, ymax = 10.16202343462137;  /* image dimensions */
            pen yqqqyq = rgb(0.5019607843137255,0.,0.5019607843137255); pen ffqqff = rgb(1.,0.,1.); pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.);

            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(4.846554211506446,-2.620429350613437)--(-3.14,-2.7)--cycle, linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(-5.051246248590594,6.115799681176306)--(2.251206267261163,9.350852527005179)--cycle, linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235)--(3.0810645932710234,1.12395692083598)--cycle, linewidth(1.1) + ffqqff);
            draw((-2.6885720014591716,6.552852553843345)--(-2.1789546962989768,6.77861765259111)--(-2.4047197950467414,7.288234957751304)--(-2.9143371002069363,7.0624698590035395)--cycle, linewidth(1.1) + qqwuqq);
            draw((0.7780870069641727,0.10371691540088587)--(0.5523219082164079,0.6133342205610806)--(0.04270460305621318,0.3875691218133157)--(0.268469701803978,-0.12204818334687892)--cycle, linewidth(1.1) + qqwuqq);
            /* draw figures */
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(4.846554211506446,-2.620429350613437), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((4.846554211506446,-2.620429350613437)--(-3.14,-2.7), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-3.14,-2.7)--(-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(1.3905292426795337,-2.654861991247058), linewidth(1.1) + blue);
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(-5.051246248590594,6.115799681176306), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-5.051246248590594,6.115799681176306)--(2.251206267261163,9.350852527005179), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((2.251206267261163,9.350852527005179)--(-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533), linewidth(1.1) + yqqqyq);
            draw((-2.9143371002069363,7.0624698590035395)--(-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533), linewidth(1.1) + blue);
            draw((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533)--(-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235), linewidth(1.1) + ffqqff);
            draw((-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235)--(3.0810645932710234,1.12395692083598), linewidth(1.1) + ffqqff);
            draw((3.0810645932710234,1.12395692083598)--(-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533), linewidth(1.1) + ffqqff);
            draw((-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235)--(-3.14,-2.7), linewidth(1.1) + ffqqff);
            draw((-5.051246248590594,6.115799681176306)--(-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235), linewidth(1.1) + blue);
            draw((3.0810645932710234,1.12395692083598)--(2.251206267261163,9.350852527005179), linewidth(1.1) + blue);
            /* dots and labels */
            dot((-0.8535898390715775,2.4107656245533),dotstyle);
            label("$A$", (-1.6,2.1217356723134735), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((4.846554211506446,-2.620429350613437),dotstyle);
            label("$B$", (5.163488257557553,-2.712947165152712), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((-3.14,-2.7),dotstyle);
            label("$C$", (-3.796440261877091,-2.844324416170815), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((-5.051246248590594,6.115799681176306),dotstyle);
            label("$G$", (-5.819649927555882,6.06305320285656), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((2.251206267261163,9.350852527005179),dotstyle);
            label("$H$", (2.3520150857701427,9.610238980345336), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((0.8408620061861096,-1.4141036218163907),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            label("$O$", (1.1170689261999718,-1.5305519059897863), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((1.3905292426795337,-2.654861991247058),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            label("$D$", (1.3798234282361783,-3.2384561692251235), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((-0.895059345715962,-0.6375021281980235),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            label("$F$", (-1.0900688909041634,-1.2677974039535806), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((3.0810645932710234,1.12395692083598),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            label("$E$", (3.1928294922860037,1.3334721662048563), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((-2.9143371002069363,7.0624698590035395),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            label("$D'$", (-3.139554006786575,7.481927513852071), NE * labelscalefactor);
            dot((0.268469701803978,-0.12204818334687892),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle);
            clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle);
[/asy]

Claim: $\triangle AEF \sim \triangle ABC$ and $EF \parallel HG$.

Proof: Observe
\[\angle AFE = \frac{1}{2} \angle AFD = \angle ACB.\]$\angle AEF = \angle ABC$ follows symmetrically proving the similarity. For the parallel part,
\begin{align*}
    \angle AD'G & = \angle D'HA + \angle D'AH \\
                & = \angle ABC + \angle CAD   \\
                & = 90^\circ = \angle(FE,AD)
\end{align*}and the claim is proven. $\square$
We first prove the if direction. If $EFGH$ is a rectangle, then
\[\overline{EF} = \overline{GH} = \overline{BC}.\]This would give $\triangle ABC \cong \triangle AEF$. This would give $\overline{AF} = \overline{FC} = \overline{AC}$ giving $\triangle AFC$ equilateral. It is not hard to compute $\angle AFC = 2(90^\circ -C +B)$. Setting this equal to $60^\circ$, we would get $C-B = 60^\circ$ as desired.

