I write today to announce my retirement as CEO from Art of Problem Solving. When I founded AoPS 22 years ago, I never imagined that we would reach so many students and families, or that we would find so many channels through which we discover, inspire, and train the great problem solvers of the next generation. I am very proud of all we have accomplished and I’m thankful for the many supporters who provided inspiration and encouragement along the way. I'm particularly grateful to all of the wonderful members of the AoPS Community!
I’m delighted to introduce our new leaders - Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland. Ben has extensive experience in education and edtech prior to joining AoPS as my successor as CEO, including starting like I did as a classroom teacher. He has a deep understanding of the value of our work because he’s an AoPS parent! Meanwhile, Andrew and I have common roots as founders of education companies; he launched Quizlet at age 15! His journey from founder to MIT to technology and product leader as our Chief Product Officer traces a pathway many of our students will follow in the years to come.
Thank you again for your support for Art of Problem Solving and we look forward to working with millions more wonderful problem solvers in the years to come.
And special thanks to all of the amazing AoPS team members who have helped build AoPS. We’ve come a long way from here:IMAGE
ka March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.
Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!
Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
A number theory problem from the British Math Olympiad
Rainbow197111
N4 minutes ago
by Rainbow1971
Source: British Math Olympiad, 2006/2007, round 1, problem 6
I am a little surprised to find that I am (so far) unable to solve this little problem:
[quote]Let be an integer. Show that, if is an integer, then it is a perfect square.[/quote]
I set . If is an integer, then is at least rational, so that must be a perfect square then. Using Conway's topograph method, I have found out that the smallest non-negative pairs for which this happens are and , and that, for every such pair , the "next" such pair can be calculated as The eigenvalues of that matrix are irrational, however, so that any calculation which uses powers of that matrix is a little cumbersome. There must be an easier way, but I cannot find it. Can you?
A number theory about divisors which no one fully solved at the contest
nAalniaOMliO21
N41 minutes ago
by nAalniaOMliO
Source: Belarusian national olympiad 2024
Let's call a pair of positive integers interesting if is composite and for every divisor of at least one of and is also a divisor of
Find the number of interesting pairs with M. Karpuk
and are points on a semicircle. The tangent at meets the extended diameter of the semicircle at , and the tangent at meets it at , so that and are on opposite sides of the center. The lines and meet at . is the foot of the perpendicular from to . Show that bisects angle
and are points on a semicircle. The tangent at meets the extended diameter of the semicircle at , and the tangent at meets it at , so that and are on opposite sides of the center. The lines and meet at . is the foot of the perpendicular from to . Show that bisects angle
and are points on a semicircle. The tangent at meets the extended diameter of the semicircle at , and the tangent at meets it at , so that and are on opposite sides of the center. The lines and meet at . is the foot of the perpendicular from to .
Show that bisects angle
Maybe it's another midnight hallucination, but I have some strange feeling of seeing the following solution on ML:
Let the tangents to the semicircle at the points C and D meet each other at a point G. Also, let U be the center of the semicircle. Then, the points A and B, both lying on the diameter of this semicircle, must be collinear with its center U.
Since the semicircle touches the sides AG and BG of the triangle ABG, its center U must lie on the angle bisector of the angle between these sides, i. e. of the angle AGB. In other words, the line GU is the angle bisector of the angle AGB.
Since the line BG is the tangent to the semicircle at the point C, while U is the center of this semicircle, we have ; thus, the point C is the foot of the perpendicular from the point U to the line BG. Similarly, the point D is the foot of the perpendicular from the point U to the line AG.
Now, we can apply the result of http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=5460 to the triangle ABG with the point U on its side AB, and obtain that the line GE is an altitude of the triangle ABG if and only if the line GU is an interior angle bisector of the triangle ABG. But the line GU indeed is an interior angle bisector, as we saw above; thus, the line GE is an altitude of triangle ABG. In other words, the point E lies on the altitude of triangle ABG from the vertex G to the side AB. Hence, the point F, being the foot of the perpendicular from the point E to the line AB, must be the foot of this altitude.
Now we can describe our situation as follows: The point F is the foot of the altitude of the triangle ABG from the vertex G, and the point E is a point on this altitude GF. The lines AE and BE intersect the lines BG and AG at the points C and D, respectively.
