Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
Equation has no integer solution.
Learner94   34
N 38 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: INMO 2013
Let $a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $a \ge b \ge c \ge d $. Show that the equation $x^4 - ax^3 - bx^2 - cx -d = 0$ has no integer solution.
34 replies
Learner94
Feb 3, 2013
Ilikeminecraft
38 minutes ago
Symmetry in Circumcircle Intersection
Mimii08   0
an hour ago
Hi! Here's another geometry problem I'm thinking about, and I would appreciate any help with a proof. Thanks in advance!

Let AD and BE be the altitudes of an acute triangle ABC, with D on BC and E on AC. The line DE intersects the circumcircle of triangle ABC again at two points M and N. Prove that CM = CN.

Thanks for your time and help!
0 replies
Mimii08
an hour ago
0 replies
Polynomial of Degree n
Brut3Forc3   20
N an hour ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: 1975 USAMO Problem 3
If $ P(x)$ denotes a polynomial of degree $ n$ such that $ P(k)=\frac{k}{k+1}$ for $ k=0,1,2,\ldots,n$, determine $ P(n+1)$.
20 replies
Brut3Forc3
Mar 15, 2010
Ilikeminecraft
an hour ago
Really fun geometry problem
Sadigly   5
N 2 hours ago by GingerMan
Source: Azerbaijan Senior MO 2025 P6
In the acute triangle $ABC$ with $AB<AC$, the foot of altitudes from $A,B,C$ to the sides $BC,CA,AB$ are $D,E,F$, respectively. $H$ is the orthocenter. $M$ is the midpoint of segment $BC$. Lines $MH$ and $EF$ intersect at $K$. Let the tangents drawn to circumcircle $(ABC)$ from $B$ and $C$ intersect at $T$. Prove that $T;D;K$ are colinear
5 replies
Sadigly
Yesterday at 4:29 PM
GingerMan
2 hours ago
Blog Post 60
EpicSkills32   0
Feb 14, 2014
$\ [\text{Blog Post 60}] $

I might stop the title format sometime. It's getting a little boring, and I'll probably just label it in the post (that thing you see at the top of the post in brackets or as a fraction), and tag it. (sigh* shoulda put everything into categories, but o well.)

Here's an interesting thing that came up recently in my math life.

For $\ x\geq 0 $, find the minimum value of $\ f(x) $ if
$\ f(x)=\dfrac{4x^2+8x+13}{6(1+x)} $

Now when I first see max/min problems, I think: DERIVATIVES. However, this problem was discovered in my AoPS Algebra book, from a chapter dealing with inequalities.
I decided I would give it a try first with some inequalities(AM-GM, Cauchy, etc.). However, I got stuck.
Time for Plan B: Differentiate!

Calculus solution

Now if you clicked on my calculus solution, you understand the ugliness and stress involved in that solution. As I looked back on my work, I thought that there must be a better solution. I tried looking at the problem again with inequalities in mind. And then...
AM-GM solution

Wow that inequality was way better than our calculus one.
0 replies
EpicSkills32
Feb 14, 2014
0 replies
No more topics!
f(2) = 7, find all integer functions [Taiwan 2014 Quizzes]
v_Enhance   58
N Apr 25, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Find all increasing functions $f$ from the nonnegative integers to the integers satisfying $f(2)=7$ and \[ f(mn) = f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) \] for all nonnegative integers $m$ and $n$.
58 replies
v_Enhance
Jul 18, 2014
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 25, 2025
f(2) = 7, find all integer functions [Taiwan 2014 Quizzes]
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#1 • 12 Y
Y by son7, kirillnaval, mathematicsy, megarnie, Anshul_singh, HamstPan38825, Jufri, itslumi, Adventure10, Sedro, MS_asdfgzxcvb, and 1 other user
Find all increasing functions $f$ from the nonnegative integers to the integers satisfying $f(2)=7$ and \[ f(mn) = f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) \] for all nonnegative integers $m$ and $n$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Jul 19, 2014, 7:37 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cobbler
2180 posts
#2 • 9 Y
Y by son7, Adventure10, Mango247, MS_asdfgzxcvb, and 5 other users
Adding 1 to both sides gives $f(mn)+1=f(m)+f(n)+f(m)f(n)+1=(f(m)+1)(f(n)+1)$.
Define $g(x)=f(x)+1$, thus $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. Note that $g(x)=x^3$ for $x\in \{0,1,2\}$.
Taking logs of both sides yields $\ln g(mn)=\ln g(m)g(n)=\ln g(m)+\ln g(n)$. Define $h(x)=\log g(x)$,
$\therefore h(mn)=h(m)+h(n)$. Trivial solution is $h(x)=0\ \forall x\in \mathbb{N}$, but this doesn't satisfy the condition.