For the iff direction, assume $C-B = 60^\circ$. Analogous calculations as above, again reveal that $\triangle AFC$ and $\triangle AEB$ as equilateral. Note that $\triangle AEH$ and $\triangle AFG$ are isosceles. These triangles would also imply $\triangle AEF \cong \triangle ACB$. With some angle chasing one can compute
\[\angle AFG = \frac{1}{2} A - 30^\circ \qquad \text{and} \qquad \angle AEH = \frac{1}{2} A + 30^\circ.\]Finally observe that
\[\angle GFE = C + \frac{1}{2} A - 30^\circ = 90 ^\circ = \angle HEF\]which proves that $EFGH$ is indeed a rectangle and we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
huashiliao2020
1292 posts
#22
Y by
First we prove the necessity: It's clear that $$30=C-60+90-C=ABC+OAB=ADC\implies AFC=60\implies AG=AC=FA.$$Now note the cyclicislscelestrapezoid since $$HAB=GAC,BHA=HBA=90-HAB/2=90-GAC/2=AGC=ACG,$$and that $AFD=2C\implies DAF=90-C=BAO$. Now, $$GFE=GFA+EFA=90-DAF+AGF=90-1/2BAF+90-GAF=90,$$$HGF=HGA+AGF=C+90-C=90,$ where the last step follows from knowing that $$AGF=(180-GAF)/2=FAB/2=FAD=90-C.$$Finally, we note that $AEF\cong ABC$, which follows immediately from $$FA=FC, EAF=EAB+BAF=60+BAF=FAC+BAF=BAC,AFE=90-AFG=90-AGF=C.$$It is now evident that EF=BC=HG ($BAC\cong HAG$), whence the already known right trapezoid (EFG and HGF are 90 degrees) has EF=HG which makes it a rectangle! $\blacksquare$



As for sufficiency, if EFGH is a rectangle, remark that BC=HG=EF, and $$AFE=AFD/2=ACB,AEF=AED/2=ABC\stackrel{SAS}{\implies}ABC\cong AEF\implies AF=AC,$$whence AFC is equilateral, and $$60=AFC=2ADC=2(B+BAO)=2(B+90-C)=180+2B-2C\implies C-B=60.$$$\blacksquare$

I'm really happy about this solution because it only took half an hour and it was straightforward, a very nice problem, and I did it on my own, with some nice observations! Obviously my necessity was overkill but I can't be bothered to shorten it lol
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by huashiliao2020, Aug 31, 2023, 3:55 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
starchan
1601 posts
#23
Y by
how do you come up with problems like these
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OronSH
1724 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by GrantStar
Solved with GrantStar :omighty: :omighty:

First, let $P$ be the intersection of the altitude from $A$ to $BC$ with the circumcircle of $ABC.$ Notice that since $EF$ and $OF$ are the perpendicular bisectors of $AD$ and $AC,$ we have $\measuredangle AEF=\frac{1}{2} \measuredangle AED=\measuredangle ABC=\frac{1}{2} \measuredangle AOC=\measuredangle AOF,$ so $AEOF$ is cyclic and $AO \perp EF.$ Also, by symmetry, we have $\measuredangle AFE=\measuredangle ACB,$ so $\triangle AEF$ and $\triangle ABC$ are similar and similarly oriented. Thus, there exists a spiral similarity at $A$ sending $\triangle AEF$ to $\triangle ABC.$ Notice that this spiral similarity also sends $O$ to $P,$ so we have $\frac{EF}{BC}=\frac{AO}{AP}.$

Next, Reim on lines $AB,AC$ and quadrilaterals $AABC$ and $BCGH$ gives us that $GH$ is parallel to the tangent to the circumcircle of $ABC$ at $A,$ so $GH \perp AD$ and $GH \parallel EF.$ Also, we have $\angle EAD=90-\frac{1}{2} \angle AED=90-\angle ABC=90-\frac{1}{2} \angle AOC=\angle OAC,$ so $AD$ bisects $\angle EAC,$ so the tangent to the circumcircle of $ABC$ at $A$ bisects $\angle EAH,$ and thus also bisects $\angle GAF$ by symmetry. Therefore, $EFGH$ being a rectangle is equivalent to $EF=GH.$

However, we know $GH=BC,$ and $BC=EF$ if and only if $AO=AP.$ Since $OA=OP,$ this holds if and only if $AOP$ is equilateral, or equivalently $\angle OAP=60.$ Now, let $A'$ be the point such that $AA'BC$ is an isosceles trapezoid with $AA' \parallel BC,$ and let $AO$ intersect the circumcircle of $ABC$ again at $Q.$ Then we have $\angle OAP=\angle QAP=\angle A'CA=\angle ACB-\angle BCA'=\angle ACB-\angle ABC,$ so we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7586 posts
#25
Y by
Obviously $EF$ is the perpendicular bisector of $AD$ and $OE\perp AB$, $OF\perp AC$.

For convenience let $L$ be the foot of $A$ to $BC$. Now
\[\measuredangle DAE=\measuredangle LAB\]\[\measuredangle DAF=\measuredangle LAC\]so $\triangle AEF\sim \triangle ABC$.

Now we prove that $EF\parallel GH$. Consider the acute angles formed by each of the lines with $BC$. It suffices to show:
\[90^{\circ}-\angle ADC=180^{\circ}-(\angle A+2\angle B)\]\[90^{\circ}-(\angle B+90^{\circ}-\angle C)=180^{\circ}-(\angle A+2\angle B)\]which is true.

