Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Fixed angle
iv999xyz   0
5 minutes ago
Let ABC be an acute triangle with circumcircle w and D is fixed point on BC. E is randomly selected on BC and C, D and E are in this order. AE intersects w again at F and circumcircle around DEF intersects w again at M. Prove that ∠ABM is fixed.
0 replies
iv999xyz
5 minutes ago
0 replies
6 tangents to 1 circle
moony_   1
N 17 minutes ago by soryn
Source: own
Let $P$ be a point inside the triangle $ABC$. $AP$ intersects $BC$ at $A_0$. Points $B_0$ and $C_0$ are defined similarly. Line $B_0C_0$ intersects $(ABC)$ at points $A_1$, $A_2$. The tangents at these points to $(ABC)$ intersect BC at points $A_3$, $A_4$. Points $B_3$, $B_4$, $C_3$, $C_4$ are defined similarly. Prove that points $A_3$, $A_4$, $B_3$, $B_4$, $C_3$, $C_4$ lie on one conic
1 reply
moony_
Yesterday at 9:30 AM
soryn
17 minutes ago
2024 numbers in a circle
PEKKA   30
N 18 minutes ago by NicoN9
Source: Canada MO 2024/2
Jane writes down $2024$ natural numbers around the perimeter of a circle. She wants the $2024$ products of adjacent pairs of numbers to be exactly the set $\{ 1!, 2!, \ldots, 2024! \}.$ Can she accomplish this?
30 replies
PEKKA
Mar 8, 2024
NicoN9
18 minutes ago
Inspired by ZDSX 2025 Q845
sqing   5
N 43 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $   a,b,c>0   $ and $  a^2+b^2+c^2 +ab+bc+ca=6   $ . Prove that$$  \frac{1}{2a+bc }+ \frac{1}{2b+ca }+ \frac{1}{2c+ab }\geq 1$$
5 replies
sqing
Yesterday at 1:41 PM
sqing
43 minutes ago
No more topics!
USAMO 2000 Problem 5
MithsApprentice   21
N Aug 21, 2024 by cursed_tangent1434
Let $A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $\omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $A_1$ and $A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $\omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $\omega_k$ is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$ and passes through $A_k$ and $A_{k+1},$ where $A_{n+3} = A_{n}$ for all $n \ge 1$. Prove that $\omega_7 = \omega_1.$
21 replies
MithsApprentice
Oct 1, 2005
cursed_tangent1434
Aug 21, 2024
USAMO 2000 Problem 5
G H J
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MithsApprentice
2390 posts
#1 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
Let $A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $\omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $A_1$ and $A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $\omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $\omega_k$ is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$ and passes through $A_k$ and $A_{k+1},$ where $A_{n+3} = A_{n}$ for all $n \ge 1$. Prove that $\omega_7 = \omega_1.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MithsApprentice
2390 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
When replying to the problem, I ask that you make posts for solutions and submit comments, jokes, smilies, etc. separately. Furthermore, please do not "hide" any portion of the solution. Please use LaTeX for posting solutions. Thanks.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
grobber
7849 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247, and 1 other user
Clearly, $\omega_i$ is determined by its center $O_i$, since we know that it passes through $A_i,A_{i+1}$. We also know that for all $i,\ O_i,A_{i+1},O_{i+1}$ are collinear. We must prove that in these conditions, $O_7=O_1$.

Suppose we prove that for all $i$, the angles $\angle OA_iO_i$ and $\angle OA_iO_{i+2}$ are equal (where $O$ is the circumcenter of $A_iA_{i+1}A_{i+2}$). The result would then follow, since $O_i\mapsto O_{i+3}$ would be an involution on the perpendicular bisector $d_i$ of $A_iA_{i+1}$, mapping a point on this line to its harmonic conjugate wrt $O$ and the intersection of the tangents in $A_i,A_{i+2}$ to the circumcircle of $A_iA_{i+1}A_{i+2}$. Since $O_1\mapsto O_4\mapsto O_7$, we must have $O_7=O_1$, as desired.

