Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
an equation from the a contest
alpha31415   0
19 minutes ago
Find all (complex) roots of the equation:
(z^2-z)(1-z+z^2)^2=-1/7
0 replies
alpha31415
19 minutes ago
0 replies
Self-evident inequality trick
Lukaluce   12
N 23 minutes ago by sqing
Source: 2025 Junior Macedonian Mathematical Olympiad P4
Let $x, y$, and $z$ be positive real numbers, such that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 3$. Prove the inequality
\[\frac{x^3}{2 + x} + \frac{y^3}{2 + y} + \frac{z^3}{2 + z} \ge 1.\]When does the equality hold?
12 replies
Lukaluce
May 18, 2025
sqing
23 minutes ago
Who loves config geo with orthocenter?
Assassino9931   11
N 30 minutes ago by ravengsd
Source: RMM 2024 Shortlist G2
Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle with orthocentre $H$ and circumcircle $\Gamma$. Let $D$ be the point
diametrically opposite $A$ on $\Gamma$. The line through $H$, parallel to $BC$, intersects $AB$ and $AC$ at $X$
and $Y$, respectively. Let $AD$ intersect the circumcircle of triangle $DXY$ again at $S$. Let the tangent to $\Gamma$ at $A$ intersect $XY$ at $T$. Prove that lines $DT$ and $HS$ intersect on $\Gamma$.
11 replies
Assassino9931
Feb 17, 2025
ravengsd
30 minutes ago
Numbers on circle
RagvaloD   1
N an hour ago by Radin_
Source: St Petersburg Olympiad 2008, Grade 11, P4
There are $100$ numbers on circle, and no one number is divided by other. In same time for all numbers we make next operation:
If $(a,b)$ are two neighbors ($a$ is left neighbor) , then we write between $a,b$ number $\frac{a}{(a,b)}$ and erase $a,b$
This operation was repeated some times. What maximum number of $1$ we can receive ?

Example: If we have circle with $3$ numbers $4,5,6$ then after operation we receive circle with numbers $\frac{4}{(4,5)}=4,\frac{5}{(5,6)}=5, \frac{6}{(6,4)}=3$.
1 reply
RagvaloD
Aug 30, 2017
Radin_
an hour ago
3 var inequality
JARP091   5
N an hour ago by Mathzeus1024
Source: Own
Let \( x, y, z \in \mathbb{R}^+ \). Prove that
\[
\sum_{\text{cyc}} \frac{x^3}{y^2 + z^2} \geq \frac{x + y + z}{2}
\]without using the Rearrangement Inequality or Chebyshev's Inequality.
5 replies
JARP091
3 hours ago
Mathzeus1024
an hour ago
Number Theory Chain!
JetFire008   63
N an hour ago by GreekIdiot
I will post a question and someone has to answer it. Then they have to post a question and someone else will answer it and so on. We can only post questions related to Number Theory and each problem should be more difficult than the previous. Let's start!

Question 1
63 replies
JetFire008
Apr 7, 2025
GreekIdiot
an hour ago
Computing functions
BBNoDollar   0
2 hours ago
Let $f : [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty)$, $f(x) = \dfrac{ax + b}{cx + d}$, with $a, d \in (0, \infty)$, $b, c \in [0, \infty)$. Prove that there exists $n \in \mathbb{N}^*$ such that for every $x \geq 0$
\[
f_n(x) = \frac{x}{1 + nx}, \quad \text{if and only if } f(x) = \frac{x}{1 + x}, \quad \forall x \geq 0.
\](For $n \in \mathbb{N}^*$ and $x \geq 0$, the notation $f_n(x)$ represents $\underbrace{(f \circ f \circ \dots \circ f)}_{n \text{ times}}(x)$. )
0 replies
BBNoDollar
2 hours ago
0 replies
4 variables
Nguyenhuyen_AG   9
N 2 hours ago by arqady
Let $a,\,b,\,c,\,d$ are non-negative real numbers and $0 \leqslant k \leqslant \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}.$ Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+kabcd \geqslant k+4+(k+2)(a+b+c+d-4).$$hide
9 replies
Nguyenhuyen_AG
Dec 21, 2020
arqady
2 hours ago
Prove the inequality
Butterfly   5
N 2 hours ago by Nguyenhuyen_AG

