Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Problem 1
SlovEcience   1
N a minute ago by KAME06
Prove that
\[
C(p-1, k-1) \equiv (-1)^{k-1} \pmod{p}
\]for \( 1 \leq k \leq p-1 \), where \( C(n, m) \) is the binomial coefficient \( n \) choose \( m \).
1 reply
SlovEcience
an hour ago
KAME06
a minute ago
a hard geometry problen
Tuguldur   0
18 minutes ago
Let $ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. Suppose that the circles with diameters $AB$ and $CD$ intersect at points $X$ and $Y$. Let $P=AC\cap BD$ and $Q=AD\cap BC$. Prove that the points $P$, $Q$, $X$ and $Y$ are concyclic.
( $AB$ and $CD$ are not the diagnols)
0 replies
+1 w
Tuguldur
18 minutes ago
0 replies
hard problem
Cobedangiu   0
20 minutes ago
$1\le a\le 2,1\le b \le 2:$ Find max of $A$ (and prove) $: A=(a+b^2+\frac{4}{a^2}+\frac{2}{b})(b+a^2+\frac{4}{b^2}+\frac{2}{a})$
0 replies
Cobedangiu
20 minutes ago
0 replies
Problem 2
SlovEcience   0
23 minutes ago
Let \( a, n \) be positive integers and \( p \) be an odd prime such that:
\[
a^p \equiv 1 \pmod{p^n}.
\]Prove that:
\[
a \equiv 1 \pmod{p^{n-1}}.
\]
0 replies
SlovEcience
23 minutes ago
0 replies
Regarding Maaths olympiad prepration
omega2007   1
N 29 minutes ago by GreekIdiot
<Hey Everyone'>
I'm 10 grader student and Im starting prepration for maths olympiad..>>> From scratch (not 2+2=4 )

Do you haves compilled resources of Handouts,
PDF,
Links,
List of books topic wise

which are shared on AOPS (and from your prespective) for maths olympiad and any useful thing, which will help me in boosting Maths olympiad prepration.
1 reply
omega2007
an hour ago
GreekIdiot
29 minutes ago
Difference between being pre-qualified and pre-approved for a mortgage
smitjohn   0
30 minutes ago
Source: Home
In the context of a Southern Home Ownership Programs, it’s essential to understand the difference between pre-qualification and pre-approval. Pre-qualification is an informal estimate of how much you might be able to borrow, based on self-reported financial information. It's a good first step, but it doesn’t carry much weight with sellers.