I know the rest is wrong, but I g2g so I might as well post it since it seems to give the right answer.

Assume that $h(x)$ is differentiable $x>0$, thus differentiating wrt $x$ we obtain $nh'(mn)=h'(m)$,
which for $m=1$ becomes $h'(n)=\tfrac{h'(1)}{n}$ or $h(n)=\int \tfrac{h'(1)}{n}\ dn = h'(1)\ln |n|+C$
$\implies g(n)=e^{h'(1)\ln |n|+C}=|n|^{h'(1)}e^C=n^{h'(1)}e^C$ since $n\ge 0$ by definition.
Putting $n=1$ yields $g(1)=e^C$ or $1=e^C\iff C=0$. Putting $n=2$ yields $g(2)=2^{h'(1)}$ or
$8=2^{h'(1)}\iff h'(1)=3$. It follows that $g(n)=n^3\ \forall n\in \mathbb{N}\implies \boxed{f(n)=n^3-1\ \forall n\in \mathbb{N}}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by HamstPan38825, mathematicsy, Adventure10, Assassino9931
Oops I seem to have left out the condition that $f$ is increasing. Sorry about that... Can a mod please edit that in? [EDIT: never mind, computer obtained]

Without the increasing condition I think the solution family is just to pick a value for each $f(p)$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fclvbfm934
759 posts
#4 • 8 Y
Y by kprepaf, Kezer, JasperL, sa2001, missgirl, EulersTurban, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $g(x) = f(x)+1$, so we have $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$ for all non-negative $m,n$, and $g(2) = 8$. Substitute $m = 0$ and we get $g(0) = g(0)g(n)$ which tells us that $g(0) = 0$. Letting $m = 1$ we get $g(n) = g(1)g(n)$ so $g(1) = 1$. It is also easy to see that $g(2^n) = 2^{3n}$.

Since $g$ is completely multiplicative, we only have to define $g$ over the set of prime numbers. I will now show that $g(p) = p^3$ for all primes $p$. Here, we have to use that increasing condition. Let $a=g(p)$ and given a certain integer $s$, let $r$ be an integer such that suppose $2^r < p^s < 2^{r+1}$, which means $r = \lfloor s\log_2{p} \rfloor$. Because $g$ is increasing, we know that $g(2^r) = 2^{3r} < g(p)^s$ which means that
\[g(p) > 2^{\frac{3r}{s}} = 2^{\frac{3(s\log_2{p} - \{ s\log_2{p} \})}{s}} = \frac{p^3}{\sqrt[s]{2^{3 \{ s\log_2{p} \}}}}\]
Clearly, if we make $s$ arbitrarily large, we can get as close to $p^3$ as we want; specifically, we can get it so that $\frac{p^3}{\sqrt[s]{2^{3\{ s\log_2{p} \}}}} > p^3 - 1$ for sure, which means that $g(p) \ge p^3$. Through a similar argument, we can get an upper bound on $g(p)$ as tight as we want to $p^3$, getting $g(p) < p^3 + 1$, telling us that $g(p) \le p^3 \Rightarrow g(p) = p^3$.

So now that we have defined $g(p) = p^3$ for all primes $p$, it becomes evident that $g(n) = n^3$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}_0^+$, which implies that $f(n) = n^3 - 1$ is the only possible solution. It is quite easy to test this:
\[m^3n^3 - 1 = m^3 - 1 + n^3 - 1 + (m^3-1)(n^3-1)\]
which is clearly true if you just expand it.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
droid347
2679 posts
#5 • 5 Y
Y by Generic_Username, Kezer, Korgsberg, sa2001, Adventure10
First, we define $g(x)=f(x)+1$. After adding 1 to both sides, the statement becomes $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$, and $m=0\implies g(0)=0$ or $g(n)=1$ for all $x$, the latter of which is a contradiction to $f$ increasing (because $g$ is increasing as well). Then, $m=1\implies g(n)=g(n)g(1)$ so take some $n$ such that $g(n)\neq 0$ (which must exist because $g$ is increasing) and we get $g(1)=1$. This, together with the condition, implies $g$ is totally multiplicative and is thus defined by its values on the primes.

