We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
+1 w
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Vieta Jumping Unsolved(Reposted)
Eagle116   1
N 8 minutes ago by Eagle116
Source: MONT, Vieta Jumping part
The question is:
Let $x_1$, $x_2$, $\dots$, $x_n$ be $n$ integers. If $k>n$ is an integer, prove that the only solution to
$$x_1^2 + x_2^2 + \dots + x_n^2 = kx_1x_2\dots x_n $$is is $x_1 = x_2 = \dots = x_n = 0$.
1 reply
Eagle116
Yesterday at 4:53 PM
Eagle116
8 minutes ago
Interesting inequality
sqing   3
N 15 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq 0,(ab+c^2)(ac+b^2)\neq 0 $ and $ a+b+c=3 . $ Prove that
$$ \frac{1}{ab+c^2}+\frac{1}{ac+b^2} \geq\frac{3}{4} $$$$ \frac{1}{ab+2c^2}+\frac{1}{ac+2b^2} \geq\frac{4}{9} $$
3 replies
sqing
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
sqing
15 minutes ago
stuck on a system of recurrence sequence
Nonecludiangeofan   3
N 15 minutes ago by Ywgh1
Please guys help me solve this nasty problem that i've been stuck for the past month:
Let \( (a_n) \) and \( (b_n) \) be two sequences defined by:
\[
a_{n+1} = \frac{1 + a_n + a_n b_n}{b_n} \quad \text{and} \quad b_{n+1} = \frac{1 + b_n + a_n b_n}{a_n}
\]for all \( n \ge 0 \), with initial values \( a_0 = 1 \) and \( b_0 = 2 \).

Prove that:
\[
a_{2024} < 5.
\]
(btw am still not comfortable with system of recurrence sequences)
3 replies
Nonecludiangeofan
Mar 20, 2025
Ywgh1
15 minutes ago
2 degree polynomial
PrimeSol   0
36 minutes ago
Let $P_{1}(x)= x^2 +b_{1}x +c_{1}, ... , P_{n}(x)=x^2+ b_{n}x+c_{n}$, $P_{i}(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x], \forall i=\overline{1,n}.$ $\forall i,j ,1 \leq i<j \leq n : P_{i}(x) \ne P_{j}(x)$.
$\forall i,j, 1\leq i<j \leq n : Q_{i,j}(x)= P_{i}(x) + P_{j}(x)$ polynomial with only one root.
$max(n)=?$
0 replies
PrimeSol
36 minutes ago
0 replies
Sequence
PrimeSol   0
an hour ago
$(a_{n})_{n>0},  a_{0} =a_{1} =a_{2} =1$, $a_{n}a_{n+3} - a_{n+1}a_{n+2}=n! $ for all $n>=0$.
Prove that for all $n>=0$ : $a_{n} $ -is integer.
0 replies
PrimeSol
an hour ago
0 replies
D1018 : Can you do that ?
Dattier   0
an hour ago
Source: les dattes à Dattier
We can find $A,B,C$, such that $\gcd(A,B)=\gcd(C,A)=\gcd(A,2)=1$ and $$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (C^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2=0 $$.

For example :

$C=20$
$A=47650065401584409637777147310342834508082136874940478469495402430677786194142956609253842997905945723173497630499054266092849839$

$B=238877301561986449355077953728734922992395532218802882582141073061059783672634737309722816649187007910722185635031285098751698$

Can you find $A,B,C$ such that $A>3$ is prime, $C,B \in (\mathbb Z/A\mathbb Z)^*$ with $o(C)=(A-1)/2$ and $$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (C^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2=0 $$?
0 replies
Dattier
an hour ago
0 replies
The Sums of Elements in Subsets
bobaboby1   2
N an hour ago by bobaboby1
Given a finite set \( X = \{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\} \), and the pairwise comparison of the sums of elements of all its subsets (with the empty set defined as having a sum of 0), which amounts to \( \binom{2}{2^n} \) inequalities, these given comparisons satisfy the following three constraints:

1. The sum of elements of any non-empty subset is greater than 0.
2. For any two subsets, removing or adding the same elements does not change their comparison of the sums of elements.
3. For any two disjoint subsets \( A \) and \( B \), if the sums of elements of \( A \) and \( B \) are greater than those of subsets \( C \) and \( D \) respectively, then the sum of elements of the union \( A \cup B \) is greater than that of \( C \cup D \).