Pre-approval, however, is a formal process where a lender verifies your income, credit score, and debts. Once pre-approved, you’ll receive a letter showing you're a serious buyer—often giving you an edge in competitive markets. Many home ownership programs require pre-approval before offering down payment assistance or other benefits. Getting pre-approved shows you're financially ready and serious about buying. It also helps you set a realistic home budget and avoid falling for homes you can’t afford. Always aim for pre-approval to give your offer strength and move forward with confidence.
0 replies
smitjohn
30 minutes ago
0 replies
Induction
Mathlover_1   2
N 33 minutes ago by GreekIdiot
Hello, can you share links of same interesting induction problems in algebra
2 replies
Mathlover_1
Mar 24, 2025
GreekIdiot
33 minutes ago
n-gon function
ehsan2004   10
N 44 minutes ago by Zany9998
Source: Romanian IMO Team Selection Test TST 1996, problem 1
Let $ f: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ be a function such that for every regular $ n $-gon $ A_1A_2 \ldots A_n $ we have $ f(A_1)+f(A_2)+\cdots +f(A_n)=0 $. Prove that $ f(x)=0 $ for all reals $ x $.
10 replies
ehsan2004
Sep 13, 2005
Zany9998
44 minutes ago
Functional equations
hanzo.ei   13
N an hour ago by GreekIdiot
Source: Greekldiot
Find all $f: \mathbb R_+ \rightarrow \mathbb R_+$ such that $f(xf(y)+f(x))=yf(x+yf(x)) \: \forall \: x,y \in \mathbb R_+$
13 replies
1 viewing
hanzo.ei
Mar 29, 2025
GreekIdiot
an hour ago
Congruency in sum of digits base q
buzzychaoz   3
N an hour ago by sttsmet
Source: China Team Selection Test 2016 Test 3 Day 2 Q4
Let $a,b,b',c,m,q$ be positive integers, where $m>1,q>1,|b-b'|\ge a$. It is given that there exist a positive integer $M$ such that
$$S_q(an+b)\equiv S_q(an+b')+c\pmod{m}$$
holds for all integers $n\ge M$. Prove that the above equation is true for all positive integers $n$. (Here $S_q(x)$ is the sum of digits of $x$ taken in base $q$).
3 replies
buzzychaoz
Mar 26, 2016
sttsmet
an hour ago
Unsolved NT, 3rd time posting
GreekIdiot   11
N an hour ago by GreekIdiot
Source: own
Solve $5^x-2^y=z^3$ where $x,y,z \in \mathbb Z$
Hint
11 replies
GreekIdiot
Mar 26, 2025
GreekIdiot
an hour ago
Bashing??
John_Mgr   2
N an hour ago by GreekIdiot
I have learned little about what bashing mean as i am planning to start geo, feels like its less effort required and doesnt need much knowledge about the synthetic solutions?
what do you guys recommend ? also state the major difference of them... especially of bashing pros and cons..
2 replies
John_Mgr
3 hours ago
GreekIdiot
an hour ago
Inspired by JK1603JK
sqing   13
N an hour ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq 0 $ and $ab+bc+ca=1.$ Prove that$$\frac{abc-2}{abc-1}\ge \frac{4(a^2b+b^2c+c^2a)}{a^3b+b^3c+c^3a+1} $$
13 replies
sqing
Today at 3:31 AM
sqing
an hour ago
A simple power
Rushil   19
N an hour ago by Raj_singh1432
Source: Indian RMO 1993 Problem 2
Prove that the ten's digit of any power of 3 is even.
19 replies
Rushil
Oct 16, 2005
Raj_singh1432
an hour ago
IMO Shortlist 2012, Geometry 3
lyukhson   74
N Yesterday at 11:11 AM by endless_abyss
Source: IMO Shortlist 2012, Geometry 3
In an acute triangle $ABC$ the points $D,E$ and $F$ are the feet of the altitudes through $A,B$ and $C$ respectively. The incenters of the triangles $AEF$ and $BDF$ are $I_1$ and $I_2$ respectively; the circumcenters of the triangles $ACI_1$ and $BCI_2$ are $O_1$ and $O_2$ respectively. Prove that $I_1I_2$ and $O_1O_2$ are parallel.
74 replies
lyukhson
Jul 29, 2013
endless_abyss
Yesterday at 11:11 AM
IMO Shortlist 2012, Geometry 3
G H J
Source: IMO Shortlist 2012, Geometry 3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
InterLoop
250 posts
#62 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Markas
105 posts
#63 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Denote $I_3$ as the incenter of $\triangle CED$.

Claim: $AI_1I_2B$, $AI_1I_3C$, $BI_2I_3C$ are cyclic quadrilaterals.