Now since $\triangle AEF\sim \triangle ABC$, $\triangle ABC\cong \triangle AHG$ we must have $AF=AG=AC$ in order to have $EF=GH$.

So $\angle AFC=60^{\circ}$, $\angle ADC=30^{\circ}$, so
\[\angle ADC=\angle B+90^{\circ}-\angle C=30^{\circ}\implies \angle C-\angle B=60^{\circ}\]and we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1313 posts
#26
Y by
Since $\triangle GAB \cong \triangle CAH$, we have $GH \parallel BC$ due to $\angle ABG = \angle AHC$. If $EFGH$ is a rectangle, then $GH =  EF$. Then consider the homothety $\mathcal{H}$ sending $(ABD) \to (ACD)$. Then $\mathcal{H}(E) = F$, and $\mathcal{H}(B) = C$, so $\triangle{AEF} \cong \triangle{ABC}$. Then notice that if $\triangle{AEF} \cong \triangle{ABC}$, then $AF = AC$ which implies that $\triangle AFC$ is equilateral. From here, we find $\angle FAC = \angle FCA = 60^{\circ} \implies \angle ADC = 30^{\circ}$. We can angle chase to find $\angle B = 90^{\circ} = \angle C + 30^{\circ}$, so we are done.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by dolphinday, Feb 7, 2024, 5:29 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cj13609517288
1868 posts
#27 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
Headsolved! Typed up without a diagram either, so there might be some mistakes in point names lol.

First, we will prove that $HG$ and $EF$ are always parallel. Note that $HG$ and $BC$ are reflections over the $A$-external angle bisector, and lines $AO$ and $AH$ are reflections over the $A$-external angle bisector (since they are isogonal). Since $EF\perp AO$, we want to show that $AH\perp BC$, which is obvious.

Now suppose $EF=GH$. Then note that the projections of $E$ and $F$ onto $BC$ have distance exactly half of $BC$. Thus the angle bietween $EF$ and $BC$ is $60^{\circ}$, so $\angle ADC=30^{\circ}$, so
\[180^{\circ}=30^{\circ}+\angle DAC+\angle C=30^{\circ}+(90^{\circ}-\angle B)+\angle C\Longrightarrow \angle C-\angle B=60^{\circ}.\]
Conversely, if $\angle C-\angle B=60^{\circ}$, the previous paragraph is all reversible, so we still get $EF=GH$, so $EFGH$ is a parallelogram. Also, $\angle AFC=60^{\circ}$, so $AF=AC=AG$. Since $\angle BAD=\angle DAF=90^{\circ}-\angle C$, so $\angle FAG=2\angle C$. But note that since $AF=AG$, we get $\angle AFG=90^{\circ}-\angle C=\angle DAF$, so $AO\parallel FG$, so $EF\perp FG$, so we get that $EFGH$ is a rectangle. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2513 posts
#28
Y by
Note that $\angle ACB - \angle ABC = 90^\circ - \angle ADC$ through some simple angle chasing. Hence, it suffices to show that $EFGH$ is a rectangle if and only if $\angle ADC = 30^\circ$. Notice that

\[\angle AEF = \frac{1}{2} \angle AEB = \angle ABD,\]
and similarly, $\angle AFE = \angle ACD$. Hence, $\triangle AEF \sim \triangle ABC$, and thus $\triangle AEF \sim \triangle AHG$. Moreover, if we extend $\overline{AO}$ past $A$ to intersect $\overline{GH}$ at $D'$, we get

\begin{align*}
\angle AD'G &= 180^\circ - \angle D'GA - \angle D'AG  \\
&= 180^\circ - (\angle ACB + \angle BAD) \\
&= 90^\circ = \angle (\overline{AO}, \overline{EF}).
\end{align*}
So, $\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{GH}$. Then, note that $\triangle AGH$ is obtained from $\triangle AEF$ by reflecting it over the line perpendicular to $\overline{AD}$ passing through $A$, and performing a homothety centered at $A$ with ratio $\tfrac{GH}{EF}$. If $EFGH$ is a rectangle, then the ratio is simply $1$, and it is easy to see that $EFGH$ cannot be a rectangle if the ratio is not $1$.

Hence, the condition of $EFGH$ being a rectangle is equivalent to $EF = GH$, or $\triangle AEF \cong \triangle AGH$. This is equivalent to $AF = AG = AC$, or $\triangle AFC$ being equilateral. Since $\angle AFC = 2 \angle ADC$, we clearly have $\triangle AFC$ is equilateral if and only if $\angle ADC = 30^\circ$. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
792 posts
#29
Y by
We'll prove both are equivalent to $EF = BC$.

To prove it is equivalent to $EFGH$ being a rectangle, first notice $AO \perp EF$, but also $AO \perp GH$ from isogonality properties. To prove it is equivalent to $\angle C - \angle B = 60$, note that Salmon Lemma gives
\[BC = EF = BC \cdot 2 \cos \angle BAE\]\[\iff 60 = \angle BAE = 90 - \angle ADC = \angle A + 2 \angle C - 180 = \angle C - \angle B. \quad \blacksquare\]
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a