Now, according to the Blanchet theorem ( http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=20809 post #5 problem (a)), we have < DFG = - < CFG (with directed angles modulo 180°); in other words, the line EF bisects the angle CFD. And the problem is solved.
An alternative approach would be possible by reflecting the whole figure in the line AB and applying some degenerate cases of Brianchon.
An equivalent enunciation. Let be a triangle for which the projection of the vertex to the line belongs to the side . Denote : the foot of the - bisector; the its points , for which ,; the intersection . Prove that .
Proof. Denote the intersections and .
It is well-known that the division is harmonically, i.e. .
Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal and the triangle :
. But .
From .
But and for the projection of the point to the line exists the same relation
Extend and to meet at ,and let be the foot of the perpendicular from to . Denote be the center of semicircle.We have:
Finally, since the points are concyclic, we have:
Let and be on the semicircle so that are collinear, in that order. Let the tangents to the semicircle at and intersect at , and let be the intersection of and (possibly the point at infinity.) By Pascal's theorem on , we get that ,, and are collinear. and , so is the orthocenter of . Hence, ,, and are collinear, so ,, and are collinear. Since is an altitude, Blanchet's theorem tells us that , so our proof is complete.
My previous solution is completely incorrect... sorry about that.
Lemma: In cyclic quadrilateral , let ,,,, and . Then ,, and each lie on the polar of . Proof: By Pascal's theorem on , we find that ,, and are collinear. By Pascal's theorem on , we find that ,, and are collinear. The polars of and are and . Since lies on the polars of and , and lie on the polar of . Hence, ,,, and all lie on the polar of .
Let be on the semicircle so that are collinear, in that order. Let hit at , and let and intersect the semicircle at and , respectively. By Pascals' theorem on , we find that ,, and are collinear. By the lemma, the polar of passes through .
Let hit at , and let hit at . and , so is the orthocenter of , whence . Furthermore, the polar of also passes through , and , so by the lemma, ,,, and are collinear. It follows that is an altitude of , so by Blanchet's theorem .
First of all, we establish the following lemma: let be a tangential quadrilateral, in which circle is inscribed. If , and , then .
This follows trivially from Menelaus' Theorem on and . Consequently, by Ceva's Theorem, and are concurrent, where .
Going back to the problem, it is clear that it suffices to prove that and are collinear. Let be the foot of perpendicular from to , and let us reflect the whole diagram with respect to .
According to our corollary of the lemma, we have that are concurrent. However, , and we must have that are collinear.
Now, and , implying that . Hence, are collinear, and we are done.
Lemma: In cyclic quadrilateral , let ,,,, and . Then ,, and each lie on the polar of . Proof: By Pascal's theorem on , we find that ,, and are collinear. By Pascal's theorem on , we find that ,, and are collinear. The polars of and are and . Since lies on the polars of and , and lie on the polar of . Hence, ,,, and all lie on the polar of .
Typo: Pascal on AACBBD gives P, T, R collinear, instead of P, R, S.
So a faster way to finish using this lemma and the fact that Zhero derived about the polar of Z passing through E is that since AB passes through the center of the circle and Z is on AB, then PE is perpendicular to AB, so line PE = line PF = line EF, so P, E, F are collinear, and we can apply Blanchet's Theorem to finish, or cyclic quadrilaterals.
I saw on blackbelt14253's blog that he had used Brianchon's theorem on hexagon PCBP'AD where P' is the reflection of P across AB, which is probably a more convenient way of deducing that P, E, F collinear.
LEMMA:
Suppose we have the triangle ABC and we have h_a
Let h_a intersect BC at H
Let P be a point on h_a
Let BP intersect AC at E
Let CP intersect AB at F
Then:h_a bisects the angle EHF
Solution:
Let BC intersect AD at X
From X draw a perpendicular line to AB
Let's say this line intersects AB at F
It's enough to prove that XF, BD, AC meet at E
We do this by using Seva
Now it's enough to prove that CB/FB=AD/AF
Draw the line OC
XFOC is cyclic --> these angles are equal COB=BXF
Since OCB=XFB=90 and by using the equality above we have CB/BF=OC/XF
Similarly we get AD/AF=OD/XF
Since OC=OD=R
WE ARE DONE
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by kamymath, Jan 21, 2011, 6:38 AM
Let be the center of the circle. Let the tangents meet at . Let H be the foot of the perpendicular from to . The key is that and intersect on .
and are similar, so . and are similar, so . But , so . Also (equal tangents), so . Hence by Ceva's theorem applied to the triangle , the lines , and are concurrent. So ., so , and lie on the circle diameter . So .