Proof: First it i enough to prove one of the quadrilaterals is cyclic. Lets show that $AI_1I_2B$ is cyclic. Let $AI_1 \cap BI_2 = I$ $\Rightarrow$ we want to prove that $II_1.IA = II_2.IB$. Now let $\angle AFI_1 = \angle I_1FE = \alpha$, also $\angle EFH = \angle HFD = 90 - 2\alpha$ $\Rightarrow$ $\angle DFI_2 = \angle I_2FB = \alpha$. Let $\angle FAI_1 = \angle I_1AE = \beta$, from FAEH being cyclic $\angle FHE = 180 - 2\beta$ $\Rightarrow$ $\angle FHB = \angle FDB = 2\beta$ $\Rightarrow$ $\angle FDI_2 = \angle I_2DB = \beta$ and now $\angle ABI_2 = \angle I_2BC = 90 - \alpha - \beta$ and $\angle ACI_3 = \angle I_3CB = \alpha$. Now we have that $\triangle AEF \sim \triangle ABC$ $\Rightarrow$ $\frac{AI_1}{AI} = \frac{AE}{AB}$. Also $\triangle BFD \sim \triangle BCA$ $\Rightarrow$ $\frac{BI_2}{BI} = \frac{BD}{BA}$. We want to prove $II_1.IA = II_2.IB$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $AI.(AI - AI_1) = BI(BI - BI_2)$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $AI^2 - AI.AI_1 = BI^2 - BI.BI_2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $AI^2(1 - \frac{AI_1}{AI}) = BI^2(1 - \frac{BI_2}{BI})$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $AI^2(1 - \frac{AE}{AB}) = BI^2(1 - \frac{BD}{BA})$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $(\frac{AI}{BI})^2 = \frac{(1 - \frac{BD}{BA})}{(1 - \frac{AE}{AB})}$. We know that $\frac{AI}{BI} = \frac{\sin(\frac{B}{2})}{\sin(\frac{A}{2})}$. Also $\frac{BD}{BA} = \cos B$ and $\frac{AE}{AB} = \cos A$ $\Rightarrow$ $(\frac{AI}{BI})^2 = \frac{(1 - \frac{BD}{BA})}{(1 - \frac{AE}{AB})}$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $(\frac{\sin(\frac{B}{2})}{\sin(\frac{A}{2})})^2 = \frac{(1 - \cos B)}{(1 - \cos A)}$, which is obvious from the trigonometry formulas $\Rightarrow$ with that, our claim is proven.

Now we have that $BI_2I_3C$ is cyclic $\Rightarrow$ $I_3O_2 = CO_2$ $\Rightarrow$ $O_2 \in S_{I_3C}$, also from $AI_1I_3C$ cyclic it follows that $I_3O_1 = O_1C$ $\Rightarrow$ $O_1 \in S_{I_3C}$ $\Rightarrow$ $O_1O_2 \equiv S_{I_3C}$ $\Rightarrow$ $O_1O_2 \perp I_3C$.

Let $CI_3 \cap I_1I_2 = P$. Now $\angle PI_1I_3 = \angle PI_1I + \angle II_1I_3 = \angle I_2BA + \angle I_3CA = 90 - \alpha - \beta + \alpha = 90 - \beta$. Also $\angle I_1I_3P = \angle I_1AC = \beta$ $\Rightarrow$ $\angle I_1PI_3 = 180 - \angle PI_1I_3 - \angle I_1I_3P = 180 - (90 - \beta) - \beta = 90^{\circ}$ $\Rightarrow$ $I_1I_2 \perp I_3C$ $\Rightarrow$ we know that $O_1O_2 \perp I_3C$ and $I_1I_2 \perp I_3C$ $\Rightarrow$ it follows that $I_1I_2 \parallel O_1O_2$ which is what we wanted to prove. We are ready.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pyramix
419 posts
#64 • 2 Y
Y by GeoKing, cubres
Solved with Aadish.
Switch the indexing to $A-$ index.

Claim. $I_1BCI_2$ are cyclic.
Proof. Note that $A,F,D,C$ and $A,E,D,B$ are cyclic. So, $\angle A=\angle BAC=\angle FAC=\angle FDB$ and, similarly, $\angle BAC=\angle CDE$. So, $\angle I_2DI_1=180^\circ-\angle I_2DB-\angle I_1DC=180^\circ-\angle A$. We show that $\angle DI_1I_2=90^\circ-\angle C$ and $\angle I_1I_2D=90^\circ-\angle B$. It suffices to show that $\frac{DI_1}{DI_2}=\frac{\sin(90^\circ-\angle B)}{\sin(90^\circ-\angle C)}=\frac{\cos(\angle B)}{\cos(\angle C)}$. But that is true, because $\angle FDB=\angle CDE$ which means $\frac{DI_1}{DI_2}=\frac{\triangle FDB}{\triangle EDC}=\frac{\cos(\angle B)}{\cos(\angle C}$.
Finally note $\angle BI_1D=90^\circ+\frac{\angle BFD}2=90^\circ+\frac{\angle C}2$ which means $\angle DI_1I=90^\circ-\frac{\angle C}{2}$ but $\angle DI_1I_2=90^\circ-\angle C$, which means $\angle I_2I_1D=\frac{\angle C}2=\angle I_2CB=\angle ICB$. So, we're done. [This also means $I_1I_2\perp AI$.]