All that’s left to prove is:

Let $O_1$ be any point on $d_1$, and put $O_2=O_1A_2\cap d_2,\ O_3=O_2A_3\cap d_3$. Then, $A_1O_1,\ A_1O_3$ make equal angles with $OA_1$.

This, however, is a simple angle chase :).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The QuattoMaster 6000
1184 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
MithsApprentice wrote:
Let $ A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $ \omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $ A_1$ and $ A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $ \omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $ k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $ \omega_k$ is externally tangent to $ \omega_{k - 1}$ and passes through $ A_k$ and $ A_{k + 1},$ where $ A_{n + 3} = A_{n}$ for all $ n \ge 1$. Prove that $ \omega_7 = \omega_1.$
Sorry to revive an old topic, but I have a rather different solution than the one posted previously:
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
E^(pi*i)=-1
982 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
Easy Coordinates
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#6 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
E^(pi*i)=-1 wrote:
Since $ \omega_k$ and $ \omega_{k + 1}$ are externally tangent at $ A_{k + 1}$, we see that $ A_{k + 1}$ is the midpoint of $ O_k$ and $ O_{k + 1}$.

Why?

darij
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
E^(pi*i)=-1
982 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08
Oops, you're right, it's wrong. :oops:

It seems like there should be a constant ratio between radii of circles through $ A_1$ and $ A_2$ and those through $ A_2$ and $ A_3$, though . . . maybe there is a way to multiply the coordinates by these factors such that it works out?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CatalystOfNostalgia
1479 posts
#8 • 5 Y
Y by vsathiam, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
Hmm I think you can do this with just trivial angle chasing: $ A=\angle{A_{3}A_{1}A_{2}},B=\angle{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}},C=\angle{A_{2}A_{3}A_{1}},X=\angle{O_{1}A_{1}A_{2}}$. Then, measures of the angles $ \angle{O_{i}A_{i}A_{i+1}}$ are easy to get, we find that $ \angle{O_{7}A_{1}A_{2}}=X$, and we also need $ O_{1},O_{7}$ on the same side of $ A_{1}A_{2}$ (which follows from the fact that we need $ A_{i}$ between $ O_{i+1}$ and $ O_{i+2}$, blah.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sayantanchakraborty
505 posts
#9 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
We let the radius of the circle $\omega_i$ by $r_i$.As usual denote the side opposite to vertex $A_i$ by $a_i$ for $i=1,2,3$.
Let $O_1A_2A_1=\theta$,where $O_1$ is the centre of $\omega_1$.
By applications of sine rule we may easily deduce the following relations:

$\frac{r_1}{r_2}=-\frac{a_1}{a_3}\frac{\cos\theta}{\cos(A_2+\theta)}$

$\frac{r_2}{r_3}=-\frac{a_2}{a_1}\frac{\cos(A_2+\theta)}{\cos(A_2-A_3+\theta)}$

$\frac{r_3}{r_4}=-\frac{a_3}{a_2}\frac{\cos(A_2-A_3+\theta)}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}$

Multiplying these out we get

$\frac{r_1}{r_4}=-\frac{\cos\theta}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}$.

Similarly it is easy to observe that

$\frac{r_4}{r_7}=-\frac{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta))}=-\frac{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}{\cos\theta}$.

Multiplying these equalities we obatain $r_7=r_1$.Also because $7 \equiv 1\pmod{3}$ we note that $\omega_7$ passes through $A_1$ and $A_2$.We thus obtain $\omega_7=\omega_1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Delray
348 posts
#10 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Hint
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6872 posts
#11 • 5 Y
Y by v4913, HamstPan38825, jhu08, rayfish, Adventure10
The idea is to keep track of the subtended arc $\widehat{A_i A_{i+1}}$ of $\omega_i$ for each $i$. To this end, let $\beta = \measuredangle A_1 A_2 A_3$, $\gamma = \measuredangle A_2 A_3 A_1$ and $\alpha = \measuredangle A_1 A_2 A_3$.