Let $a,b,c,d$ be positive real numbers. Prove $$a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+abcd-3(a+b+c+d)+7\ge 0.$$
5 replies
Butterfly
Yesterday at 12:36 PM
Nguyenhuyen_AG
2 hours ago
Inspired by Butterfly
sqing   1
N 3 hours ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c>0. $ Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+c^2+ab+bc+ca+abc-3(a+b+c) \geq 34-14\sqrt 7$$$$a^2+b^2+c^2+ab+bc+ca+abc-\frac{433}{125}(a+b+c) \geq \frac{2(57475-933\sqrt{4665})}{3125} $$
1 reply
sqing
3 hours ago
sqing
3 hours ago
Inequality
VicKmath7   17
N 3 hours ago by math-olympiad-clown
Source: Balkan MO SL 2020 A2
Given are positive reals $a, b, c$, such that $\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}=3$. Prove that
$\frac{\sqrt{a+\frac{b}{c}}+\sqrt{b+\frac{c}{a}}+\sqrt{c+\frac{a}{b}}}{3}\leq \frac{a+b+c-1}{\sqrt{2}}$.

Albania
17 replies
VicKmath7
Sep 9, 2021
math-olympiad-clown
3 hours ago
R+ FE f(f(xy)+y)=(x+1)f(y)
jasperE3   2
N 3 hours ago by GeorgeRP
Source: p24734470
Find all functions $f:\mathbb R^+\to\mathbb R^+$ such that for all positive real numbers $x$ and $y$:
$$f(f(xy)+y)=(x+1)f(y).$$
2 replies
jasperE3
Today at 12:20 AM
GeorgeRP
3 hours ago
Inequality with ^3+b^3+c^3+3abc=6
bel.jad5   6
N 4 hours ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $a,b,c\geq 0$ and $a^3+b^3+c^3+3abc=6$. Prove that:
\[ \frac{a^2+1}{a+1}+\frac{b^2+1}{b+1}+\frac{c^2+1}{c+1} \geq 3\]
6 replies
1 viewing
bel.jad5
Sep 2, 2018
sqing
4 hours ago
Inequality with x+y+z=1.
FrancoGiosefAG   4
N 4 hours ago by sqing
Let $x,y,z$ be positive real numbers such that $x+y+z=1$. Show that
\[ \frac{x^2-yz}{x^2+x}+\frac{y^2-zx}{y^2+y}+\frac{z^2-xy}{z^2+z}\leq 0. \]
4 replies
FrancoGiosefAG
Yesterday at 8:36 PM
sqing
4 hours ago
An nxn Checkboard
MithsApprentice   27
N Apr 25, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: USAMO 1999 Problem 1
Some checkers placed on an $n \times n$ checkerboard satisfy the following conditions:

(a) every square that does not contain a checker shares a side with one that does;

(b) given any pair of squares that contain checkers, there is a sequence of squares containing checkers, starting and ending with the given squares, such that every two consecutive squares of the sequence share a side.

Prove that at least $(n^{2}-2)/3$ checkers have been placed on the board.
27 replies
MithsApprentice
Oct 3, 2005
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 25, 2025
An nxn Checkboard
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: USAMO 1999 Problem 1
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MithsApprentice
2390 posts
#1 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
Some checkers placed on an $n \times n$ checkerboard satisfy the following conditions:

(a) every square that does not contain a checker shares a side with one that does;

(b) given any pair of squares that contain checkers, there is a sequence of squares containing checkers, starting and ending with the given squares, such that every two consecutive squares of the sequence share a side.