So, we have $II_1\cdot IB=II_2\cdot IC$ which means $I$ has same power from both circles. So, $AI$ is the radical axis and $AI\perp O_1O_2$ which means $O_1O_2\parallel I_1I_2$. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AngeloChu
470 posts
#65 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
first, let $I_1I_2$ intersect $AD$ and $BE$ at $P_1$ and $P_2$, and $AC$ and $BC$ at $Q_1$ and $Q_2$. let the orthocenter of the triangle be $H$, and let the incenter of the triangle be $I$
some simple angle chasing yields that $AP_1I_1F$ and $BP_2I_2F$ are both cyclic quadrilaterals
then, angle chasing yields that $AP_1I_1=BP_2I_2$ and $HP_1=HP_2$, as well as $CQ_1=CQ_2$
also, even more angle chasing yields $I_1II_2$, $I_1Q_1A$, and $BQ_2I_2$ are similar, so $AI_1I_2B$ are cyclic
then, by radical axis and stuff we get that $O_1O_2$ is perpendicular to $CI$
however, $CI$ is also perpendicular to $I_1I_2$ since $CQ_1=CQ_2$, so $I_1I_2$ is parallel to $O_1O_2$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3441 posts
#66 • 3 Y
Y by OronSH, Inconsistent, cubres
Claim: Line $I_1 I_2$ is perpendicular to the bisector of $\angle C$.
Proof: Extend $FI_1$ and $FI_2$ to meet $\overline{AC}$ and $\overline{BC}$ at $D_1$ and $D_2$, respectively. Since $\triangle AFE \sim \triangle DFB$, it follows that $\overline{I_1 I_2} \parallel \overline{D_1 D_2}$.

Since $\angle D_1 F D_2 = 180^{\circ} - \angle C$, it follows that $CD_1 FD_2$ is cyclic. Furthermore, since $\angle D_1 F C = \angle D_2 FC$, it follows that $D_1 C = D_2 C$. So, $\overline{D_1 D_2}$ is perpendicular to the bisector of $\angle C$, which proves our claim. $\square$

Claim: $AI_1 I_2 B$ is cyclic.
Proof: Let $\ell$ be the line through $I$ tangent to $(AIB)$. It's well known that $\ell$ is perpendicular to the bisector of $\angle C$, so our claim follows by Reim's theorem. $\square$

Claim: Line $O_1 O_2$ is perpendicular to the bisector of $\angle C$.
Proof: It is clear that $I$ is the radical center of $(AI_1 I_2 B)$, $(CI_1 A)$ and $(CI_2 B)$, so it follows that the bisector of $\angle C$ is the radical axis of $(CI_1 A)$ and $(CI_2 B)$. Therefore, the line connecting these two circles' centers, line $O_1 O_2$, is perpendicular to the radical axis, the bisector of $\angle C$. $\square$

Since lines $I_1 I_2$ and $O_1 O_2$ are both perpendicular to the bisector of $\angle C$, they are parallel, as desired.

Remark
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ihatemath123, Jun 1, 2024, 12:20 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
EpicBird08
1741 posts
#67 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
This problem dies if you know spiral similarity.

Notice that there is a spiral similarity at $F$ sending $\triangle FAE$ to $\triangle FDB.$ (This is a well-known property of the orthic triangle.) This spiral similarity sends $I_1$ to $I_2,$ so $F$ is the spiral center sending $AI_1$ to $DI_2.$ This implies that $F$ is the spiral center sending $AD$ to $I_1 I_2.$ Hence $\boxed{\triangle FAD \sim \triangle FI_1 I_2}.$ We will repeatedly use this fact, which we call (*) for convenience.

Let $I = AI_1 \cap BI_2$ be the incenter of the triangle.