[asy] size(8cm); defaultpen(fontsize(9pt)); pair A2 = (0,0); pair O1 = (-8,0); pair O2 = (5,0); pair A1 = abs(A2-O1)*dir(285)+O1; pair A3 = abs(A2-O2)*dir(245)+O2; pair O3 = extension(O2, A3, midpoint(A1--A3), midpoint(A1--A3)+dir(A1-A3)*dir(90));

filldraw(circle(O1,abs(A1-O1)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(circle(O2,abs(A2-O2)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(circle(O3,abs(A3-O3)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(A1--A2--A3--cycle, invisible, red);

pair J = (0,-3.2); draw(O1--O2--O3, deepcyan+dotted);

dot("$O_1$", O1, dir(90), deepcyan); dot("$O_2$", O2, dir(90), deepcyan); dot("$O_3$", O3, dir(-90), deepcyan); dot("$A_1$", A1, dir(A1-J), red); dot("$A_2$", A2, dir(A2-J), red); dot("$A_3$", A3, dir(A3-J), red);

label("$\alpha$", A1, 2.4*dir(J-A1), red); label("$\beta$",  A2, 2*dir(J-A2), red); label("$\gamma$", A3, 2*dir(J-A3), red); [/asy]



Initially, we set $\theta = \measuredangle O_1 A_2 A_1$. Then we compute \begin{align*} 	\measuredangle O_1 A_2 A_1 &= \theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_2 A_3 A_2 &= -\beta-\theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_3 A_1 A_3 &= \beta-\gamma+\theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_4 A_2 A_1 &= (\gamma-\beta-\alpha)-\theta \\ \end{align*}and repeating the same calculation another round gives \[ \measuredangle O_7 A_2 A_1 = k-(k-\theta) = \theta \]with $k = \gamma-\beta-\alpha$. This implies $O_7 = O_1$, so $\omega_7 = \omega_1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeronimoStilton
1521 posts
#12 • 3 Y
Y by Imayormaynotknowcalculus, jhu08, Mango247
I think you can do this with moving points, but here is the angle chase approach.

Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$ for $i=1,2,\dots,7$.

Observe
\[\measuredangle O_7A_1A_2=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3-\measuredangle A_3A_1O_6=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3-\measuredangle O_6A_3A_1=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2+\measuredangle A_2A_3O_5=\]\[-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2+\measuredangle O_5A_2A_3=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2-\measuredangle A_3A_2A_1-\measuredangle A_1A_2O_4.\]A similar angle chase finishes.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by centslordm, jhu08
Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$. Also let $\theta_1=\measuredangle A_1A_2A_3,\theta_2=\measuredangle A_2A_3A_1,\theta_3=\measuredangle A_3A_1A_2$. Observe that $\omega_1$ is uniquely determined by $\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1$, and $\omega_7$ is uniquely determined by $\measuredangle O_7A_2A_1$, so if we can show those are equal we're done. Now, let $\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1=\theta$. By basic angle chasing (since $O_i,A_{i+1},O_{i+1}$ are collinear), we can find:
\begin{align*}
\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1&=\theta\\
\measuredangle O_2A_3A_2&=-\theta_1-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_3A_1A_2&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta\\
\measuredangle O_4A_2A_1&=-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_5A_3A_2&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta_3-\theta_1+\theta\\
\measuredangle O_6A_1A_2&=-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3+\theta_1-\theta_2-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_7A_2A_1&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta_3-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3+\theta=\theta.
\end{align*}hence $\omega_1=\omega_7$ as desired. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by IAmTheHazard, May 16, 2021, 10:24 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
edfearay123
92 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Interesting problem. We will aply an inversion on $\Gamma$ with center $A_1$ and ratio $R$ (it's not important). Define $Inv _{\Gamma} (\omega _i)=\Omega _i$ and $Inv _{\Gamma} (A_i)=B_i$. Note that $\Omega _i$ is a line for $i=1, 3, 4, 6, 7$ because $\omega _i$ pass through $A_1$. Also note that $\Omega _i$ and $\Omega _{i+1}$ are parallels for $i=3, 6$ because $\Omega _i$ and $\Omega _{i+1}$ are tangents in $A_1$. We want that $\Omega _1=\Omega _7$, it's sufficient to prove that $\Omega _1 \parallel \Omega _6$. Now we will use directed angles. Let $\ell=B_2B_3$:
$$\measuredangle (\Omega _1,\ell)=\measuredangle(\ell,\Omega _3)=\measuredangle(\ell,\Omega _4)=\measuredangle (\Omega _6,\ell).$$
So we have that $\Omega _1$ and $\Omega _6$ are parallels as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7586 posts
#16 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Not sure if this works.