The question is: Does there necessarily exist a positive solution \( (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \) that satisfies all these conditions?
2 replies
bobaboby1
Mar 12, 2025
bobaboby1
an hour ago
An inequality
JK1603JK   1
N an hour ago by anduran
Source: unknown
Let a,b,c\ge 0: ab+bc+ca=1. Prove that \frac{a}{\left(a+1\right)^{2}}+\frac{b}{\left(b+1\right)^{2}}+\frac{c}{\left(c+1\right)^{2}}\ge \frac{1}{a+b+c}+\frac{abc}{4}.
1 reply
JK1603JK
2 hours ago
anduran
an hour ago
No More than √㏑x㏑㏑x Digits
EthanWYX2009   0
an hour ago
Source: 2024 April 谜之竞赛-3
Let $f(x)\in\mathbb Z[x]$ have positive integer leading coefficient. Show that there exists infinte positive integer $x,$ such that the number of digit that doesn'r equal to $9$ is no more than $\mathcal O(\sqrt{\ln x\ln\ln x}).$

Created by Chunji Wang, Zhenyu Dong
0 replies
EthanWYX2009
an hour ago
0 replies
Find all functions
Jackson0423   2
N 2 hours ago by pco
Find all functions F:R->R such that
1/(F(F(x))-F(x))=F(x)
I know x+1/x works..
2 replies
Jackson0423
Yesterday at 4:06 PM
pco
2 hours ago
Sharygin 2025 CR P8
Gengar_in_Galar   5
N 2 hours ago by ohiorizzler1434
Source: Sharygin 2025
The diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral $ABCD$ meet at point $P$. Points $K$ and $L$ lie on $AC$, $BD$ respectively in such a way that $CK=AP$ and $DL=BP$. Prove that the line joining the common points of circles $ALC$ and $BKD$ passes through the mass-center of $ABCD$.
Proposed by:V.Konyshev
5 replies
Gengar_in_Galar
Mar 10, 2025
ohiorizzler1434
2 hours ago
Interesting inequality
sqing   2
N 2 hours ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c  >0  . $ Prove that
$$  \frac{a}{2b+c}+ \frac{ b}{2a+b+2c} +\frac{ c}{a+ 2b } \geq \frac{5}{7 }$$$$  \frac{a}{4b+c}+ \frac{ b}{ a+b+ c} +\frac{ c}{a+ 4b } \geq \frac{5}{7 }$$$$  \frac{a}{3b+c}+ \frac{ b}{3a+b+3c} +\frac{ c}{a+ 3b } \geq \frac{9}{17 }$$$$  \frac{a}{4b+c}+ \frac{ b}{4a+b+4c} +\frac{ c}{a+ 4b } \geq \frac{13}{31 }$$
2 replies
sqing
2 hours ago
sqing
2 hours ago
Concentric Circles
MithsApprentice   59
N 2 hours ago by golden_star_123
Source: USAMO 1998
Let ${\cal C}_1$ and ${\cal C}_2$ be concentric circles, with ${\cal C}_2$ in the interior of ${\cal C}_1$. From a point $A$ on ${\cal C}_1$ one draws the tangent $AB$ to ${\cal C}_2$ ($B\in {\cal C}_2$). Let $C$ be the second point of intersection of $AB$ and ${\cal C}_1$, and let $D$ be the midpoint of $AB$. A line passing through $A$ intersects ${\cal C}_2$ at $E$ and $F$ in such a way that the perpendicular bisectors of $DE$ and $CF$ intersect at a point $M$ on $AB$. Find, with proof, the ratio $AM/MC$.
59 replies
MithsApprentice
Oct 9, 2005
golden_star_123
2 hours ago
CMJ 1284 (Crazy Concyclic Circumcenter Circus)
kgator   1
N 2 hours ago by ohiorizzler1434
Source: College Mathematics Journal Volume 55 (2024), Issue 4: https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.2024.2373015
1284. Proposed by Tran Quang Hung, High School for Gifted Students, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam. Let quadrilateral $ABCD$ not be a trapezoid such that there is a circle centered at $I$ that is tangent to the four sides $\overline{AB}$, $\overline{BC}$, $\overline{CD}$, and $\overline{DA}$. Let $X$, $Y$, $Z$, and $W$ be the circumcenters of the triangles $IAB$, $IBC$, $ICD$, and $IDA$, respectively. Prove that there is a circle containing the circumcenters of the triangles $XAB$, $YBC$, $ZCD$, and $WDA$.
1 reply
kgator
Yesterday at 3:42 AM
ohiorizzler1434
2 hours ago
Inequality with ordering
JustPostChinaTST   7
N Saturday at 9:17 AM by AshAuktober
Source: 2021 China TST, Test 1, Day 1 P1
Given positive integers $m$ and $n$. Let $a_{i,j} ( 1 \le i \le m, 1 \le j \le n)$ be non-negative real numbers, such that
$$ a_{i,1} \ge a_{i,2} \ge \cdots \ge a_{i,n} \text{ and } a_{1,j} \ge a_{2,j} \ge \cdots \ge a_{m,j} $$holds for all $1 \le i \le m$ and $1 \le j \le n$. Denote
$$ X_{i,j}=a_{1,j}+\cdots+a_{i-1,j}+a_{i,j}+a_{i,j-1}+\cdots+a_{i,1},$$$$ Y_{i,j}=a_{m,j}+\cdots+a_{i+1,j}+a_{i,j}+a_{i,j+1}+\cdots+a_{i,n}.$$Prove that
$$ \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} X_{i,j} \ge \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} Y_{i,j}.$$
7 replies
JustPostChinaTST
Mar 17, 2021
AshAuktober
Saturday at 9:17 AM
Inequality with ordering
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: 2021 China TST, Test 1, Day 1 P1
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JustPostChinaTST
38 posts
#1 • 3 Y
Y by mlgjeffdoge21, Rg230403, Mango247
Given positive integers $m$ and $n$. Let $a_{i,j} ( 1 \le i \le m, 1 \le j \le n)$ be non-negative real numbers, such that
$$ a_{i,1} \ge a_{i,2} \ge \cdots \ge a_{i,n} \text{ and } a_{1,j} \ge a_{2,j} \ge \cdots \ge a_{m,j} $$holds for all $1 \le i \le m$ and $1 \le j \le n$. Denote
$$ X_{i,j}=a_{1,j}+\cdots+a_{i-1,j}+a_{i,j}+a_{i,j-1}+\cdots+a_{i,1},$$$$ Y_{i,j}=a_{m,j}+\cdots+a_{i+1,j}+a_{i,j}+a_{i,j+1}+\cdots+a_{i,n}.$$Prove that
$$ \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} X_{i,j} \ge \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} Y_{i,j}.$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
XbenX
590 posts
#2 • 1 Y
Y by guptaamitu1
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
xiejiesuo
19 posts
#3
Y by
Solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by xiejiesuo, Mar 20, 2021, 12:29 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CANBANKAN
1301 posts
#4
Y by
Note $X_{i,j}\ge (i+j-1)a_{i,j}$, $Y_{i,j}\le (m+n-i-j+1)a_{i,j}$, so done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DNCT1
235 posts
#5
Y by
xiejiesuo wrote:
Solution