Claim: $A,B,I_1,I_2$ are concyclic.
Proof: By (*), $\angle FI_2 I_1 = \angle FDA = \angle FCA = \angle FCA = 90^\circ - \angle BAC$ since $AFDC$ is cyclic. Also, $\angle BDF = \angle BAC,$ so $\angle BIF = 90^\circ + \frac{\angle BDF}{2} = 90^\circ + \frac{\angle BAC}{2}.$ Therefore, $$\angle BI_2 I_1 = 90^\circ - \angle BAC + 90^\circ + \frac{\angle BAC}{2} = 180^\circ - \frac{\angle BAC}{2}.$$However, $\angle BAI_1 = \frac{\angle BAC}{2},$ so $\angle BAI_1 + \angle BI_2 I_1 = 180^\circ,$ concluding our proof of the claim.

Claim: $CI \perp I_1 I_2.$
Proof: We note that $AD \perp BC,$ and the spiral similarity in (*) sends $AD$ to $I_1 I_2$, so we wish to show that it sends $BC$ to a line parallel to $CI.$ In other words, we wish to show that the spiral similarity rotates things by $\angle BCI = \frac{\angle BCA}{2}.$ Indeed, it rotates $FA$ to $FI_1,$ and the angle between these two lines is $\angle AFI_1 = \frac{\angle AFE}{2} = \frac{\angle ACB}{2}.$ Thus $CI \perp I_1 I_2,$ as claimed.

To finish, by applying the radical center theorem on $(ABI_1 I_2), (ACI_1),$ and $(BCI_2),$ we see that $CI$ is the radical axis of $(ACI_1)$ and $(BCI_2).$ Since $CI \perp I_1 I_2,$ we see that the radical axis is perpendicular to $I_1 I_2.$ However, it is clear that this radical axis is perpendicular to $O_1 O_2.$ Therefore, $O_1 O_2$ and $I_1 I_2$ are perpendicular to a common line, and we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by EpicBird08, Sep 19, 2024, 1:45 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N3bula
256 posts
#68 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Let $I_3$ be defined similarly to $I_1$ and $I_2$, thus proving $ABI_1I_2$, $ACI_1I_3$ and $BCI_2I_3$ are all cyclic suffices as this gives that $I$ is the orthocenter of
$I_1I_2I_3$ and also gives that the radical axis of $(ACI_1I_3)$ and $(BCI_2I_3)$ is $II_3$ and thus gives that $O_1O_2$ is perpendicular to $II_3$, thus meaning $I_1I_2 \parallel O_1O_2$.
To prove the cyclic consider the spiral similarity taking $FAE$ to $FBD$, this also takes $I_1$ to $I_2$, thus giving us that $FI_1I_2$ is similar to $FBE$, giving that $\angle I_1I_2F = 90-\angle CAB$,
we have that $\angle FIB= 90+\frac{\angle CAB}{2}$, which gives the cyclic, by similar arguements we get all the cyclics thus we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mathandski
737 posts
#69 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
$               $
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AshAuktober
960 posts
#70 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
@navi_09220114 orz, I can finally do geo.

Define $I_3, I$ in the sensible way.
Then the main claims are as follows:

1. $A, I_1, I_2, B$ are cyclic. (Proof: power of point on $I$, trig bash)
2. $O_1O_2 \perp CI$. (Proof: Radical axis, noting that $I$ is the radical centre of three circles $AI_1C, BI_2C, AI_1I_2B$)
3. $I$ is the orthocentre of $\Delta I_1I_2I_3$. (Proof: Angle chase)
And tada!! We're done!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Phat_23000245
18 posts
#71 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
hehe :pilot:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mquej555
15 posts
#72 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Say Intersections of $AI$1$C$ and $BI$2$C$ be $X$ then intuitively $CX$ is the angle bisector of $C$. Now AI1, BI2 and CX concur at I. So by Pop AI1I2B is concyclic. Then O1O2 is perpendicular to CI and by simple angle chasing I1I2 is also perpendicular to CI so O1O2 is parallel to O1O2.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fearsum_fyz
48 posts
#73 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Let $AI_1$ and $BI_2$ intersect at the incenter $I$.