Prove that at least $(n^{2}-2)/3$ checkers have been placed on the board.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Severius
194 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
We'll cover the board with checkers and ghost-checkers.

For each checker we'll have two ghost-checkers available. So we'll have $3k$ units available, where $k$ is the number of checkers. For each checker X with just two neighbors A, B: place the two ghost-checkers for X on the two squares adjacent to X different from A and B. For each checker with three neighbors, place one of its ghosts on the fourth adjacent square and keep the other. For each checker with four neighbors, keep both of its ghosts.

For each checker X with just one neighbor A, place the two ghost-checkers for X on the squares adjacent to X different from A and its opposite. (Of course there are no lonely checkers since the graph is connected). When we're done there may be squares covered more than once, and there may be ghosts outside the board; it doesn't matter. The only squares that may be left uncovered are those squares A with just one checkered neighbor X, where X has just one checkered neighbor itself (call it Y), and A, X, Y are collinear.

Now note that, for the connected graph formed by the checkers, the number of "endpoints" of the graph (that is, checkers with just one neighbor) is at most 2+the number of checkers with 3 neighbors+twice the number of checkers with 4 neighbors (the event "a checker with 4 neighbors" is equivalent to the event "a checker with 3 neighbors" ocurring two different times), which is easy to prove by induction (take an endpoint, go along the graph till you find a point where the path has two or more branches, and remove the string connecting the taken endpoint to the rest of the graph; if we find no points where it branches out, it must be a simple path with just 2 endpoints). This means that using the checkers we'd kept before, we can cover all the yet uncovered squares except at most 2, so $3k \geq n^2-2$, which is what we wanted to prove.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
calc rulz
1126 posts
#3 • 3 Y
Y by vsathiam, lifeisgood03, Adventure10
Let us place the checkers on the board as follows: place one checker on the board to start, and then continually place a checker adjacent to one that has already been placed. Since any arrangement of checkers that satisfies the problem must be connected (i.e. (b)), we can form any arrangement of checkers in this manner.

Call a square "on" if it has a checker on it or it is next to a square that has a checker. By (a), we require an arrangement for which every single square is on. When we place the first checker, at most five squares are turned on. For every subsequent checker we place, at most three squares are turned on (the place we just filled and the filled space next to it being already on).

If we fill the board with $ k$ checkers, we have turned on at most $ 5 + 3(k-1) = 3k+2$ checkers. Since there are $ n^2$ squares on the board, we need $ 3k+2 \ge n^2$ or $ k \ge \frac{n^2-2}{3}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ghjk
858 posts
#4 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
How about the result if this just has only the first restriction? Is it 12 in the case 5*5 blackboard? :roll:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
limac
638 posts
#5 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
What about when n=2? Then the problem requires that we need at least 2/3, or 1 checker. But no matter where we put it the square diagonally from that square doesn't share a side with that square with the checker.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JBL
16123 posts
#6 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
That's true and doesn't contradict the statement of the problem. (It does show that the statement is not sharp for $n = 2$, since in that case at least 2 checkers are needed.)

@ghjk, two years later: no, 12 is much too large for the $5 \times 5$. For example, my first attempt did it in 8. In general, the best case should be approximately $\frac{n^2}{5}$ (but slightly larger due to edge effects).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math154
4302 posts
#7 • 5 Y
Y by vsathiam, Fermat_Theorem, Kamran011, 554183, Adventure10
Suppose there are $f(n)$ checkers on the board (and $n^2-f(n)$ empty squares), so from (b), the checkers form a connected graph $G$.

Now let $X$ denote the number of pairs of neighboring squares both containing checkers and $Y$ denote the number of pairs of neighboring squares with exactly one containing a checker. Then $X$ is simply the number of edges in $G$, so $X\ge f(n)-1$. Furthermore, since each checker borders at most four other squares, we have $2X+Y\le4f(n)$, so $Y\le4f(n)-2X$.

