Y by baopbc, cjquines0, mineiraojose, hoangA1K44PBC, ThE-dArK-lOrD, GoJensenOrGoHome, mihajlon, aopser123, Scorpion.k48, A-B-C, Ankoganit, buratinogigle, langkhach11112, wu2481632, Lin_yangyuan, atmchallenge, rkm0959, baladin, champion999, Akatsuki1010, AlastorMoody, enhanced, Pluto1708, Supercali, Math5000, AmirKhusrau, amar_04, 62861, nguyendangkhoa17112003, Kagebaka, hsiangshen, Rg230403, Kanep, mijail, 606234, Atpar, Modesti, DanDumitrescu, centslordm, Tafi_ak, SerdarBozdag, Dr_Vex, David-Vieta, Adventure10, math_comb01, Parsia--, GioOrnikapa, VIATON, ehuseyinyigit, onyqz, OronSH, MS_asdfgzxcvb, wizixez
In this topic, I'll prove some properties related to the orthocenter
of
respectively (where
is an arbitrary point). Note that all symbols in this post bear the same meaning (except
).
Property 1 : Let
be the isogonal conjugate of
WRT
and let
be its pedal triangle WRT
Then
is inscribed in
(i.e.
lies on
respectively.).
Proof : Let
be the antipedal triangle of
WRT
Since
lie on a circle with diameter
so
Similarly, we can prove
so we get
Combining
i.e.

____________________________________________________________
Property 2 : Let
be the orthocenter of
and let
be the midpoint of
Then the anticomplement
of
WRT
is the orthocenter of

Proof : Let
be the centroid of
Clearly,
is the centroid of
so the midpoint of
is the complement of
WRT
Notice
is the reflection of
in the midpoint of
we get
Analogously, we can prove
and
so
is the orthocenter of

____________________________________________________________
Property 3 : Let
be the orthocenter of
respectively. Then the A-altitude of
are concurrent (similar for
and
).
Proof : Let
cuts
at
and let
be the projection of
on
(define
similarly). Let
be the orthocenter of
respectively. From
so notice
we get
hence
are homothetic
is parallel to the Steiner line
of the complete quadrilateral
formed by
and 
Let
be the pedal triangle of
WRT
Let
be the isotomic conjugate of
WRT
respectively. From
we get
and
are congruent and homothetic, so
is parallel to the Newton line of
hence

Let the perpendicular from
to
cuts the A-altitude of
at
and let
Since
so
Similarly, we can prove
so notice the intersection of
is the orthocenter of
we conclude that the intersection of
and
lies on the A-altitude of

From the proof above we get the following corollaries :
Corollary 3.1 :
is the cevian triangle of
WRT 
Corollary 3.2 :
and
are congruent and homothetic.
____________________________________________________________
Property 4 :

Proof : Let
cuts
again at
and
be the projection of
on
Note that
(See here (Lemma at post #4) or here (Lemma)), so we get
Analogously, if
cuts
again at
and
is the projection of
on
then
Let
(on the A-altitude of
) be the intersection of
and
Let
be the point at infinity with direction
Since
so we conclude that

____________________________________________________________
Property 5 :
and
are cyclologic.
Proof : Let
be the second intersection of
and
Since
so
lies on
i.e.
are concurrent at 
Analogously, we can prove
are concurrent at

____________________________________________________________
Property 6 : Let
Then
lie on
respectively.
Proof : It is well-known that
(
), so from Pappus's theorem for
are collinear. Similarly, we can prove
so
are collinear. 
____________________________________________________________
Before stating property 7, we recall following two lemmas.
Lemma 1 : Given a hexagon
s.t.
Let
be the intersection of
and
be the intersection of
Then
Proof : Let
be the point s.t.
and
be the point s.t.
From
are collinear. Similarly, we can prove
are collinear.
Since
so notice
we get
Combining
we get

Lemma 2 (well-known) : Given two (not homothetic) triangles
. If
is a point s.t. the parallel from
to
, resp. are concurrent, then
lies on a circumconic of
or the line at infinity.
____________________________________________________________
Property 7 :
lie on a conic.
Proof : From Lemma 1
so from Lemma 2 we get the conclusion. 








Property 1 : Let













Proof : Let





































____________________________________________________________
Property 2 : Let










Proof : Let




























____________________________________________________________
Property 3 : Let











Proof : Let












































Let

































Let the perpendicular from

























From the proof above we get the following corollaries :
Corollary 3.1 :



Corollary 3.2 :


____________________________________________________________
Property 4 :









Proof : Let


































____________________________________________________________
Property 5 :


Proof : Let










Analogously, we can prove





____________________________________________________________
Property 6 : Let





















Proof : It is well-known that




















____________________________________________________________

Lemma 1 : Given a hexagon





















































Since
























Lemma 2 (well-known) : Given two (not homothetic) triangles











____________________________________________________________
Property 7 :










Proof : From Lemma 1