Through some manipulations we find that it suffices to show $\angle O_1A_2O_4=\angle O_7A_1O_4$, but this is true because $$\angle O_1A_2A_4=\angle O_5A_2O_2=\angle O_5A_3O_2=\angle O_3A_3O_6=\angle O_3A_1O_6=\angle O_7A_1O_4$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7586 posts
#17
Y by
wait i think this works only when using directed angles (because $A_1O_4$ bisecting $\angle O_1A_1O_7$ is possible)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1692 posts
#18
Y by
Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$. Define $\angle A_3A_1A_2=\alpha,\angle A_1A_2A_3=\beta,\angle A_2A_3A_1=\gamma.$ Define $\angle A_iA_{i+1}O_i=\angle A_{i+1}A_iO_i=\theta_i.$ It suffices to show $\theta_1=\theta_7.$ In fact, note that
\begin{align*}
\theta_2 &= 180^\circ-\beta-\theta_1 \\
\theta_3 &= 180^\circ-\gamma-\theta_2 \\
&= \beta-\gamma +\theta_1 \\
\theta_4 &= 180^\circ - \alpha -\theta_3 \\
&= 180^\circ - \alpha - \beta + \gamma - \theta_1 \\
&= 2\gamma - \theta_1
\end{align*}Note that this process is the exact same for $\theta_4\to \theta_7$, and since function $f(k)=2\gamma -k$ is cyclic with order $2$, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#19
Y by
Let $\theta=\angle A_1O_1A_2$, where $O_i$ is the center of $\omega_i$. Furthermore, let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ be the angles of the triangle. Then, check that we have the sequence $$\theta \to 2\beta - \theta \to \theta+2\gamma-2\beta \to 2\alpha-2\gamma+2\beta-\theta=360^\circ-4\beta-\theta.$$Upon applying another sequence of three transformations, this returns the identity $\theta$, so the centers of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_7$ coincide, which suffices.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Spectator
657 posts
#20
Y by
Define $O_{k}$ as the centers of each respective circle. Let $\alpha = \angle{O_{1}A_{2}A_{1}}$.
\begin{align*}
    \angle{A_{2}O_{4}A_{1}} &= 180-\angle{A_{1}}-\angle{O_{3}A_{1}A_{3}} \\
    &= 180-\angle{A_{1}}-(180-\angle{A_{3}-\angle{A_{2}A_{3}O_{2}}}) \\
    &= \angle{A_{3}}+\angle{A_{2}A_{3}O_{2}}-\angle{A_{1}} \\
    &= \angle{A_{3}}+180-\angle{A_{2}}-\alpha-\angle{A_{1}}
\end{align*}We can apply this transformation twice to get that,
\[\angle{A_{2}A_{1}O_{7}} = \alpha\implies \omega_{1} = \omega_{7}\]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Math4Life7
1703 posts
#21
Y by
Consider if we extend the internal tangent of all of the pairs of circles $\omega_{k-1}$ and $\omega_k$ for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 8$. Name these $\ell_1, \ell_2, \dots \ell_7$. Since $\ell_x$ is just $\ell_{x-1}$ reflected over the perpendicular bisecter of some side, and because the internal tangent is not dependent on the circle (it is in fact what makes the next circle), we just have to prove that $\ell_1 = \ell_7$.