We will now show that $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes $p$. Assume not; first we will assume $g(p)>p^3$ and produce a contradiction. If there exist $k, p$ such that $2^k>p^n$ but yet $g(2^k)<g(p^n)$, then we contradict $f$ increasing. Because $f$ is totally multiplicative, $f(a^b)=f(a)^b$ so the second inequality becomes $g(2)^k=8^k<g(p)^n$. Taking the log base 2 of both inequalities, we want to find $n,k$ where $k>n\log_2 p, 3k<n\log_ 2 g(p)$ so it suffices to find $n,k$ where \[\log_2 p^3 <\frac{3k}{n}<\log_2 g(p).\]However, a rational $\frac{a}{b}$ must exist between these two values because the rationals are dense in the reals, and we can take $k=a, n=3b$ to finish. We can repeat the same argument with the reverse inequalities to show that $g(p)<p^3$ yields a contradiction, so we must have $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes and thus $g(x)=x^3$ for all integer $x$. Therefore, the only solution is $f(x)=x^3-1$ and we can check that this works to finish:
\[\begin{aligned} f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n)&=m^3-1+n^3-1+(m^3-1)(n^3-1)\\ &=(mn)^3+1-m^3-n^3+m^3+n^3-2\\ &=(mn)^3-1\\ &=f(mn).\end{aligned}\]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1980 posts
#6 • 9 Y
Y by Wizard_32, Kalpa, sa2001, kirillnaval, hakN, Beginner2004, Adventure10, Mango247, parola
Posting as I like this idea a lot! :)
v_Enhance wrote:
Find all increasing functions $f$ from the nonnegative integers to the integers satisfying $f(2)=7$ and \[ f(mn) = f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) \]for all nonnegative integers $m$ and $n$.

Set $g(x)=f(x)+1$ and obtain $g(2)=8$ and $g$ is multiplicative, monotone increasing. Let $p$ be a prime and pick $x, y$ as positive integers such that $$p^x>2^y \iff \frac{y}{x} <\log_2 p \Longrightarrow g(p)^x=g(p^x) \ge g(2^y)=g(2)^y=2^{3y} \Longrightarrow g(p)>2^{3\frac{y}{x}}.$$Since rationals are dense in $\mathbb{R}$ we can take the LHS as close to $p^3$ as we want, so in fact, $g(p) \ge p^3$. A similar argument with upper bounds yields $g(p)=p^3$ thus $g(n)=n^3$ for all $n>1$. It's clear to see $g(1)=1$ and $g(0)=0$ so $g(n)=n^3$ for all $n$, consequently $f(n)=n^3-1$ for all $n$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
zhcosin
11 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
make $g(x)=1+f(x)$, so we have $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
winnertakeover
1179 posts
#8 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Slightly different...