But (a) tells us that
\[n^2-f(n) \le Y\le4f(n)-2X,\]so
\[5f(n)\ge n^2+2X\ge n^2+2f(n)-2\implies f(n)\ge\frac{n^2-2}{3},\]as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Delray
348 posts
#8 • 3 Y
Y by vsathiam, Adventure10, Mango247
Solution with vsathiam.
solution
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by Delray, Aug 29, 2017, 2:37 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#9 • 5 Y
Y by Pluto04, HamstPan38825, Dansman2838, cosdealfa, NicoN9
Solution from Twitch Solves ISL:

Take a spanning tree on the set $V$ of checkers where the $|V|-1$ edges of the tree are given by orthogonal adjacency. By condition (a) we have \[ \sum_{v \in V} (4-\deg v) \ge n^2 - |V| \]and since $\sum_{v \in V} \deg v = 2(|V|-1)$ we get \[ 4|V| - \left( 2|V|-2 \right) \ge n^2 - |V| \]which implies $|V| \ge \frac{n^2-2}{3}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#10 • 1 Y
Y by hh99754539
statement (b) says that the squares with checkers on them form a polyomino

finally, statement (a) says that if we "extend" the polyomino outward (this probably doesn't make sense oops) the area must be $n^2$

its easy to see that extend the polyomino, maximum area is $3k+2$ given $k$ checkers (because we form a $1$ by $k$ rectangle)

therefore number of checkers satisfies $3k+2\geq n^2$ and we are done
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by hh99754539
to show max is $3k+2$ area, note that the first tile adds $5$ squares, and each successive one must add only $3$ at most
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
john0512
4190 posts
#12 • 2 Y
Y by Mango247, Mango247
Let $m$ be the number of checkers. We say that a cell is good if it either contains a checker or is adjacent to a cell that contains a checker. Since the order we place them in does not matter, we placed them in an order such that each checker after the first is placed next to an existing checker (this is possible due to the connected component condition).

Note that the first checker can make at most 5 cells good. Each additional checker can make at most 3 cells good (since the cell its placed on is already good and it is "blocked" in one of the directions by an existing checker). Therefore, we must have $5+3(m-1)\geq n^2$, so $$m\geq \frac{n^2-2}{3}$$
Remark: this was somewhat motivated by the very peculiar condition $\frac{n^2-2}{3}$. in particular, this is never an integer due to 2mod3, so this motivates a method where each checker placed counts as multiple "things" (in this case good cells)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8867 posts
#13 • 1 Y
Y by Mango247
Let $k$ be the number of squares with checkers.

First, notice that the number of pairs of adjacent squares with one filled and one empty is at least $n^2-k$ (the number of empty squares). On the other hand, the number of pairs of adjacent squares, both filled, is at least $k-1$. However, in total, there are at most $4k$ pairs of adjacent squares, at least one of which is filled. Therefore, we have the inequality $$n^2-k+2(k-1) \leq 4k \iff k \geq \frac{n^2-2}3,$$as required.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
We count the pairs of adjacent squares such that one is filled and one is empty. If there are $k$ filled squares, the maximum perimeter of the filled squares is $2k+2$ as each new block after the original one adds at most $2$ to the perimeter of the filled squares. The minimum perimeter is $n^2-k$ as each non-filled square must share a side with a filled square. Hence, $2k+2\ge n^2-k$, as desired. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peppapig_
280 posts
#15 • 2 Y
Y by Significant, mulberrykid
Consider a square to be "covered" if it is covered by a checker or shares a side with a square covered by a checker. First place down one checker. This checker can "cover" at most $5$ squares. For each checker placed down after that, by problem conditions, it must share a side with another checker, meaning that it can "cover" at most $3$ new squares. This means that we need at least
\[1+\frac{n^2-5}{3},\]or $\frac{n^2-2}{3}$ checkers.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by peppapig_, Nov 26, 2023, 5:00 PM
Reason: Rewrite
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
416554
223 posts
#16
Y by
We count the total number of cells in two ways:

First, it is obviously $n^2$.