Claim: $A, I_1, I_2, B$ are concyclic.
Proof. It is easy to see that $\Delta{DI_2B} \sim \Delta{AIB} \sim \Delta{AI_1E}$ by angle chasing. Hence:
$I_1 A = IA \cdot \frac{AE}{AB} = \frac{r}{\sin{\frac{A}{2}}} \cdot \cos{A} \implies II_1 = IA - I_1A = \frac{r}{\sin{\frac{A}{2}}} (1 - \cos{A}) = 2 \frac{r}{\sin{\frac{A}{2}}} \cdot \sin^2{\frac{A}{2}} = 2 r \sin{\frac{A}{2}}$
Similarly, $II_2 = 2 r \sin{\frac{B}{2}}$.
Hence $II_1 \cdot IA = 2 r \cancel{\sin{\frac{A}{2}}} \frac{r}{\cancel{\sin{\frac{A}{2}}}} = 2 r^2 = II_2 \cdot IB$ as desired.


Now since $II_1 \cdot IA = II_2 \cdot IB$, the point $I$ must be on the radical axis of $(ACI_1)$ and $(BCI_2)$. In fact, this radical axis must be the line $CI$. Hence, since the radical axis is perpendicular to the line joining the centers,
$CI \perp O_1O_2$
Further, a trivial angle chase using the Claim yields
$CI \perp I_1I_2$

Hence $O_1O_2 \parallel I_1I_2$ as desired.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fearsum_fyz
48 posts
#74 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
AshAuktober wrote:
@navi_09220114 orz, I can finally do geo.

Define $I_3, I$ in the sensible way.
Then the main claims are as follows:

1. $A, I_1, I_2, B$ are cyclic. (Proof: power of point on $I$, trig bash)
2. $O_1O_2 \perp CI$. (Proof: Radical axis, noting that $I$ is the radical centre of three circles $AI_1C, BI_2C, AI_1I_2B$)
3. $I$ is the orthocentre of $\Delta I_1I_2I_3$. (Proof: Angle chase)
And tada!! We're done!

My solution is almost identical to this. Nice!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
YaoAOPS
1501 posts
#75 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Let $I$ be the incenter and $A$ center such that $BI_1, CI_2$ are bisectors.

Claim: Quadrilateral $BI_1I_2C$ is cyclic.
Proof. It's equivalent by PoP to show that \[ II_1 \cdot IB = II_2 \cdot IC \iff \left(\frac{BI}{CI}\right)^2 = \frac{1 - \cos C}{1 - \cos B} \]which is obvious. $\blacksquare$
As such, $O_1O_2 \perp AI$ and \[ \measuredangle I_1I_2 = \measuredangle BI_1 + \measuredangle I_2C - \measuredangle BC = \measuredangle BI + \measuredangle CI - BC \]is parallel to the tnagent at $I$ to $(BIC)$ which is perpendicular to $AI$ which finishes.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by YaoAOPS, Mar 11, 2025, 4:59 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
endless_abyss
34 posts
#76 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Nice! :)

Claim - $A- I_1 - I_2 - B$ are concyclic

Note that -
$A I_1 = AI cos A$
and
$II_1 = A I(1 - cos A)$
$II_2 = B I(1 - cos B)$

so, it suffices to prove that -
$(II_1)(I A) = (I I_2)(I B)$
or
$(A I/ B I)^2 = ( 1 - cos A )/( 1 - cos B)$
or
$ (sin^2 a/2) / (sin^2 b/2) = (1 - cos A)/(1 - cos B)$
which is obvious after writing -
$cos A = cos^2 a/2 - sin^2 a/2$

Claim - $C I$ is perpendicular to $I_1 I_2$

Note that
$\angle  I_2 I_1 I = \angle I B A = b/2$
and
$180 - \angle I_1 I C = a/2 + c/2$
so, by triangle sum property the intersection is forced to be a right angle.

Claim - $C I$ is the radical axis of $A I_1 C$ and $B I_2 C$ and is thus perpendicular to $O_1 O_2$ as well.

From claim 1, $I$ has equal power with respect to the circles and $C$ lies on both the circles so the power is equal, and the claim is proven.

$\square$

:starwars:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by endless_abyss, Yesterday at 11:12 AM
Reason: typo
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a