Write $g(m) = f(m)+1$. Then we have $g(2)=8$ and $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. Note $g(0)=g(0)^2$ and $g(1)=g(1)^2$, and since $g(0)<g(1)$, we have $g(0)=0$ and $g(1)=1$. Now fix and $m$ and assume WLOG that $m$ is not a power of 2. Note that $$g\left(2^{\lfloor \log_2 m^k \rfloor}\right) < g(m^k) < g\left(2^{\lfloor \log_2 m^k \rfloor + 1}\right)$$Invoking multiplicity, $$g(2)^{\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor} < g(m)^k < g(2)^{\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor + 1}.$$Hence, $$g(2)^{(\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor)/k} < g(m) < g(2)^{(\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor + 1)/k}.$$It's obvious that $g(m)=g(2)^{\log_2 m}=m^3$ satisfies the inequality. Now we claim there is only one integer between the two bounds and that will finish the problem. It suffices to show that we may pick some $k$ such that $8^{(\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor + 1)/k} - 8^{(\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor)/k} < 1$. Note that $$8^{(\lfloor k\log_2 m \rfloor)/k}\left( 8^{1/k}-1\right) < m^3(8^{1/k}-1)$$Clearly, we may choose some $k$ such that $8^{1/k} \le \frac{1}{m^3}+1$, and this $k$ satisfies the required bounds. Hence, $g(m)=m^3$, and we have $f(m)=m^3-1$, and it is easy to check this satisfies the original constraints.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Grizzy
920 posts
#9 • 3 Y
Y by DrYouKnowWho, centslordm, Mango247
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
brianzjk
1201 posts
#10 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
incorrect solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by brianzjk, Nov 6, 2020, 1:58 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
justin1228
301 posts
#11 • 2 Y
Y by kirillnaval, endless_abyss
This was a pretty hard problem. I did not solve it entirely myself and got quite a few hints.
We claim that the only solutions are $f(x)=2^{3k}-1$
Using Simon's favorite Factoring Trick, we have:
$$[f(m)+1][f(n)+1]=f(mn)+1$$Let $g=f+1$. Then $g$ is completely multiplicative.

Claim:$g(2^k)=8^k$

Proof:
$g(2^k)=\underbrace {g(2) \cdot g(2) \ldots \cdot g(2) }_\text {k times}=g(2)^k=2^{3k=8^k}$
Now, we bound $g$ on prime powers. Let $ g(p)=q$ for a prime $p$, and $g(p^k)=q^k$.
Then notice that we have for some $a$ and $b$, $g(2^a) \le g(p^k) \le g(2^b)$ since $g$ is strictly increasing. Let us take $a= \lfloor {klog_2p} \rfloor$ and $b= \lceil {klog_2p} \rceil$.


This yields $$8^{\lfloor {klog_2p} \rfloor} \le q^k \le 8^{\lceil {klog_2p} \rceil}$$Taking log base 2,
$$ 3{\lfloor {klog_2p} \rfloor} \le log_2 q^k \le 3{\lceil {klog_2p} \rceil}$$and thus:
$${\lfloor {klog_2p} \rfloor} \le k log_2 \sqrt[3]{q} \le {\lceil {klog_2p} \rceil}$$Using trivial but useful inequalities (basic properties of floor and ceiling function), we have that:

$$ klog_2-1 \le  k log_2 \sqrt[3]{q} \le klog_2p+1$$and thus,
$$ log_2-1/k \le log_2 \sqrt[3]{q} \le log_2p+1/k$$Now taking $lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}$, we can conclude that $\sqrt[3]{q}=p \implies q=p^3$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#12 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
The answer is $f(x)=x^3-1$, which clearly works. Now we show nothing else works.
Add $1$ to both sides to get
$$f(mn)+1=f(m)f(n)+f(m)+f(n)+1=(f(m)+1)(f(n)+1).$$Then define $g: \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{Z}$ such that $g(x)=f(x)+1$. The equation then becomes $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. We also have $g(2)=8$ and $g$ is strictly increasing. Now, we have to show that $g(x)=x^3$ is the only solution to this functional equation.
First, putting $m=0,n=2$ gives $g(0)=8g(0)$, hence $g(0)=0$. Also, putting in $m=n=1$ gives $g(1)=1$ since $g$ is strictly increasing. Hence, for positive integers $x$, $g(x)$ is positive. Further, note that from $g(2)=2^3$ and $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$, we find that $g(2^k)=2^{3k}$, where $k$ is a positive integer.
Now suppose $g(x)>x^3$, where $x>2$, and let $g(x)=(ax)^3$ where $a>1$ is real. We can easily see that $g(x^k)=(ax)^{3k}$. Now pick some $k$ such that $a^{3k}>8$, and choose $y$ such that $2^{y-1}<x^k<2^y$. Since $g$ is strictly increasing, it follows that
$$g(x^k)<g(2^y) \iff (ax)^{3k}<2^{3y},$$but we also have $(ax)^{3k}>8(x^k)^3>8(2^{y-1})^3=2^{3y}$, which is a contradiction. Similarly, if $g(x)<x^3$, letting $g(x)=(ax)^3$ for $0<x<1$ and picking $y$ such that $2^y<x^k<2^{y+1}$ and $a^k<\tfrac{1}{8}$ yields a contradiction. It follows that $g(x)=x^3$ for all nonnegative integers $x$, which is the desired result. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by IAmTheHazard, Aug 24, 2021, 3:10 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
circlethm
98 posts
#13
Y by
Solution. Let $g(x) = f(x) + 1$. Then $g$ has to be increasing and satisfy
$$
g(mn) = g(m)g(n).
$$
Lemma (Erdős). If $g: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is totally multiplicative and increasing then $g(n) = n^{\alpha}$, for some $\alpha$.
Proof. Suppose that $f(2) = 2^{\alpha}$, and take $n > 2$ such that $f(n) = n^{\beta}$. Then for any $\ell \in \mathbb{N}$, we can write
$$
2^a \leq n^{\ell} \leq 2^{a + 1},
$$for $a = \lfloor \log_2(n) \ell \rfloor$. Since $f$ is increasing, evaluating the function at each of the above must still satisfy the inequality
$$
\begin{aligned}
2^{\alpha a} \leq n^{\beta \ell} &\leq 2^{\alpha(a + 1)} \\
\implies \lfloor \log_2(n) \ell\rfloor \leq \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \log_2(n) \ell &\leq \lceil \log_2(n) \ell\rceil.
\end{aligned}
$$This implies the inequality
$$
\log_2(n) \ell \left|\frac{\beta}{\alpha} - 1\right| \leq 1.
$$But this has to hold for all $\ell \in \mathbb{N}$, and thus we must have $\beta = \alpha$, and we're done.