Let be the intersection of and . We reflect the whole diagram by , and let , and the reflections of , and . By symmetry: and are tangents to the circle. Consider the quadrilateral , and , so and belong to the perpendicular bisector of and therefore they are perpendicular, let be their intersection. Applying Brianchon's theorem in the degenerated hexagon we conclude that , and are concurrent, therefore belongs to and so belongs to and =.
We apply Brianchon's again in and in to conclude that ,, and concur at .
Finally we see that by symmetry triangles and are congruent, thus . Therefore and the problem is solved.
let and intersect at , is the center of the circle. connect ,,.
try to prove ,, are conliear. in , use ceva theorem, try to prove: .
because: ,, suppose the radium of circle is ,,,. so we can find ,, are conliear.
, so are concylic, so . , so are concylic, so . it is easy to konw . prove is done.
Let be the intersection of and . We reflect the whole diagram by , and let , and the reflections of , and . By symmetry: and are tangents to the circle. Consider the quadrilateral , and , so and belong to the perpendicular bisector of and therefore they are perpendicular, let be their intersection. Applying Brianchon's theorem in the degenerated hexagon we conclude that , and are concurrent, therefore belongs to and so belongs to and =.
We apply Brianchon's again in and in to conclude that ,, and concur at .
Finally we see that by symmetry triangles and are congruent, thus . Therefore and the problem is solved.
A diagram for posterity:
Let , the circle be , and the center of .
Lemma: The points are collinear.
Proof: Put down Cartesian coordianates. Let , let be the unit circle, and let be the axis. Let where . It suffices to show that .
By similar triangles, and . Then line has equation Similarly, has equation Since , we have Now, line has equation and similarly line has equation Since , we have as desired.
Now we claim is cyclic. Obviously is cyclic since Then since lies on the same circle.
Finally, we want which is obvious by equal tangents.
By JBMO 2000 we have that are collinear where . It suffices to prove that bisects . Let and let . Then and from this two facts we have that bisects thus bisects q.e.d
In , Let be the orthic triangle WRT . Let tangents at to intersect at . Let meet at . Let be the foot from to .Prove, bisects
Solution: Let be the orthocenter of and be the midpoint of . Then, lies on . Let the perpendiculars from to intersect at . Let intersect again at concur, suppose say at , then, Apply Pascal on passes through . By La Hire's Theorem are polars of WRT . Now since, are collinear, their polars are concurrent lies on and since is the incenter of () bisects ()
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by AlastorMoody, Apr 5, 2019, 3:32 PM
So let's define point
Let point such that
Then the pentagon is cyclic.
Then we have 2 similarity relations and
Thus we have the following relation: Thus we have the following: Because and because of the ratios above.
Thus by the reverse Ceva theorem we have that and are concurrent cevians,thus
Thus we have that is cyclic
This angle-chase finishes the problem off: Thus we have shown,because , that PF is an angle-bisector of the angle
Let be the intersection of and . Let be the foot of the perpendicular from onto . Let be the center of the given semicircle.
Then, since , Since , Multiplying, we see that . We also know that by power of a point. Therefore, by Ceva’s theorem, we see that , and are concurrent. Furthermore, we know that is cyclic because . Now, we proceed with angle-chasing. Let . Then, . Then, . Since is the center of the semicircle, as well, so .Thus, bisects , which as we showed beforehand is the same as saying that bisects .
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by AopsUser101, May 5, 2020, 3:59 PM
Let A' be the point on the diameter for semicircle closer to B. It is not hard to see, with a simple diagram (drawing perp. angles are easy), that we can suspect concurrency. If the intersection of AD and BC is G, by similar triangles ADO with AFG and BCO with BFG, we have by Ceva's that they (AD, BC, and EF) concur. <ODG=<OCG=<OFG=90 degrees, so OFCPD is cyclic. We then have <CFG=<CDG=<CA'D, and <DFG=<DCG=<DA'C, where the last two steps follow from the well known tangent angle rule (or the fact that it is an "instantaneous same point" that are angle <DCG=<DCC=DA'C).
Edit: Will attach ggb diagram later
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by huashiliao2020, Jun 6, 2023, 11:40 PM