How you get that $\prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} (i+j-1) a_{i,j} \ge \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} (m+n-i-j+1) a_{i,j}$, I was stuck here when I tried to sol the problem
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CANBANKAN
1301 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by DNCT1, Mathematicsislovely
$\prod_{i=1}^m \prod_{j=1}^n (i+j-1) = \prod_{i=1}^m \prod_{j=1}^n (m+n-i-j+1)$. This is true because we can pair $(i,j)$ with $(m+1-i,n+1-j)$. Another way to see this is that on both sides, $x$ is counted $\min\{x,2n-x\}$ times for $1\le x\le 2n-1$.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by CANBANKAN, Mar 21, 2021, 8:32 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CHOUKRI
21 posts
#7 • 1 Y
Y by bo18
First, we saw that for any couple $(i,j)$ of index, we have
$$\dfrac{Y_{i,j}}{n+m+1-i-j}\leq a_{i,j}\leq \dfrac{X_{i,j}}{i+j-1},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad (*) $$Hence, by multuplying all inequalities (formed by $LHS$ and $RHS$ of $(*)$) for $i=1,\ldots,n$ and $j=1,\ldots,m$, we get

$$\dfrac{1}{\displaystyle \prod_{i,j}((n+1-i)+(m+1-j)-1)}\times \prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} Y_{i,j}\leq \dfrac{1}{\displaystyle\prod_{i,j}(i+j-1)}\times\prod_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{j=1}^{n} X_{i,j}   $$
But,

$$\displaystyle \prod_{i,j}((n+1-i)+(m+1-j)-1)=\displaystyle\prod_{i,j}(i+j-1) $$
Finally, we get the desired inequality.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by CHOUKRI, Dec 14, 2021, 7:34 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AshAuktober
934 posts
#8
Y by
The main idea is to not be scared, and laugh in the face of symbols.
We have:

Claim: \[X_{i,j}X_{m+1-i,n+1-j} \ge Y_{i,j}Y_{m+1-i,n+1-j}\]for all $1 \le i \le m, 1 \le n \le j$.
Proof sketch: Expand, and then bound each factor with the largest/smallest term in the product as required.


From here, multiply this claim over all $i,j$: If $mn$ is even, taking the square root gives us the inequality outright. Else, don't multiply the inequality for $(i,j) = (\frac{m+1}2, \frac{n+1}2)$, and instead use the fact that $X_{\frac{m+1}2,\frac{n+1}2} \ge Y_{\frac{m+1}2,\frac{n+1}2}$, to get the inequality. $\square$

Remark: There's a nice way to visualise this using an $m \times n$ grid.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by AshAuktober, Saturday at 9:26 AM
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a