Call $\angle A_2A_1A_3$ $a$, $\angle A_3A_2A_1$ $b$, and $\angle A_1A_3A_2$ $c$
We know that the angle formed by $A_1$, $A_2$, and $\ell_1$ is less than $a$ (otherwise $\omega_2$ does not exist). Thus we call this $x$ and we know that the angle formed by $\ell_1$, $A_1$, and $A_3$ is $a-x$ we can see that this is equal to the angle formed by $A_1$, $A_3$, and $\ell_2$, so we know that the angle formed by $\ell_2$, $A_3$, $A_2$ is $b-a+x$. Continuing this pattern for subsequent angles we find that the next angles are $180-2b-x$, $a+2b+x - 180$, $180 - a - b - x$, and $x$. Thus we find that $\ell_7 = \ell_1$ and we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eibc
599 posts
#22
Y by
For $1 \le i \le 7$, let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$ and $\theta_i = \measuredangle O_iA_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle A_iA_{i + 1}O_i$. Then for $2 \le i \le 7$, the tangency condition tells us that $O_{i - 1}, A_i$, and $O_i$ are collinear, so
$$\theta_i = \measuredangle O_iA_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle O_{i - 1} A_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle O_{i - 1}A_iA_{i - 1} + \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1} = -\theta_{i - 1} + \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1}.$$Therefore, applying this identity in succession, we have
$$\theta_7 = \theta_1 + \sum_{i = 2}^7 (-1)^{7 - i} \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1} = \theta_1 + \sum_{i = 2}^4 ((-1)^{7 - i} + (-1)^{4 - i})(\measuredangle A_{i -1}A_iA_{i + 1}) = \theta_1.$$Thus, $\measuredangle O_1A_1A_2 = \measuredangle O_7A_1A_2$ and $\measuredangle A_1A_2O_1 = \measuredangle A_1A_2O_7$. This is enough to imply that $O_1 = O_7$ since we would otherwise have $\angle O_1A_1A_2 + \angle O_7A_1A_2 = 180^{\circ}$ (using non-directed angles), which is impossible since $\angle O_1A_1A_2, \angle O_7A_1A_2 < 90^{\circ}$. So, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
579 posts
#23
Y by
Cute problem. Let $O_i$ denote the center of each circle $\omega_i$. Let $\ell_1 , \ell_2$ and $\ell_3$ denote respectively the perpendicular bisectors of segments $BC , AB$ and $AC$. Note that for all $k = 2,3, \dots, 7$, the center $O_k$ of $\omega_k$ lies on the line $\ell_{k-1 \pmod{3}}$. First, note that since $O_k$ is a center of a circle passing through points $A_{k+1}$ and $A_{k}$, it must lie on $\ell_{k \pmod{3}}$. Further, since it is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$, which clearly passes through $A_k$ as well, $O_k$ also lies on $\overline{O_kA_{k \pmod{3}}}$.

Now, with this information in hand, it suffices to show that point $O_1 , A_1$ and $O_6$ are collinear since then $O_7 = O_1$ and thus $\omega_7 = \omega_1$ as desired. To see why, simply note that
\[\measuredangle O_1A_1O_4 = \measuredangle O_4A_2O_1 = \measuredangle O_5A_2O_2 = \measuredangle O_2A_3O_5 = \measuredangle O_3A_3O_6 = \measuredangle O_6A_1O_3\]which implies that $O_1 , A_1$ and $O_6$ are collinear finishing the proof.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a