On the other hand, it is the number of cells with checkers along with the number of cells that are adjacent to checkers. Let the number of cells with checkers be $k$. Then from the second condition, all checkers must be able to form a path, and so each checker must be adjacent to two others except for the "end" checkers if they exist, giving a maximum of $2k+2$ in this case. Thus, we have
\[ 3k+2 \leq n^2 \implies k \geq \frac{n^2-2}{3} \]completing the proof. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2534 posts
#17
Y by
Let there be $k$ squares with checkers in them. It is clear that they border at most $2(k-2)+3 \cdot 2=2k+2$ squares because of the first condition. Thus,

\[3k+2 \ge n^2 \iff k \ge \frac{n^2-2}{3}. \ \square\]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bjump
1032 posts
#18
Y by
This is a funny way to solve.
Connect squares with checkers in them to become a spanning tree $V$
Consider the sum $\sum_{v \in V} (4-\text{deg}(v))$
Note that in this sum each square without a checker on it gets counted so
$$\sum_{v \in V} (4-\text{deg}(v)) \geq n^2- |V|$$$$4|V|-2(|V|-1) \geq n^2-|V|$$$$|V| \geq \tfrac{n^2-2}{3}. \square$$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by bjump, Nov 12, 2023, 1:45 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cj13609517288
1922 posts
#19
Y by
Let $w$ be the number of white cells and let $b$ be the number of black cells. Then each white cell has at least one black neighbor.

Consider the graph on the black cells where there is an edge between two black cells if they share an edge. Since this graph is connected, it must have at least $b-1$ edges. Therefore, the black cells can satisfy at most $2b+2$ white cells, so $w\le 2b+2$. Therefore, $n^2=w+b\le 3b+2$, which implies the wanted result.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
799 posts
#20 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
Let $A$ and $B$ be the set of squares with and without a checker, respectively. A upper bound for $|B|$ is \[\sum_{a \in A} (4-\deg a) = 4|A| - \sum_{a \in A} (\deg a)\].
The graph of $A$ is connected, so it contains at least $|A|-1$ edges, and thus
\[4|A| - \sum_{a \in A} (\deg a) \ge 4|A| - 2(|A|-1) \ge |B| = n^2 - |A| \implies |A| \ge \frac{n^2-2}{3}. \quad \blacksquare\]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1417 posts
#21
Y by
Let $C_i$ be the number of checkers next to square $i$, and let $a$ be the total number of checkers. The checkers must be connected, so the first time we add a checker nothing happens with the checker, but after adding a checker next to it, the count of $\sum C_i$ goes up by $2$, and goes up by $2$ for each additional checker we put next to another checker. Note that in this count, we have not yet included $C_i$ for squares without checkers. When we do, the count goes up by at least $n^2-a$, because every non checker square has at least one checker next to it. So in total, we have that \[\sum_{i=1}^{n^2}C_i\geq 2a-2+n^2-a = n^2-2+a.\]However, notice that each checker is counted at most four times, because it has at most $4$ surrounding squares. This gives us \[4a\geq\sum_{i=1}^{n^2}C_i\geq n^2-2+a,\]giving $a\geq \frac{n^2-2}{3}$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blueprimes
356 posts
#22
Y by
Define a neighbor of a square containing a checker as an adjacent square that does not contain a checker. Clearly no valid configuration exists where a square with a checker has exactly $4$ neighbors. Now in any valid configuration suppose there are $k$ squares with a checker, $a$ of which have $3$ neighbors.

Denote $S$ as the sum of the number of neighbors of every square with a checker. On one hand we have $S \ge n^2 - k$, but since $k - a$ checkers have at most $2$ neighbors we also have the bound $3a + 2(k - a) = 2k + a \ge S$. So $3k + a \ge n^2 \implies k \ge \frac{n^2 - a}{3}$. This implies the conclusion when $a \ge 2$.