Since $g(n) = n^{\alpha}$ for some $\alpha$, and $g(2) = 8 = 2^3$, we must have $g(n) = n^{3}$, and thus $f(n) = n^{3} - 1$, which clearly works.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by circlethm, Sep 2, 2021, 3:12 PM
Reason: Equality is possible
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DrYouKnowWho
184 posts
#14
Y by
\walkthrough Answer: $f(n) \equiv n^3-1$
\begin{walk}
\ii Add $1$ to both sides and factorize
\ii Introduce $g(m) = f(m)+1$, notice that $g$ is thus completely multiplicative.
\ii Notice that $g(m^k) = g(m)^k$ for all $m,k\in \mathbb{N}$
\ii Use the strcitly increasing condition on the fact that $g(2^{\lfloor \log_2p^k\rfloor})<g(p^k)$
\ii Show that the previous step implies $\frac{\lfloor k\log_2p\rfloor\cdot 3}{k}<\log_2g(p)$
\ii Repeat similarly for $g(p^l)<g(2^{\lceil \log_2p^l\rceil})$
\ii Notice that we would arrive with the following, which holds for all positive integers $k,l$: \[3(\log_2p-\frac{1}{k})<\frac{3\lfloor k\log_2p\rfloor}{k}<\log_2g(p)<\frac{3\lceil l\log_2p\rceil}{l}<3(\log_2p+\frac{1}{l})\]\ii Notice that by varying $k,l$, we can make $\log_2g(p)$ arbitrarily close to $\log_2p^3$, which is what we wanted.
\end{walk}
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DottedCaculator
7351 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
Let $g(x)=f(x)+1$. Then, $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$ and $g(2)=8$. We claim that $g(x)=x^3$. Since $g$ is multiplicative, it suffices to show $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes. Suppose that $g(p)\neq p^3$. Then, $g(2^k)=8^k$ and $g(p^k)=g(p)^k$. Therefore, $2^i<p^j$ if and only if $8^i<g(p)^j$, so $i\log2<j\log p$ if and only if $i\log8<j\log(g(p))$. This is equivalent to $\frac{3i\log2}j<\log(p^3)$ if and only if $\frac{3i\log2}j<\log(g(p))$. Since $g(p)\neq p^3$, this means that $\log(g(p))\neq3\log p$. However, there exists integer $i$ and $j$ such that $\frac{3i\log2}j$ is between $\log(p^3)$ and $\log(g(p))$, which is a contradiction. Therefore, we must have $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes $p$, so $g(x)=x^3$, which satisfies the conditions. Therefore, the only function $f$ that satisfies the original equation is $\boxed{f(x)=x^3-1}$.
Z K Y
G
H
=
a