Now if $a = 1$, note that some three squares have checkers that form an L-shape. Then two of the squares with a checker share a neighbor, and we have $3 + 2(k - 1) - 1 \ge S \ge n^2 - k \implies k \ge \frac{n^2}{3} > \frac{n^2 - 2}{3}$.

Our proof is complete.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by blueprimes, Aug 7, 2024, 9:35 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
numbertheory97
43 posts
#23
Y by
Let $k$ be the number of checkers placed. Call a square black if it contains a checker and white otherwise. For each square $S$, let $f(S)$ be the number of black neighbors of $S$. Our plan is to sum $f$ over all squares so that we can get a lower bound on $k$.

Claim: The sum of $f$ over all white squares is at least $n^2 - k$.

Proof. Each white square has at least one black neighbor, so the result follows.

Claim: The sum of $f$ over all black squares is at least $2k - 2$.

Proof. Let $G = (V, E)$ be a graph with its vertices as the $k$ black squares, and connect two vertices by an edge if and only if they're neighbors on the checkerboard. By the handshaking lemma we have \[\sum_{s\text{ black}} f(s) = \sum_{v \in V} \text{deg}(v) = 2|E| \geq 2k - 2,\]where the last inequality follows since $G$ is connected. $\square$

The above two claims imply that $\sum_s f(s) \geq (n^2 - k) + (2k - 2) = n^2 + k - 2$. But each black square in $\sum_s f(s)$ is counted $4$ times, so $\sum_s f(s) = 4k$. Thus \[4k \geq n^2 + k - 2 \implies k \geq \frac{n^2 - 2}{3}\]as desired. $\square$

Remark. The bound can actually be improved to $\frac{n^2 - 1}{3}$, since $n^2 - 2$ is never divisible by $3$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by numbertheory97, Oct 4, 2024, 2:06 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lpieleanu
3001 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by KevinYang2.71
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eg4334
637 posts
#25
Y by
Let there be $x$ squares with checkers in them. It is clear that all $x$ squares must be connected, and that for the other $n^2-x$ squares we need one of their sides to touch a square with a checker. Therefore, the perimeter of our $x$ squares must be at least $n^2-x$, but if we have $x$ squares our perimeter is at most $2x+2$ (this is from the second condition and that some squares touch sides of the grid). Therefore $$2x+2 \geq n^2-x \implies x \geq \frac{n^2-2}{3}$$done
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
575 posts
#26
Y by
Let $k$ squares have checkers, clearly $k \geq 1.$ If $k=1,$ we have at least $4$ empty squares adjacent to a filled square. But adding more squares, no matter what we always lose $1$ and gain at least $3$ empty squares, meaning that we have at least $2(k-1)+4$ empty squares adjacent to a filled square. Thus $$2(k-1)+4 \geq n^2-k \implies k \geq \frac{n^2-2}{3}.$$QED
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
NicoN9
157 posts
#27
Y by
Short solution:

Let $m$ be the number of checkers, and $a$ be the number of $1\times 2$ or $2\times 1$ rectangle such that it contains exactly one checker. Count $a$ in two ways.

first, by (a), we have $a\ge n^2-m$.

second, since the checkers are all connected, counting with each checkers will get $a\le 2m+2$.

so $n^2-m\le a\le 2m+2$, which implies that $(n^2-2)/3\le m$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
658 posts
#28
Y by
Let there be $A$ checkers, $X$ consecutive checkers, and $Y$ the number of consecutive squares such that exactly 1 square has a checker. Now, by $(a),$ we have that $n^2 - A \leq Y.$ By $(b),$ we have that $X \geq A - 1.$ Finally, since one checker can border only 4 squares, we have that $2X + Y \leq 4A.$ Thus, we have that $n^2 - A\leq Y \leq 4A - 2X\implies 5A \geq n^2 + 2X \geq n^2 + 2A - 2 \implies A \geq \frac{n^2 - 2}{3}.$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a